Output of UNIX commands

2001-09-13 Thread Volker Moell
Hi, there! The output of UNIX commands traditionally will be substituted before the line is parsed. For the example my_hdr X-Operating-System: `uname -a` this is ok. But is there a solution to get the output of commands which change often, for example my_hdr X-Date: `date` I tried to put it

Re: mutt & exchange

2001-09-13 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Piet Delport [14/09/01 00:40 +0200]: > Actually, i remember ssmtp running quite well when used mutt on Cygwin > (i've since moved to FreeBSD, thank Eris). It can be installed very > easily via Cygwin's setup.exe, AFAIR, just like mutt. Speaking of cygwin, is there any way to spool mail locally

New mail 'N' flag not showing up

2001-09-13 Thread Denis Perelyubskiy
hello, i dont think i have any biff-like programs running. i have mutt 1.2.5i when i am in the folder view, i see 'N' message indicator, but it seems as if after a while those disappear. i am not sure if i can tie that to something i do does this problem ring a bell for anyone? is it something

repeat a command x times

2001-09-13 Thread David
Sorry for the double mail I sent it prematurely. Is there a way to repeat a command [n] times? (again, mimicing the vi number modifiers to most any command). /db

repeat a command

2001-09-13 Thread David
Simple question, and a lack of an answer in the manual/web search make me think 'no', but here goes: Is there any way to repeat a command ala the '.' character in vi? Maybe through a macro, etc? /db

Re: pb with arrows and numeric keypad (rxvt terminfo)

2001-09-13 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 01:32:30AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 18:50:41 -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote: > > ncurses 4.0 is a bit old (unless you're using one of Redhat's broken-rpm's - > > I'm assuming that's the case if you have a 2.2x kernel). > > We have RedHat 6.2. I c

Re: pb with arrows and numeric keypad (rxvt terminfo)

2001-09-13 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 18:50:41 -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote: > ncurses 4.0 is a bit old (unless you're using one of Redhat's broken-rpm's - > I'm assuming that's the case if you have a 2.2x kernel). We have RedHat 6.2. I could also install a new ncurses version in my HOME. > rxvt's terminfo defi

Re: pb with arrows and numeric keypad (rxvt terminfo)

2001-09-13 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 12:01:22AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > I switched from xterm-color to rxvt because of some terminfo problems > with xterm-color, but now the arrow keys and the numeric keypad don't > work any longer with my terminal. I think the problem comes from the > fact that Mutt s

Re: mutt & exchange

2001-09-13 Thread Piet Delport
--aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 13 Sep 2001 at 03:01:09 +0200, Magnus Stenman wrote: > if you run cygwin (and since mutt now is in cygwin more people will) > you might not be able to get

pb with arrows and numeric keypad (rxvt terminfo)

2001-09-13 Thread Vincent Lefevre
I switched from xterm-color to rxvt because of some terminfo problems with xterm-color, but now the arrow keys and the numeric keypad don't work any longer with my terminal. I think the problem comes from the fact that Mutt switches to the application keypad but doesn't support it! Could this be c

Re: Handling attachments

2001-09-13 Thread Mack Stevenson
Thank you all for your help; I didn't know about mailcap. Everything is working fine now. Cheers Mack _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

Re: .signature

2001-09-13 Thread Rich Lafferty
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 09:15:41PM +0200, Cliff Sarginson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hello > I have a .signature file .. as below. > When I respond to a mailing list message the signature does not > seem to get appended. > Is this a feature ? Perhaps your editor is configured to strip signatur

Re: Handling attachments

2001-09-13 Thread William Park
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 12:40:45PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote: > Mack Stevenson wrote: > > That's not what I meant :); after pressing 'v', I get a "tree" of the > > attachments in this email. Suppose that one of them is an image, .e.g., > > monkey.jpg. How do I go about seeing that picture? > >

Re: Handling attachments

2001-09-13 Thread Hall Stevenson
> That's not what I meant :); after pressing 'v', I get a "tree" > of the attachments in this email. Suppose that one of them > is an image, .e.g., monkey.jpg. How do I go about seeing > that picture? Mutt handles this through MIME/mailcap. See this page, http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-5

