cooresponds to the support request number. Is it possible to
have a save hook dynamically suggest the based on the number
that actually appears in the subject of the email?
Thank you,
--
Joshua Smith
Lead Systems Administrator WVNET
Montani Semper Liberi
I try to set a fcc-save-hook to save all messages that math to:
Cotacao or cotacao or Cotação or cotação or Cotaçao or Cotacão ... or
Quotacao or quotacao or Quotação ...
in any message fields (subject, body, to, cc, Ccc) to
~/Mail/Cotacao/Inbox
I created the folders ~/Mail/Cotacao/Inbox
I set
Never mind, I figured out the problem myself. save-hook works fine
inside of folder-hook after all :)
pants.
Hello,
I'd like to change the place that mutt saves messages to based on the
folder that I'm currently in, like I do with 'set' commands within
folder-hooks. However, it doesn't seem that I can use save-hooks in
that way. Any help would be appreciated.
Cheers,
pants.
in
the To: and Cc:, then I want to automatically save to a specific
folder.
Well, you can either string together a bunch of criteria with 'ors'
and use the ~C pattern:
fcc-save-hook '~C name1 | ~C name2 | ~C name3' foler_name
or you can put all the addresses in a group and just use the %C
AND is assumed.
Thanks, but I still cannot find a pattern modifier that specifies
So if it is a mail from one of three names and the other two names are
in ~C (To: or Cc:), then it is a match.
What is the smartest way to specify this logic with an
fcc-save-hook
On Dec 08, 2011 at 10:39 PM +0100, Eric Smith wrote:
So if it is a mail from one of three names and the other two names are
in ~C (To: or Cc:), then it is a match.
What is the smartest way to specify this logic with an
fcc-save-hook?
If I understand correctly, the following should do it. It's
On Dec 08, 2011 at 08:15 AM -0500, Tim Gray wrote:
On Dec 08, 2011 at 12:08 PM +0100, Eric Smith wrote:
Thanks Tim but the condition is AND not OR.
All three addresses need to be present in random order in the To: or
Oops. Just take that the |'s then. If you just place several search
way to specify this logic with an
fcc-save-hook?
If I understand correctly, the following should do it. It's a hook
that has all three recipients in the To: or CC: fields which sets
the fcc/save folder to 'project_folder', followed by three
individual hooks for the separate people.
fcc
On Dec 09, 2011 at 12:05 AM +0100, Eric Smith wrote:
But this will not match if the mail is From: foo and To: bar, baz
You'll just need to add a couple more hooks to catch all the cases.
It's really all explained in the manual.
fcc-save-hook '~f foo ~C bar ~C baz' project_folder
If a sent or received mail has a certain list of email addresses in
the To: and Cc:, then I want to automatically save to a specific
folder.
How would I implement this?
--
- Eric Smith
:
fcc-save-hook '~C name1 | ~C name2 | ~C name3' foler_name
or you can put all the addresses in a group and just use the %C pattern:
fcc-save-hook '%C groupname' folder_name
The first is probably more direct.
save_hook file. Is there a way to use patters to
achieve this automatically? Here's roughly what I would write it in
regexp language:
fcc-save-hook ([a-z\.]+)@work.com =work/\1
That syntax probably doesn't fly with mutt (or does it), but you
probably get the idea. I'd like to match the part before
I have a script that generates entries into my hooks file as follows:
fcc-save-hook ~t @swypeinc\.com | ~f @swypeinc\.com +swypeinc.com
Now this fails when the mail is cc'ed to me and the recipient entry
appears *before* the sender's entry in the hooks file.
This of course results
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
srevilak I found a way to get the behavior I was looking for: move
srevilak the save-hook into the individual folder hooks:
kyle-mutt Heh - I was just writing you a message saying precisely
kyle-mutt that.
kyle-mutt
kyle-mutt The reason is because
...@mail.example.com; \
set from= ...; \
set pgp_sign_as=...'
