On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:29:47PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
for mdir
=
MAILDIR=$HOME/mail ## your mail dir below /home/user
:0:
* ^TO_mutt/-users/@mutt/.org
$MAILDIR/mutt-users
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 02:18:37AM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:29:47PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
for mdir
=
MAILDIR=$HOME/mail ## your mail dir below /home/user
:0:
*
* horseriver horseriv...@gmail.com [01-25-13 08:50]:
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 02:18:37AM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
[...]
AFAIR, maildir doesn't need locking whereas mbox does, so compare:
:0:
to
:0
i.e. no trailing semicolon.
Thanks!
To make procmail wok fine .
Incoming from Patrick Shanahan:
* horseriver horseriv...@gmail.com [01-25-13 08:50]:
To make procmail wok fine . is a .forward file in my home dir a
must ?
man procmail
Even better: http://www.procmail.org/era/lists.html
If we discussed everything that works with mutt on the
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:18:21AM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
Incoming from horseriver:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 01:46:54PM -0700, Robert Holtzman wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:58:37AM +0800, horseriver wrote:
How to edit my .procmailrc to put mails from different mail
dir below /home/user
:0:
* ^TO_mutt/-users/@mutt/.org
$MAILDIR/mutt-users/
=
reference: man procmail
man proxmailsc
man procmailex
man procmailrc
and maildir , what is the difference
between them ?
reference: man procmail
man proxmailsc
man procmailex
man procmailrc
--
(paka)Patrick Shanahan
/
=
Thanks!
But I really do not know what is mdir and maildir , what is the difference
between them ?
reference: man procmail
man proxmailsc
man procmailex
man procmailrc
sorry
:
reference: man procmail
man proxmailsc
man procmailex
man procmailrc
sorry, that mdir s/b mbox
mbox stores multiple emails in a single file while maildir separates each
email into separate files. There are advantages and dis
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:18:21AM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
Incoming from horseriver:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 01:46:54PM -0700, Robert Holtzman wrote:
snip
Read this:
http://www.ii.com/internet/robots/procmail/qs/
Is your mutt directory really
* s. keeling keel...@nucleus.com [01-24-13 12:06]:
Incoming from Patrick Shanahan:
mbox stores multiple emails in a single file while maildir separates
each email into separate files. There are advantages and
dis-advantages to each format. Personally, I use mbox but have a
great number
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 08:23:02AM +0800, horseriver wrote:
snip.
OK!
Here is my config:
:0
* ^TO_: mutt-users@mutt.org
$MAILDIR/mutt
can it works ?
Did you try it? If not, why? You're not doing your homework.
--
Bob Holtzman
If you think
* Robert Holtzman hol...@cox.net [01-24-13 13:27]:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 08:23:02AM +0800, horseriver wrote:
snip.
OK!
Here is my config:
:0
* ^TO_: mutt-users@mutt.org
$MAILDIR/mutt
can it works ?
Did you try it? If not,
=yes
in your .procmailrc, then tail -N $your_procmail_log_file where N
== number of lines to display. Note you can wrap each recipe in your
.procmailrc with VERBOSE=yes VERBOSE=no pairs to test each new
recipe by itself.
--
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
(*) :(){ :|: };:
- -
Thanks!
There is no log file generated in the $PMDIR/.
Here is my .procmailrc:
VERBOSE=yes
# Upon debugging remove the #
LOGABSTRACT=all
MAILDIR=$HOME/Mail
PMDIR=$HOME/procmail #procmail home dir
LOGFILE=$PMDIR/log
INCLUDERC=$PMDIR/test.rc
INCLUDERC=$PMDIR/lists.rc
* horseriver horseriv...@gmail.com [01-24-13 23:25]:
Thanks!
There is no log file generated in the $PMDIR/.
Here is my .procmailrc:
VERBOSE=yes
# Upon debugging remove the #
LOGABSTRACT=all
MAILDIR=$HOME/Mail
PMDIR=$HOME/procmail #procmail home dir
LOGFILE=$PMDIR
* Patrick Shanahan ptilopt...@gmail.com [01-24-13 23:36]:
* horseriver horseriv...@gmail.com [01-24-13 23:25]:
Thanks!
There is no log file generated in the $PMDIR/.
