At 10:04 PM EDT on May 26 David Champion generally semanticized from the world
of Null-A:
On 2000.05.26, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
"Rob Reid" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You mean strip sigs from quoted text in a reply? That's the editor's job
I strenuously disagree. I think we should
Both of these revolve around the use of sig-dashes.
First, I have a corrspondent who (despite protests) uses the ``-- ``
sequence to separate his message from the text he is replying to.
Needless to say, this causes mutt to syntax hilight the first
paragraph of his reply as a signature. Perhaps
At 5:00 PM EDT on May 26 Anton Graham sent off:
Both of these revolve around the use of sig-dashes.
First, I have a corrspondent who (despite protests) uses the ``-- ``
sequence to separate his message from the text he is replying to.
Sounds pretty perverse. Maybe you could convince him
At 5:02 PM EDT on May 26 Rob Reid sent off:
At 5:00 PM EDT on May 26 Anton Graham sent off:
Both of these revolve around the use of sig-dashes.
First, I have a corrspondent who (despite protests) uses the ``-- ``
sequence to separate his message from the text he is replying to.
On 2000.05.26, in [EMAIL PROTECTED],
"Rob Reid" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You mean strip sigs from quoted text in a reply? That's the editor's job
I strenuously disagree. I think we should rather say: it is the
established judgement of the Mutt development team that stripping