Finally, I have one save hook:
save-hook . =messages
This _almost_ works. If I'm *not* reading mail at
imaps://mail.example.com/, mutt offers the save folder:
Save to mailbox ('?' for list): =messages
which
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Monday, May 25 at 08:43 AM, quoth Steve Revilak:
I found a way to get the behavior I was looking for: move the
save-hook into the individual folder hooks:
Heh - I was just writing you a message saying precisely that.
The reason is because
://m...@mail.example.com; \
set from= ...; \
set pgp_sign_as=...'
Finally, I have one save hook:
save-hook . =messages
This _almost_ works. If I'm *not* reading mail at
imaps://mail.example.com/, mutt offers the save folder:
Save to mailbox ('?' for list): =messages
which
Hi,
* Jörg Sommer wrote:
Corsair [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So there's no way to do it (without a external mail filter) when mails
from mailing lists and other mails are mixed in a folder?
From /usr/share/doc/mutt/manual.txt.gz:
12. Using Multiple spool mailboxes
Usage: mbox-hook
Hallo Corsair,
Corsair [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 01:31:41PM +0100, Rocco Rutte wrote:
If you want to move read mail to ~/read-mail and ~/read-lists, you can do
something like this:
folder-hook . 'set mbox=~/read-mail'
folder-hook =lists 'set mbox=~/read-lists'
have a save-hook setting:
save-hook ~l =lists
And of course, I do have subscribed some mailing lists in the .muttrc.
But the save-hook above seems not to work. When I change mailbox from
the spool or quit Mutt, all read mails just move to mbox. How
should I setup Mutt so that mails from
Hi,
* Corsair wrote:
And of course, I do have subscribed some mailing lists in the .muttrc.
But the save-hook above seems not to work. When I change mailbox from
the spool or quit Mutt, all read mails just move to mbox. How
should I setup Mutt so that mails from mailing lists automatically
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 01:31:41PM +0100, Rocco Rutte wrote:
Your mixing up two different concepts: 1) $mbox is an archive for read mail
and 2) save-hook let's you tune what folder mutt suggests when you ask it
to save a message (hit 's').
Sorry... It's just that one of my mailbox is named
Hi,
* Corsair wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 01:31:41PM +0100, Rocco Rutte wrote:
If you want to move read mail to ~/read-mail and ~/read-lists, you can do
something like this:
folder-hook . 'set mbox=~/read-mail'
folder-hook =lists 'set mbox=~/read-lists'
The first makes sure that
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 04:55:21PM +0100, Rocco Rutte wrote:
If they're in one folder, there're two more options. 1) You use a macro to
move messages or 2) use folder-hooks that move messages when you enter the
folder.
For 1) you'd need to hit a single key, 2) would be automatic but has
I prefer to use a combined fcc and save hook. These are
automatically generated whenever I create a new contact.
However, with the Fcc: part, when it sees a Cc address,
this over-rules the To: address so the mail is saved in the
folder matching the rule of the Cc: address. *Not* at all
what I
, moving, editing them... except
if you could save the hook-lists and load them on startup.
so all it takes is a dump of the current list to a file.
then you can look at it and rearrange it with your editor
:unhook * and :source file from within. sounds fine.
so, developers, how about a save
* Adam Fields [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-06-05 19:25]:
Actually, I've discovered that it is possible to set up a save-hook
with a To: (or any header) match, using a pattern. Something like:
save-hook ~h mutt-users@\\.mutt\\.org =mutt-users
This works great! Combined with tagging threads
* munk [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-05-14 00.12 +0100]:
Hi,
Hello!
I'm having trouble getting the 'save-hook' command to work properly in my .muttrc
file.
The current settings I have look as follows:
save-hook mutt +mutt-users-list
save-hook bugtraq +bugtraq-list
Hmm. I'm
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [05/14/02 06:02]:
* munk [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-05-13 23:14]:
I'm having trouble getting the 'save-hook' command
to work properly in my .muttrc file.
