Re: ISO 8601 (was Re: OT: attribution line with 80 chars max)

2002-03-14 Thread Raymond A. Meijer
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, 15:05, Gary Johnson wrote: 2002-01-02 If we know this is ISO, then obviously it's January 2, 2002. But if we're not _sure_ it's ISO, then it could be February 1, 2002. Nah. Not even someone who had never even _heard_ of ISO would ever write -DD-MM. For

Re: editors and paragraphs

2002-03-14 Thread Dave Pearson
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-13 17:40:27 +0100]: * MuttER [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020313 14:17]: Many editors would have difficulty recognizing and parsing your date format. Which editors parse for dates? examples? (anyone?) Some people consider emacs to be an editor. ,

tagging/deleting weirdness

2002-03-14 Thread Ken Weingold
This is all at least in 1.3.27. If I tag messages, and then hit ';d', it doens't apply 'd' to the tagged messages, only the one the indicator is on. Also, if I am on the last message and hit 'd', it gets applied to the message above the last, and every time I hit 'd' again, it applies to the

Non-interactive command line send

2002-03-14 Thread Simon White
I have seen a few posts about this, but no matter how I try, I am missing something to make mutt send without prompting me for a password for my IMAP account, which is set up in my .muttrc file. I have a script which grabs today's Garfield comic, and /should/ then send it on to my wife. This

Fw: error w/ muttprint (or Latex)

2002-03-14 Thread Dr . Sharukh K . R . Pavri .
I am using mutt 1.3.27 w/ muttprint. Previously I used set print_command=lpr which worked quite fine. I downloaded muttprint, installed it, copied over the default .muttprintrc and made minimal changes to it to get it to work. But, on trying to print, though it gives a message: Messages

Re: editors and paragraphs

2002-03-14 Thread Sven Guckes
* Dave Pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-14 09:27]: * Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-13 17:40:27 +0100]: Which editors parse for dates? examples? (anyone?) Some people consider emacs to be an editor. oh - that one. , | *** Welcome to IELM *** Type (describe-mode) for help.

Re: tagging/deleting weirdness

2002-03-14 Thread Dominik Mierzejewski
On Thursday, 14 March 2002, Ken Weingold wrote: This is all at least in 1.3.27. If I tag messages, and then hit ';d', it doens't apply 'd' to the tagged messages, only the one the indicator is on. Also, if I am on the last message and hit 'd', it gets applied to the message above the

Re: tagging/deleting weirdness

2002-03-14 Thread Sven Guckes
* Ken Weingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-14 09:29]: This is all at least in 1.3.27. If I tag messages, and then hit ';d', it doens't apply 'd' to the tagged messages, only the one the indicator is on. check the bindings of these keys then! (you know, use help with '?' ;-) Sven

Re: Non-interactive command line send

2002-03-14 Thread Sven Guckes
* Simon White [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-14 10:24]: I have a script which grabs today's Garfield comic, and /should/ then send it on to my wife. This is what I have: mutt -x -s Daily\ Garfield -a ga$theimg.jpg [EMAIL PROTECTED] echo smooches | mutt -s Daily Garfield -a ga$theimg.jpg [EMAIL

Re: Watch thread functionality - Usenet

2002-03-14 Thread Sven Guckes
* John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-14 01:36]: Is this easily do-able ? A keypress would mean all following emails in this thread get marked somehow (colour, whatever ...) it is possible whenever a followup has a reference to this message - or to a followup which in turn has a reference

Re: Per-list configuration of PGP?

2002-03-14 Thread David T-G
Shawn -- ...and then Shawn McMahon said... % % Now if you guys would just submit your keys to the public keyservers... Can you not find mine? I should be fairly widely spread, I think... :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL

Re: Per-list configuration of PGP?

2002-03-14 Thread David T-G
Shawn -- ...and then Shawn McMahon said... % % This one time, at band camp, David T-G wrote: % % Do you mean something like % %send-hook . set pgp_autosign ... % % You rule, David. Works like a friggin' charm. Why, thank you bows. :-D -- David T-G *

Re: Per-list configuration of PGP?

