On 2015-09-20 09:06 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> > ... so, no matter how "bad" a message is (let's say, a top post, a
> > thread hijack, an ALL CAPS subject, and unlimited line length LOL), the
> > worst it can score is 0. Am I right? I haven't used mutt sco
message is (let's say, a top post, a
> thread hijack, an ALL CAPS subject, and unlimited line length LOL), the
> worst it can score is 0. Am I right? I haven't used mutt scoring yet,
> so I am trying to learn how to best put it to my purposes. It seems
> to me that for flagging "b
On 2015-07-29 20:19 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> I'm using scoring to mark, auto delete, ... certain mails I do not
> want to read. I'd like to auto-score top posters for the next
> mail. For the first mail it is not possible due to scoring is based on
> header lines. But the
Hello,
(I'm top posting here con intention to see how t-prot[1] will later
react on this mail).
I have installed it and it detects, for example, if the quoted lines
exeeds the limit (default=30); but it does not detect, at least I could
not figure out how, a normal top posting like this one
On 30.07.2015, Matthias Apitz wrote:
A top posting we see, when in the body of the mail before a line like
this:
On 29 Jul 2015, Matthias Apitz wrote:
are some other text lines. Of course we need here a good regular
expression because the line 'On 29 Jul 2015, Matthias Apitz wrote:'
is
On Thu Jul 30 22:24:03 2015, Heinz Diehl wrote:
That said, I doubt such a script which *reliably* detects top-postings
can be done. As a starting point for your language problem: simply
check if the first line in the mail body ends with a colon (:).
It’s not so simple. The first line of the
El día Wednesday, July 29, 2015 a las 03:52:01PM -0400, Fred Smith escribió:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 02:38:30PM -0500, David Champion wrote:
Simplest idea I have is to add a procmail (or whatever) rule to detect
top-posting,
then insert a yes or no header into the message:
Hi Mattias -
* On 30 Jul 2015, Matthias Apitz wrote:
are some other text lines. Of course we need here a good regular
expression because the line 'On 29 Jul 2015, Matthias Apitz wrote:'
is highly configurable and language dependent.
That's why I wouldn't do it with anything
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 02:38:30PM -0500, David Champion wrote:
Simplest idea I have is to add a procmail (or whatever) rule to detect
top-posting,
then insert a yes or no header into the message:
X-Top-Posted: yes
Then it's trivial to score it in mutt.
and just to satisfy my
Hello,
I'm using scoring to mark, auto delete, ... certain mails I do not want
to read. I'd like to auto-score top posters for the next mail. For the
first mail it is not possible due to scoring is based on header lines.
But the sender could be scored with -10 or -20 for the next mail...
Any
Simplest idea I have is to add a procmail (or whatever) rule to detect
top-posting,
then insert a yes or no header into the message:
X-Top-Posted: yes
Then it's trivial to score it in mutt.
* On 29 Jul 2015, Matthias Apitz wrote:
Hello,
I'm using scoring to mark, auto delete
Hi all,
is there a specific event / command to re-evaluate the message scoring? I
have a set of scores that rely on ~d 2d, but as long as my mutt instance
lives it is never re-evaluated. So as my mutt runs mostly for weeks the
score gets stays at the value that correct days ago, no matter if I
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 12:00:14PM +0200, Alexandre wrote:
Suppose you want to score all threads with this form:
ABAB
without any specifications about the name of authors.
Is it possible ?
I'm not aware of any way to do this generically.
me
Many thanks for your answer. One more question though:
Le mercredi 13 avril de l'année 2011, vers 09 heures et 39 minutes, Michael
Elkins écrivait:
- if you really don't want to read what person A has to say when she's
following up to person B, but want to read what she says when she's
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 06:52:05PM +0200, Alexandre wrote:
- if you're really interested in what a person has to say only when
she's talking about a particular subject
~f alice ~s 'interesting topic'
- if you really don't want to read what person A has to say when she's
following up to
Hi
Scoring on Subjects and From headers is nice enough (man muttrc), but
how to score this:
- if you're really interested in what a person has to say only when
she's talking about a particular subject
- if you really don't want to read what person A has to say when she's
following up to person B
Hi all,
I would like to score any thread that i have replied to i.e. the entire thread.
