On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 09:06:35AM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 07Jun2021 15:49, Jon LaBadie wrote:
Is there a way to use mutt from the command like to "Bounce" a
received message. I had hopes for the '-e "command"' option, but
that is limited to confi
directly though.
I thought procmail had some directive to 'bounce" messages? Haven't used
it for a while.
Cheers,
Cameron Simpson
On 07Jun2021 15:49, Jon LaBadie wrote:
>Is there a way to use mutt from the command like to "Bounce" a
>received message. I had hopes for the '-e "command"' option, but
>that is limited to configuration commands.
The usual approach is to "push"
Some messages I receive my wife should see also. Rather than
"Forward" ("f" command) them, I typically "Bounce" ("B" command)
them to her.
I would like to automate this procedure for certain sender addresses
so I'm developing a procmail recipie.
Is
Thanks! This must be it! I'm using mutt as distributed by
Debian/testing. I'm attaching the output of mutt -v in case it helps
to completely identify my version.
Thanks and best regards,
Luis
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 04:15:58AM +, Michael Elkins wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 04:10:52AM +0
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 04:10:52AM +, Michael Elkins wrote:
I just did a test and it does appear that Mutt is properly encoding
the header:
Resent-To: Luis =?iso-8859-1?Q?Moch=E1n?=
This is change that fixed the above problem. It looks like the
package of mutt you are using doesn't inc
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 04:06:42AM +, Michael Elkins wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 01:42:14PM -0600, Luis Mochan wrote:
Of course, in this example Amavis rejected the message, but it seems
it did so for a good reason, as the message had this strange
characters \303\241. So I guess the probl
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 01:42:14PM -0600, Luis Mochan wrote:
Of course, in this example Amavis rejected the message, but it seems
it did so for a good reason, as the message had this strange
characters \303\241. So I guess the problem is my configuration of
mutt (or mutt itself).
That is the ut
> Could have to do with your character set, or whether the email itself is
> encoded as 7 bit or 8 bit,
I believe you are right, but I don't know though how to control this. On
the other hand, forwarding mails, as opposed to bouncing them, has not
failed.
> but I'm suspecting it may have more to
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 01:01:55PM -0600, Luis Mochan wrote:
> I made some tests and... I'm even more confused. For some reason, if I
> bounce your message to myself (through my alias) it arrives without
> problem. However, if I compose a message to myself and then bounce it
>
I made some tests and... I'm even more confused. For some reason, if I
bounce your message to myself (through my alias) it arrives without
problem. However, if I compose a message to myself and then bounce it
to myself, it is rejected. The rejection has to do with the
'Resend-to:'
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:33:36PM -0600, Luis Mochan wrote:
> I mean the fullname. For example, my alias file contains the line
>
>alias mochan Luis Mochán
>
> so if I bounce a mail to myself (b mochan) the alias is expanded and
> the á in my last name produces the
I mean the fullname. For example, my alias file contains the line
alias mochan Luis Mochán
so if I bounce a mail to myself (b mochan) the alias is expanded and
the á in my last name produces the failure.
Regards,
Luis
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 08:18:19PM -0800, Will Yardley wrote
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 12:34:55PM -0600, Luis Mochan wrote:
> I wonder if someone knows how to 'bounce' a message to
> a recipient whose name contains special characters, such as the
> accents áéíóú? I can 'forward', but 'bounce' fails. The manual
> ht
I wonder if someone knows how to 'bounce' a message to
a recipient whose name contains special characters, such as the
accents áéíóú? I can 'forward', but 'bounce' fails. The manual
http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-2.html#forwarding_mail doesn't
seem to
Some names in my alias file include accented characters such as
áéíóú. When I compose/forward a message to someone with those
characters in his name the message has no problem, but when I bounce a
message delivery fails with the message INVALID HEADER Non-encoded
8-bit data. Is there a fix
* Mandar Mitra [09-07-12 07:37]:
> Patrick Shanahan wrote (Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 07:18:56AM -0400):
>
> > grep resent-message-id -A 4 /var/log/mail
> >
> > will show bounced (resent) posts including recipient address
>
> Not if one uses msmtp, will it?