Re: Handling attachments

2001-09-13 Thread Will Yardley
Mack Stevenson wrote: > That's not what I meant :); after pressing 'v', I get a "tree" of the > attachments in this email. Suppose that one of them is an image, .e.g., > monkey.jpg. How do I go about seeing that picture? > > To successfully pipe it into an image viewer I would need an image vie

Re: .signature

2001-09-13 Thread William Park
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 09:15:41PM +0200, Cliff Sarginson wrote: > Hello I have a .signature file .. as below. When I respond to a > mailing list message the signature does not seem to get appended. Is > this a feature ? Your .signature should get added when you go into your editor in "compose"

Re: Handling attachments

2001-09-13 Thread Mack Stevenson
>From: Volker Moell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: ML mutt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: Handling attachments >Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 14:10:27 +0200 > >Mack Stevenson wrote: > > I am using mutt 1.2.5, but I can't read/view attachments if I don't >first > > save them into a separate file. When the v

Re: Filtering mail in mailboxes

2001-09-13 Thread Cliff Sarginson
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 11:49:09AM -0700, petko popadiyski wrote: > Is there any way in mutt to filter the mail without saving every singal message >with "s" key. I wanna something like filter in pine, where after opening MUA it sort >the messages in differnet folders > > > > ---

.signature

2001-09-13 Thread Cliff Sarginson
Hello I have a .signature file .. as below. When I respond to a mailing list message the signature does not seem to get appended. Is this a feature ? -- Regards Cliff

Re: Filtering mail in mailboxes

2001-09-13 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
petko popadiyski [13/09/01 11:49 -0700]: > Is there any way in mutt to filter the mail without saving every singal > message with "s" key. I wanna something like filter in pine, where after > opening MUA it sort the messages in differnet folders Use procmail. -suresh

Re: Filtering mail in mailboxes

2001-09-13 Thread Charles Cazabon
petko popadiyski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wanna something like filter in pine, > where after opening MUA it sort the messages in differnet folders This isn't the MUA's job. This is the MDA's job. Use procmail, maildrop, or your MTA's extension-address mechanism for this. Charles -- ---

Re: the 'You have got new mail' message

2001-09-13 Thread Cliff Sarginson
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 07:32:15PM +0200, Matthias LOITSCH wrote: > all this has nothing to do with mutt!! : > > > i just want to change my default mailbox from '/var/spool/mail/username' > to '~/mbox' > but when i put the command "MAIL=~/mbox" in the .bashrc, when i log in, > he still looks in

Filtering mail in mailboxes

2001-09-13 Thread petko popadiyski
Is there any way in mutt to filter the mail without saving every singal message with "s" key. I wanna something like filter in pine, where after opening MUA it sort the messages in differnet folders [EMAIL PROTECTED] for FREE ! htt

Re: the 'You have got new mail' message

2001-09-13 Thread Lars Hecking
> or if this does not work : is there a bash command to look if i have got > new mail. so that i can put this command in the .bashrc file What's so hard about doing a "man bash"?

the 'You have got new mail' message

2001-09-13 Thread Matthias LOITSCH
all this has nothing to do with mutt!! : i just want to change my default mailbox from '/var/spool/mail/username' to '~/mbox' but when i put the command "MAIL=~/mbox" in the .bashrc, when i log in, he still looks in the false mailbox. i suppose this is because the .bashrc file is executed after

Re: Mutt + PGP

2001-09-13 Thread Ailbhe Leamy
On (13/09/01 21:59), Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > Cliff Sarginson [13/09/01 18:08 +0200]: > > > > Query: why do people pgp-sign mail to mailing lists? Ailbhe > > > This is an excellent question, since I just accidentally bombarded > > this list with my public key I have been thinking that si

Re: Mutt + PGP

2001-09-13 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Cliff Sarginson [13/09/01 18:08 +0200]: > > Query: why do people pgp-sign mail to mailing lists? > > Ailbhe > This is an excellent question, since I just accidentally bombarded > this list with my public key I have been thinking that signing > mailing list messages serves *no* useful purpose.

