On 2001-11-28 21:23:27 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
I agree with you. Perhaps there could be an optional cursor for
the internal pager.
Any takers? I'd include such a patch with mutt pretty much
immediately if it was clean.
--
Thomas Roessler
Hi-
Mutt's great! But I have a question.
How can I cut text from a saved message and paste it into my current
composition?
--aaron
Hi Vincent!
On Don, Nov 29, 2001 at 01:01:31 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
Christian,
Your Mail-Followup-To header is broken:
Mail-Followup-To: Christian Schoepplein [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
as [EMAIL PROTECTED] doesn't exist, though your From header is correct.
I
Sam --
...and then Samuel Padgett said...
% Vineet Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
%
% that you'll never again fall prey to a corrupted mailbox due to
% a delivery occurring at the wrong time.
%
% But shouldn't well-behaved MTAs and MUAs perform locking that
% prevents this from happening?
A quick and dumb one: How do I limit my e-mails to 70 cols in .muttrc??
I want lines to wrap auto at 70.
I don't see a setting for that.
Thanks.
-Wash
S y s t e m s A d m i n.
--
Odhiambo Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED]The box said 'Requires
Wananchi Online Ltd. www.wananchi.com
Sam --
...and then Sam Phomsopha said...
% How do I get off this mailing list?
Ask the server to unsubscribe you, of course. You kept the welcome to
the list; keep this message very first email you got, right?
%
% Sam.
:-D
--
David T-G * It's easier to fight for
Wash --
You never answered my other question about your filtering, you know...
...and then Odhiambo Washington said...
%
% A quick and dumb one: How do I limit my e-mails to 70 cols in .muttrc??
% I want lines to wrap auto at 70.
Do you mean for viewing or editing? The latter is an editor
Hi,
* Dairy Wall Limey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-11-29 01:11]:
i don't want to have to start using unique addresses for internal lists
too, but it messes up my organization when list messages get in my inbox
(due to use of 'reply-all').
I don't understand the problem. Could you elaborate?
Thorsten
Thorsten --
...and then Thorsten Haude said...
% Hi,
Hello! BTW, I only just noticed your clever domain name -- cool! :-)
%
% * Dairy Wall Limey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-11-29 01:11]:
% i don't want to have to start using unique addresses for internal lists
% too, but it messes up my
Hi,
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-11-29 14:19]:
...and then Thorsten Haude said...
Hello! BTW, I only just noticed your clever domain name -- cool! :-)
Imagine my frustration when I learned that 'hau.de' was gone.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] would have been even better.
% * Dairy Wall Limey [EMAIL
Thorsten, et al --
...and then Thorsten Haude said...
% Hi,
%
% * David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-11-29 14:19]:
% ...and then Thorsten Haude said...
% Hello! BTW, I only just noticed your clever domain name -- cool! :-)
% Imagine my frustration when I learned that 'hau.de' was gone.
% [EMAIL
I have a directory full of Unix mailboxes. I put a statement into my
.muttrc like so:
set folder=/path/to/my/directory/of/mailboxes
I then start mutt so:
mutt -y
and mutt sez
No incoming mailboxes defined.
Huh? What am I doing wrong?
What I'm trying to do is start
Moin,
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-11-29 16:32]:
% I don't know why I didn't get it the first time.
Probably because you're used to using mutt ;-)
Not really, I let myself slip into a pretty heated discussion about
Reply-To munging in another mailing list once. But yes, Mutt make it
easy to
Hi,
* Ken Ficara [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-11-29 16:58]:
I have a directory full of Unix mailboxes. I put a statement into my
.muttrc like so:
set folder=/path/to/my/directory/of/mailboxes
I then start mutt so:
mutt -y
and mutt sez
No incoming mailboxes defined.
Huh? What
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 05:52:19 -0500
From: David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mutt Users' List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Odhiambo Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Limiting max text width
...and then Odhiambo Washington said...
%
% A quick and dumb one: How do I limit my e-mails to
Thorsten Haude wrote:
Yeah, the basic brain-dead-mailer-problem and its reply-to-munging or
group-reply answer. Fortunately, there's Mutt. I use group-reply about
once a year.
I don't know why I didn't get it the first time.
Dairy, you could set the Reply-To header, this is more widely
hello! I hope anyone of you can help me ...
when I recive a mail that ist signed mutt tells me that the signature
wasn't correct . I already read in the mailinglist several threads but
nothing helped:
I tryed : set pgp_good_sign=gpg: Korrekte Unterschrift von
it is not realy a thing that kills
Hi, all,
This probably sounds stupid but I really get stuck here. I don't know
how to setup filters to organize different mailing list into different
folder, just like pine does.
Thanks for any help,
/Jun
Moin,
* Dairy Wall Limey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-11-29 20:58]:
Thorsten Haude wrote:
Yeah, the basic brain-dead-mailer-problem and its reply-to-munging or
group-reply answer. Fortunately, there's Mutt. I use group-reply about
once a year.
I don't know why I didn't get it the first time.
This has probably been rehashed a few times in the list but I'm trying
to find an efficient way to remove the tag for mailing lists. For
example:
Subject: [maillist] this is subject.
I want to read:
Subject: this is subject
I have created a script that is filtered through procmail but is
Moin,
* Jun Liu [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-11-29 23:38]:
This probably sounds stupid but I really get stuck here. I don't know
how to setup filters to organize different mailing list into different
folder, just like pine does.
Have a look at Maildrop, http://www.flounder.net/~mrsam/maildrop/
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 11:04:33PM +0100, Andreas Selig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello! I hope anyone of you can help me ...
when I recive a mail that ist signed mutt tells me that the signature
wasn't correct . I already read in the mailinglist several threads but
nothing helped:
I tryed :
* Thorsten Haude ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Yeah, the basic brain-dead-mailer-problem and its reply-to-munging or
group-reply answer. Fortunately, there's Mutt. I use group-reply about
once a year.
