Re: send public key

2001-09-13 Thread Cliff Sarginson

-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
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=HNB5
-END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-



Re: send public key

2001-09-13 Thread Cliff Sarginson

-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
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=HNB5
-END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-



Re: send public key

2001-09-13 Thread Cliff Sarginson

-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
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=HNB5
-END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-



Re: send public key

2001-09-13 Thread Cliff Sarginson

-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
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=HNB5
-END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-



Re: send public key

2001-09-13 Thread Cliff Sarginson

-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
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=HNB5
-END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-



Re: send public key

2001-09-13 Thread Cliff Sarginson

-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
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=HNB5
-END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-



Handling attachments

2001-09-13 Thread Mack Stevenson

I am using mutt 1.2.5, but I can't read/view attachments if I don't first 
save them into a separate file. When the viewer expects the name of a file 
in the command-line, piping doesn't work; so how do other mutt users solve 
this problem?

TIA,

Mack

_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Still can't get folder-hook, save-hook right...

2001-09-13 Thread Peter Lavender

Hi Everyone,

I'm starting to get a hang of things, but a few things still elude me.

I have gone through the archives and actually fixed a few problems..
so I really have been trying.. :)

But I'm down to getting email sent from a folder to be saved to it's
own folder.. but I can't get it to do it.  I have a default save-hook
. =sent, with a folder-hook latter on.

Also, I can't get the REply-to field right for this folder either..
which is a real pain.


My hooks etc follow:

# Setup the rest as defaults.
folder-hook .set signature=~/.signature

folder-hook .unmy_hdr *
folder-hook .my_hdr From: Peter Lavender [EMAIL PROTECTED]
folder-hook .my_hdr Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
folder-hook .my_hdr X-Operating-System: Linux/`uname -r` (`uname
-m`)
folder-hook .my_hdr X-Uptime: \`uptime\`
save-hook   .=sent

# Maxware config
folder-hook maxware unmy_hdr *
folder-hook maxware set sort=reverse-date-received

#folder-hook maxware reply-to=
folder-hook maxware my_hdr From: Peter Lavender
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
folder-hook maware  my_hdr Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
folder-hook maxware my_hdr Organisation: MaXware Australia

#send-hook maxware unmy_hdr X-Operating-System: Linux/`uname -r`
(`uname -m`)
#send-hook maxware unmy_hdr X-Uptime: \`uptime\`
folder-hook maxware set signature=~/mail/maxware.sig

folder-hook maxware 'unhook save-hook; save-hook ~A =maxware-sent'

Your time and assistance are much appreciated.

Regards,

Pete.

-- 
Due to a lack of imagination, 
this signature will remain 
under construction indefinately.



Re: Handling attachments

2001-09-13 Thread Volker Moell

Mack Stevenson wrote:
 I am using mutt 1.2.5, but I can't read/view attachments if I don't first 
 save them into a separate file. When the viewer expects the name of a file 
 in the command-line, piping doesn't work; so how do other mutt users solve 
 this problem?

Just by pressing v in the index/pager? This is the normal way.
Or didn't I understand your question correct?

-volker

-- 
  http://die-moells.de/  *  http://stama90.de/  *  http://scriptdale.de/

Twenty Percent of Zero is Better than Nothing.
-- Walt Kelly



Re: send public key

2001-09-13 Thread Christian Ordig

On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 09:18:58AM +0200, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
 -END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
well why to the list and why the hell 7 times ?!?

-- 
Christian Ordig, Germany| Homepage: http://thor.prohosting.com/~chrordig/

open(IN,distris.txt)||die(Keine Distris, Du Affe!);while(IN){chomp;
print $_??? hätte ich was besseres erwartet!!! naja,was solls...\n;}
close(IN);

 PGP signature


Re: send public key

2001-09-13 Thread Cliff Sarginson


Oops, sorry guys.
A slight configuration error !
Apologies for the annoyance.

-- 
Regards
Cliff




Re: send public key

2001-09-13 Thread darren chamberlain

Cliff Sarginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said something to this effect on 09/13/2001:
 Oops, sorry guys.
 A slight configuration error !
 Apologies for the annoyance.

Well, at least now we all have your public key...

(darren)

-- 
I'd rather have my own game show than enough votes to become
president.