/var/log/mail is *not* a postfix file, it
Patrick Shanahan wrote (Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 07:18:56AM -0400):
> grep resent-message-id -A 4 /var/log/mail
>
> will show bounced (resent) posts including recipient address
Not if one uses msmtp, will it?
* Mandar Mitra [09-04-12 03:02]:
> Jamie Paul Griffin wrote (Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 07:53:02AM +0100):
>
> > I wouldn't have thought you'd need to as the mail you've bounced is
> > already in one of your mail folders. AFAIK, it just 'bounces' it as
> > is and the MTA sends it off to its new destin
[ Mandar Mitra wrote on Tue 4.Sep'12 at 12:30:52 +0530 ]
> Jamie Paul Griffin wrote (Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 07:53:02AM +0100):
>
> > I wouldn't have thought you'd need to as the mail you've bounced is already
> > in one of your mail folders. AFAIK, it just 'bounces' it as is and the MTA
> > send
Jamie Paul Griffin wrote (Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 07:53:02AM +0100):
> I wouldn't have thought you'd need to as the mail you've bounced is already
> in one of your mail folders. AFAIK, it just 'bounces' it as is and the MTA
> sends it off to its new destination.
I use it as an alternative to forw
[ Eric Smith wrote on Mon 3.Sep'12 at 14:07:54 +0200 ]
> Is there a way to keep a record of mail that
> you bounce?
I wouldn't have thought you'd need to as the mail you've bounced is already in
one of your mail folders. AFAIK, it just 'bounces' it as is
Is there a way to keep a record of mail that
you bounce?
--
Eric Smith
he mailing list.
>
> Now this should be easy to do but I have not found a simple way to
> resend the message with a different from: address. The message is stored
> in my Sent folder but using the bounce function on it asks me to input a
> new destination (to:) address but what I want is
ot
> > bounced
> > back because that address is not registered in the mailing list.
> >
> > Now this should be easy to do but I have not found a simple way to
> > resend the message with a different from: address. The message is stored
> > in my Sent folder but
st.
>
> Now this should be easy to do but I have not found a simple way to
> resend the message with a different from: address. The message is stored
> in my Sent folder but using the bounce function on it asks me to input a
> new destination (to:) address but what I want is to cha
message with a different from: address. The message is stored
in my Sent folder but using the bounce function on it asks me to input a
new destination (to:) address but what I want is to change the from:
address and resend the message intact as it is.
How to achieve this feat?
--
regards,
Horacio
Hello Dilip, Benjamin,
On Sunday, March 9, 2008 at 10:18:34 +0530, Dilip M wrote:
> Benjamin Buch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> when I bounce this e-mail:
>>| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>| CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PRO
Benjamin Buch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> What do you mean by "remains intact"? To get this right, when I bounce
> this e-mail:
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> then the h
Hello Benjamin,
On Thursday, March 6, 2008 at 17:46:18 +0100, Benjamin Buch wrote:
> If I bounce e-mail, is it sent to the addresses specified in the
> CC-field of the original e-mail?
No. But a misconfigured $sendmail using the -t option (or something
equivalent) might do such harm
t;remains intact"?
To get this right, when I bounce this e-mail:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
then the header of the bounced e-mail is:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC:
Benjamin Buch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> So user C does not now (if he doesn't take a close look at the header
> that is...) that the message was sent to him from user B?
Opps! I'm sorry. user C receives email with from:user B, but all other CC
headers remains intact!
--
dm
Hi,
> > So my question is: If I bounce e-mail, is it sent to the addresses
> > specified in the CC-field of the original e-mail?
>
> No
>
Great!
So no mass forwarding by accident...
> Use forward option to forward emails.
My problem with the forward option is that m
Benjamin Buch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> So my question is: If I bounce e-mail, is it sent to the addresses
> specified in the CC-field of the original e-mail?