Is this possible ? If yes, any pointers ?
-aW
IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Australian Defence
Organisation and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the CRIMES ACT
1914.
* On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 08:41PM +0900 Wilkinson, Alex
(alex.wilkin...@dsto.defence.gov.au) muttered:
I would like to score any thread that i have replied to i.e. the
entire thread.
Is this possible ? If yes, any pointers ?
Let's see - what does the manual say about score?
Usage: score
doing that calculation until the last possible
moment: sorting. Unfortunately, this means that stuff like
this---scoring and anything else that happens BEFORE messages are
sorted (e.g. things triggered by folder-hooks)---*CANNOT* get access
to that thread-relationship information. Nor can they get
I'm currently trying to set up a scoring policy for mail sent to
u...@example.com.
The problem is, I only get mass-mailings to this adress, with
u...@example.com usually residing in the BCC. But the header contains
envelope-to: u...@example.com, I just don't get how to access this
information.
I
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 02:35:16PM +0100, ssiza...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm currently trying to set up a scoring policy for mail sent to
u...@example.com.
The problem is, I only get mass-mailings to this adress, with
u...@example.com usually residing in the BCC. But the header contains
envelope
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 15:14, Ed Blackman e...@edgewood.to wrote:
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 02:35:16PM +0100, ssiza...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm currently trying to set up a scoring policy for mail sent to
u...@example.com.
The problem is, I only get mass-mailings to this adress, with
u
' with besides removing it completely, putting \ in front
of my dots and removing everything but the domain name. But I still
get errors.
score '~h ^Envelope-to: u...@example.com' 41
That ought to work, but do read the manual on scoring. Not everything
(as in patterns) works and I have a vague
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, March 4 at 05:01 PM, quoth ssiza...@gmail.com:
~h '^Envelope-to: u...@example.com'
works when I'm limiting messages once inside the folder, but
score '~h '^Envelope-to: u...@example.com'' 41
in my .muttrc doesn't.
Obviously. It
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 17:18, Kyle Wheeler kyle-m...@memoryhole.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, March 4 at 05:01 PM, quoth ssiza...@gmail.com:
~h '^Envelope-to: u...@example.com'
works when I'm limiting messages once inside the folder, but
score '~h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, March 4 at 05:33 PM, quoth ssiza...@gmail.com:
Well it would make sense if any of your examples worked, but
unfortunately they don't.
I've tried mixing and ' myself, except for the
escaping-quotes-trick. That's new, but gives me
in the index, such as ˜b, ˜B or ˜h, may not be used
Personally, I think that's a silly restriction, but you'd have to take
that up with the developers.
Ah ok, sorry I didn't see that myself.
I guess I'll just use ~f mailinglist or something like that to take
care of the scoring.
Thanks,
Meli
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Alexandre wrote:
[snip (16 lines)]
i have that in ~/.muttrc, maybe you could try it:
[snip (54 lines)]
Thanks for the help. I will have a play with my muttrc.
Regards,
Chris.
--
oOoOo I'd go over twelve percent for that... - Nice Guy Eddie, oOoOo
oOoOo
Le vendredi 13 février de l'année 2009, vers 22 heures et 10 minutes, Chris
Willard écrivait:
Hello All,
Can someone please explain how scoring works for a beginner? I belong
to a few mailing lists and some of them have quite a lot of messages.
As I understand it I can use scoring
Hello All,
Can someone please explain how scoring works for a beginner? I belong
to a few mailing lists and some of them have quite a lot of messages.
As I understand it I can use scoring to filter the messages but I am
not sure of how to do this and how scoring works!
Any help would
.
