Re: binding a key to forward mail
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 10:31:18PM -0800, Gary Johnson (dis)graced my inbox with: On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 06:55:19PM -0700, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote: On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 03:00:49PM -0800, Gary Johnson (dis)graced my inbox with: Hmmm... push in the macro, you mean? That's certainly an idea; thanks! Yes, that's what I meant. For example, I tried this just to see if it would work: :macro pager G :push mail^Mgaryjohn^M^Mtest message^My And this text is actually entered into your editor? Cool, I thought the macro couldn't actually affect what happened once the editor opened. No, test message is the Subject. But you're right about the macro not being able to affect what happens within the editor, at least not via the keyboard buffer since mutt and the editor don't share the same keyboard buffer. Oh, oops. I thought you were providing a simpler way to implement David's way of setting the editor to /bin/true for some recipients ;) -- Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Be an MCSE - Minesweeper Consultant Solitaire Expert! msg21488/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: tag-(thread|pattern) in pager
Cedric Duval muttered: Hi Roman, I'd like to be able to use tag-thread, tag-subthred, tag-pattern in the pager view. Looks like they're not defined in the pager map (1.3.23i) are there any plans to include them in pager map, and if not, would I (as someone who is not very good in C) be able to hack this in myself? Where should I look? Would something like this do the trick? macro pager \et exittag-threaddisplay-message Hm, I would toggle $resolve using that macro, YMMV macro pager \et 'exitenter-commandset noresolveentertag-thread \ enter-commandset resolveenterdisplay-message' HTH, Michael -- PGP-Key: http://www-stud.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/~tatgeml/public.key
Re: a dumb question about filter ...
Will Yardley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yeah i don't know how i'd survive without procmail. i've heard good things about spam assassin. i use spambouncer (www.spambouncer.org) which is great. it does catch some stuff that isn't spam, so you do have to check your spam folder once in a while, but it's a big help to my sanity. Well, my spam folder (/dev/null) is pretty hard to check... ;-) i like postfix a lot personally... this is really a matter of preference. for a small machine i doubt it makes much difference, but i think postfix is a bit more secure and robust. i try to run it wherever possible. Well, I don't know about the security issues and I started to use Exim just because it is the default MTA of Debian. And, as I said, I've been totally satisfied with it - it transports the mail just the way it should! :-) This went way off-topic, so... maybe we should continue our discussion (if there's anything left to do so :-) in private? -- Jussi Ekholm, Everything is so fine it could be a little, ill flower don't let your mind take you in misery [EMAIL PROTECTED] all the feelings you're not so much pleased http://ekhowl.goa-head.org they're just to take you to sweet harmony
Re: a dumb question about filter ...
David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm always looking for ways to cut down on spam, but I haven't come up with a good rc.spam file (I have a fairly simple $HOME/.procmailrc and a bunch of $HOME/.procmail/rc.* includes). Would you care to post [a link to] your .procmailrc and method? Well, my rc.mailsort is extremely simple, as well. It sorts the incoming mail to different folders, and whenever I find a spam mail in my inbox, I write the following three lines in my rc.mailsort: :0: * ^From.*spammer@foo\.bar /dev/null So, I don't have any intelligent spam spotter; I add the spammer's address to ~/.procmail/rc.mailsort manually. That's about it. :-) -- Jussi Ekholm, Everything is so fine it could be a little, ill flower don't let your mind take you in misery [EMAIL PROTECTED] all the feelings you're not so much pleased http://ekhowl.goa-head.org they're just to take you to sweet harmony
Re: razor-check
On 2001-12-10 14:31:54 -0800, Vineet Kumar wrote: I think your best bet is to check them at delivery time via your MDA (maildrop, procmail, etc.) Have it add a header indicating its results, and have mutt perform checks based on the presence or contents of this header. I'd also recommend some kind of reversible spam filtering - after all, razor has had a couple of bad false positives in the past week or so, including bugtraq posts and messages to the razor-users mailing list. Possible approaches include using mutt's scoring, or creating a special folder to which all messages identified as spam by razor are written. -- Thomas Roesslerhttp://log.does-not-exist.org/ msg21492/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: a dumb question about filter ...