2002-03-14 Thread David T-G
Knute -- ...and then Knute said... % % On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, David T-G wrote: % % Do you mean something like % %send-hook . set pgp_autosign ... % % or so? Modify to folder-hook as you see fit. % ^^^ % What folder-hook? The one that he will write to

Re: ~/Mailbox oddness?

2002-03-14 Thread David T-G
Myrddin -- ...and then J. Scott Dorr said... % % On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 11:51:38PM +0100, Maarten den Braber wrote: % * J. Scott Dorr [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020313 22:36]: % Everything works just fine, -except- when it comes to the main/default mailbox ... % into one of the other mailboxes

Re: editors and paragraphs

2002-03-14 Thread Dave Pearson
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-14 12:09:19 +0100]: * Dave Pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-14 09:27]: , | ELISP (parse-time-string 020313 14:17) | (0 17 14 nil nil nil nil nil nil) ` looks like the parsing can still be enhanced. *ehem* How should it infer the

Re: mutt and ncurses

2002-03-14 Thread Thomas E. Dickey
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Ken Weingold wrote: On Wed, Mar 13, 2002, David Champion wrote: Run ldd mutt. This will tell you what shared dependencies the binary has (including whether it used the shared or static libs from your ncurses build). Oh, cool. So the following means that mutt

Re: mutt and ncurses

2002-03-14 Thread Thomas E. Dickey
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, David Champion wrote: On 2002.03.13, in [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ken Weingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oh, cool. So the following means that mutt doesn't need any of the ncurses libraries at all after the binary is built? ./mutt: -lintl.1 =

Re: Opening html links in text mail

2002-03-14 Thread David T-G
Joel -- ...and then Joel Hammer said... % % Well I found urlview. Good! % I do not want to install yet another helpler application (yet). Also, can't Fair enough. % even download the thang. This urlview looks hardcore to me! Why can't you download it? [zero] [7:21am] ~ ftp -n ftp

Re: Reply quoting an unwrapped message - the vim way

2002-03-14 Thread Sven Guckes
* Philip Mak [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-02-22 01:41]: How does pine do it, anyway? pine wraps paragraphs in replies fine. They seem to have some heuristic or something that does the right thing almost all the time... Pine people use pico and its justify command (bound to CTRL-J). You can have

logical operator

2002-03-14 Thread Heiko Heil
Hello Mutt-users, taken from my ~/.muttrc: save-hook ~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]|~c [EMAIL PROTECTED] +tux Is it possible to use an logical or operator in order to avoid redundancy? I didn't succeed with this attempt: save-hook (~t|~c) [EMAIL PROTECTED] +tux -- Cheers, Heiko Heil

Re: logical operator - doc/manual.txt Patterns

2002-03-14 Thread Sven Guckes
* Heiko Heil [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-14 12:32]: taken from my ~/.muttrc: save-hook ~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]|~c [EMAIL PROTECTED] +tux Is it possible to use an logical or operator in order to avoid redundancy? I didn't succeed with this attempt: save-hook (~t|~c) [EMAIL PROTECTED] +tux You

Re: Non-interactive command line send

2002-03-14 Thread Simon White
14-Mar-02 at 12:39, Sven Guckes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote / schreibt : now, if crontab does all this then you probably have to use /dir/mutt. You telepathic fiend you. (idiomatic word order, for your English notes Sven) hmm... make mutt use some non-standard setup file then by applying the

Re: yymmdd is *informal*, dammit!

2002-03-14 Thread Sven Guckes
* Dave Pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-14 12:17]: * Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-14 12:09]: * Dave Pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-14 09:27]: , | ELISP (parse-time-string 020313 14:17) | (0 17 14 nil nil nil nil nil nil) ` looks like the parsing can still

Re: Non-interactive command line send

2002-03-14 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
Am 14.03.2002 um 12:51:27 + schrieb Simon White folgendes: 14-Mar-02 at 12:39, Sven Guckes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote / schreibt : now, if crontab does all this then you probably have to use /dir/mutt. You telepathic fiend you. (idiomatic word order, for your English notes Sven) We have

Mail-Followup-To on mutt-users redundant?

