Sorry I meant how does this get differentiated from the mutt /
offlineimap side of things?
--
Keith Smiley
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018, at 13:17, Keith Smiley wrote:
> Sorry I meant what's the difference from the mutt / offlineimap
> perspective on these?
>
> --
> Keith Smiley
>
> On Sun, Mar 11,
Sorry I meant what's the difference from the mutt / offlineimap perspective on
these?
--
Keith Smiley
On Sun, Mar 11, 2018, at 13:01, Yubin Ruan wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 12:10:46PM -0700, Keith Smiley wrote:
> > > That is the same for archiving.
> >
> > What is the differentiation for
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 03:58:28PM -0800, Keith Smiley wrote:
> I realized this might actually be a side-effect of my nametrans settings
> which at some point were required in my configuration, but I'm not sure if
> they still are:
>
>
I realized this might actually be a side-effect of my nametrans settings
which at some point were required in my configuration, but I'm not sure
if they still are:
https://github.com/keith/dotfiles/blob/95ba28fb8e7be24ed3bbcfebcfd8aafc2b146b3f/mutt/offlineimaphelpers.py#L37-L53
It looks like that does fix undelete, but offlineimap doesn't move the
message to the trash, only the archive, when I use the default d
command. Do I need some other configuration to make that part work as
expected?
--
Keith Smiley
On 02/20, Yubin Ruan wrote:
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 12:54:19PM -0800, Keith Smiley wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> I was wondering if anyone had a working gmail configuration with offlineimap
> that correctly supports undeleting messages. In my configuration[0] I
> delete/archive by moving messages to the appropriate mailboxes.
Hey everyone,
I was wondering if anyone had a working gmail configuration with
offlineimap that correctly supports undeleting messages. In my
configuration[0] I delete/archive by moving messages to the appropriate
mailboxes. Just using standard `u` command with these results in the
message
