-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
mQGiBDuamOoRBAC8n1wDEKj1k6hFOhMFji4s27e+g+15tgGmViBMiiXWottugMWn
L9FgOjKCDCXGnNKa0hxYsF/3qDlmv/EWT0XKzE07uXQGH9ibeuIYRuo3ou0XOVlV
-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
mQGiBDuamOoRBAC8n1wDEKj1k6hFOhMFji4s27e+g+15tgGmViBMiiXWottugMWn
L9FgOjKCDCXGnNKa0hxYsF/3qDlmv/EWT0XKzE07uXQGH9ibeuIYRuo3ou0XOVlV
-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
mQGiBDuamOoRBAC8n1wDEKj1k6hFOhMFji4s27e+g+15tgGmViBMiiXWottugMWn
L9FgOjKCDCXGnNKa0hxYsF/3qDlmv/EWT0XKzE07uXQGH9ibeuIYRuo3ou0XOVlV
-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
mQGiBDuamOoRBAC8n1wDEKj1k6hFOhMFji4s27e+g+15tgGmViBMiiXWottugMWn
L9FgOjKCDCXGnNKa0hxYsF/3qDlmv/EWT0XKzE07uXQGH9ibeuIYRuo3ou0XOVlV
-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
mQGiBDuamOoRBAC8n1wDEKj1k6hFOhMFji4s27e+g+15tgGmViBMiiXWottugMWn
L9FgOjKCDCXGnNKa0hxYsF/3qDlmv/EWT0XKzE07uXQGH9ibeuIYRuo3ou0XOVlV
-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
mQGiBDuamOoRBAC8n1wDEKj1k6hFOhMFji4s27e+g+15tgGmViBMiiXWottugMWn
L9FgOjKCDCXGnNKa0hxYsF/3qDlmv/EWT0XKzE07uXQGH9ibeuIYRuo3ou0XOVlV
I am using mutt 1.2.5, but I can't read/view attachments if I don't first
save them into a separate file. When the viewer expects the name of a file
in the command-line, piping doesn't work; so how do other mutt users solve
this problem?
TIA,
Mack
Hi Everyone,
I'm starting to get a hang of things, but a few things still elude me.
I have gone through the archives and actually fixed a few problems..
so I really have been trying.. :)
But I'm down to getting email sent from a folder to be saved to it's
own folder.. but I can't get it to do
Mack Stevenson wrote:
I am using mutt 1.2.5, but I can't read/view attachments if I don't first
save them into a separate file. When the viewer expects the name of a file
in the command-line, piping doesn't work; so how do other mutt users solve
this problem?
Just by pressing v in the
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 09:18:58AM +0200, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
-END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
well why to the list and why the hell 7 times ?!?
--
Christian Ordig, Germany| Homepage: http://thor.prohosting.com/~chrordig/
Oops, sorry guys.
A slight configuration error !
Apologies for the annoyance.
--
Regards
Cliff
Cliff Sarginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said something to this effect on 09/13/2001:
Oops, sorry guys.
A slight configuration error !
Apologies for the annoyance.
Well, at least now we all have your public key...
(darren)
--
I'd rather have my own game show than enough votes to become
president.
Hello,
Well, I installed gpg a couple of weeks ago and was looking around for
a answer to my problem, and just did'nt find one so I left it like that.
But it's become quite anoying looking at that everytime I get a signed
email.
PGP signature could NOT be verified.
I get that everytime...how
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 10:37:26AM -0400, Nelson D. Guerrero wrote:
Well, I installed gpg a couple of weeks ago and was looking around for
a answer to my problem, and just did'nt find one so I left it like that.
But it's become quite anoying looking at that everytime I get a signed
email.
Well, I installed gpg a couple of weeks ago and was looking around for
a answer to my problem, and just did'nt find one so I left it like that.
But it's become quite anoying looking at that everytime I get a signed
email.
PGP signature could NOT be verified.
I get that everytime...how
On (13/09/01 10:37), Nelson D. Guerrero wrote:
PGP signature could NOT be verified.
# Recognise good signatures set pgp_good_sign=^gpg: Good signature
from
This way, only genuinely unrecognised signatures will give you this
warning.
Query: why do people pgp-sign mail to mailing lists?
I'm a subscriber of many lists and when I reply some message I have to
modify the field 'To:' because in it invariably the name of the sender
appears insted of the list address.
I've tried modifying tke folder.hook 'To:' putting in it ,e.g.,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] but this list address is added
Vittorio [EMAIL PROTECTED] said something to this effect on 09/13/2001:
i'm a subscriber of many lists and when i reply some message i have to
modify the field 'to:' because in it invariably the name of the sender
appears insted of the list address.
i've tried modifying tke folder.hook
On (13/09/01 16:44), Vittorio wrote:
How can I reply directly to the list address?
L, i.e. shift-l
--
Homepage: http://ailbhe.ossifrage.net/
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 09:41:49AM -0400, darren chamberlain wrote:
Cliff Sarginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said something to this effect on 09/13/2001:
Oops, sorry guys.
A slight configuration error !
Apologies for the annoyance.
Well, at least now we all have your public key...
(darren)
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 03:48:39PM +0100, Ailbhe Leamy wrote:
On (13/09/01 10:37), Nelson D. Guerrero wrote:
PGP signature could NOT be verified.
# Recognise good signatures set pgp_good_sign=^gpg: Good signature
from
This way, only genuinely unrecognised signatures will give you this
Cliff Sarginson mutt [13/09/01 18:08 +0200]:
Query: why do people pgp-sign mail to mailing lists?