The current settings I have look as follows:
save-hook mutt +mutt-users-list
save-hook bugtraq
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 11:41:28AM +0200, Martin Karlsson wrote:
Hmm. I'm not sure it works that way. Look for something specific in
the mail (just like when writing a procmail recipe). I have:
save-hook ~h owner-mutt-users +s.mutt-users
save-hook (~f pal1|~f pal2) +s.pal1_and_2
The ~h
Hi,
I'm having trouble getting the 'save-hook' command to work properly in my .muttrc file.
The current settings I have look as follows:
save-hook mutt +mutt-users-list
save-hook bugtraq +bugtraq-list
but whenever I press 's' to save a mail that includes 'mutt' or 'bugtraq
* munk [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-05-13 23:14]:
I'm having trouble getting the 'save-hook' command
to work properly in my .muttrc file.
The current settings I have look as follows:
save-hook mutt +mutt-users-list
save-hook bugtraq +bugtraq-list
but whenever I press 's' to save a mail
Hi, all --
I have some hooks that set the fcc to a particular directory so that
folks from one location (church or work or school or whatnot) are stored
in their own directory. They look, for instance, like
fcc-save-hook 'pattern|dave|pattern' =D.D/dir1/%_%O
fcc-save-hook 'pattern|sue
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi I've put this line in my rc file.
fcc-save-hook . Outbox/%O
and I'm getting an error when starting mutt, 'variable not found'
and i can't find it in the manual.
er, help?
- --
Nick Wilson
Tel:+45 3325 0688
Fax:+45 3325 0677
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 11-01-02 at 11:20
* Nick Wilson said
Hi I've put this line in my rc file.
fcc-save-hook . Outbox/%O
and I'm getting an error when starting mutt, 'variable not found'
and i can't find it in the manual.
er, help?
Alas
) this mail, mutt's proposition is
Save to mailbox ('?' for list): =foobar
But I have a
save-hook 'foobar@' =friends/foo_bar
so I expected to save the mail to =friends/foo_bar, not to =foobar.
Ok, the man page to save-hook says: filename will be used as the
default filename if the message
* Charles Jie [EMAIL PROTECTED] [27-12-2001 05:32]:
| I've tried to auto-move all messages To: or CC: to
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] into a mailbox =mutt. But the following trial
| failed:
|
| save-hook ~C mutt-users +mutt
|
| or
|
| save-hook ~Cmutt-users +mutt
My muttrc says:
save-hook '~C mutt
Charlie --
...and then Charles Jie said...
%
% Hi,
Hello!
%
% I've tried to auto-move all messages To: or CC: to [EMAIL PROTECTED] into a
mailbox =mutt. But the following trial failed:
%
% save-hook ~C mutt-users +mutt
%
% or
%
% save-hook ~Cmutt-users +mutt
If you want to move
* Charles Jie [EMAIL PROTECTED] [27-12-2001 05:32]:
| I've tried to auto-move all messages To: or CC: to
^
Aargh, I'm reading too fast! Use David's solution instead of mine
(that is, try procmail first, mbox-hook afterwards!)
Bye,
--
René Clerc -
Rene --
...and then Rene Clerc said...
%
% * Charles Jie [EMAIL PROTECTED] [27-12-2001 05:32]:
%
% | I've tried to auto-move all messages To: or CC: to
% ^
%
% Aargh, I'm reading too fast! Use David's solution instead of mine
% (that is, try procmail first, mbox-hook
Hi,
I've tried to auto-move all messages To: or CC: to [EMAIL PROTECTED] into a mailbox
=mutt. But the following trial failed:
save-hook ~C mutt-users +mutt
or
save-hook ~Cmutt-users +mutt
Does ~C not work in save-hook? I didn't find enough info about save-hook. It's said
(by default
Hi,
I couldn't find too much helpful stuff through google or the archives,
so here goes...