2002-03-14 Thread Sven Guckes
* Simon White [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-14 12:51]: 14-Mar-02 at 12:39, Sven Guckes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote / schreibt : now, if crontab does all this then you probably have to use /dir/mutt. You telepathic fiend you. (idiomatic word order, for your English notes Sven) *grin*

Re: Non-interactive command line send

2002-03-14 Thread David T-G
Simon Ralf -- ...and then Ralf Hildebrandt said... % % Am 14.03.2002 um 12:51:27 + schrieb Simon White folgendes: % % You telepathic fiend you. (idiomatic word order, for your English notes Sven) % % We have this in German as well. But we use a comma: % You telepathic fiend, you. Same

Re: Non-interactive command line send

2002-03-14 Thread Simon White
David, Ralph... % We have this in German as well. But we use a comma: % You telepathic fiend, you. Same here in the US. *Blush* so I should have used a comma too. My mistake. My English is usually so good, too *sarcastic grin*. -- John Lennon:--v [Simon White. vim/mutt/Linux. [EMAIL

Re: Emails to different folders

2002-03-14 Thread Oliver Fuchs
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 01:16:08PM -0500, David T-G wrote: Oliver -- My, but you really should work on your quote trimming. At least I get rid of *some* of the original message! ...and then Oliver Fuchs said... % % On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 09:32:09AM -0500, David T-G wrote: ... %

Re: list-reply and Mail-Followup-To

2002-03-14 Thread Sven Guckes
* Simon White [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-14 13:08]: Can I set up a keymapping to Reply to the mailing list, rather than hitting g and manually pruning the headers where necessary? *checks manual* Ahh yes there is. L (list-reply). Or whatever you map it to in your muttrcs. Cool.

Re: Emails to different folders

2002-03-14 Thread David T-G
Oliver -- ...and then Oliver Fuchs said... % % On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 01:16:08PM -0500, David T-G wrote: % % My, but you really should work on your quote trimming. At least I get % rid of *some* of the original message! % ... % http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur

Re: Watch thread functionality - Usenet

2002-03-14 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 12:50:10PM +0100, Sven Guckes wrote: it is possible whenever a followup has a reference to this message - or to a followup which in turn has a reference pointing back at the message. so much for theory. And in practice, mutt does a great job of threading already.

Re: yymmdd is *informal*, dammit!

2002-03-14 Thread Dave Pearson
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-14 13:52:07 +0100]: * Dave Pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-14 12:17]: How should it infer the year format, get the seconds and work out the timezone from the above data? Even if the seconds is considered lossy the other two items of data seem

Hook question

2002-03-14 Thread Jerome De Greef
Hi, I use the nntp patch from vvv. I have folder hooks to change my email for the newsgroups to avoid spam. When i press F to write a follow-up, my address is changed accordingly. Now my question is: is there a way to have my 'normal address' used when I hit 'r' to personnaly reply to a

Re: Mail-Followup-To on mutt-users redundant?

2002-03-14 Thread Dave Pearson
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-14 13:55:59 +0100]: * Simon White [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-14 12:51]: Don't follow... what am I doing wrong? well, you have to be subscribed to the list to be able to send to it. so I know that when I reply to the list you'll get a copy. So this

Re: Mail-Followup-To on mutt-users redundant?

2002-03-14 Thread Sven Guckes
* Dave Pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-14 14:14]: So this Mail-Followup-To seems redundant [on a closed list] Could it not be the case that the personal entry in Mail-Followup-To might be pointing to an address with which the author isn't subscribed to the list? This might be an address

Re: Hook question

2002-03-14 Thread Andre Berger
* Jerome De Greef [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2002-03-14 09:13 -0500: Hi, I use the nntp patch from vvv. I have folder hooks to change my email for the newsgroups to avoid spam. When i press F to write a follow-up, my address is changed accordingly. Now my question is: is there a way to have my

Re: Hook question

2002-03-14 Thread Andre Berger
* Jerome De Greef [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2002-03-14 09:13 -0500: Hi, I use the nntp patch from vvv. I have folder hooks to change my email for the newsgroups to avoid spam. When i press F to write a follow-up, my address is changed accordingly. Now my question is: is there a way to have my

