On 2014-09-13, Will Yardley wrote:
I don't think the stuff_all_quoted patch has been kept up to date.
No, it hasn't. One reason is that I no longer work at the company
where mutt was my primary mail client and where I regularly received
all sorts of different mail formats including
Hello,
13.09.2014, 18:11, Russell Urquhart russurquha...@verizon.net:
Can someone tell me where these log files are/what their names are?
I can't seem to find them readily.
The last log file is in your home directory and it's named `.muttdebug0'.
It's a dotfile, so `ls' will show it only when
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 06:06:26PM +0400, Alexander Gattin wrote:
Hello,
The last log file is in your home directory and it's named `.muttdebug0'.
It's a dotfile, so `ls' will show it only when run with `-a' or `-A' option.
I have looked all over my drive but i can't find this file. I
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 11:36:28PM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote:
On 2014-09-13, Will Yardley wrote:
I don't think the stuff_all_quoted patch has been kept up to date.
No, it hasn't. One reason is that I no longer work at the company
where mutt was my primary mail client and where I
What operating system are you using? If it is a Linux system, you would use ls
-alt .muttdebug* to list the mutt debug files from the command line. And need
to do it from the command line, a file viewer will not detect the files, unless
you possibly symlink to them with non-dot.file names.
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 10:42:19AM -0700, Eliana wrote:
What operating system are you using? If it is a Linux system, you would use
ls -alt .muttdebug* to list the mutt debug files from the command line. And
need to do it from the command line, a file viewer will not detect the files,
On 13Sep2014 23:36, Gary Johnson garyj...@spocom.com wrote:
On 2014-09-13, Will Yardley wrote:
I don't think the stuff_all_quoted patch has been kept up to date.
No, it hasn't. One reason is that I no longer work at the company
where mutt was my primary mail client and where I regularly
=== Lurk-Mode OFF ===
I created a minor civil war on the Mozilla list when I proposed that
text NOT be flowed at all; that it's the responsibility of the viewing
application to format messages to the user's specification; that
formatting should NOT be coded within messages. Flowing and rewrapping
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 07:05:17PM -0400, Mark Filipak wrote:
I created a minor civil war on the Mozilla list when I proposed that
text NOT be flowed at all; that it's the responsibility of the viewing
application to format messages to the user's specification; that
formatting should NOT be
* Will Yardley mutt-us...@veggiechinese.net [09-14-14 19:29]:
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 07:05:17PM -0400, Mark Filipak wrote:
I created a minor civil war on the Mozilla list when I proposed that
text NOT be flowed at all; that it's the responsibility of the viewing
application to format
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 08:20:06PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
The *real* problem is that email is a text function and all the fancy
formatting is irrelevant. Sentence structure,tables and paragraphs
suffice. And all the jump-thru-hoops to present some fancy display
disappear.
That is
Just to be sure you created the .debug files, don't forget the
-d#
command line option when envoking mutt to debug. Try to keep the
session as
-short as possible just enough work to show the problem. This keeps the
log
-files more manageable.
The # in the -d option defines the debug level, 0-4
On 2014-09-14, Derek Martin wrote:
This is one important way in which the hand some functionality
off to another program model falls down.
I don't think that this is a problem with that model. There is no
reason that an e-mail client should not hand off the task of editing
a message to an
=== Lurk-Mode OFF ===
I hesitate to be drawn in... but...
See what a hot-button topic formatting is?
Will,
Do you equate quoted text with characters at the beginning of lines?
Think about it. Embedding that stuff in the actual messages is dumb,
don't you agree? It could/should be handled as
14 matches
Mail list logo