But I have another question. I had some problems using a
scoring rule like:
score '~w ... (~s ... | ~s ...)'
while:
score '(~s ... | ~s ...) ~w ...'
works as expected. Since there's no special AND operator
(...meaning that no operator stands for AND) I think the
order shouldn't matter
Hi,
* Michael Elkins [02-10-05 23:15:05 +0200] wrote:
Rocco Rutte wrote:
[...]
score '~s \[?[Mm][Uu][Tt][Tt]\]?' ...
If you specify all lowercase letters, Mutt will
automatically use a case-insensitive search. If you use
at least one uppercase letter, Mutt assumes case-sensitive
* Rocco Rutte [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-07 13:14]:
score '(~s \[?[Mm][Uu][Tt][Tt]\]? ) ~w $newsgroup' +100
...which works as intended while:
score '(~s \[?mutt\]? ) ~w $newsgroup' +100
...is applied to all messages and doesn't work.
~w? using some patches, i presume? nntp?
Rocco Rutte wrote:
Hmm, I thought so, too, and tried it before I asked the list
for help because I doesn't work. I use:
score '(~s \[?[Mm][Uu][Tt][Tt]\]? ) ~w $newsgroup' +100
...which works as intended while:
score '(~s \[?mutt\]? ) ~w $newsgroup' +100
...is applied to all
* Christian Garbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-05 19:41]:
Is there a way to show the score of hidden messages in
a [collapsed] thread (perhaps by setting the score of
the root message to the sum of all hidden messages)?
no.
Or can I flag the whole thread when a
single message in the thread
Hi there!
I've recently started to use the scoring mechanisms of mutt. My mails
are now colored depending on their score and some mails even get
flagged automatically.
I need the scoring for mailing lists. In my mailing list folders, I
use scoring as well as threading. I like all threads
Hi,
see subject. Is there any way to specify case-insensitive
scoring patterns? This is minor important but I'm too lazy
to write filters like:
score '~s \[?[Mm][Uu][Tt][Tt]\]?' ...
bye, Rocco
Rocco Rutte wrote:
see subject. Is there any way to specify case-insensitive
scoring patterns? This is minor important but I'm too lazy
to write filters like:
score '~s \[?[Mm][Uu][Tt][Tt]\]?' ...
If you specify all lowercase letters, Mutt will automatically use a
case-insensitive search
* Rocco Rutte [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-05 20:52]:
see subject.
this reference is almost always BAD.
content changes - and subject should
be adjusted to fit the contents. so
subjects should not describe problems.
Is there any way to specify case-insensitive scoring patterns?
This is minor
Slrn does for me at the moment. Could someone who uses scoring show
me some examples of how you sort the folders?
I don't believe you can, until Daniel's latest threading patches make
it into 1.5.n, n=2. The new patches will isolate threading from
sorting, so that you enable or disable threads
Lars Hecking [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[I Cc'd this message to mutt-users, too - I think this belongs there
instead of mutt-dev]
I think the documentation about scoring is quite lacking.
I could somewhat agree; I've never been able to fully understand how
mails could be sorted first by threads
the
documentation. :)
Anyway, what if I want Mutt to sort all mailing list folders first by
thread, then by date (most recent last) and finally by score; like Slrn
does for me at the moment. Could someone who uses scoring show me some
examples of how you sort the folders?
I don't believe you can
X-Mailer: Mutt-1.3.27i (Debian Linux 2.4.16, i686)
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Aha, still suffering from schizophrenia! ;)
Hey people.
Hi Michael,
Is there a way to use scoring as a primary sort method but still have
threading take effect? I tried putting threads as an aux sort
Hey people.
Is there a way to use scoring as a primary sort method but still have
threading take effect? I tried putting threads as an aux sort, but it just
sort of groups them together, it doesn't thread them.
Thanks,
Mike
--
Michael P. Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED], GnuPG pub
On Feb 28, Volker Moell [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Is there a posibillity to score all known mail addresses (i.e. all
addresses defined in aliases) in one single score statement?
