Mat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 30 Dec 1999:
> Hi there!
Hello!
First, please use the address [EMAIL PROTECTED], not
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks.
> I would like to to reply to an incoming mail using the
> TO: field of the mail that I received in my header FROM:.
> I need this because I have
Would anyone tell me what I have to do, to
successfully build mutt -- I tried 1.1.1i and got
many and varied errors -- in this environment?
Regards,
- Irving
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Happy Man Corporation
+1 206 463 9399, ext. 1014410 SW Pt Robinson Rd
fax: +1 209 821 5439Vashon, W
Hi there!
I'm trying to configure properly my mutt ;)
I would like to to reply to an incoming mail using the
TO: field of the mail that I received in my header FROM:.
I need this because I have many address mail on several mail server,
and I fetch the mails on my local user.
I've tried with this
John Verel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 04 Jan 2000:
> I'm trying to print using enscript. If I set the print_command
> variable to enscript, it prints fine. However, if I use any of the
> arguments available for enscript, such as the -f variable to change
> font, I always get an "unknown v
Hi.
I'm trying to print using enscript. If I set the print_command
variable to enscript, it prints fine. However, if I use any of the
arguments available for enscript, such as the -f variable to change
font, I always get an "unknown variable" message upon opening Mutt
(version 1.0pre3i). I've
On Tue, Jan 04, 2000 at 10:42:23AM -0500, Subba Rao wrote:
> Is it possible to have multiple signature files and be able to select one before
>sending out the email?
>
I use the program signify. It makes a random signature from a file
you create. It is supposed to have scoring so signatures c
Slightly off-topic (flames in private mail, please), but applicable to
mutt:
getmail 0.94 is now available from
http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/getmail/
getmail is intended as a simple replacement for fetchmail, for those who
don't need all of its various features, configura
Would anyone tell me what I have to do, to
successfully build mutt -- I tried 1.1.1i and got
many and varied errors -- in this environment?
Regards,
- Irving
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Happy Man Corporation
+1 206 463 9399, ext. 1014410 SW Pt Robinson Rd
fax: +1 209 821 5439Vashon, W
On Tue, Jan 04, 2000 at 16:02:45 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Fortunately, time machines don't exist. Otherwise I don't know how
> one could write a mail in year 99; perhaps 0099? What is the minimal
> year that is accepted?
1970. All times are internally stored as an unsigned integer
showing
On Tue, Jan 04, 2000 at 06:58:45 -0600, Jeremy M. Dolan wrote:
> What I would like to have is:
> * All message Date: headers displayed in local machine time (C[DS]T)
Mutt cannot rewrite the date header or any other headers when
displaying the message.
> * Date part of message index displaye
Has anyone ever had the problem of gpg signed messages appearing
to non-mutt users as only atatchments? In other words no body,
but a text atatchment of what was supposed to be the message and
another of the pgp signature.
If this is a known bug, in a faq or otherwise documentmented then
feel fr
Eudora breaks atatchments from the messages and keeps them in a directory. Each
mailbox has an index
file which keeps tracks of what belongs to what.
Apologies to he to whome I replied by accident instead of this list.
Quoting Jon Walthour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> There is another option, as well
At 06:58 -0600 04 Jan 2000, "Jeremy M. Dolan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What I would like to have is:
> * All message Date: headers displayed in local machine time (C[DS]T)
Mutt displays headers as they are, aside from MIME decoding, so I don't
think there's a way to do that without changing
Nevermind, I answered my own question as soon as I wrote this, of
course. My irc client turned out to be the culprit. It was displaying
a message on new mail to the inbox. I was so sure my shell was doing it
that I didn't think about other apps.
Brian
On Tue, Jan 04, 2000 at 02:55:35PM -0600,
Hi all. I have the following mailboxes set up in my muttrc:
mailboxes "!" =a2 =ph =zspam =mutt-users =zblocked =mac
When I get new mail in any of the folders (from procmail) except my
inbox, the %b field in my status bar gets updated. Likewise, when I do
'c' to change boxes, the new ones prese
Just out of curiousity, can both co-exist in the same message header
(like mine) or does it violate any standard (which one)?
--
Ronny Haryanto
Hi all,
I would like to be able to PGP (actually, gpg) sign messages sent from
the command line in batch mode. Yes, I know this has its inherent
security problems, but it does have its uses -- namely, making email
from a daemon that much harder to spoof.
I can do this by having gpg generate a "
Suporte SCO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> # mutt
> dynamic linker : mutt : error opening /usr/local/lib/libncurses.so.4
> Killed
Did you look for the dynamic library at /usr/local/lib/libncurses.so.4 ??
It's obviously not there, so... go find it.
--
David DeSimone | "The doctrine of human eq
There is another option, as well. Get a copy of Eudora (not Eudora Lite) and convert
them through there. I did this some time ago. So, I don't remember all the details.