Re: Opening html links in text mail

2002-03-14 Thread Gary Johnson
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 11:15:27PM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote: On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 10:09:09PM -0500, Joel Hammer wrote: Is there a way to run a shell script which would automatically read in the current contents of the clipboard, thus avoiding the need for the mouse click? I used to

Re: Hook question

2002-03-14 Thread David T-G
Andre, et al -- ...and then Andre Berger said... % % folder-hook nntp send-hook '~t ^.*$' 'my_hdr From: news' % folder-hook !nntp send-hook '~t ^.*$' 'my_hdr From: mail' Since one doesn't change folders without leaving the folder, you might say, couldn't the send-hooks be left out and you just

Re: Mail-Followup-To on mutt-users redundant?

2002-03-14 Thread Dave Pearson
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-14 15:26:01 +0100]: oh - you mean, this Mail-Followup-To is for extra notification? Please actually read what I write. I mean it could be one use for someone. You asked a question, I provided one possible answer. Once again it seems that such a question

Re: Fw: error w/ muttprint (or Latex)

2002-03-14 Thread Sridhar Srinivasan
Dr . Sharukh K . R . Pavri . [EMAIL PROTECTED] may have typed [02/03/14 05:47]: the error log shows the following, which makes me suspect it is a Latex error, but I may be wrong. I have *not* ever used or configured Latex on my machine. snip Output written on mail.dvi (1 page, 2124

send-hook for local addresses

2002-03-14 Thread Andy Spiegl
Hi Mutters, a short question: I have send-hooks defined to change my .signature depending on the To: address. This works great, for example: send-hook '~C radiomaranon\\.org\\.pe$' set signature=$HOME/.mutt/.signature.rm But I would also like to define a send-hook that hooks when I send to

Re: send-hook for local addresses

2002-03-14 Thread David T-G
Andy -- ...and then Andy Spiegl said... % % Hi Mutters, Hello! % % a short question: ... % But I would also like to define a send-hook that hooks when I send to % local addresses, i.e. mutt user1 instead of mutt [EMAIL PROTECTED]. % % How can I write the send-hook line for local addresses?

bounce/forward message with all attachments

2002-03-14 Thread Rory Campbell-Lange
I often receive attachments with Mac encoding which I need to bounce or forward to another email address. How do I get the 'forward' and 'bounce' commands to automatically include all the attached files in the original mail? -- Rory Campbell-Lange [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.campbell-lange.net

Re: Hook question

2002-03-14 Thread Jerome De Greef
* Andre Berger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: * Jerome De Greef [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2002-03-14 09:13 -0500: Hi, I use the nntp patch from vvv. I have folder hooks to change my email for the newsgroups to avoid spam. When i press F to write a follow-up, my address is changed accordingly.

Re: Per-list configuration of PGP?

2002-03-14 Thread Shawn McMahon
This one time, at band camp, David T-G wrote: Nope; I sign everything except for a few special cases, so I just use send-hooks, and I just gave him my example and let him convert to folders on his own. Excercises for the student and all :-) No need; I sign everything except for two

Re: Mail-Followup-To on mutt-users redundant?

2002-03-14 Thread Shawn McMahon
This one time, at band camp, Simon White wrote: Ahh yes there is. L (list-reply). Or whatever you map it to in your muttrcs. Cool. Except it doesn't work with any mailing list I've tried. Including, for example, this one... msg25508/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Mail-Followup-To on mutt-users redundant?

2002-03-14 Thread Dan Boger
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 12:20:06PM -0500, Shawn McMahon wrote: This one time, at band camp, Simon White wrote: Ahh yes there is. L (list-reply). Or whatever you map it to in your muttrcs. Cool. Except it doesn't work with any mailing list I've tried. Including, for example, this

Re: Mail-Followup-To on mutt-users redundant?