David Champion has a patch for this... you can find a link to it from
www.mutt.org in the user patches section.
On 2002.03.05, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Jeremy Blosser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 28, Volker Moell [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Is there a posibillity to score all known mail addresses (i.e. all
addresses defined in aliases) in one single score statement?
David Champion has a
Hi, all!
Is there a posibillity to score all known mail addresses (ie all
addresses defined in aliases) in one single score statement?
I only found then ~l for all messages addressed to a known mailing list:
score ~l +100
Greetings,
-volker
--
http://die-Moellsde/ *
set
alternates=pmak@animeglobe\.com|pmak@animelyrics\.com|pmak@trapezoid\.interserver\.net
set score # set scoring on
score ~A 5000 # default score is 5000
set score_threshold_delete=0 # Delete messages with score = 0
score ~F +1000 # Increase score of flagged messages
score ~p +1000
Hi, I've just re-subscribed to this list!
I would like to use the same keystroke F12 to add senders to my
procmail killfile and score them to 0 in mutt.
My setup (below) tells procmail to source the addresses in
~/.procmail/spam, and add the message to my spam/ Maildir:
#~/.procmailrc
On 2002.02.13, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Andre Berger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My setup (below) tells procmail to source the addresses in
~/.procmail/spam, and add the message to my spam/ Maildir:
Looks like you have a file (~/.procmail/spam) containing e-mail
addresses of people you
* David Champion [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2002-02-13 14:11 -0500:
On 2002.02.13, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Andre Berger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My setup (below) tells procmail to source the addresses in
~/.procmail/spam, and add the message to my spam/ Maildir:
Looks like you have a
* On Fri Dec 14, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
Out of curiousity, how does everyone make use of message scoring?
I don't know about others, but I use scoring in a very limited way. In my
main folder, where I only put personal mail, I use this:
score ~N 2
folder-hook ! 'set sort=reverse-score
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 11:11:32PM -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
Out of curiousity, how does everyone make use of message scoring?
I would use it but mutts scoring abilities don't met my demands. I
need something like the ability of slrn to create a scoring entries with
one key (like k
On Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 04:56:16PM +0100, Johannes Segitz wrote:
I would use it but mutts scoring abilities don't met my demands. I
need something like the ability of slrn to create a scoring entries with
one key (like k in slrn)
You could bind any key not bound to a function, yet to a macro
Hey people.
Out of curiousity, how does everyone make use of message scoring?
Cheers,
Mike
--
Michael P. Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED], GnuPG pub key: 5BC8BE08
...the word HACK is used as a verb to indicate a massive amount
of nerd-like effort. -Harley Hahn, A Student's Guide to Unix
Hi, I am trying to get Mutt to work with a spam filter.
The filter is run through procmail,
and generates a custom header field: X-Priority:
Now I am trying to make Mutt score based on that header field,
but the manual has the following bit under the Scoring section:
_begin
(note
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there something else I can do to sort messages based on the
header field that my filter is generating?
Well, way back I wrote a small patch that adds support for a custom
scoring header to mutt. I'm sure it was messy, and it definately
slowed folder opening
patch that adds support for a custom
scoring header to mutt. I'm sure it was messy, and it definately
slowed folder opening (was noticable for very large folders), but you
can take a look at this (which appears to still apply to 1.3.24!). Of
course, while it may still apply cleanly, you're on your
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Patched 1.3.24i ok, but doesn't build.
Bombs out at this point:
gcc -DPKGDATADIR=\/usr/local/share/mutt\ -DSYSCONFDIR=\/usr/local/etc\
-DBINDIR=\/usr/local/bin\ -DMUTTLOCALEDIR=\/usr/local/share/locale\
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H=1 -I. -I. -Iintl -I./intl
Josh Huber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It builds for me with this, but you'll have to test it yourself :)
Maybe I should mention how to use it.
just add:
score_header X-Priority
to your .muttrc, and the messages with this header will use the
integer contents of said header as the inital score
After a long time using mutt I am trying to understand
more of it's features.