I'm trying to construct a fcc-save-hook thingamajig that will save all
outgoing mail into a file, except for mail sent to certain lists etc.
Right now I have:
fcc-save-hook . +sent-mail/sent-mail-`date
Munish --
...and then Munish Chopra said...
%
% Hi,
Hello!
%
% I couldn't find too much helpful stuff through google or the archives,
% so here goes...
At least you looked first; thanks! :-)
%
% I'm trying to construct a fcc-save-hook thingamajig that will save all
% outgoing mail
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 08:12:08AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
%
% fcc-save-hook . +sent-mail/sent-mail-`date +%d-%b-%Y`
%
% ...which sends all my outgoing mail to
% ~/Mail/sent-mail/sent-mail-[day-month-year]
Man, that must play hell with your sorting :-) Why not Y-M-D instead,
I wonder
Munish --
...and then Munish Chopra said...
%
% On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 08:12:08AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% %
% % fcc-save-hook . +sent-mail/sent-mail-`date +%d-%b-%Y`
% %
% % ...which sends all my outgoing mail to
% % ~/Mail/sent-mail/sent-mail-[day-month-year]
%
% Man, that must
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 08:26:06AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
%
% While I'm at it, is there some kind of hook for moving deleted mail
% around? I know, I didn't check this time...so pointers are welcome!
Um, how do you mean? Once it's deleted, it's gone, so there isn't much
to move :-)
Munish --
...and then Munish Chopra said...
%
% On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 08:26:06AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
%
% Cedric Duval has a trash-folder patch that provides recycle-bin-like
% recovery functionality that you might find interesting.
...
%
% No, actually I think that's exactly what I
Hi all,
I want to specify save-hook based on a particular value in the subject field say
CSCdv12334.
I want mutt to specify CSCdv12334 as the file name when I choose to save this mail.
I tried the following, based on my little knowledge of extended regular expressions.
In ERE \1 refers
it. I have a default save-hook
. =sent, with a folder-hook latter on.
Also, I can't get the REply-to field right for this folder either..
which is a real pain.
My hooks etc follow:
# Setup the rest as defaults.
folder-hook .set signature=~/.signature
folder-hook .unmy_hdr *
folder-hook
msg.pgp
Hi Andrei!
On Thu, 09 Aug 2001, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
I have a few save-hooks set up to save my mailing list stuff into
different folders. However, I'd like to set up a default save-hook that
would save anything that is not caught by the other save-hooks into
another directory according
On Mon, 13 Aug 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
have you tried:
save-hook '~f [EMAIL PROTECTED]' =people/foo
save-hook '~f [EMAIL PROTECTED]' =people/jester
Hi,
Of course I can do that for each individual email address, but it would
suck. I need to know if there's a way to do it for any email
Quoting Andrei Zmievski [EMAIL PROTECTED], who wrote:
Hi,
Of course I can do that for each individual email address, but it would
suck. I need to know if there's a way to do it for any email address
that's not already caught by other save-hooks.
Did you look at save_name? I think it also
On Mon, 13 Aug 2001, Sam Roberts wrote:
Of course I can do that for each individual email address, but it would
suck. I need to know if there's a way to do it for any email address
that's not already caught by other save-hooks.
Did you look at save_name? I think it also interacts with
On 010813, at 09:47:00, Andrei Zmievski wrote
[...] Right now if I have email from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and I hit 'save', it prompts me for where to save it to
and the default location is =joeman. What I want it to be is
=people/joeman..
Perhaps 'save-hook . =people/%u' or 'save-hook !~l
it to be is
: =people/joeman..
:
: Perhaps 'save-hook . =people/%u' or 'save-hook !~l =people/%u' will
: do what you want.
Is '%u' documented in the Mutt 1.2.5 docs as a valid save-hook sequence?
--
Eugene Lee
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
it to
% : and the default location is =joeman. What I want it to be is
% : =people/joeman..