Mutt + PGP

2001-09-13 Thread Nelson D. Guerrero

Hello,

Well, I installed gpg a couple of weeks ago and was looking around for
a answer to my problem, and just did'nt find one so I left it like that.
But it's become quite anoying looking at that everytime I get a signed
email. 

PGP signature could NOT be verified. 

I get that everytime...how can I 'NOT' get this?

--
Nelson D. Guerrero

 PGP signature


Re: Mutt + PGP

2001-09-13 Thread Dan Boger

On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 10:37:26AM -0400, Nelson D. Guerrero wrote:
 Well, I installed gpg a couple of weeks ago and was looking around for
 a answer to my problem, and just did'nt find one so I left it like that.
 But it's become quite anoying looking at that everytime I get a signed
 email. 
 
 PGP signature could NOT be verified. 
 
 I get that everytime...how can I 'NOT' get this?

  6.3.128.  pgp_verify_sig

Type: quadoption
Default: yes

If ``yes'', always attempt to verify PGP/MIME signatures.  If ``ask'',
ask whether or not to verify the signature.  If ``no'', never attempt
to verify PGP/MIME signatures.

so just put set pgp_verify_sig=no and it won't try.  Or, fix your gpg
config :)

-- 
Dan Boger
Linux MVP
brainbench.com


 PGP signature


Re: Mutt + PGP

2001-09-13 Thread Ben Jones

 Well, I installed gpg a couple of weeks ago and was looking around for
 a answer to my problem, and just did'nt find one so I left it like that.
 But it's become quite anoying looking at that everytime I get a signed
 email. 
 
 PGP signature could NOT be verified. 
 
 I get that everytime...how can I 'NOT' get this?

Assuming that the signature actually *is* good, add this line to your
muttrc:

set pgp_good_sign=^gpg: Good signature from

-- 
-Ben Jones

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.superutility.net/

 PGP signature


Re: Mutt + PGP

2001-09-13 Thread Ailbhe Leamy

On (13/09/01 10:37), Nelson D. Guerrero wrote:

 PGP signature could NOT be verified.

# Recognise good signatures set pgp_good_sign=^gpg: Good signature
from

This way, only genuinely unrecognised signatures will give you this
warning.

Query: why do people pgp-sign mail to mailing lists?

Ailbhe

-- 
Homepage: http://ailbhe.ossifrage.net/



lists

2001-09-13 Thread Vittorio

I'm a subscriber of many lists and when I reply some message I have to
modify the field 'To:' because in it invariably the name of the sender
appears insted of the list address.

I've tried modifying tke folder.hook 'To:' putting in it ,e.g.,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] but this list address is added to that
of the sender.

How can I reply directly to the list address?

Vittorio



Re: lists

2001-09-13 Thread darren chamberlain

Vittorio [EMAIL PROTECTED] said something to this effect on 09/13/2001:
 i'm a subscriber of many lists and when i reply some message i have to
 modify the field 'to:' because in it invariably the name of the sender
 appears insted of the list address.
 
 i've tried modifying tke folder.hook 'to:' putting in it ,e.g.,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] but this list address is added to that
 of the sender.
 
 how can i reply directly to the list address?

The list-reply command, bound to L by default, is exactly what
this is for.  Make sure you have the list specified in a list
command in your config file.

(darren)

-- 
I have discovered that all human evil comes from this, man's being
unable to sit still in a room.
-- Blaise Pascal



Re: lists

2001-09-13 Thread Ailbhe Leamy

On (13/09/01 16:44), Vittorio wrote:

 How can I reply directly to the list address?

L, i.e. shift-l

-- 
Homepage: http://ailbhe.ossifrage.net/



Re: send public key

2001-09-13 Thread Cliff Sarginson

On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 09:41:49AM -0400, darren chamberlain wrote:
 Cliff Sarginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said something to this effect on 09/13/2001:
  Oops, sorry guys.
  A slight configuration error !
  Apologies for the annoyance.
 
 Well, at least now we all have your public key...
 
 (darren)

Well, think I'll make a new one and re-instate the configuration
I was using..just for the hell of it..

(joke joke !!)

-- 
Regards
Cliff





Re: Mutt + PGP

2001-09-13 Thread Cliff Sarginson

On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 03:48:39PM +0100, Ailbhe Leamy wrote:
 On (13/09/01 10:37), Nelson D. Guerrero wrote:
 
  PGP signature could NOT be verified.
 