Here is my .procmailrc:
VERBOSE=yes
# Upon debugging remove the #
LOGABSTRACT=all
MAILDIR
hi:
How to edit my .procmailrc to put mails from different mail list into
different maildir?
can this work :
:0
* ^to: mutt-users@mutt.org
mutt-users@mutt.org
thanks
* horseriver horseriv...@gmail.com [2013-01-23 13:42]:
hi:
How to edit my .procmailrc to put mails from different mail list into
different maildir?
can this work :
:0
* ^to: mutt-users@mutt.org
mutt-users@mutt.org
thanks
I use a more generic approach for this since years
Incoming from horseriver:
How to edit my .procmailrc to put mails from different mail list
into different maildir?
can this work :
:0
* ^to: mutt-users@mutt.org
mutt-users@mutt.org
.^^^
That should be a file (mbox) or folder (maildir). Otherwise
* horseriver horseriv...@gmail.com [01-01-70 12:34]:
How to edit my .procmailrc to put mails from different mail list
into different maildir?
can this work :
:0
* ^to: mutt-users@mutt.org
mutt-users@mutt.org
it would be better:
for mdir
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:58:37AM +0800, horseriver wrote:
hi:
How to edit my .procmailrc to put mails from different mail list into
different maildir?
can this work :
:0
* ^to: mutt-users@mutt.org
mutt-users@mutt.org
thanks
This is a configuration that I used to use
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:58:37AM +0800, horseriver wrote:
hi:
How to edit my .procmailrc to put mails from different mail list into
different maildir?
can this work :
:0
* ^to: mutt-users@mutt.org
mutt-users@mutt.org
Read this:
http://www.ii.com/internet/robots
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:17:45AM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
Incoming from horseriver:
How to edit my .procmailrc to put mails from different mail list
into different maildir?
can this work :
:0
* ^to: mutt-users@mutt.org
mutt-users@mutt.org
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 01:46:54PM -0700, Robert Holtzman wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:58:37AM +0800, horseriver wrote:
hi:
How to edit my .procmailrc to put mails from different mail list into
different maildir?
can this work :
:0
* ^to: mutt-users@mutt.org
Incoming from horseriver:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 01:46:54PM -0700, Robert Holtzman wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:58:37AM +0800, horseriver wrote:
How to edit my .procmailrc to put mails from different mail
list into different maildir?
can this work :
:0
* Gregor Zattler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi Thomas,
which 7 other ml headers did you mean?
Mailing-List: list
Sender: owner-
X-BeenThere:
Delivered-To: mailing list
X-Mailing-List:
X-Loop:
X-List:
X-ML-Name:
My full lists.rc is at http://voi.aagh.net/code/lists.rc if you want a
real
Hi Thomas,
* Thomas Hurst [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02. Okt. 2002]:
[mailing list filter]
Nice generalised solution:
:0:
* ^Sender: owner-\/[^@]+
lists/`echo $MATCH | sed -e 's/[\/]/_/g'`
Repeat for the 7 other common mailing list headers, and you're all
done, assuming you don't want to get
* savanna ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
A slightly offtopic question - I'm using procmail for my mail
filtering, just wondering what people are using to catch all of the
mutt-users email.
Nice generalised solution:
:0:
* ^Sender: owner-\/[^@]+
lists/`echo $MATCH | sed -e 's/[\/]/_/g'`
Repeat
* Patrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Oliver Fuchs [EMAIL PROTECTED] [09-30-02 18:56]:
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, savanna wrote:
A slightly offtopic question - I'm using procmail for my mail filtering,
..
You might find this easier/simpler:
:0:
* ^Sender:.*owner\-mutt\-
mutt
Thanks
A slightly offtopic question - I'm using procmail for my mail filtering,
just wondering what people are using to catch all of the mutt-users
email. I'm currently using:
:0 :
* ^To:.*(mutt-.*)
mutt-users
:0 :
* ^Cc:.*(mutt-.*)
mutt-users
:0 :
* ^From:.*(mutt-.*)
mutt-users
An better recipe out
* savanna [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-30 15:51]:
A slightly offtopic question - I'm using procmail for my mail
filtering, just wondering what people are using to catch all of the
mutt-users email. I'm currently using:
[-- snip --]
An better recipe out there?
I've been using:
# Mutt
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 01:19:54PM +1000, savanna wrote:
A slightly offtopic question - I'm using procmail for my mail filtering,
just wondering what people are using to catch all of the mutt-users
email. I'm currently using:
:0 :
* ^To:.*(mutt-.*)
mutt-users
:0 :
* ^Cc:.*(mutt-.*)
-.*)
mutt-users
:0 :
* ^From:.*(mutt-.*)
mutt-users
man procmailrc. search for TO.
HTH
--
.~.
/V\ L I N U X
/( )\ Phear the Penguin
^^-^^
msg31327/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
* at 30. Sep. 2002 wrote savanna:
An better recipe out there? (procmail recipes aren't my strength).