- What is the purpose/use of scoring of mail messages?
- Can i mark a message as undeletable (and reverse that)
--
Regards
Cliff
On 2001.09.09, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Cliff Sarginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- What is the purpose/use of scoring of mail messages?
I'm sure that people use it in different ways, but fundamentally, it's
just a ratings system. You can value/devalue messages according to the
results
Not directly a technical question so Slightly OT;
A wise man once said real man score their email
Well poking around with scoring in mutt I would like to ask
any real man what strategy do you use in scoring mail?
give every incomming mail 50 points and then subtract or add
points based
).
Question #2: What is a message's default score, if no scoring matches
it?
See the score_* variables in the manual. I use:
set score_threshold_delete=0
set score_threshold_flag=30 # autoflag at 30
set score_threshold_read=15
unscore *
score '~A' 20 # initial score value
score '~P|~p|~Q' 20 # flag msg
I'm fairly new to mutt and don't understand how the scoring mechanism
works. I can score my own address, say
score '~f uzscd5@uni-bonn\.de' =
But how do I set up the rest of the score file properly ? What's
wrong with
score '~f Benji\ Fisher' 500
score '~f gmxred
dress should get more priority and should be on
top.
I know that lbdb is a separate program and has no direct relation to
mutt. So, I think, one possible way it can be done is to add some kind
of scoring feature in lbdb and increase the score of selected addressed
from some macro magic from mutt
On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 03:14:03PM +0530, Abhay Ghaisas wrote:
I know that lbdb is a separate program and has no direct relation to mutt.
So, I think, one possible way it can be done is to add some kind of
scoring feature in lbdb and increase the score of selected addressed from
some macro
On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 01:35:30PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Johannes Zellner proclaimed on mutt-users that:
ahh, yes. Thanks. Now: is it possible to /show/ the
scores ? -- As far as I understand this, scoring is
there will be different colors (see the sample.muttrc)
How do
Hi,
is it possible to do scoring in mutt (like in slrn) ?
Would be useful for ML's with large bandwidth.
--
Johannes
Johannes Zellner proclaimed on mutt-users that:
is it possible to do scoring in mutt (like in slrn) ?
Would be useful for ML's with large bandwidth.
yes
from the sample.muttrc -
unscore *
# score pattern value
# at that entry. If you prefix the score with an equal sign
On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 10:42:52AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Johannes Zellner proclaimed on mutt-users that:
is it possible to do scoring in mutt (like in slrn) ?
Would be useful for ML's with large bandwidth.
yes
from the sample.muttrc -
[...]
ahh, yes. Thanks. Now
List:
I've a number of lines in my .muttrc file like this:
score ~A 1000
score '~f terra.com.br -'# spambot
Followed by:
score_threshold_delete=0
However, I still get messages from terra.com.br. Am I misunderstanding how
this is supposed to work? My intent is to killfile that
Charles Krug proclaimed on mutt-users that:
score ~A 1000
score '~f terra.com.br -'# spambot
Followed by:
score_threshold_delete=0
However, I still get messages from terra.com.br. Am I misunderstanding how
Block terra.com.br either at your mailserver or using procmail
:0:
On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 08:49:47PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Charles Krug proclaimed on mutt-users that:
score ~A 1000
score '~f terra.com.br -'# spambot
Followed by:
score_threshold_delete=0
However, I still get messages from terra.com.br. Am I
On 2000-11-01 10:06:28 -0500, Charles Krug wrote:
score '~f terra.com.br -'# spambot
^
Followed by:
score_threshold_delete=0
However, I still get messages from terra.com.br. Am I
misunderstanding how this is supposed to work? My intent is to
Charles Krug proclaimed on mutt-users that:
Unfortunatly, not an option. Our email system was recently "improved" by
moving it from a Linux box to an NT box. I'm just happy that it hasn't been
further improved by moving it to Win2000.