 # Recognise good signatures set pgp_good_sign=^gpg: Good signature
 from
 
 This way, only genuinely unrecognised signatures will give you this
 warning.
 
 Query: why do people pgp-sign mail to mailing lists?
 
 Ailbhe

This is an excellent question, since I just accidentally bombarded
this list with my public key I have been thinking that signing
mailing list messages serves *no* useful purpose.

An identity crisis maybe ?

-- 
Regards
Cliff





Re: Mutt + PGP

2001-09-13 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian

Cliff Sarginson mutt [13/09/01 18:08 +0200]:
  Query: why do people pgp-sign mail to mailing lists?
  Ailbhe
 
 This is an excellent question, since I just accidentally bombarded
 this list with my public key I have been thinking that signing
 mailing list messages serves *no* useful purpose.

There's no damned point to it - unless you anticipate that your mail will be
forged by someone.  Web of trust indeed .. based on a system that mistrusts
everyone, assumes that someone's going to forge your address, in the first
place ;)
  ^^
smiley, in 40 point arial black bold

-suresh



Re: Mutt + PGP

2001-09-13 Thread Ailbhe Leamy

On (13/09/01 21:59), Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:

 Cliff Sarginson mutt [13/09/01 18:08 +0200]:

   Query: why do people pgp-sign mail to mailing lists?  Ailbhe

  This is an excellent question, since I just accidentally bombarded
  this list with my public key I have been thinking that signing
  mailing list messages serves *no* useful purpose.

 There's no damned point to it - unless you anticipate that your mail
 will be forged by someone.  Web of trust indeed .. based on a system

Unless you anticipate that your mail will be forged by someone who
sends something potentially damaging to a public mailing list.

I can't think of anything sent to something as public as this list that
would really be really damaging. Certianly nothing that couldn't be
denied with a pgp-signed mail...

Ailbhe

-- 
Homepage: http://ailbhe.ossifrage.net/



the 'You have got new mail' message

2001-09-13 Thread Matthias LOITSCH

all this has nothing to do with mutt!! :


i just want to change my default mailbox from '/var/spool/mail/username'
to '~/mbox'
but when i put the command MAIL=~/mbox in the .bashrc, when i log in,
he still looks in the false mailbox. 
i suppose this is because the .bashrc file is executed after he looks in
my mail box. 

so how can i change the MAIL path BEFORE he looks in it??

or if this does not work : is there a bash command to look if i have got
new mail. so that i can put this command in the .bashrc file 


thanks a lot!
enyo


.


-- 
 /  I  Matthias Loitsch  I  \
 O--I[EMAIL PROTECTED]I--O :  : chimera
 \  I   www.yourth.net   I  /   myTH is yourTH




Re: the 'You have got new mail' message

2001-09-13 Thread Lars Hecking


 or if this does not work : is there a bash command to look if i have got
 new mail. so that i can put this command in the .bashrc file 

 What's so hard about doing a man bash?




Filtering mail in mailboxes

2001-09-13 Thread petko popadiyski

 Is there any way in mutt to filter the mail without saving every singal message with 
s key. I wanna something like filter in pine, where after opening MUA it sort the 
messages in differnet folders




[EMAIL PROTECTED] for FREE ! http://www.CannabisMail.com



Re: the 'You have got new mail' message

2001-09-13 Thread Cliff Sarginson

On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 07:32:15PM +0200, Matthias LOITSCH wrote:
 all this has nothing to do with mutt!! :
 
 
 i just want to change my default mailbox from '/var/spool/mail/username'
 to '~/mbox'
 but when i put the command MAIL=~/mbox in the .bashrc, when i log in,
 he still looks in the false mailbox. 
 i suppose this is because the .bashrc file is executed after he looks in
 my mail box. 
 
 so how can i change the MAIL path BEFORE he looks in it??
 
 or if this does not work : is there a bash command to look if i have got
 new mail. so that i can put this command in the .bashrc file 
 
Mmmm..as pointed out this is a shell question...
try putting it in ~/.profile

Cliff



Re: Filtering mail in mailboxes

2001-09-13 Thread Charles Cazabon

petko popadiyski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I wanna something like filter in pine,
 where after opening MUA it sort the messages in differnet folders

This isn't the MUA's job.  This is the MDA's job.  Use procmail,
maildrop, or your MTA's extension-address mechanism for this.