% :
% : Perhaps 'save-hook . =people/%u' or 'save-hook !~l =people/%u' will
% : do what you want.
%
% Is '%u' documented in the Mutt 1.2.5 docs as a valid save-hook sequence?
Now that you know what it is and searching
On Mon, 13 Aug 2001, David Ellement wrote:
[...] Right now if I have email from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and I hit 'save', it prompts me for where to save it to
and the default location is =joeman. What I want it to be is
=people/joeman..
Perhaps 'save-hook . =people/%u' or 'save-hook !~l
On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 11:41:48AM -0400, David T-G wrote:
: ...and then Eugene Lee said...
: %
: % Is '%u' documented in the Mutt 1.2.5 docs as a valid save-hook sequence?
:
: Now that you know what it is and searching is trivial, you should look
: it up for yourself and see.
:
: It is. Well
On 010813, at 10:50:53, Andrei Zmievski wrote
Perhaps 'save-hook . =people/%u' or 'save-hook !~l =people/%u' will
do what you want.
It works but it disables all other save-hooks I have. For example:
save-hook . =people/%u
save-hook ~Lphp-dev +OpenSource/PHP
Since mutt uses
On Mon, 13 Aug 2001, David Ellement wrote:
Since mutt uses the first matching save-hook, a default save-hook
needs to be appear last.
Woohoo, it works! Thank you.
-Andrei
The galaxy is, in other words, an immensely, intrinsically,
and inexhaustibly interesting place. -- Iain M. Banks
I use quite a few fcc-save-hooks (in mutt v1.2.5), and I've noticed
something which makes them almost useless now. The Fcc: seems to be set
according to the first sequential address match. This would be fine if
mutt compared the fcc-save-hook to the To: field first, but it seems to
consider
I have a few save-hooks set up to save my mailing list stuff into
different folders. However, I'd like to set up a default save-hook that
would save anything that is not caught by the other save-hooks into
another directory according to the From: address. Example: if I have
mail from [EMAIL
On 2001-06-26 at 16:59:35, Zane Crawford warbled:
What I'm trying to do, is make it such that by default, if no other rule
defines how something will be saved, that it offers USER (from
[EMAIL PROTECTED]) as the folder name. Thanks!
But this is the default behaviour anyway, isn't it?
[I originally sent this on Wed, May 30, 2001 at 03:18:41PM -0700, but it
apparently didn't make it. We've been having terrible network problems
all day.]
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 08:51:59PM +0200, Jeroen Valcke wrote:
All of a sudden my default save-hook doesn't work anymore.
But I have
* On [010508 06:29] Dale Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]But I'm having a hard time
getting mutt to put a copy of the message *I've sent* to the
list in my =out mailbox. Here's what I have in my .muttrc
thus far:
save-hook '~C mutt-users' =support
fcc-save-hook '~C mutt-users' =out
Lawrence Mitchell [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
fcc-hook '~t mutt-users' =muttsent
the fcc-save-hook is if you want the save-hook and the fcchook to be the same
for a particular pattern, saves on typing. That might be your problem.
hope that helps
thanks, I'll give it try.
:
save-hook '~C mutt-users' =support
fcc-save-hook '~C mutt-users' =out
save-hook ~l =%Osave-hook
send-hook ~l 'push f^Uenter
I'm using 1.3.15i version of mutt.
Greetings,
Is there an easy way to define a save hook for multiple people on either
the To:/Cc: or From: list? I'd like to save all the mail from family
members for example in one folder. Right now I'm doing the following
save-hook '(~f brother|\
~C brother|\
~f sister1
see http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-4.html#ss4.2
Good stuff!
HTH, George
-Original Message-
From: Dale Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 11:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: debian-user save hook
I do it like this in my muttrc
with a single command?
subscribe mutt-users@
fcc-save-hook '~C mutt-users' =mutt-users
What does '~C mean here? I want to save messages from from
+debian-user mailbox to a +support mailbox
subscribe debian@
fcc-save-hook '~C debian'=support
?? I'm confused.
subscribe
I'm very pleased with mutt, it's a great program.