Re: Mutt + PGP

2001-09-13 Thread Cliff Sarginson
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 03:48:39PM +0100, Ailbhe Leamy wrote: > On (13/09/01 10:37), Nelson D. Guerrero wrote: > > > PGP signature could NOT be verified. > > # Recognise good signatures set pgp_good_sign="^gpg: Good signature > from" > > This way, only genuinely unrecognised signatures will giv

Re: send public key

2001-09-13 Thread Cliff Sarginson
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 09:41:49AM -0400, darren chamberlain wrote: > Cliff Sarginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said something to this effect on 09/13/2001: > > Oops, sorry guys. > > A slight configuration error ! > > Apologies for the annoyance. > > Well, at least now we all have your public key... >

Re: lists

2001-09-13 Thread Ailbhe Leamy
On (13/09/01 16:44), Vittorio wrote: > How can I reply directly to the list address? L, i.e. shift-l -- Homepage: http://ailbhe.ossifrage.net/

Re: lists

2001-09-13 Thread darren chamberlain
Vittorio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said something to this effect on 09/13/2001: > i'm a subscriber of many lists and when i reply some message i have to > modify the field 'to:' because in it invariably the name of the sender > appears insted of the list address. > > i've tried modifying tke folder.hoo

lists

2001-09-13 Thread Vittorio
I'm a subscriber of many lists and when I reply some message I have to modify the field 'To:' because in it invariably the name of the sender appears insted of the list address. I've tried modifying tke folder.hook 'To:' putting in it ,e.g., [EMAIL PROTECTED] but this list address is added to

Re: Mutt + PGP

2001-09-13 Thread Ailbhe Leamy
On (13/09/01 10:37), Nelson D. Guerrero wrote: > PGP signature could NOT be verified. # Recognise good signatures set pgp_good_sign="^gpg: Good signature from" This way, only genuinely unrecognised signatures will give you this warning. Query: why do people pgp-sign mail to mailing lists? Ail

Re: Mutt + PGP

2001-09-13 Thread Ben Jones
> Well, I installed gpg a couple of weeks ago and was looking around for > a answer to my problem, and just did'nt find one so I left it like that. > But it's become quite anoying looking at that everytime I get a signed > email. > > PGP signature could NOT be verified. > > I get that everytim

Re: Mutt + PGP

2001-09-13 Thread Dan Boger
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 10:37:26AM -0400, Nelson D. Guerrero wrote: > Well, I installed gpg a couple of weeks ago and was looking around for > a answer to my problem, and just did'nt find one so I left it like that. > But it's become quite anoying looking at that everytime I get a signed > email.

Mutt + PGP

2001-09-13 Thread Nelson D. Guerrero
Hello, Well, I installed gpg a couple of weeks ago and was looking around for a answer to my problem, and just did'nt find one so I left it like that. But it's become quite anoying looking at that everytime I get a signed email. PGP signature could NOT be verified. I get that everytime...how

Re: send public key

2001-09-13 Thread darren chamberlain
Cliff Sarginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said something to this effect on 09/13/2001: > Oops, sorry guys. > A slight configuration error ! > Apologies for the annoyance. Well, at least now we all have your public key... (darren) -- I'd rather have my own game show than enough votes to become presid

Re: send public key

2001-09-13 Thread Cliff Sarginson
Oops, sorry guys. A slight configuration error ! Apologies for the annoyance. -- Regards Cliff

Re: send public key

2001-09-13 Thread Christian Ordig
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 09:18:58AM +0200, Cliff Sarginson wrote: > -BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- > -END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- well why to the list and why the hell 7 times ?!? -- Christian Ordig, Germany| Homepage: http://thor.prohosting.com/~chrordig/ open(IN,"distris.txt")|

Re: Handling attachments

2001-09-13 Thread Volker Moell
Mack Stevenson wrote: > I am using mutt 1.2.5, but I can't read/view attachments if I don't first > save them into a separate file. When the viewer expects the name of a file > in the command-line, piping doesn't work; so how do other mutt users solve > this problem? Just by pressing "v" in th

Still can't get folder-hook, save-hook right...