Charles
-- 
---
Charles Cazabon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPL'ed software available at:  http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
---



Re: Filtering mail in mailboxes

2001-09-13 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian

petko popadiyski mutt [13/09/01 11:49 -0700]:
  Is there any way in mutt to filter the mail without saving every singal
  message with s key. I wanna something like filter in pine, where after
  opening MUA it sort the messages in differnet folders

Use procmail.
 
-suresh



Re: Filtering mail in mailboxes

2001-09-13 Thread Cliff Sarginson

On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 11:49:09AM -0700, petko popadiyski wrote:
  Is there any way in mutt to filter the mail without saving every singal message 
with s key. I wanna something like filter in pine, where after opening MUA it sort 
the messages in differnet folders
 
 
 
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] for FREE ! http://www.CannabisMail.com

procmail

-- 
Regards
Cliff





Re: Handling attachments

2001-09-13 Thread Mack Stevenson

From: Volker Moell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ML mutt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Handling attachments
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 14:10:27 +0200

Mack Stevenson wrote:
  I am using mutt 1.2.5, but I can't read/view attachments if I don't 
first
  save them into a separate file. When the viewer expects the name of a 
file
  in the command-line, piping doesn't work; so how do other mutt users 
solve
  this problem?

Just by pressing v in the index/pager? This is the normal way.
Or didn't I understand your question correct?

That's not what I meant :); after pressing 'v', I get a tree of the 
attachments in this email. Suppose that one of them is an image, .e.g., 
monkey.jpg. How do I go about seeing that picture?

To successfully pipe it into an image viewer I would need an image viewer 
which reads raw data from stdin, something which isn't very common... The 
only other option is to first save that image into a separate file, and then 
invoke (outside of mutt) the image viewer; but this isn't very practical...

When you receive an image as an attachment, how do you see its contents? Do 
you first save it into a file, put mutt into the background and then run an 
image viewer?

Thank you for any help,

Mack S.


_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Re: .signature

2001-09-13 Thread William Park

On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 09:15:41PM +0200, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
 Hello I have a .signature file .. as below.  When I respond to a
 mailing list message the signature does not seem to get appended.  Is
 this a feature ?

Your .signature should get added when you go into your editor in
compose or reply mode.

-- 
William Park, Open Geometry Consulting, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
8 CPU cluster, (Slackware) Linux, Python, LaTeX, Vim, Mutt, Sc.



Re: Handling attachments

2001-09-13 Thread Will Yardley

Mack Stevenson wrote:
 That's not what I meant :); after pressing 'v', I get a tree of the 
 attachments in this email. Suppose that one of them is an image, .e.g., 
 monkey.jpg. How do I go about seeing that picture?
 
 To successfully pipe it into an image viewer I would need an image viewer 
 which reads raw data from stdin, something which isn't very common... The 
 only other option is to first save that image into a separate file, and then 

adding an appropriate entry to your .mailcap.   i've never done this with
image files before, but it would probably be something like:
image/jpeg; xv '%s' ; test=test $DISPLAY != 

that's not tested; just a guess.

if you wanted the image to just pop up you could probably set that type
to autoview too although i don't know why you'd want to.

w

-- 
Sintax error in config file! (line 378)
aborted!

GPG Public Key:
http://infinitejazz.net/will/pgp/



Re: Handling attachments

2001-09-13 Thread Hall Stevenson

 That's not what I meant :); after pressing 'v', I get a
tree
 of the attachments in this email. Suppose that one of them
 is an image, .e.g., monkey.jpg. How do I go about seeing
 that picture?

snip

Mutt handles this through MIME/mailcap. See this page,
http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-5.html, for more
details.

Hall




Re: Handling attachments

2001-09-13 Thread William Park

On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 12:40:45PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
 Mack Stevenson wrote:
  That's not what I meant :); after pressing 'v', I get a tree of the 
  attachments in this email. Suppose that one of them is an image, .e.g., 
  monkey.jpg. How do I go about seeing that picture?
  
  To successfully pipe it into an image viewer I would need an image viewer 
  which reads raw data from stdin, something which isn't very common... The 
  only other option is to first save that image into a separate file, and then 
 
 adding an appropriate entry to your .mailcap.   i've never done this with
 image files before, but it would probably be something like:
 image/jpeg; xv '%s' ; test=test $DISPLAY != 
 
 that's not tested; just a guess.