* Jussi Ekholm ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm always looking for ways to cut down on spam, but I haven't come up with a good rc.spam file (I have a fairly simple $HOME/.procmailrc and a bunch of $HOME/.procmail/rc.* includes). Would you care to post [a link to] your .procmailrc and method? My dotfiles (http://freak.aagh.net/dotfiles.tgz include three different rulesets - one using spamassassin (best of the bunch so far), one scoring procmail one which wasn't that good, and a simpler but more robust one I used before that. :0: * ^From.*spammer@foo\.bar /dev/null So, I don't have any intelligent spam spotter; I add the spammer's address to ~/.procmail/rc.mailsort manually. That's about it. :-) Giblet (http://www.linuxbrit.co.uk/) has a similar system in addition to his normal spam rules, only he uses grep and a list of addresses maintained by a bit of perl from mutt. -- Thomas 'Freaky' Hurst - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.aagh.net/
Re: binding a key to forward mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] definitely sucks. Don't use it. Thus spake Peter Jay Salzman, on Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 11:45:10AM -0800: hi there, how can i bind an unused key to: 1. turn on all headers 2. forward the email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3. run a script i wrote that keeps track of how much spam i get in a day thanks! pete -- ** Please don't send me html email ** PGP Fingerprint: B9F1 6CF3 47C4 7CD8 D33E 70A9 A3B9 1945 67EA 951D PGP Public Key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jose Celestino [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Re: binding a key to forward mail
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 01:24:59PM +, Jose Celestino wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] definitely sucks. Don't use it. thank you for sharing this observation. -- Dan Boger [EMAIL PROTECTED] msg21495/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Open tar.gz /tgz, bz2 with mutt
Hi, On Tue, 11 Dec 2001 Abu spewed into the ether: I want open file (tar.gz,tgz,bz2) on the fly with mutt, like open .pdf file, how can i do it with mutt? Dave Pearson has a neat mutt.octet.filter here : http://www.davep.org/mutt/ I find it quite cool :-) pv. -- Prahlad Vaidyanathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]What, me worry ? http://www.symonds.net/~prahladv/Don't Panic ! -- msg21496/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
are options replaced or and'ed?
when setting an option like lists, are: lists '[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]' and lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] equivalent? or do susequent lists directives replace earlier ones? is this behavior reasonably consistant? by reasonably consistant, i mean for example, that nobody would expect two editors to be set simultaneously after set editor='/usr/bin/vim' set editor='/usr/bin/ed' but things like unignore would behave this way. also, is there a command (like vim's :set) that lets me view all mutt configuration options? for instance, is there a way of seeing all the defined lists from within mutt? hmmm.. this email was longer than i planned. thanks for reading down this far. :) pete -- ** Please don't send me html email ** PGP Fingerprint: B9F1 6CF3 47C4 7CD8 D33E 70A9 A3B9 1945 67EA 951D PGP Public Key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: are options replaced or and'ed?
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 10:10:24 -0800 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: are options replaced or and'ed? From: Peter Jay Salzman [EMAIL PROTECTED] setting an option like lists, are: lists '[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]' and lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] equivalent? or do susequent lists directives replace earlier ones? I don't know about lists, but subscribe lines are definitely anded, and I have this feeling that mailboxes is the same. Why don't you try it? -- FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE 7:24PM up 49 days, 6:07, 13 users, load averages: 0.13, 0.11, 0.08
Re: are options replaced or and'ed?