Yes, i use
:0 H
* Sender:.*[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| rcvstore +Foren/Mutt-Users
Bye Michael
--
Bash ist zwar nur trocken Brot und Wasser,
aber Tcl ist Nutella mit Maggi ;) -- Christian Perle in
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, savanna wrote:
A slightly offtopic question - I'm using procmail for my mail filtering,
just wondering what people are using to catch all of the mutt-users
email. I'm currently using:
:0 :
* ^To:.*(mutt-.*)
mutt-users
:0 :
* ^Cc:.*(mutt-.*)
mutt-users
:0 :
*
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, savanna wrote:
A slightly offtopic question - I'm using procmail for my mail filtering,
just wondering what people are using to catch all of the mutt-users
email. I'm currently using:
:0 :
* ^To:.*(mutt-.*)
mutt-users
:0 :
* ^Cc:.*(mutt-.*)
mutt-users
:0 :
*
* On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, savanna wrote:
A slightly offtopic question - I'm using procmail for my mail filtering,
just wondering what people are using to catch all of the mutt-users
email. I'm currently using:
:0 :
* ^To:.*(mutt-.*)
mutt-users
:0 :
* ^Cc:.*(mutt-.*)
mutt-users
:0 :
Bernard Massot wrote:
I'm using this one :
:0:
* ^TO.*mutt-users(mutt.org|.*gbnet.net)
ML/mutt-users
I believe that TO.* is redundant, since there's already a .* built in
to ^TO and ^TO_
--
Will Yardley
input: william hq . newdream . net .
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 11:53:10PM +0200, Oliver Fuchs wrote:
An erlier mail by Sven Guckes shows this alternatives:
* From: Sven Guckes
* Subject: Re: procmail filerting for mutt lists
* Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 13:22:39 -0700
[...]
:0:
*
* Oliver Fuchs [EMAIL PROTECTED] [09-30-02 18:56]:
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, savanna wrote:
A slightly offtopic question - I'm using procmail for my mail filtering,
just wondering what people are using to catch all of the mutt-users
email. I'm currently using:
:0 :
* ^To:.*(mutt-.*)
Isn't that supposed to be * ^TO_.*@...? Aren't you missing an
underscore there?
From the procmailrc man page:
If the regular expression contains `^TO_' it will be sub
stituted by `(^((Original-)?(Resent-)?(To|Cc|Bcc)|(X-
Envelope|Apparently(-Resent)?)-To):(.*[^-a-zA-Z0
hello,
has someone tried procmailrc when you use the pop functionnality of mutt?
mutt fetches all my mail in /var/spool/mail/$LOGNAME
I made a .forward and .procmailrc
checked the permissions of these files
I made a small test so if I sent a mail with test in the subject it should go
Andre Bonhote proclaimed on mutt-users that:
is there a way to kinda automatically add an entry to my procmailrc from
within mutt? someting like this:
Try www.spambouncer.org - it keeps updating a set of procmail recipes to stop
spam ... or try http://razor.sourceforge.net
-s
if what you want is just to send the (previously unfiltered)
spam to /dev/null, there is no need to interact with procmail.
no, that's not exactly what i want. i'd rather like to have a
script/macro/program which can be used to populate my .procmailrc. no
matter if it's spam
Andre Bonhote wrote:
hi out there
i am using mutt 1.2.5i together with fetchmail and procmail.
is there a way to kinda automatically add an entry to my procmailrc from
within mutt? someting like this:
Andre,
if what you want is just to send the (previously unfiltered)
spam to /dev
Marco Fioretti proclaimed on mutt-users that:
The right solution is to tell from mutt that, from now on,
messages with that (sender, header...) must be
destroyed ON THE POP3 server before ever downloading them.
This also cuts on phone bills, if any.
You'd do better to
1. Enable
hi out there
i am using mutt 1.2.5i together with fetchmail and procmail.
is there a way to kinda automatically add an entry to my procmailrc from
within mutt? someting like this:
- mail arrives
- ah, it's spam
- hit ^k (or something else, of course)
- let me decide, what procmail
# Nuke duplicate messages
:0 Wh: msgid.lock
| $FORMAIL -D 8192 msgid.cache
This recipe should not be used. It can cause mail loss. Read the
_complete_ example in the procmailex man page.
Now, this works nicely most of the time but I find that about 50% of
postings from mutt-users are
On 2000.10.16 11:03:17, you,
the extraordinary Lars Hecking, opined:
(quoting someone)
# Nuke duplicate messages
:0 Wh: msgid.lock
| $FORMAIL -D 8192 msgid.cache
This recipe should not be used. It can cause mail loss. Read the
_complete_ example in the procmailex man page.
Is
Conor Daly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Sun, 15 Oct 2000:
Now, this works nicely most of the time but I find that about 50% of
postings from mutt-users are coming directly from the authors rather than
from the list. I suspect that this is to do with how long the list takes
to turn around a
51 matches
Mail list logo
