"Cory T. Echols" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 02/14, Andre Berger wrote:
I'd like to know if Mutt and Gnus could read from and write to the
same mailboxes?
If I remember correctly, Emacs mail programs must use a different folder
locking mechanism than other Unix mail apps. So for
Hi Mutt-users,
I have a problem during startup of mutt on a fast hardware.
Starting mutt with
xterm -geometry 220x80+70+100 -vb -T "mutt Mail" -j -e mutt
produces a large xterm, but mutt only uses 1/3 of the lines.
Starting first xterm -geometry 220x80+70+100 -vb -T "mutt Mail" -j
and then
Hi Frank,
I have a problem during startup of mutt on a fast hardware.
Starting mutt with
xterm -geometry 220x80+70+100 -vb -T "mutt Mail" -j -e mutt
produces a large xterm, but mutt only uses 1/3 of the lines.
...
I use a script Xmutt and the "essential" line is:
xterm -T "Mail for
Roel Vanhout ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said something to this effect on 02/15/2001:
Anyway, my question of the day is if there is a better way to detect new
mail in the folder view. According to the manual new mail is detected by
checking the access time of the folder, but I also have a mailchecker
Frank Derichsweiler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said something
to this effect on 02/15/2001:
I have a problem during startup of mutt on a fast hardware.
Starting mutt with
xterm -geometry 220x80+70+100 -vb -T "mutt Mail" -j -e mutt
produces a large xterm, but mutt only uses 1/3 of the lines.
Hi Frank,
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 12:09:26PM +0100, Dirk Ruediger wrote:
I have a problem during startup of mutt on a fast hardware.
Starting mutt with
xterm -geometry 220x80+70+100 -vb -T "mutt Mail" -j -e mutt
produces a large xterm, but mutt only uses 1/3 of the lines.
...
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 08:32:49AM -0500, darren chamberlain wrote:
[mutt does not properly recognize screen size]
Out of curiosity, what happens when you resize the xterm? Does
mutt rearrange itself to take advantage of the full size, after
the xterm is resized?
yes, that works fine
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 10:35:03AM +0100, Frank Derichsweiler wrote:
Hi Mutt-users,
xterm -geometry 220x80+70+100 -vb -T "mutt Mail" -j -e mutt
produces a large xterm, but mutt only uses 1/3 of the lines.
Any idea?
Does -wf help at all?
--
Oo---o, Oo---o,
On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Frank Derichsweiler wrote:
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 08:32:49AM -0500, darren chamberlain wrote:
[mutt does not properly recognize screen size]
Out of curiosity, what happens when you resize the xterm? Does
mutt rearrange itself to take advantage of the full size,
I'd like mutt to do the following for me:
1. In my "" folder, display not the sender (which is always me)
but the recipient.
2. When I have read something in the "!" folder, only file it
in "" when the sender is not a correspondent recognized from
my mail-aliases and list aliases.
Thank you for the tips; do you know how anything about that last thing (i.e., how to
use the
Meta-key in the minibuffer)?
Cheers,
Manuel
* Suresh Ramasubramanian [EMAIL PROTECTED] [11 Feb 01 00:12]:
[a bit OT]
Does ssmtp do deferred delivery (so that I can queue mail offline and
then send it all at one shot, as I do with /usr/sbin/sendmail -q)?
I have not found it so, but then I have only installed it this
morning. For the
The more I read about MacOS X, the more excited I am getting.
http://salon.com/tech/review/2000/11/17/hubbard_osx/index1.html. It
is looking more and more like a poor-man's SGI workstation. GUI-based
OS with a real UNIX kernel in the background. As much as I like Linux
and such, I lose a lot
Hi
I'm subscribed to some mailing lists, they (the mbox files ;-) reside in
~~/Mail/Lists/.
I defined in ~/.muttrc:
unsubscribe *
subscribe `cd $HOME/Mail/Lists/ ; echo *`
unlists *
lists `cd $HOME/Mail/Lists/ ; echo *`
They are expanded to:
lists=cygwin debian-announce debian-bsd
Hello!
I've seen very cool $EDITOR settings to edit messages in emacs; but XEmacs
is different with Emacs in regard of servering.
I am not an [X]Emacs guru (yet), so all my attempts to set it up ended in
nothing.
Maybe someone has made it?
Alex.
On Thursday, 15 February 2001 at 19:53, Alex Povolotsky wrote:
Hello!
I've seen very cool $EDITOR settings to edit messages in emacs; but XEmacs
is different with Emacs in regard of servering.
I am not an [X]Emacs guru (yet), so all my attempts to set it up ended in
nothing.
Maybe
In the attachment menu of an email I received, I hit 'd' on an
attached jpeg, then 'q' to get back to the index. The messaged showed
the lowercase 'd' indicating that one part was marked for deletion. I
resync the mailbox and it doesn't delete the attachment. Message
stays the same. The
Hi!
Can someone tell me how to reply to all in mutt? (everyone in TO: and CC: )
Thx in advance!
Bostjan
--
Botjan Mller [NEONATUS], [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://neonatus.net/~neonatus
For my PGP key finger: [EMAIL PROTECTED], RSA id: 0x90178DBD, ICQ #:7506644
Celular: +386(0)41243189,
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 04:05:38PM -0500 or so it is rumoured hereabouts,
Ken Weingold thought:
In the attachment menu of an email I received, I hit 'd' on an
attached jpeg, then 'q' to get back to the index. The messaged showed
the lowercase 'd' indicating that one part was marked for
Hiho
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 11:45:35PM +0100, Bostjan Muller wrote:
Can someone tell me how to reply to all in mutt? (everyone in TO: and CC: )
Simply with "g" (group-reply)
HTH
Mick
--
[Michael Baro] [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] [05323/922061]
[ http://www.welcome.to/Elvis.Presley ] [ICQ:
At 10:34 -0500 15 Feb 2001, Ken Weingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
at NT. Anyway, has anyone here tried it and built mutt on it? I am
wondering how some of the software I use a lot will build and run
under it.
Yes, I've built mutt under OS X public beta. It's been awhile since I
did it, so
Roel Vanhout wrote:
X-Apparently-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] via web10802
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 23:18:54 +0100
From: Roel Vanhout [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: removing duplicate messages + changing mailbox
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello all,
I've switched from
22 matches
Mail list logo