But Eudora (and I just downloaded a trial version rather than buying it) will convert
the Outlook .pst to standard mail format
Jeff, et al --
...and then Fairlight said...
% On Tue, Jan 04, 2000 at 10:57:41AM -0500, Jeff Abrahamson thus spoke:
% >
% > I'm trying to switch someone from Outlook to mutt. I've found
Yay! :-)
% > utilities on the net to convert his address book, but I've had no
% > success finding utiliti
On Tue, Jan 04, 2000 at 10:57:41AM -0500, Jeff Abrahamson thus spoke:
> This is more mutt advocacy than usage, and is perhaps more general
> than just mutt. Well, hope it's still appropriate.
>
> I'm trying to switch someone from Outlook to mutt. I've found
> utilities on the net to convert his a
Jeremy --
...and then Jeremy M. Dolan said...
%
% What I would like to have is:
% * All message Date: headers displayed in local machine time (C[DS]T)
% * Date part of message index displayed in local machine time
% * Messages sorted by theyre local dates, no more priority given to
% a
This is more mutt advocacy than usage, and is perhaps more general
than just mutt. Well, hope it's still appropriate.
I'm trying to switch someone from Outlook to mutt. I've found
utilities on the net to convert his address book, but I've had no
success finding utilities for converting the actual
Subba Rao [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Is it possible to have multiple signature files and be able to select one
> before sending out the email?
You can change the value of $signature at any point before editing the mail
message to change it. You can use send-hooks, folder-hooks, or just
arbitra
Is it possible to have multiple signature files and be able to select one before
sending out the email?
Subba Rao
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
==
http://pws.prserv.net/truemax/
=> Time is relative. Here is one new way to look at time. <=
http://w
On Tue, Jan 04, 2000 at 10:40:46 +0100, Martin Schröder wrote:
> On 2000-01-01 19:12:28 +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> > Mutt as a small y2k problem on the receiving end. While mutt works
> > just fine with four-digit year numbers, RFC 822 originally specifies
> > two-digit year numbers, which s
Robert Chien [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> I'd like to suggest that from now on, whenever a new
> command/variable is added to mutt, the version number be
> reflected in mutt's manual accordingly, like this:
>
> 6.3 Configuration variables
>
> subscribe (version 1.1 and up)
> blah blah bl
By default (I think, I made my .muttrc quite a while ago but I think
this is how it works by default). By default, mutt displays message
Date: headers as they are entered on the remote side. It also uses
this value for the "Jan XX" part of the index. On many mailing lists,
people are in differant
Apparently, some script on sigtrap.guug.de has been messing around
with the file ownership of the CVS history file, leading to problems
with anonymous CVS, and to empty snapshot tar-balls.
I have corrected the history file for now, and generated new
snapshots, which are available under /pub/mutt/
Hello,
I have Mutt 0.92.8 (ver 98.2) instaled in my SCO Unix 5.0.5, I do not
excute, shows the message below:
# mutt
dynamic linker : mutt : error opening /usr/local/lib/libncurses.so.4
Killed
#
Thank,
Flavio Souza
On Mon, Jan 03, 2000 at 03:16:32PM -0200, Suporte SCO wrote:
> # mutt
>
> dynamic linker : mutt : error opening /usr/local/lib/libncurses.so.4
> Killed
in the source-packet is a file INSTALLATION. there is an explanation
given how to configure it using which library.
Jan
Hi,
I'd like to suggest that from now on, whenever a new
command/variable is added to mutt, the version number be
reflected in mutt's manual accordingly, like this:
6.3 Configuration variables
subscribe (version 1.1 and up)
blah blah blah ...
While mutt's manual (esp. the one on www.mu
Hello,
I have Mutt 0.92.8 (ver 98.2) instaled in my SCO Unix 5.0.5, I do not
excute, shows the message below:
# mutt
dynamic linker : mutt : error opening /usr/local/lib/libncurses.so.4
Killed
#
Thank,
Flavio Souza
On Mon, Jan 03, 2000 at 03:16:32PM -0200, Suporte SCO wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have Mutt 0.92.8 (ver 98.2) instaled in my SCO Unix 5.0.5, I do not
> excute, shows the message below:
Use a recent version. We've reached 1.0 by now.
> dynamic linker : mutt : error opening /usr/local/lib/libncurses.so
On 2000-01-01 19:12:28 +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> Mutt as a small y2k problem on the receiving end. While mutt works
> just fine with four-digit year numbers, RFC 822 originally specifies
> two-digit year numbers, which still seem to be permitted. (Not that
> any one should be using them no
Firstly, I would like to say I just compiled up mutt 1.0i for the first
time and I _love_ it. I will never go back to my old MH again! Mutt sucks
_way_ less.
Now, with that out of the way, on to the problem :)
I compiled mutt on my x86 RedHat-based box, and have used it
36 matches
Mail list logo