2002-03-14 Thread Simon White
14-Mar-02 at 12:20, Shawn McMahon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : This one time, at band camp, Simon White wrote: Ahh yes there is. L (list-reply). Or whatever you map it to in your muttrcs. Cool. Except it doesn't work with any mailing list I've tried. I just hit SHIFT-L and this

Re: tagging/deleting weirdness

2002-03-14 Thread Ken Weingold
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002, Sven Guckes wrote: * Ken Weingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-14 09:29]: This is all at least in 1.3.27. If I tag messages, and then hit ';d', it doens't apply 'd' to the tagged messages, only the one the indicator is on. check the bindings of these keys then!

Re: bounce/forward message with all attachments

2002-03-14 Thread David T-G
Rory -- ...and then Rory Campbell-Lange said... % % I often receive attachments with Mac encoding which I need to bounce or % forward to another email address. How do I get the 'forward' and % 'bounce' commands to automatically include all the attached files in the % original mail? Since

Re: OT: attribution line with 80 chars max

2002-03-14 Thread Phil Gregory
* John Buttery [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-13 06:01 -0600]: Oh, I definitely agree that the ISO format is the way to go. Although I would change it a bit since technically the hyphens (-) are unnecessary due to the fields being fixed-length, but that's a bigger nitpick than even I am

Re: send-hook for local addresses

2002-03-14 Thread Andy Spiegl
Hi David, I haven't tested it yet, and I don't know how clever the regex engine is for hooks, but have you tried send-hook [^@]* ... yet? No, I haven't. Great idea... and it worked! So mutts regex engine is really smart :-) Thanks, Andy. -- Dr. Andy Spiegl, Radio Marañón, Jaén, Perú

Re: OT: attribution line with 80 chars max

2002-03-14 Thread Nicolas Rachinsky
* Martin Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-14 20:26:29 +0100]: * Nicolas Rachinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-14 20.02 +0100]: * Phil Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-14 12:43:53 +]: I tried: attribution=* %f [%{%Y-%m-%e %k:%M:%S %z}]: Why not set the date-part in $date_format,

Subject: Re: Opening html links in text mail

2002-03-14 Thread The spice must flow
* On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 10:09:09PM -0500, Joel Hammer wrote: I used to highlight and copy the address into the browser (netscape). But, this seems a bit clumsy. It was clumsy, in fact. For the Cygwin mutt users among us, I do the following to view URLs in IE by highlighting the link then

Re: OT: attribution line with 80 chars max

2002-03-14 Thread Nicolas Rachinsky
* Nicolas Rachinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-14 20:38:15 +0100]: * Martin Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-14 20:26:29 +0100]: * Nicolas Rachinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-14 20.02 +0100]: * Phil Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-14 12:43:53 +]: I tried: attribution=* %f

Re: OT: attribution line with 80 chars max

2002-03-14 Thread Martin Karlsson
* Nicolas Rachinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-14 20.44 +0100]: [...SNIP...] Now it works, I have to use %Z instead of %z. attribution=* %f [%{%Y-%m-%e %k:%M:%S %Z}]: Stupid me, of course I want attribution=* %f [%{%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S %Z}]: Nicolas (who should go to bed now, and get rid

Re: editors and paragraphs

2002-03-14 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 09:21:49AM +, Dave Pearson wrote: * Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-13 17:40:27 +0100]: * MuttER [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020313 14:17]: Many editors would have difficulty recognizing and parsing your date format. Which editors parse for dates?

Re: Subject: Re: Opening html links in text mail

2002-03-14 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 02:40:27PM -, The spice must flow wrote: * On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 10:09:09PM -0500, Joel Hammer wrote: I used to highlight and copy the address into the browser (netscape). But, this seems a bit clumsy. It was clumsy, in fact. For the Cygwin mutt users among us,

Re: yymmdd is *informal*, dammit!