Particularly the way it handles high volumes of mail. One
question though:
How do I set up a save hook for the debian-user list so that
it will save selected messages to a +support mailbox? I
tried the from [EMAIL PROTECTED] and that doesn't
work
Quoting Dale Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED], who wrote:
I'm very pleased with mutt, it's a great program.
Particularly the way it handles high volumes of mail. One
question though:
How do I set up a save hook for the debian-user list so that
it will save selected messages to a +support mailbox? I
I do it like this in my muttrc, is there a better way, maybe one
that works for all subscribed lists with a single command?
subscribe mutt-users@
fcc-save-hook '~C mutt-users' =mutt-users
subscribe sawfish@
fcc-save-hook '~C sawfish'=sawfish
In addition
On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 12:14:55AM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 05:56:41PM -0700, Duke Normandin wrote:
I have the following that doesn't work:
folder-hook "IN.mutt" 'save-hook * =mutt'
When I'm reading "IN.mutt" and go to save a mess
I have the following that doesn't work:
folder-hook "IN.mutt" 'save-hook * =mutt'
When I'm reading "IN.mutt" and go to save a message, "IN.mutt" keeps
coming up as the default for that folder. Any ideas? Tia..
--
-duke
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Okan Demirmen - mutt wrote:
newbie-type: some patience required, unless stupidity is too obvious...
can a save-hook have a regex in it?...if so, i might be totally clueless...
i am trying to save mail to folders, whose names are based on a mailing
list...wihtout creating a save-hook for
newbie-type: some patience required, unless stupidity is too obvious...
can a save-hook have a regex in it?...if so, i might be totally clueless...
i am trying to save mail to folders, whose names are based on a mailing list...wihtout
creating a save-hook for every single mailing list
i
Awhile ago, someone posted an extremely helpful save-hook:
save-hook . "+%(%Y%m)/%a" # Save mails to date-received/user@host
I'd like to turn that into an fcc-save-hook, but fcc doesn't work right.
I'm missing something obvious, but what?
--
Lan
Alright, sorry if this is an FAQ; but I did not seem to find anything
about this in either the manual or the mailing list archives.
I'm using mutt-1.2.5i. save-hook works perfectly alright, when filtering
by the sender's address; however, I want to filter by something more than
that - either
Is there a way to do something similar to save-hook, but
use an expression
similar to the one used in tagging? Something like "~h
owner-freebsd-bugs"
or "~s BUGTRAQ"?
Yeah - it's called 'procmail'.
-suresh
Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 26 Oct 2000:
Is there a way to do something similar to save-hook, but use an expression
similar to the one used in tagging? Something like "~h owner-freebsd-bugs"
or "~s BUGTRAQ"?
Did you actually try this? I think
s
I can't figure out for the life of me why this doesn't work
save-hook ~s\\fm-news =freshmeat_list
Mutt refuses to save in the mbox 'freshmeat_list' but instead only 'noreply'
Message headers below...
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: freshmeat daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 23:59:01
On Sat, Oct 21, 2000 at 03:00:09PM +1000, Darrin Mison wrote:
I can't figure out for the life of me why this doesn't work
save-hook ~s\\fm-news =freshmeat_list
Mutt refuses to save in the mbox 'freshmeat_list' but instead only 'noreply'
Message headers below...
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From
On Saturday, 21 October 2000 at 15:00, Darrin Mison wrote:
I can't figure out for the life of me why this doesn't work
save-hook ~s\\fm-news =freshmeat_list
Mutt refuses to save in the mbox 'freshmeat_list' but instead only 'noreply'
Message headers below...
what are your other save
On Sat, Oct 21, 2000 at 03:00:09PM +1000, Darrin Mison wrote:
I can't figure out for the life of me why this doesn't work
save-hook ~s\\fm-news =freshmeat_list
Subject: [fm-news] newsletter for Friday, October 20th
Maybe because there is no '\fm-news' in the subject. Be careful
Darrin --
...and then Darrin Mison said...
