* Mark H. Wood [11-03-19 07:58]:
> On Sat, Nov 02, 2019 at 12:31:29PM -0400, Patrice Levesque wrote:
> >
> > > […] virtually all of the people who use mutt either as their only
> > > email client or along with others, chose mutt because of its
> > > simplicity.
> >
> > People who want a simple
On Sat, Nov 02, 2019 at 12:31:29PM -0400, Patrice Levesque wrote:
>
> > […] virtually all of the people who use mutt either as their only
> > email client or along with others, chose mutt because of its
> > simplicity.
>
> People who want a simple text mail client will use Alpine or similar.
>
Regarding the following, written by "Kurt Hackenberg" on 2019-11-03 at 00:11
Uhr -0400:
Mutt runs an external text editor to
compose plain text; it could do the same
for this -- run some external composition
program that would return both HTML and
plain text.
There is nothing stopping you
On Sun, Nov 03, 2019 at 07:56:34AM -0500, Mark H. Wood wrote:
I like that Mutt presents emails simply. It ignores all the fancy
to-the-pixel formatting, pointless images, distracting backgrounds,
and flashing multicolored nonsense. I find that reading mail with
Mutt is more restful than with
Derek Martin wrote:
> TBH most of the time, if I really need to see what's in an HTML mail,
> I just bounce it to gmail. But sometimes that doesn't work either due
> to DNS-based spam prevention.
Forwarding the email as an attachment rather than bouncing it should solve that.
cheers,
raf
* raf [11-03-19 18:23]:
> Derek Martin wrote:
>
> > TBH most of the time, if I really need to see what's in an HTML mail,
> > I just bounce it to gmail. But sometimes that doesn't work either due
> > to DNS-based spam prevention.
>
> Forwarding the email as an attachment rather than bouncing