Peter Jay Salzman muttered: when setting an option like lists, are: lists '[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]' and lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] equivalent? They are. or do susequent lists directives replace earlier ones? No s.o. is this behavior reasonably consistant? i mean for example, that nobody would expect two editors to be set simultaneously after set editor='/usr/bin/vim' set editor='/usr/bin/ed' but things like unignore would behave this way. unignore, lists, mailboxes,... are commands that append there arguments to a list of values. $editor is a variable. Variables can be set to another value. You can append, or delete an element from a list; in mutt you can only append; though. Would you expect after color index green yellow ~N color index white black ~D That there's only one color pattern in the index? also, is there a command (like vim's :set) that lets me view all mutt configuration options? AFAIK no. That would be a nice feature, though. Any takers? HTH, Michael -- PGP-Key: http://www-stud.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/~tatgeml/public.key
Empty mails without body or subject
Hi, I'm getting a lot of mails novadays which have no subject and no body at all. They all seem to come from various mailing list I'm subscribed to, nut mostly from debian-users and linux-kernel. Also all of them seem to have a bounce address of that list in the From headers. e.g bounce-debian-user... or owner-linux-kernel... I've read once somewhere, that sometimes the MUA might separate one message into two, but I don't remember the datails. Also if this is the case, should I not have the other halves somewhere? I'm using procmail to filter mail from mailing lists to their own folders, but these messages end up in my spool folder, so it's hard to see if there is another 'half' somewhere... Does anybody have any ideas what might be the cause or how to investigate? Please see attached mbox... Many thanks in advance! best regards, Balazs From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 10 22:09:10 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Envelope-to: bjavor@localhost Delivery-date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 22:09:10 +0100 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] ident=fetchmail) by zhadum.bjavor.d2g.com with esmtp (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian)) id 16DXfi-0002jL-00 for bjavor@localhost; Mon, 10 Dec 2001 22:09:10 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from freemail.hu by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.9.5) for bjavor@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 10 Dec 2001 22:09:10 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 44457 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2001 22:02:17 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bcc: Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 22:09:10 +0100 Content-Length: 0 Lines: 0 X-IMAPbase: 1008021707 1 Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1 From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 11 03:17:17 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Envelope-to: bjavor@localhost Delivery-date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 03:17:17 +0100 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] ident=fetchmail) by zhadum.bjavor.d2g.com with esmtp (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian)) id 16DcTt-0003aZ-00 for bjavor@localhost; Tue, 11 Dec 2001 03:17:17 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from freemail.hu by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.9.5) for bjavor@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 11 Dec 2001 03:17:17 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 23872 invoked from network); 11 Dec 2001 03:15:16 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bcc: Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 03:17:17 +0100 Status: RO Content-Length: 0 Lines: 0 From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 11 03:38:54 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Envelope-to: bjavor@localhost Delivery-date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 03:38:54 +0100 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] ident=fetchmail) by zhadum.bjavor.d2g.com with esmtp (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian)) id 16Dcoo-0003bs-00 for bjavor@localhost; Tue, 11 Dec 2001 03:38:54 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from freemail.hu by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.9.5) for bjavor@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 11 Dec 2001 03:38:54 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 63378 invoked from network); 11 Dec 2001 03:30:39 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bcc: Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 03:38:54 +0100 Status: RO Content-Length: 0 Lines: 0 From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 11 09:59:07 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Envelope-to: bjavor@localhost Delivery-date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 09:59:07 +0100 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] ident=fetchmail) by zhadum.bjavor.d2g.com with esmtp (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian)) id 16Dikl-0004iD-00 for bjavor@localhost; Tue, 11 Dec 2001 09:59:07 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from freemail.hu by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.9.5) for bjavor@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 11 Dec 2001 09:59:07 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 94151 invoked from network); 11 Dec 2001 09:55:21 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bcc: Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 09:59:07 +0100 Status: RO Content-Length: 0 Lines: 0 From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 11 14:40:47 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Envelope-to: bjavor@localhost Delivery-date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 14:40:47 +0100 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] ident=fetchmail) by zhadum.bjavor.d2g.com with esmtp (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian)) id 16Dn9L-0004sq-00 for bjavor@localhost; Tue, 11 Dec 2001 14:40:47 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from freemail.hu by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.9.5) for bjavor@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 11 Dec 2001 14:40:47 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 65883 invoked from network); 11 Dec 2001 14:38:58 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bcc: Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 14:40:47 +0100 Status: RO Content-Length: 0 Lines: 0 From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 11 19:32:27 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Envelope-to: bjavor@localhost Delivery-date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 19:32:27 +0100 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] ident=fetchmail)