No
> That would be strange in my opinion because when I want to bounce mail I
> normally want to forward m
is:
If I bounce e-mail, is it sent to the addresses specified in the
CC-field of the original e-mail?
That would be strange in my opinion because when I want to bounce mail I
normally want to forward mail to someone who didn't receive the message
yet. But it would be the explanation why I got
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, December 11 at 02:16 PM, quoth Ray Stell:
>perfect.
>
>Not sure where in the docs I could have connected with this syntax.
>Mind teaching me to fish a little better?
http://www.mutt.org/doc/devel/manual.html#macro
~Kyle
- --
Where all
key to in order to bounce to a pre-defined address.
>
> Use a macro. e.g.:
>
> macro index,pager B '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>
> ~Kyle
> --
> The more men you make free, the more freedom is strengthened and the
> ... greater is the security of the State.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, December 11 at 01:37 PM, quoth Ray Stell:
>Mutt 1.5.11
>How might I bind a key to in order to bounce to a pre-defined address.
Use a macro. e.g.:
macro index,pager B '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
~Kyle
- --
The more men yo
Mutt 1.5.11
How might I bind a key to in order to bounce to a pre-defined address.
Thanks.
Hello,
it seems to me setting hostname has no effect when using bounce.
I expect hostname is what goes into the Resent-Message-Id: and the
Received: entry. Or am I wrong?
I have set hostname unconditionally.
Is hostname superseded by some other setting?
-Hanspeter
Hello,
is there a hook based on the bounce target?
Or is there a `bounce target pattern' for send-hook?
It seems to me that ~A in a send-hook has no effect with bounce.
-Hanspeter
* jennyw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-04 00:32]:
> Is there a way to forward a message whole? Including attachments?
> I do this by using resend which isn't quite what I want to do ...
how about "bounce"? and then reply to the message,
but then exchange the addres
Rory --
...and then Rory Campbell-Lange said...
%
% I often receive attachments with Mac encoding which I need to bounce or
% forward to another email address. How do I get the 'forward' and
% 'bounce' commands to automatically include all the attached files in the
% o
I often receive attachments with Mac encoding which I need to bounce or
forward to another email address. How do I get the 'forward' and
'bounce' commands to automatically include all the attached files in the
original mail?
--
Rory Campbell-Lange
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'm using my_hdr to customize the From: header, it's ok. But when I
bonce a message, I want the Resent-From: header to be customized with
my real email and my full name. I can't just put a my_hdr Resent-From...
because all messages will have this header set, but I can't figure out
how to make a se
and in envelope (using sendmail -f), rather then from my Unix
> username?
> Defining Resent-From: with my_hdr seems to be a no-no ;)
That's strange. I'm using 1.2.5i with:
set from="Peter Pentchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
in my .muttrc, and when I tried to send a message
furio ercolessi proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> You people really examine headers too much :)
bad habit picked up from spam-l and from working an abuse desk till ~ a year
ago (sysadmining since then doesnt give me any chance to kick the habit) :)
> I just upgraded, and I take the occasion
On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 04:49:46PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Jeremy Blosser proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>
> > He said he had 1.2.5, as did his User-Agent header. :)
>
> Woops - till recently (at least, from assorted posts in the spam-l list) he had
> an 1.0 version
You people
Jeremy Blosser proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> > I use set envelope_from (Furio, that needs a newer mutt, I suggest you
> > upgrade to the latest stable - 1.2.5). However, I use folder hooks to
> He said he had 1.2.5, as did his User-Agent header. :)
Woops - till recently (at least, from
Suresh Ramasubramanian [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Using a large mallet, Jeremy Blosser whacked out:
> > The proper way to do this with mutt is using the $alternates and
> > $reverse_name variables, see the manual.
>
> I use set envelope_from (Furio, that needs a newer mutt, I suggest you
> u
Using a large mallet, furio ercolessi whacked out:
> Our 'sendmail' is really the sendmail-like interface of postfix.
