On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 12:41:44PM +1300, martin f krafft wrote:
Script output would be the content-type, a blank line, then the
generated content.
This makes me itch, but I cannot really devise a better approach. I
want to say that the script needs to return the complete MIME part,
Matthias Apitz writes:
> So, run mutt in an unicode-rxvt terminal. It presents URLs underlined
> and click-able. I do so and sometimes I do hate it: you click into your
Definitely not by default. I'm using rxvt-unicode, and I've tried
the "matcher" and "selection" extensions but neither one
Regarding the following, written by “雨宫恋叶” on 2019-10-29 at 00:41 Uhr +:
For this, I think we should design a pager for that purpose.
Urlview could probably be extended accordingly. It’d still be disruptive. Imagine reading a long email, and 75% down you encounter a link you want to
October 29, 2019 8:38 AM, "martin f krafft" wrote:
> Regarding the following, written by "Dave Woodfall" on 2019-10-29 at 00:10
> Uhr +:
>
>> Urlview handles long and short links just fine. I've been using it
>> for over 10 years.
>
> Yes, it does. I think Chris' and José's points were
El día lunes, octubre 28, 2019 a las 06:33:19p. m. -0400, José María Mateos
escribió:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 11:11:31PM +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> >Well, do you speak for you or for a 'lot of people'? Who they are?
> >I speak only for my own interests (as I said: I do not need this).
>
>
Regarding the following, written by "Dave Woodfall" on 2019-10-29 at 00:10 Uhr
+:
Urlview handles long and short links just fine. I've been using it
for over 10 years.
Yes, it does. I think Chris' and José's points were more about
requiring an external tool to provide functionality
El día martes, octubre 29, 2019 a las 11:19:43a. m. +1300, martin f krafft
escribió:
> Regarding the following, written by "Matthias Apitz" on 2019-10-28 at 23:11
> Uhr +0100:
> >Well, do you speak for you or for a 'lot of people'? Who they are?
> >I speak only for my own interests (as I said:
> 2. The ability to natively display a subset of HTML (the same subset)
>with the ability to trigger links to open in a browser (or perhaps
>execute an arbitrary configured command). Modern terminal windows
>can handle all of the formatting required to do just this much...
elinks
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 00:10:09 +, Dave Woodfall wrote:
> Urlview handles long and short links just fine. I've been using it
> for over 10 years.
One issue I have with it is that context is lost. Marketing emails today
tend to be massive strings with embedded IDs in them. Telling one from
On Tue 29 Oct 2019 12:04,
martin f krafft put forth the proposition:
> Regarding the following, written by "Chris Green" on 2019-10-28 at 22:40 Uhr
> +:
> > Isn't that handled by your terminal program? Mine certainly allows
> > one to right click on any URL to open it.
>
> rxvt-unicode also
Hi Kevin,
Thanks for sharing your thoughts and plans on this. This all reads
really well, and I think it would go most of the way towards the
ideal solution.
I have a couple of points/questions about some of the things you
propose:
If there were an error sending, the alternative would be
Regarding the following, written by "Chris Green" on 2019-10-28 at 22:40 Uhr
+:
Isn't that handled by your terminal program? Mine certainly allows
one to right click on any URL to open it.
rxvt-unicode also has an extension ("matcher") that allows you to
select and open URLs using the
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 10:40:16PM +, Chris Green wrote:
Isn't that handled by your terminal program? Mine certainly allows
one to right click on any URL to open it.
Not if the URL spans several lines. I think it's a common issue across
several terminal programs and last time I read
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 06:33:19PM -0400, José María Mateos wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 11:11:31PM +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> > Well, do you speak for you or for a 'lot of people'? Who they are?
> > I speak only for my own interests (as I said: I do not need this).
>
> Talking for
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 11:11:31PM +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
Well, do you speak for you or for a 'lot of people'? Who they are?
I speak only for my own interests (as I said: I do not need this).
Talking for myself, I really don't need point 1 (composing of HTML
messages), but number 2,
Regarding the following, written by "Matthias Apitz" on 2019-10-28 at 23:11 Uhr
+0100:
Well, do you speak for you or for a 'lot of people'? Who they are?
I speak only for my own interests (as I said: I do not need this).
Matthias, any such feature would of course be optional, and probably
El día lunes, octubre 28, 2019 a las 04:50:40p. m. -0500, Derek Martin escribió:
> > FWIW, I (as a mutt user for 15++ years) do not need this. Thanks
>
> Perhaps not, but the fact that it keeps coming up here is pretty clear
> indication that it's a feature that would be useful to a lot of
>
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 10:06:18PM +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día lunes, octubre 28, 2019 a las 03:59:01p. m. -0500, Derek Martin
> escribió:
>
> > FWIW, my two biggest wishlist items for Mutt are:
> >
> > 1. the ability to create and send at least simple HTML messages, with
> >or
El día lunes, octubre 28, 2019 a las 03:59:01p. m. -0500, Derek Martin escribió:
> FWIW, my two biggest wishlist items for Mutt are:
>
> 1. the ability to create and send at least simple HTML messages, with
>or without multipart alternatives, specifically for basic text
>formatting
On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 10:02:38AM +0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 11:16:25AM +1300, martin f krafft wrote:
> Native support for multipart/alternative composition isn't in my todo list.
> However, I do have a plan to allow external filter generation of the
> alternative.
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 07:29:52PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 01:31:57PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> > You're probably better off using (local) IMAP over SSH with your Mutt
> > mailboxes. That is, you can ssh into your mail server and run imapd
> > locally (rather than
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 01:31:57PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 08:58:06AM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> > I just tried running mutt 'remotely' by mounting ~/.muttrc and my main
> > mail directory ~/Mail using sshfs and running a local copy of mutt.
> > This makes handling
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 08:58:06AM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> I just tried running mutt 'remotely' by mounting ~/.muttrc and my main
> mail directory ~/Mail using sshfs and running a local copy of mutt.
> This makes handling attachments and HTML E-Mail much faster and easier
> than running mutt
23 matches
Mail list logo