Re: GPG-PGP
Thus spake Benjamin Michotte ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): when mutt send a GPG message, it use PGP/MIME as defined in RFC 2015 and/or 3156. Yes. Mutt is in the minority for doing this, but it's now the right way, especially for non-US character sets. Some friends use mua as kmail which still use PGP in line as described in RFC 1991 and receive my mails signed/crypted as attachments. Is it possible to ask mutt sending signed messages in line or must I force my friends to use mutt ? (I try but is difficult ;p) Yes. Try 'pgp_create_traditional', optionally with the Outlook compatibility patch. It will change the content-type so that Outlook doesn't barf on clearsigned messages. -- Justin R. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] View my website at http://codesorcery.net Please encrypt email using key 0xC9C40C31 msg21501/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
subscribe and lists commands
Hi there, the post about anding / oring values of these variables (ok, so they're listed as commands :) reminded me of one thing that was a somewhat unpleasant surprise when I started using mutt... I never got around asking about it, so here you are. :) I was quite surprised to find out that the patterns you give to subscribe are anchored at the beginning; I would certainly expect them to be anchored at the end of the string: I don't want to get into the most sites do it this or that way, so instead lemme give you an example: instead of subscribe php-dev php-qa pear-dev jitterbug I could've just have subscribe lists.php.net and instead of subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] subscribe lists.horde.org would have been enough It's obvious that this behavior is not going to change after it's been in use for so long, I'm just curious about the reasons that lead to the current behavior. And, as a bonus question: would it be possible to add RE support to subscribe and lists? -- FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE 7:34PM up 49 days, 6:17, 13 users, load averages: 0.34, 0.15, 0.10
Re: GPG-PGP
Justin R. Miller wrote: Is it possible to ask mutt sending signed messages in line or must I force my friends to use mutt ? (I try but is difficult ;p) Yes. Try 'pgp_create_traditional', optionally with the Outlook compatibility patch. It will change the content-type so that Outlook doesn't barf on clearsigned messages. I've said it before, this will only work with mails which are in us-ascii character sets. If you use another character set, pgp_create_traditional will be ignored and you'll have to hack a work around (look at the archives). Viktor -- Viktor Rosenfeld WWW: http://www.informatik.hu-berlin.de/~rosenfel/ msg21503/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: GPG-PGP
Thus spake Viktor Rosenfeld ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): I've said it before, this will only work with mails which are in us-ascii character sets. If you use another character set, pgp_create_traditional will be ignored and you'll have to hack a work around (look at the archives). Agreed. Sorry I forgot to mention that. I know that I mentioned that _someplace_ today :-) -- Justin R. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] View my website at http://codesorcery.net Please encrypt email using key 0xC9C40C31 msg21504/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
patch for multiple '?' suggestion
The more I run 1.3.24, the more I am appreciating the multiple '?'s in long threads, where some messages have been deleted, so I know which messages are on equal levels and such. But, I wonder if this could be done, which might have the same effect, but make the threads narrower. Instead of something like -?-?-?-?- , maybe things like -?4?- or the like, replacing all the '?'s with a number representing them? Seems like a happy medium. Thanks. -Ken
Re: GPG-PGP
Benjamin Michotte wrote: On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 12:19:49AM, Viktor Rosenfeld wrote: I've said it before, this will only work with mails which are in us-ascii character sets. If you use another character set, pgp_create_traditional will be ignored and you'll have to hack a work around (look at the archives). Ok, so, I will continue to push them to mutt ;) well there's always a happy middle ground. 'Becky!' has an openPGP plugin i'm told, and should work with PGP/Mime mails if this plugin is installed. there's a link to the main site for this at: http://www.rimarts.co.jp/ it's not freeware, but you can download a trial for free, and it seems quite nice. this might be easier for an Outhouse user to get used to than mutt. here's a good summary of various MUAs for different platforms (including GUI clients for 'doze) and their PGP support. http://www.cryptorights.org/pgp-users/pgp-mail-clients.html here's a link to the GnuPG plugin for becky, which appears to implement PGP/MIME http://hp.vector.co.jp/authors/VA023900/gpg-pin/manual/index_en.html -- The three wise men brought frank incest and mirth. msg21506/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Negative scores and regexp questions
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 06:43:04PM +0200, Stefan Frank wrote:
Does that mean, that I have to add a default score to all received
messages before I can delete them (or mark them read) by score?
yes, I think so.
add:
score ~A 5000
as your first scoring rule and everything should be fine (or 5 instead
of 5000 if you only need 10 steps ...)
This is a little bit strange, isn't it?