2001-09-13 Thread Peter Lavender
Hi Everyone, I'm starting to get a hang of things, but a few things still elude me. I have gone through the archives and actually fixed a few problems.. so I really have been trying.. :) But I'm down to getting email sent from a folder to be saved to it's own folder.. but I can't get it to do i

Handling attachments

2001-09-13 Thread Mack Stevenson
I am using mutt 1.2.5, but I can't read/view attachments if I don't first save them into a separate file. When the viewer expects the name of a file in the command-line, piping doesn't work; so how do other mutt users solve this problem? TIA, Mack

Re: send public key

2001-09-13 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Cliff Sarginson [13/09/01 09:18 +0200]: > -BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- > Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org Erm - did the mailing list ask you for your public key? -suresh

Re: send public key

2001-09-13 Thread Cliff Sarginson
-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org mQGiBDuamOoRBAC8n1wDEKj1k6hFOhMFji4s27e+g+15tgGmViBMiiXWottugMWn L9FgOjKCDCXGnNKa0hxYsF/3qDlmv/EWT0XKzE07uXQGH9ibeuIYRuo3ou0XOVlV FOWqr7CItjm3eToR1DwcyBAKWS3HSp4tqVHrpN+ULoknFcZ9y//KG

Re: send public key

2001-09-13 Thread Cliff Sarginson
-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org mQGiBDuamOoRBAC8n1wDEKj1k6hFOhMFji4s27e+g+15tgGmViBMiiXWottugMWn L9FgOjKCDCXGnNKa0hxYsF/3qDlmv/EWT0XKzE07uXQGH9ibeuIYRuo3ou0XOVlV FOWqr7CItjm3eToR1DwcyBAKWS3HSp4tqVHrpN+ULoknFcZ9y//KG

Re: send public key

2001-09-13 Thread Cliff Sarginson
-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org mQGiBDuamOoRBAC8n1wDEKj1k6hFOhMFji4s27e+g+15tgGmViBMiiXWottugMWn L9FgOjKCDCXGnNKa0hxYsF/3qDlmv/EWT0XKzE07uXQGH9ibeuIYRuo3ou0XOVlV FOWqr7CItjm3eToR1DwcyBAKWS3HSp4tqVHrpN+ULoknFcZ9y//KG

Re: send public key

2001-09-13 Thread Cliff Sarginson
-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org mQGiBDuamOoRBAC8n1wDEKj1k6hFOhMFji4s27e+g+15tgGmViBMiiXWottugMWn L9FgOjKCDCXGnNKa0hxYsF/3qDlmv/EWT0XKzE07uXQGH9ibeuIYRuo3ou0XOVlV FOWqr7CItjm3eToR1DwcyBAKWS3HSp4tqVHrpN+ULoknFcZ9y//KG

Re: send public key

2001-09-13 Thread Cliff Sarginson
-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org mQGiBDuamOoRBAC8n1wDEKj1k6hFOhMFji4s27e+g+15tgGmViBMiiXWottugMWn L9FgOjKCDCXGnNKa0hxYsF/3qDlmv/EWT0XKzE07uXQGH9ibeuIYRuo3ou0XOVlV FOWqr7CItjm3eToR1DwcyBAKWS3HSp4tqVHrpN+ULoknFcZ9y//KG

Re: send public key

2001-09-13 Thread Cliff Sarginson
-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org mQGiBDuamOoRBAC8n1wDEKj1k6hFOhMFji4s27e+g+15tgGmViBMiiXWottugMWn L9FgOjKCDCXGnNKa0hxYsF/3qDlmv/EWT0XKzE07uXQGH9ibeuIYRuo3ou0XOVlV FOWqr7CItjm3eToR1DwcyBAKWS3HSp4tqVHrpN+ULoknFcZ9y//KG