As you are running a unix box you can surely use
On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 04:52:01PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
Your quoting is screwed up. Try
score '~f terra.com.br' -
instead. (Note that the last single quote character has moved.)
*laughs* No, that's just me not getting my cut-paste working so I did it by
hand.
I had problems getting procmail to work about 6months ago and gave up on it. Does it
require I particular style of email setup? I use mutt with getmail and ssmtp.
As you are running a unix box you can surely use procmail locally - or add
them to the access.db of _your_ workstation's
Darrin Mison proclaimed on mutt-users that:
I had problems getting procmail to work about 6months ago and gave up on it.
Does it require I particular style of email setup? I use mutt with getmail
and ssmtp.
Nothing in particular - though I use it with sendmail 8.11.1 - where it plugs
in
.
Don't have any ideas on that, sorry... Unless Mutt does not support
every pattern match operator for scoring, only some. But that doesn't
sound likely or make any sense (what's different between looking at ~e
or ~h?).
Mutt only supports some pattern operators for scoring. There's
which I only remember part of the content (eg. "What was
that URL again that I remember mailing to someone 3 months ago?").
Instead of using scoring, it would probably be possible to assign a
specific limit command to a macro and use this as necessary on demand.
That way entering folders is s
gular Expressions" book, and I have looked for examples
in muttrcs on the web (only one used scoring, alas). I even grepped
the source directory for where the error message occurs, and although
I don't understand the code, the fact that it's from "pattern.c" is
a big hint, I should think
Telsa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Fri, 01 Oct 1999:
I'm having some difficulties with the sorting by score ability of Mutt.
Don't have any ideas on that, sorry... Unless Mutt does not support
every pattern match operator for scoring, only some. But that doesn't
sound likely or make any sense
On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 03:08:56PM +0300 or thereabouts, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
(in a lightning-fast response)
Don't have any ideas on that, sorry... Unless Mutt does not support
every pattern match operator for scoring, only some. But that doesn't
sound likely or make any sense (what's
match operator for scoring, only some. But that doesn't
sound likely or make any sense (what's different between looking at ~e
or ~h?).
Mutt only supports some pattern operators for scoring. There's a
reason, which I forget. I had a discussion with Michael Elkins about
this a long time ago. I
On Tue, Jun 22, 1999 at 10:54:59PM -0900, Matt Armstrong wrote:
2 - No way to show threads but still sort by score. In the threaded
display, gnus can sort first by thread, then by score. Maybe
something like:
sort=thread,score
set sort=treads
set sort_aux=score
seems to work for
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=bjuZg6miEcdLYP6q; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Quoth Jeremy Blosser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
It's not prompting you for the info, but anything you can stick in your
.muttrc can be done from a running mutt by doing :whatever
So ':score ~s foo value' should do what you want just fine.
Yes, but then what if you want to save the scores you've
On Wed, Jun 23, 1999 at 10:19:17AM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
So ':score ~s foo value' should do what you want just fine.
From manual.txt:
Usage: score pattern value
Should that be ':score "~s foo" value' ?
Otherwise mutt reports "score: too many arguments"
--
(T.) Michael Sanders
For the past four years I've used Gnus under Emacs as my MUA. I got
tired of the slowness and switched to mutt. I think mutt is awesome,
but I miss one thing from Gnus: scoring.
Mutt has the beginnings of it. I'll list what I miss and I solicit
comments about how I might go about getting
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=jh06fhy6YTawvwPV; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
On Mon, Jan 25, 1999 at 02:17:00PM -0700, Phil Humpherys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
How sophisticated is scoring in mutt? I didn't see anything in the
help menu... is there decent scoring in mutt?
Have you tried reading the manual yet? There is a whole section
about it.
-Daniel
--
Daniel
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=Er1qpsOqk0l6oMce; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
93 matches
Mail list logo