I have 'r' rebound to list-reply for all my mailing lists (bar one
broken one). Nice having a
Hi Jun,
my Pine manual says that it's a bad idea to use Pine or any other
email client for this purpose. It's funny that nevertheless Pine 4
offers this kind of service.
Techies use procmail for this task. First you have to tell your Mail
Transport Agent to let procmail deliver your mail. You
Dairy Wall Limey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
in any event, looks like i'm SOL here.
Gnus honors the MFT header. Recent cvs gnus also generates it.
But, if you're dealing with pine users, chances are there aren't any
(many?) Gnus users in the mix...
ttyl,
--
Josh Huber
Cristian, et al --
Welcome to the list!
...and then Cristian said...
%
...
% To tell the truth, my line actually reads,
% |IFS=' ' p=/usr/bin/procmail test -f $p exec $p -Yf- || exit 75 #cris
% where chris is my login. I don't think this complicated stuff is
% really necessary.
If you're
Curt --
...and then Curt W. Zirzow said...
% This has probably been rehashed a few times in the list but I'm trying
% to find an efficient way to remove the tag for mailing lists. For
% example:
Not a whole lot, but we've come close a few times.
%
% Subject: [maillist] this is subject.
%
%
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 07:40:18PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
Cristian, et al --
Welcome to the list!
...and then Cristian said...
%
...
% To tell the truth, my line actually reads,
% |IFS=' ' p=/usr/bin/procmail test -f $p exec $p -Yf- || exit 75 #cris
% where chris is my login. I
This isn't entirely mutt related, but I'm sure some of you will be
interested.
I just finished (for tonight :) tweaking a script designed to rebuild
quote strings with the One True Quote String (' ', obviously), even if
you're replying to someone with a really evil one. For instance:
name : |%
Thomas Hurst [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Thorsten Haude ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Yeah, the basic brain-dead-mailer-problem and its reply-to-munging or
group-reply answer. Fortunately, there's Mutt. I use group-reply about
once a year.
I have 'r' rebound to list-reply for all my
* Samuel Padgett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Thomas Hurst [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have 'r' rebound to list-reply for all my mailing lists (bar one
broken one). Nice having a MUA this flexible, means all the lists
that use (or don't use) Reply-To: act the same :)
But won't people
Hi,
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 Thorsten [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed into the ether:
[-- snip --]
No incoming mailboxes defined.
Huh? What am I doing wrong?
Nothing that I know of, but you leave something out:
mailboxes `find /path/to/my/directory/of/mailboxes -type f -print | grep -Ev
Hi,
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 christophe [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed into the ether:
[-- snip --]
Any solutions ?
Implement a tag-thread-pattern.
That's what I intent to do as soon I find time for it.
Do post your results.
Please Prahlad, upload your gpg key.
Hi,
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 dallam [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed into the ether:
Silly question that I need an answer to. I seem to have *lots* of
trailing lines when I post or reply, how do I correct this?
In Vim,
:g/^$/d
That will remove _all_ blank lines, so you will just have to add them
Hi,
Just got the above patch from David T-G's mutt-build-cocktail, but it
doesn't work for me.
make barfs on me giving errors like so :
snipped out for brevity
thread.c: In function `clean_references':
thread.c:1233: structure has no member named `next'
thread.c:1233: warning: left-hand
Hi,
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 Odhiambo [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed into the ether:
A quick and dumb one: How do I limit my e-mails to 70 cols in .muttrc??
I want lines to wrap auto at 70.
I don't see a setting for that.
Maybe a $display_filter pointing to a perl/python script ?
But, IMHO, this
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 12:54:01AM +0100, Thorsten Haude wrote:
Moin,
* Aaron Falk [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01-11-29 00:05]:
How can I cut text from a saved message and paste it into my current
composition?
What about using esce ?
This resends the message, using the current message as a
On 2001-11-30 10:32:23 +0530, Prahlad Vaidyanathan wrote:
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.2i
[...]
Any clues as to why this is happening ? This patch could be _very_
useful ... if only I can get it to work :-(
I suppose that's because you're applying this patch to a version of
mutt with the new
I've just released the next mutt beta, version 1.3.24i.
Some of the more interesting changes against mutt-1.3.23i:
- New and improved threading code from Daniel Eisenbud. See also
$duplicate_threads, $hide_missing, $thread_received.
- ANSI colors in the builtin pager are now controlled
Thomas Hurst wrote:
* Samuel Padgett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Thomas Hurst [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have 'r' rebound to list-reply for all my mailing lists (bar one
broken one). Nice having a MUA this flexible, means all the lists
that use (or don't use) Reply-To: act the same
Hi Prahlad,
Any clues as to why this is happening ? This patch could be _very_
useful ... if only I can get it to work :-(
this patch is closely tied to the threading code.
In the 1.3.23.1 release, this part of the Mutt code has been almost
completely rewritten by Daniel Eisenbud in an
Thomas Roessler wrote:
I've just released the next mutt beta, version 1.3.24i.
Some of the more interesting changes against mutt-1.3.23i:
- New and improved threading code from Daniel Eisenbud. See also
$duplicate_threads, $hide_missing, $thread_received.
i'm sorry if i'm missing
David Champion wrote:
Dairy Wall Limey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[responding on list again in case someone else has any ideas]
i'm sorry if i'm missing something obvious, but since installing 1.3.24,
the trees that indicate threads are showing up a bit funny. each '-' is
preceeded with a
43 matches
Mail list logo