> Anyway, we use a similar setup for masquerading the domain part.
I forgot you use postfix :)
> It is not the domain part but the username part that I would
> like to change.
Using a large mallet, Jeremy Blosser whacked out:
> The proper way to do this with mutt is using the $alternates and
> $reverse_name variables, see the manual.
I use set envelope_from (Furio, that needs a newer mutt, I suggest you upgrade
to the latest stable - 1.2.5). However, I use folder
really the sendmail-like interface of postfix.
> Anyway, we use a similar setup for masquerading the domain part.
> It is not the domain part but the username part that I would
> like to change. That is: if I receive mail on an alias, I would
> like to bounce mail so that it appears to c
erading the domain part.
It is not the domain part but the username part that I would
like to change. That is: if I receive mail on an alias, I would
like to bounce mail so that it appears to come from the same alias
(at least sometimes).
Why is that a feature?
furio ercolessi
Spin
Using a large mallet, furio ercolessi whacked out:
> set sendmail='/usr/sbin/sendmail -oem -oi -f user@domain'
> to change my envelope FROM, and it works fine when I send,
Hi furio - so we meet again :)
> command. In that case, the outgoing message retains my "native"
> envelope FROM, c
Hello,
I use
set sendmail='/usr/sbin/sendmail -oem -oi -f user@domain'
to change my envelope FROM, and it works fine when I send,
reply to, or forward mail.
It doesn't work, though, when I bounce mail using the bounce-message
command. In that case, the outgoing mes
On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 10:23:24AM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> Since Postfix uses Delivered-To: for improved loop-detection, I need to
> strip this and only this header upon bouncing a message using "b". How?
unset bounce_delivered
--
Gary Johnson | Agilent Technologies
[EM
Since Postfix uses Delivered-To: for improved loop-detection, I need to
strip this and only this header upon bouncing a message using "b". How?
I use mutt-1.2.5 an 1.3.8
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
System Engineerinnominate AG
Diplom-Informatiker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>If I were to get spam, very little with a good procmail recipe at this
>point, how would I bind a key to bounce the message to an email address
>and then delete the message in one fail swoop?
You can do it better with procmail -
If I were to get spam, very little with a good procmail recipe at this
point, how would I bind a key to bounce the message to an email address
and then delete the message in one fail swoop?
I won't be foolish and ask if this could be done, because I've seen that
all is possible with
On 2000-05-17 05:35:19 -0400, David T-G wrote:
> I know that it can be done, but I haven't played with
> selective attachment forwarding.
Just go to the recvattach menu, tag the attachments in
question, and apply-forward.
--
http://www.guug.de/~roessler/
On 2000-05-17 13:14:43 +0800, Reed Lai wrote:
> I do this because I bounce messages to other peoples,
> but they always confused who sent them those mails...
> and I don't know how to forward with attached items
> (however, forward has more actions than bounce...)
The $mime_fo
Reed --
...and then Reed Lai said...
% On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 12:11:27AM -0400, David T-G wrote:
% > ...and then Reed Lai said...
% > %
% > % May I change From: field before bounce message?
% >
% > Sounds like you want the new resend-message command, which lets you
%
% I do
On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 12:11:27AM -0400, David T-G wrote:
> Reed --
>
> ...and then Reed Lai said...
> % Seniors,
> %
> % May I change From: field before bounce message?
>
> Sounds like you want the new resend-message command, which lets you
> modify any part
Reed --
...and then Reed Lai said...
% Seniors,
%
% May I change From: field before bounce message?
Sounds like you want the new resend-message command, which lets you
modify any part of a message (including its headers) and then ship it off
as though you had just composed it.
This is
Seniors,
May I change From: field before bounce message?
