bounce multiple messages to the same user

Hi, Is there any easy way to bounce mutiple mail messages to the same user in one go?? Can I use tag to achieve that?? Thanks. Shao -- Shao Zhang - Running Debian 2.1 ___ _

Re: mutt, gpg and signing

Hi! On Fri, Dec 17, 1999 at 02:18:38PM +0100, Martin Lohner wrote: > If I have an old pgp and a new gpg key in my secring and > I know the pgp/gpg-version that the recipient uses (by having his > pubring) I would like that the key for signing is chosen accordingly. > Alternativly, if the recipien

Re: pgp and save-decrypted

On Mon, Dec 20, 1999 at 01:23:19PM +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > Does this make that much sense? Why do I encrypt some mails? --> because I > only want same very few people to be able to read them. This excludes (IMHO) > even the system administrator, which would happily be able to read mails

sh: +language: not found?

I am trying to sign with PGP v6 - and I get an error message stating: sh: +language: not found With the exception of $pgp_default_version = pgp6, I am using all defaults. Help? -- --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Greenville, South Carolina USA

Re: mbox anomaly

"Jeremy M. Dolan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: ... >While setting up procmail, I ran into trouble feeding it large >mbox's that were written by mutt. I first suspected it was a problem >with procmail/mutt/pine's handling of From_ lines in MIME boundaries. >the included file is a smaller test mbox,

mbox anomaly (forgot attachment)

Sorry, forgot the attachment (as usual). -- Jeremy M. Dolan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]) Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from localhost (root@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by imaxx.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA28450 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 13:05:19 -0500 Received: from mail.ima

mbox anomaly

* This message is to the procmail and mutt-users mailing lists. I'm * kind of stumped and not sure even where the problem lies, so I'm * hoping someone, somewhere, does. Please Cc: me in on the replies, * as I'm not on eaither list. Thank you. While setting up procmail, I ran into trouble feeding

Safest/latest version of SLANG?

Hello: I am wondering which is the latest version of slang recommended for use with Mutt 1.X? Currently I'm using 1.2.2. I tried some of the later slang releases and had some problems with the main Mutt menu and was told to bug John Davis. Thanks, -Clint

Re: New list patterns

* David Shaw ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [991211 01:57]: > On Sat, Dec 11, 1999 at 02:52:39AM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote: > > David Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 10 Dec 1999: > > > Here is a patch against 1.1 that: > > > 1) Makes ~l mean "mailing list" again. > > > 2) Adds a new ~u pat

Re: searching for a key binding

Jeremy -- ...and then Jeremy Blosser said... % David T-G [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: % > Is there a way to search for a key binding in mutt? I know that '?' will % % Well, you can always search the '?' screen using '/'... does that do what % you want? Oh. Yes, that's pretty good. And, since I

Re: searching for a key binding

David T-G [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > Is there a way to search for a key binding in mutt? I know that '?' will > pull up the current key bindings, but I'd like to search for a particular > one (like \ena or \enm or \ca or \cm). I'm planning to bind a couple of > keystrokes to reload my aliases

searching for a key binding

Hi & Happy Holidays! Is there a way to search for a key binding in mutt? I know that '?' will pull up the current key bindings, but I'd like to search for a particular one (like \ena or \enm or \ca or \cm). I'm planning to bind a couple of keystrokes to reload my aliases and muttrc info, and I