yes. I think so. I'd also prefer a range of - to (or something
like that)
--
Christian Ordig, Germany| Homepage: http://thor.prohosting.com/~chrordig/
open(IN,distris.txt)||die(Keine Distris, Du Affe!);while(IN){chomp;
print $_??? hätte ich was besseres erwartet!!! naja,was solls...\n;}
close(IN);
msg21507/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: patch for multiple '?' suggestion
Ken -- ...and then Ken Weingold said... % % The more I run 1.3.24, the more I am appreciating the multiple '?'s in ... % Instead of something like -?-?-?-?- , maybe things like -?4?- or the % like, replacing all the '?'s with a number representing them? Seems % like a happy medium. That sounds pretty cool. Daniel is working on the code and might be able to incorporate this pretty easily; drop him a note (in case he doesn't get to his list mail before finishing his updates). % % Thanks. % % % -Ken :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! msg21508/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Negative scores and regexp questions
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 02:19:33AM +0100, Christian Ordig wrote: On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 06:43:04PM +0200, Stefan Frank wrote: Does that mean, that I have to add a default score to all received messages before I can delete them (or mark them read) by score? yes, I think so. add: score ~A 5000 as your first scoring rule and everything should be fine (or 5 instead of 5000 if you only need 10 steps ...) This is a little bit strange, isn't it? yes. I think so. I'd also prefer a range of - to (or something like that) I still feel very dumb on this. Can someone explain to an idiot what the scoring is for and how you use it. The manual assumes you know. I assume it is some kind of super-filtering technique. -- Regards Cliff
Re: Negative scores and regexp questions
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 03:07:59AM +0100, Cliff Sarginson (dis)graced my inbox with: I still feel very dumb on this. Can someone explain to an idiot what the scoring is for and how you use it. The manual assumes you know. I assume it is some kind of super-filtering technique. I don't actually use scoring myself, but it is a neat idea. Each message has a score. The score is determined by rules that you set up. So if you hate emails from Joe, you can set up a rule that gives messages from Joe a really low score. After a message gets it's score, you can take action based on the score. for instance, you might want to put messages with a high score into a special folder like ~/mail/important or something, and messages with a low score into the garbage. HTH ;) -- Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The big innovation of [Windows] XP is that it has a back door that sucks out all your proprietary information and presents it to Microsoft to sell it back to you or any retailer. That's the big innovation in XP - a back door. By the way, it still runs all your favorite viruses. -- Scott McNealy, CEO of Sun Microsystems msg21510/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
how to decode mime encoded subjects?
Hi, Mutters! Hm, I didn't get an answer from anyone so I dare ask again: Is there a unix tool (or another method) to convert something like this Subject: Para =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_Carlos_Lavalle_?= into this Subject: Para José Carlos Lavalle The reason I need this is that I use procmail to display the subjects of all incoming mails via xmessage on my desktop, but this encoded subjects look really ugly and don't help me at all. Thanks a lot, Andy. -- Dr. Andy Spiegl, Radio Marañón, Jaén, Perú E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL: http://spiegl.de, http://radiomaranon.org.pe PGP/GPG: see headers o _ _ _ --- __o __o /\_ _ \\o (_)\__/o (_) -o) - _`\,__`\,__(_) (_)/_\_| \ _|/' \/ /\\ (_)/ (_) (_)/ (_) (_)(_) (_)(_)' _\o__\_v The average woman would rather have beauty than brains because the average man can see better than he can think.
Re: how to decode mime encoded subjects?
Thus spake Andy Spiegl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Is there a unix tool (or another method) to convert something like this Subject: Para =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_Carlos_Lavalle_?= into this Subject: Para José Carlos Lavalle The encoded format is called quoted-printable, and there should be utilities for it. I've seen algorithms in Perl for it, as well as native functions in PHP (though it'd be a little hackish to use a PHP shell script). Just search for 'quoted-printable decode' and I'm sure something will turn up :-) -- Justin R. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] View my website at http://codesorcery.net Please encrypt email using key 0xC9C40C31 msg21513/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
GPG-PGP
Hello, when mutt send a GPG message, it use PGP/MIME as defined in RFC 2015 and/or 3156. Some friends use mua as kmail which still use PGP in line as described in RFC 1991 and receive my mails signed/crypted as attachments. Is it possible to ask mutt sending signed messages in line or must I force my friends to use mutt ? (I try but is difficult ;p) cu, binny -- I'm trying to install the game on my new PC running Windows 2000 Professional You must have installed windows 2000 by mistake. to reinstall linux just insert your distribution cd, reboot the system -- on loki.games.civ-ctp °v° Benjamin Michotte[EMAIL PROTECTED] _o_ web : http://www.baby-linux.net msg21565/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: GPG-PGP
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 12:19:49AM, Viktor Rosenfeld wrote: I've said it before, this will only work with mails which are in us-ascii character sets. If you use another character set, pgp_create_traditional will be ignored and you'll have to hack a work around (look at the archives). Ok, so, I will continue to push them to mutt ;) Viktor ---end quoted text--- binny -- I'm trying to install the game on my new PC running Windows 2000 Professional You must have installed windows 2000 by mistake. to reinstall linux just insert your distribution cd, reboot the system -- lu sur loki.games.civ-ctp °v° Benjamin Michotte[EMAIL PROTECTED] _o_ web : http://www.baby-linux.net msg21566/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