--
Reed Lai http://w3.icpdas.com/reed/ | ICPDAS http://www.icpdas.com
GnuPG (DSA/ElGamal) 0x7199EAD3 Reed Lai (key #1) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
KeyServer: search.keyserver.net | HAM: BV4QO | NIC-handle: RL7000
ICQ 64518529
Wouter Hanegraaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 29 Feb 2000:
> But when I do, it will end up in my inbox. I want to be able to just
> pipe it to a fake bounce script and let the sender think he spammed an
> e-mail address that doesn't exist. If I'm lucky, he'll r
On Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 06:42:38PM +0100, Wouter Hanegraaff ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 04:02:32PM +, Lars Hecking wrote:
> >
> > You mean, "fake bounce" as in: created by yourself, not by the MTA?
>
> Yes. So I don't want any
Wouter Hanegraaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 04:02:32PM +, Lars Hecking wrote:
> >
> > You mean, "fake bounce" as in: created by yourself, not by the MTA?
> Yes. So I don't want any automatic bouncing. I don't get tha
On Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 04:02:32PM +, Lars Hecking wrote:
>
> You mean, "fake bounce" as in: created by yourself, not by the MTA?
Yes. So I don't want any automatic bouncing. I don't get that much spam.
But when I do, it will end up in my inbox. I want to be able
Wouter Hanegraaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I want to be able to send fake bounces. Although faking a bounce is not
> really what you are supposed to do with mail, there are enough cases in
> which this is perfectly appropriate.
You could edit a message as if you were going to sen
Wouter Hanegraaff writes:
> Hi,
>
> I want to be able to send fake bounces. Although faking a bounce is not
> really what you are supposed to do with mail, there are enough cases in
> which this is perfectly appropriate.
>
> I guess all that is needed is a small script wh
Hi,
I want to be able to send fake bounces. Although faking a bounce is not
really what you are supposed to do with mail, there are enough cases in
which this is perfectly appropriate.
I guess all that is needed is a small script which reads a mail from
standard input and generates a fake
Lars Hecking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I agree with and understand everything you wrote above, but according
> my copy of the bat book (1st ed only), the F flag in the F equate
> means "Need From: in header", i.e. concerns From: and Resent-From:
> headers, not the "From " mbox separator.
On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 03:19:01PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
> I imagine the problem is in the sendmail config, something like this:
>
> Mlocal, P=/usr/bin/rmail, F=lsDFMAw5:/|@m, S=10/30, R=20/40,
> T=DNS/RFC822/X-Unix,
> A=rmail -d $u
>
> This is my particu
Lars Hecking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Whatever MDA you are using, is at fault here. It has put the message
> > into your mailbox, with invalid headers. If you fix the MDA, the bounce
> > problem will go away.
>
> Possibly procmail or formail. But
[lengthy explanation]
> I imagine the problem is in the sendmail config, something like this:
>
> Mlocal, P=/usr/bin/rmail, F=lsDFMAw5:/|@m, S=10/30, R=20/40,
> T=DNS/RFC822/X-Unix,
> A=rmail -d $u
>
> This is my particular setting for the "local" MDA, in my
David DeSimone writes:
> Raju K V <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > But when I bounce a message, the recepient gets the mail with broken
> > headers. Example:
> >
> > I am bouncing a mail with headers:
> > - SENT HEADERS -
Raju K V <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> But when I bounce a message, the recepient gets the mail with broken
> headers. Example:
>
> I am bouncing a mail with headers:
> - SENT HEADERS -
> From smtp Wed Jan 12
hi,
I have linux installed on my local machine. sendmail is configured with
DSsmtp:tagore
But when I bounce a message, the recepient gets the mail with broken
headers. Example:
I am bouncing a mail with headers:
- SENT HEADERS
On Fri, Dec 24, 1999, Shao Zhang ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
|
| Thanks for all the replies about bounce multiple messages.
| I now have a special situation, where I need to bounce messages
| from 1 to 1. Is there an easy to tag them all??
T~m1-1
/kim
Hi,
Thanks for all the replies about bounce multiple messages.
I now have a special situation, where I need to bounce messages
from 1 to 1. Is there an easy to tag them all??
