Re: [PATCH] Re: handling List-Id header

2010-04-14 Thread ilf
On 04-12 14:20, Michael Elkins wrote: Attached is a patch which implement an auto-subscribe feature. When you load a mailbox, Mutt will parse the List-Post header field and add it to the 'subscribe' list automatically, unless it matches something on the 'unlists' or 'unsubscribe' list.

Re: handling List-Id header

2010-04-13 Thread Derek Martin
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:47:21AM +0200, ilf wrote: On 04-11 20:22, Michael Elkins wrote: The reason for the distinction between lists/subscribe is that just because you received an email that was addressed to a list doesn't mean that you are subscribed to said list. But if there's a

Re: handling List-Id header

2010-04-12 Thread ilf
On 04-11 20:32, Michael Elkins wrote: On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 01:38:19AM +0200, ilf wrote: I would like a workaround to use Regex in 'lists' and 'subscribe', but that feels dirty. Why doesn't Mutt allow 'lists'/'subscribe' to lists based on the List-Id: header? The List-ID header is not

Re: handling List-Id header

2010-04-12 Thread Nicolas Williams
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:47:21AM +0200, ilf wrote: On 04-11 20:32, Michael Elkins wrote: On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 01:38:19AM +0200, ilf wrote: I would like a workaround to use Regex in 'lists' and 'subscribe', but that feels dirty. Why doesn't Mutt allow 'lists'/'subscribe' to lists

[PATCH] Re: handling List-Id header

2010-04-12 Thread Michael Elkins
Attached is a patch which implement an auto-subscribe feature. When you load a mailbox, Mutt will parse the List-Post header field and add it to the 'subscribe' list automatically, unless it matches something on the 'unlists' or 'unsubscribe' list. me diff -r 2cd62f40d840 hcache.c ---

Re: handling List-Id header

2010-04-11 Thread Michael Elkins
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 11:51:49PM -0500, Brian Ryans wrote: Quoting ilf on 2010-04-09 18:38:19: Why was it decided to set the flag only for subscribed lists and not listed lists? In my limited mutt experience (as a user) I believe it was decided that way as people would probably be more

Re: handling List-Id header

2010-04-11 Thread Michael Elkins
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 01:38:19AM +0200, ilf wrote: I would like a workaround to use Regex in 'lists' and 'subscribe', but that feels dirty. Why doesn't Mutt allow 'lists'/'subscribe' to lists based on the List-Id: header? The List-ID header is not necessarily a valid email address. All that

Re: handling List-Id header

2010-04-10 Thread Brian Ryans
Quoting ilf on 2010-04-09 18:38:19: I don't know where you got 3.1.1, my manual doesn't have that section :) That was my mistake. 2.3.1.1 (3.1.1 within Chapter 2). Why was it decided to set the flag only for subscribed lists and not listed lists? I'm unsure of the actual reason for that.

Re: handling List-Id header

2010-04-09 Thread Brian Ryans
Quoting ilf on 2010-04-08 16:09:46: I'm confused by Mutts handling of mailing lists. First, I do not understand the difference of known lists (lists) and subscribed lists (subscribe). If Mutt handles mail from a known list, I'm probably subscribed, no? Mutt's meaning of known and subscribed

Re: handling List-Id header

2010-04-09 Thread ilf
On 04-09 01:21, Brian Ryans wrote: See above: concerns you raise, indirectly, in the remainder of this post seem to be addressed above to the best of my ability. Please let me know if that's not the case. Thanks for your hints. But I am still confused :) Manual section 4.8 Handling Mailing

Re: handling List-Id header

2010-04-09 Thread Brian Ryans
Quoting ilf on 2010-04-09 12:18:08: Thanks for your hints. But I am still confused :) Now I'm confused too, see below. Manual section 4.8 Handling Mailing Lists sais, Mutt can do things with mailing lists once Mutt knows what [my] mailing lists are. It can: 1. show mailing list in index

handling List-Id header

2010-04-08 Thread ilf
I'm confused by Mutts handling of mailing lists. First, I do not understand the difference of known lists (lists) and subscribed lists (subscribe). If Mutt handles mail from a known list, I'm probably subscribed, no? Secondly, I find having to manually maintain a list of subscriptions in my