2002-03-14 Thread Andre Majorel
On 2002-03-14 13:52 +0100, Sven Guckes wrote: I am using the format yymmdd on my *webpages* - and for dates only. apart from that I was using it in the attribution - with hh:mm. but if applied to messages - which century can this be? 1900? 2100? Think, man, THINK! no - try HARDER! ;-)

Re: Opening html links in text mail

2002-03-14 Thread The spice must flow
* On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 03:08:41PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote: which part is dependent upon rxvt? (other terminal windows, including the console-window that cygwin runs in would suffice). rxvt is not required (just convenient). Bob Heckel

Re: logical operator

2002-03-14 Thread David Ellement
On 020314, at 13:31:55, Heiko Heil wrote taken from my ~/.muttrc: save-hook ~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]|~c [EMAIL PROTECTED] +tux Is it possible to use an logical or operator in order to avoid redundancy? Assuming you had a number of save hooks using the same set of operators, you might find it

[OT] stripping pgp sigs

2002-03-14 Thread Timothy Ball
I know this is more of a procmail question, but no one on the procmail list seems to know or respond... I'm on a lot of mailing lists and I would like to strip out all the pgp sigs from messages but I don't know the correct kungfu to do this w/ procmail. Anyone do this before? --timball --

Re: ~/Mailbox oddness?

2002-03-14 Thread J. Scott Dorr
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 07:14:49AM -0500, David T-G wrote: % On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 11:51:38PM +0100, Maarten den Braber wrote: % % Do you have some 'buffy' kind of program that checks ~/Mailbox? % % To the best of my knowledge, no. Though I'm not sure how that would affect % mutt's

Re: OT: Re: attribution and quotes

2002-03-14 Thread Knute
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, David T-G wrote: Rob, et al -- ...and then Rob Reid said... % [snip] % Netscape/LookOut users, and David himself seems to enjoy the attention. Actually, I don't, but that doesn't seem to keep it from coming my way, does it? If such attention is the price I pay

Re: logical operator

2002-03-14 Thread Knute
On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Heiko Heil wrote: Hello Mutt-users, taken from my ~/.muttrc: save-hook ~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]|~c [EMAIL PROTECTED] +tux Is it possible to use an logical or operator in order to avoid redundancy? I didn't succeed with this attempt: save-hook (~t|~c) [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Opening html links in text mail

2002-03-14 Thread Joel Hammer
Yes!! This is just what I wanted. xclip -o just dumps the current clipboard into your script. Very nice. Very userful. Whata great utility. Thanks, Joel On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 07:49:14AM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote: On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 11:15:27PM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote: On Wed, Mar 13,

am I having list probs

2002-03-14 Thread pat
Has traffic disappeared or do I have list problems?? Please cc: me at the reply-to address in header. tks -- Pat Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535 Registered at: http://counter.li.org 7:36pm up 3:05, 6 users, load

Re: send-hook for local addresses - negated pattern

2002-03-14 Thread Sven Guckes
* Andy Spiegl [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-14 17:54]: I haven't tested it yet, and I don't know how clever the regex engine is for hooks, but have you tried send-hook [^@]* ... yet? No, I haven't. Great idea... and it worked! So mutts regex engine is really smart :-) send-hook ! @ 'set

Re: [OT] stripping pgp sigs [procmail]

2002-03-14 Thread Sven Guckes
* Timothy Ball [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-14 22:01]: I'm on a lot of mailing lists and I would like to strip out all the pgp sigs from messages but I don't know the correct kungfu to do this w/ procmail. Anyone do this before? :0 * Content-Type: multipart/signed DEVNULL works for me.

Re: Opening html links in text mail

2002-03-14 Thread Joel Hammer
This really is way cool. With KDE, I just dragged the script file onto my bottom panel. Now, I just highlight the link in mutt, hit the icon on the bottom panel, and netscape starts up, etc. Linux is an acquired taste. Joel On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 06:53:17PM -0500, Joel Hammer wrote: Yes!!

Re: Opening html links in text mail

2002-03-14 Thread Gerhard Hring
* Joel Hammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-14 23:34 -0500]: This really is way cool. With KDE, I just dragged the script file onto my bottom panel. Now, I just highlight the link in mutt, hit the icon on the bottom panel, and netscape starts up, etc. If you're using KDE 2.x, you can use the

Re: Non-interactive command line send

2002-03-14 Thread Jeremy Blosser
On Mar 14, Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: * Simon White [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-14 10:24]: I have a script which grabs today's Garfield comic, and /should/ then send it on to my wife. This is what I have: mutt -x -s Daily\ Garfield -a ga$theimg.jpg [EMAIL PROTECTED] echo