Ailbhe
This is an excellent question, since I just accidentally bombarded
this list with my public key I have been thinking that signing
mailing list messages serves *no* useful purpose.
On (13/09/01 21:59), Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Cliff Sarginson mutt [13/09/01 18:08 +0200]:
Query: why do people pgp-sign mail to mailing lists? Ailbhe
This is an excellent question, since I just accidentally bombarded
this list with my public key I have been thinking that signing
all this has nothing to do with mutt!! :
i just want to change my default mailbox from '/var/spool/mail/username'
to '~/mbox'
but when i put the command MAIL=~/mbox in the .bashrc, when i log in,
he still looks in the false mailbox.
i suppose this is because the .bashrc file is executed after
or if this does not work : is there a bash command to look if i have got
new mail. so that i can put this command in the .bashrc file
What's so hard about doing a man bash?
Is there any way in mutt to filter the mail without saving every singal message with
s key. I wanna something like filter in pine, where after opening MUA it sort the
messages in differnet folders
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for FREE !
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 07:32:15PM +0200, Matthias LOITSCH wrote:
all this has nothing to do with mutt!! :
i just want to change my default mailbox from '/var/spool/mail/username'
to '~/mbox'
but when i put the command MAIL=~/mbox in the .bashrc, when i log in,
he still looks in the
petko popadiyski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wanna something like filter in pine,
where after opening MUA it sort the messages in differnet folders
This isn't the MUA's job. This is the MDA's job. Use procmail,
maildrop, or your MTA's extension-address mechanism for this.
Charles
--
petko popadiyski mutt [13/09/01 11:49 -0700]:
Is there any way in mutt to filter the mail without saving every singal
message with s key. I wanna something like filter in pine, where after
opening MUA it sort the messages in differnet folders
Use procmail.
-suresh
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 11:49:09AM -0700, petko popadiyski wrote:
Is there any way in mutt to filter the mail without saving every singal message
with s key. I wanna something like filter in pine, where after opening MUA it sort
the messages in differnet folders
From: Volker Moell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ML mutt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Handling attachments
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 14:10:27 +0200
Mack Stevenson wrote:
I am using mutt 1.2.5, but I can't read/view attachments if I don't
first
save them into a separate file. When the viewer expects
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 09:15:41PM +0200, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
Hello I have a .signature file .. as below. When I respond to a
mailing list message the signature does not seem to get appended. Is
this a feature ?
Your .signature should get added when you go into your editor in
compose or
Mack Stevenson wrote:
That's not what I meant :); after pressing 'v', I get a tree of the
attachments in this email. Suppose that one of them is an image, .e.g.,
monkey.jpg. How do I go about seeing that picture?
To successfully pipe it into an image viewer I would need an image viewer
That's not what I meant :); after pressing 'v', I get a
tree
of the attachments in this email. Suppose that one of them
is an image, .e.g., monkey.jpg. How do I go about seeing
that picture?
snip
Mutt handles this through MIME/mailcap. See this page,
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 12:40:45PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
Mack Stevenson wrote:
That's not what I meant :); after pressing 'v', I get a tree of the
attachments in this email. Suppose that one of them is an image, .e.g.,
monkey.jpg. How do I go about seeing that picture?
To
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 09:15:41PM +0200, Cliff Sarginson ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
Hello
I have a .signature file .. as below.
When I respond to a mailing list message the signature does not
seem to get appended.
Is this a feature ?
Perhaps your editor is configured to strip signaturs
Thank you all for your help; I didn't know about mailcap. Everything is
working fine now.
Cheers
Mack
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
I switched from xterm-color to rxvt because of some terminfo problems
with xterm-color, but now the arrow keys and the numeric keypad don't
work any longer with my terminal. I think the problem comes from the
fact that Mutt switches to the application keypad but doesn't support
it! Could this be
--aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, 13 Sep 2001 at 03:01:09 +0200, Magnus Stenman wrote:
if you run cygwin (and since mutt now is in cygwin more people will)
you might not be able to get
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 12:01:22AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
I switched from xterm-color to rxvt because of some terminfo problems
with xterm-color, but now the arrow keys and the numeric keypad don't
work any longer with my terminal. I think the problem comes from the
fact that Mutt
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 18:50:41 -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
ncurses 4.0 is a bit old (unless you're using one of Redhat's broken-rpm's -
I'm assuming that's the case if you have a 2.2x kernel).
We have RedHat 6.2. I could also install a new ncurses version in my
HOME.
rxvt's terminfo
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 01:32:30AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 18:50:41 -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
ncurses 4.0 is a bit old (unless you're using one of Redhat's broken-rpm's -
I'm assuming that's the case if you have a 2.2x kernel).
We have RedHat 6.2. I could
Simple question, and a lack of an answer in the manual/web search make
me think 'no', but here goes:
Is there any way to repeat a command ala the '.' character in vi?
Maybe through a macro, etc?
/db
Sorry for the double mail I sent it prematurely.
Is there a way to repeat a command [n] times? (again, mimicing the
vi number modifiers to most any command).
/db
hello,
i dont think i have any biff-like programs running.
i have mutt 1.2.5i
when i am in the folder view, i see 'N' message indicator,
but it seems as if after a while those disappear. i am not
sure if i can tie that to something i do
does this problem ring a bell for anyone? is it something
Piet Delport mutt [14/09/01 00:40 +0200]:
Actually, i remember ssmtp running quite well when used mutt on Cygwin
(i've since moved to FreeBSD, thank Eris). It can be installed very
easily via Cygwin's setup.exe, AFAIR, just like mutt.
Speaking of cygwin, is there any way to spool mail
46 matches
Mail list logo