% I can't figure out for the life of me why this doesn't work
%
% save-hook ~s\\fm-news =freshmeat_list
What's with the \\ in your expression? It seems to me that that will
match the literal expression
\fm-news
which doesn't seem
Darrin Mison muttered:
I can't figure out for the life of me why this doesn't work
save-hook ~s\\fm-news =freshmeat_list
^^
This would refer to a litaral '\' which is not in the header you
quoted.
Subject: [fm-news] newsletter for Friday, October 20th
Try save-hook '~s fm
Darrin Mison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Sat, 21 Oct 2000:
I can't figure out for the life of me why this doesn't work
save-hook ~s\\fm-news =freshmeat_list
It's supposed to be:
save-hook '~s fm-news' =freshmeat_list
Or at least, that's how I'd write it. :-)
Mikko
--
// Mikko Hänninen
Interestingly enough all of these work.
I don't remember where I got the syntax from.
save-hook ~t\\SECURITYPORTAL =security_portal
save-hook ~t\\science-text =tips
save-hook ~t\\science-html =tips
save-hook ~s\\H-GEN =humbug
save-hook ~s\\H-CHAT =humbug
save-hook ~s\\H-ANNOUNCE =humbug
save
Hi,
I'm running mutt 1.2.5 and I have something really odd. I have
two save hooks:
save-hook sgi.com =work
save-hook cray.com =work
My intention is to have mail from those addresses default to my work
mailbox. When I hit 's' I get the following at the bottom of the screen
Dean Luick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 14 Sep 2000:
Save to mailbox ('?' for list): =work
This is what I'm expecting. However, when I hit return to actually save,
the line clears and nothing happens -- as if I aborted the save.
Yet when I hit ctrl-J instead of return, it accepts
Hello,
I've:
save-hook . ''
.. some more save-hooks here ...
save-hook '~s .*\[incr\ Tcl\].*' +itcl
how should the first line look like so that I don't get itcl
as default hook ?
--
Johannes
but whatever address that resolves to, that address seems to
be used with the save-hook regex.
Here is a message sent to mutt-users that appears in my
index:
15 sL Jul 18 David T-G[davidtg ] pgp_encrypt_self with 1.2.4 and g
Here is a message that I sent to mutt-users that appears
in my index
e-hook's
don't work.
15 sL Jul 18 David T-G[davidtg ] pgp_encrypt_self with 1.2.4 and g
17 F Jul 19 To mutt-users@mu [mutt-user] index_format %F and "sent" mailbo
save-hook mutt-users =Mutt-users
When I try to save a message that one of you sent to mutt-users,
it t
On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 03:36:56PM +0300 or thereabouts, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
Richard Curnow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Fri, 30 Jun 2000:
Is mbox-hook what you're after?
Yes, that's what I meant. I thought I *knew* there was a way to do it,
just forgot what it was. Then got confused by
Rino Mardo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Fri, 30 Jun 2000:
Hmm, that could be the reason why I'm getting a repetition operand invalid.
Yes. :-) * means "any number (0 or more) of the character just before",
so using * alone doesn't make sense, as there is no character just
before it. * works as
Mikko Hänninen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Fri, 30 Jun 2000:
Oops, what I meant is probably something like this:
folder-hook . set record='+read'
Another oops. I wonder how come nobody else caught this yet and
corrected me? :-)
Anyway, I shouldn't be talking about $record, I mean $mbox of
On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 02:05:40PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mikko Hänninen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Fri, 30 Jun 2000:
Reading the documentation on $move and $mbox, it turns out that this
feature is only enabled for the spool mailbox, so apparently you can't
use it to auto-save
1 - 100 of 169 matches
Mail list logo