Thanks.
Shao
On 1999-12-23 16:49:35 +1100, Shao Zhang wrote:
> Is there any easy way to bounce mutiple mail messages to
> the same user in one go??
> Can I use tag to achieve that??
You can - just try it. ;-)
--
http://www.guug.de/~roessler/
Shao --
...and then Shao Zhang said...
% Hi,
% Is there any easy way to bounce mutiple mail messages
% to the same user in one go??
%
% Can I use tag to achieve that??
Well, let's see:
t
t
t
;b
Bounce tagged messages to:
ctrl-g
r
Yep.
%
% Thanks.
HTH &a
Hi,
Is there any easy way to bounce mutiple mail messages
to the same user in one go??
Can I use tag to achieve that??
Thanks.
Shao
--
Shao Zhang - Running Debian 2.1
At 03:07 PM 8/20/99 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 04:40:40 +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
[snip]
>> Maybe a quick hack would be best here, like writing a script that
>> would first remove the Delivered-To header and then remail it
>> manually (eg. "grep -v ^Delivered-To:" pi
to qmail-inject with
Well, grep isn't OK, as a Delivered-To: line may also appear in the body,
and it must not be removed. And I would have to change the $sendmail
variable to call the script and pass it to sendmail (we use sendmail
here, not qmail), not only for bounce. I don't like t
Try the attached patch. I'll also put it into stable.
Index: copy.c
===
RCS file: /home/roessler/cvsroot/mutt/copy.c,v
retrieving revision 2.4
diff -u -u -r2.4 copy.c
--- copy.c 1999/02/02 15:47:51 2.4
+++ copy.c 1999/
Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 20 Aug 1999:
> > This may actually be qmail's loop detection kicking in... At least
> > that's what I'd guess.
>
> Yes: the message comes from vinc17.org, it has automatically been
> forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and I've bounced it to vinc17.o
On Thu, Aug 19, 1999 at 17:31:12 +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> David Thorburn-Gundlach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 19 Aug 1999:
> > Oh, yeah -- I got sidetracked above :-) I'm no pop expert, but I've
> > bounced messages to myself and to friends before, and they always get
> > it. Why do
David Thorburn-Gundlach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 19 Aug 1999:
> Oh, yeah -- I got sidetracked above :-) I'm no pop expert, but I've
> bounced messages to myself and to friends before, and they always get
> it. Why do you say that the delivered-to entry for ens-lyon.fr caused
> it to not
Vincent --
...and then Vincent Lefevre said...
%
% Is there a way to remove the delivered-to line when bouncing a message?
From the bounce command in mutt, I don't think so. It would be a
little ugly, but you could always save the message to another mailbox,
edit that mailbox and remov
I lost
the vinc17.org copy, I wanted to bounce the ens-lyon.fr copy to my address
at vinc17.org, but this didn't work because the delivered-to were present.
--
Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - PhD student in Computer Science
Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/> or <http://www
.
>
> you are probably also man enough to go into the source and edit out the
> offending prompt. :)
>
> Better yet, create a config variable for it, and submit a patch. :)
Try the attached patch: it creates a quad option for bounce.
--
David Ellement
--- commands.c.orig Tue
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=8NvZYKFJsRX2Djef; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
nsequences.
>
> If you are man enough that you can always type the bounce-to address
> correctly before you press , you're a better man than I am. So
> you are probably also man enough to go into the source and edit out the
> offending prompt. :)
>
> Better yet, create
Eric Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am almost 37, all grown up now and if I press `b' that means I have
> made my decision and am prepared to suffer the consequences.
If you are man enough that you can always type the bounce-to address
correctly before you press ,
How do I force bounce a mail message so as to avoid the prompt message:
"Are you sure you want to bounce this message? (Y)es/(N)o"
I am almost 37, all grown up now and if I press `b' that means I have made
my decision and am prepared to suffer the consequences.
GTFM but got noth
98 matches
Mail list logo