Looks about right...  But, be careful about capital letter in
test=  I've never been able to use captical letter in test=...,
as in test=ps -C netscape or test=test -C X.

-- 
William Park, Open Geometry Consulting, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
8 CPU cluster, (Slackware) Linux, Python, LaTeX, Vim, Mutt, Sc.



Re: .signature

2001-09-13 Thread Rich Lafferty

On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 09:15:41PM +0200, Cliff Sarginson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 
wrote:
 Hello
 I have a .signature file .. as below.
 When I respond to a mailing list message the signature does not
 seem to get appended.
 Is this a feature ?

Perhaps your editor is configured to strip signaturs when replying,
and is doing so poorly.

  -Rich 

-- 
Rich Lafferty --+---
 Montreal, Quebec, Canada   |  Save the Pacific Northwest Tree Octopus!
 http://www.lafferty.ca/|http://zapatopi.net/treeoctopus.html
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ---+---

 PGP signature


Re: Handling attachments

2001-09-13 Thread Mack Stevenson

Thank you all for your help; I didn't know about mailcap. Everything is 
working fine now.

Cheers

Mack


_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




pb with arrows and numeric keypad (rxvt terminfo)

2001-09-13 Thread Vincent Lefevre

I switched from xterm-color to rxvt because of some terminfo problems
with xterm-color, but now the arrow keys and the numeric keypad don't
work any longer with my terminal. I think the problem comes from the
fact that Mutt switches to the application keypad but doesn't support
it! Could this be changed?

I use Mutt 1.3.22.1i under Linux 2.2.17 with ncurses 4.0.

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Web: http://www.vinc17.org/ - 100%
validated HTML - Acorn Risc PC, Yellow Pig 17, Championnat International des
Jeux Mathématiques et Logiques, TETRHEX, etc.
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA



Re: mutt exchange

2001-09-13 Thread Piet Delport


--aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, 13 Sep 2001 at 03:01:09 +0200, Magnus Stenman wrote:
 if you run cygwin (and since mutt now is in cygwin more people will)
 you might not be able to get ssmtp or similar running.

Actually, i remember ssmtp running quite well when used mutt on Cygwin
(i've since moved to FreeBSD, thank Eris).  It can be installed very
easily via Cygwin's setup.exe, AFAIR, just like mutt.

--=20
Piet Delport [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Today's subliminal thought is:

--aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE7oTXrzRUP82sZFCcRAtVuAKCeLaZQyqVfz8hygRIGlLZ9hvCBkgCgllg0
6AFLPuF2JP84cn6maNemTMs=
=qjpd
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f--



Re: pb with arrows and numeric keypad (rxvt terminfo)

2001-09-13 Thread Thomas Dickey

On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 12:01:22AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
 I switched from xterm-color to rxvt because of some terminfo problems
 with xterm-color, but now the arrow keys and the numeric keypad don't
 work any longer with my terminal. I think the problem comes from the
 fact that Mutt switches to the application keypad but doesn't support
 it! Could this be changed?
 
 I use Mutt 1.3.22.1i under Linux 2.2.17 with ncurses 4.0.

ncurses 4.0 is a bit old (unless you're using one of Redhat's broken-rpm's -
I'm assuming that's the case if you have a 2.2x kernel).

rxvt's terminfo defines smkx/rmkx, so it does attempt to set the keypad
to application mode.  however, xterm-color does also - but they're different:

comparing xterm-color to rxvt.
(60 lines of difference omitted)
rmkx: '\E[?1l\E', '\E'.
smkx: '\E[?1h\E=', '\E='.

(referring to ctlseqs.ms, in xterm) -
The \E[?1h in the xterm-color sets the cursor keys also into application
mode, which may be a problem if you have hardcoded values for the escape
sequences (doesn't mutt allow you to specify the termcap or terminfo
names? - if not, that's a defect in mutt).

-- 
Thomas E. Dickey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net



Re: pb with arrows and numeric keypad (rxvt terminfo)

2001-09-13 Thread Vincent Lefevre

On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 18:50:41 -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
 ncurses 4.0 is a bit old (unless you're using one of Redhat's broken-rpm's -
 I'm assuming that's the case if you have a 2.2x kernel).

We have RedHat 6.2. I could also install a new ncurses version in my
HOME.

 rxvt's terminfo defines smkx/rmkx, so it does attempt to set the keypad
 to application mode.  however, xterm-color does also - but they're different:
 
 comparing xterm-color to rxvt.
 (60 lines of difference omitted)
   rmkx: '\E[?1l\E', '\E'.
   smkx: '\E[?1h\E=', '\E='.
 
 (referring to ctlseqs.ms, in xterm) -
 The \E[?1h in the xterm-color sets the cursor keys also into application
 mode,

With TERM=rxvt, if I send ks, this changes the behaviour of the arrow
keys (seen in less, for which I need to remove the line that sends ks
to have working arrow keys).

 which may be a problem if you have hardcoded values for the escape
 sequences (doesn't mutt allow you to specify the termcap or terminfo
 names? - if not, that's a defect in mutt).

I use up, down and so on, and \e[A, \e[B and so on (because on slow
terminals, up/down/... didn't work). But with TERM=rxvt, this doesn't
work. So, I think that with TERM=rxvt, the arrow keys are in application
mode, and this is not the case with TERM=xterm-color.

Note: with TERM=rxvt, after I type :, the up arrow gives OA and the
down arrow gives OB. This confirms what I've said.

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Web: http://www.vinc17.org/ - 100%
validated HTML - Acorn Risc PC, Yellow Pig 17, Championnat International des
Jeux Mathématiques et Logiques, TETRHEX, etc.
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA



Re: pb with arrows and numeric keypad (rxvt terminfo)

2001-09-13 Thread Thomas Dickey

On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 01:32:30AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
 On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 18:50:41 -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
  ncurses 4.0 is a bit old (unless you're using one of Redhat's broken-rpm's -
  I'm assuming that's the case if you have a 2.2x kernel).
 
 We have RedHat 6.2. I could also install a new ncurses version in my
 HOME.

That's ncurses development version from (the exact date doesn't come to mind)
early 1999, before 990301 - see
ftp://invisible-island.net/ncurses/NEWS.gz
so that's neither 4.2 nor 5.0 (I guess it was Redhat 6.0 that introduced
that problem).

  which may be a problem if you have hardcoded values for the escape
  sequences (doesn't mutt allow you to specify the termcap or terminfo
  names? - if not, that's a defect in mutt).
 
 I use up, down and so on, and \e[A, \e[B and so on (because on slow
 terminals, up/down/... didn't work). But with TERM=rxvt, this doesn't
 work. So, I think that with TERM=rxvt, the arrow keys are in application
 mode, and this is not the case with TERM=xterm-color.

yes (I believe it's a compile-time option, though - doesn't appear with
the rxvt on the system I'm running at the moment - Debian).  But if mutt
interpreted termcap names, it would isolate you from that sort of thing.
 
-- 
Thomas E. Dickey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net



repeat a command

2001-09-13 Thread David

Simple question, and a lack of an answer in the manual/web search make
me think 'no', but here goes:

  Is there any way to repeat a command ala the '.' character in vi?
  Maybe through a macro, etc?

/db



repeat a command x times

2001-09-13 Thread David

Sorry for the double mail I sent it prematurely.  

Is there a way to repeat a command [n] times?  (again, mimicing the
vi number modifiers to most any command).  

/db



New mail 'N' flag not showing up

2001-09-13 Thread Denis Perelyubskiy

hello,

i dont think i have any biff-like programs running.
i have mutt 1.2.5i

when i am in the folder view, i see 'N' message indicator,
but it seems as if after a while those disappear. i am not
sure if i can tie that to something i do

does this problem ring a bell for anyone? is it something i
am doing/not setting?

thank you,

denis

-- 
// mailto: Denis Perelyubskiy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
// icq   : 12359698
// PGP   : http://www.cs.ucla.edu/~denisp/files/pgp.asc



Re: mutt exchange

2001-09-13 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian

Piet Delport mutt [14/09/01 00:40 +0200]:
 Actually, i remember ssmtp running quite well when used mutt on Cygwin
 (i've since moved to FreeBSD, thank Eris).  It can be installed very
 easily via Cygwin's setup.exe, AFAIR, just like mutt.

Speaking of cygwin, is there any way to spool mail locally on the doze box
using a fetchmail variant?

c:/mail/ having several mboxes for example.

-suresh