Re: Spam filtering software

2002-08-30 Thread John Buttery
* Stef Slamon [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-28 08:34:03 -0700]: On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 04:05:57AM -0500, John Buttery wrote: Anyway, just out of curiosity, how come you guys aren't using TMDA? Just haven't found it yet, or...? Because I'm using ASK (www.paganini.net/ask), and it works

Re: TDMA (was Re: Spam filtering software)

2002-08-29 Thread John Buttery
* Chris Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-28 10:15:48 +0100]: On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 04:05:57AM -0500, John Buttery wrote: Anyway, just out of curiosity, how come you guys aren't using TMDA? Just haven't found it yet, or...? Probably because it's useless for quite a number of people.

Spam filtering software

2002-08-28 Thread John Buttery
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-27 02:29:36 -0600]: Alas! Ken Weingold spake thus: On Mon, Aug 26, 2002, Kai Weber wrote: + Ken Weingold [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Yeah, but with procmail I can send them to /dev/null. With Spamassassin they go to my spam folder for review. You can

Re: TDMA (was Re: Spam filtering software)

2002-08-28 Thread Chris Green
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 04:05:57AM -0500, John Buttery wrote: blacklisting adds 100 to the score. All you really have to do is set your procmail rules so that mails with a score over 90 are sent to /dev/null, and mails with less are sent to your spam folder. Then you get pretty much the

Re: TDMA (was Re: Spam filtering software)

2002-08-28 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 10:15:48 +0100 From: Chris Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TDMA (was Re: Spam filtering software) On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 04:05:57AM -0500, John Buttery wrote: Anyway, just out of curiosity, how come you guys aren't using TMDA? Just haven't found it yet

Re: TDMA (was Re: Spam filtering software)

2002-08-28 Thread Chris Green
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 12:34:58PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote: Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 10:15:48 +0100 From: Chris Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TDMA (was Re: Spam filtering software) On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 04:05:57AM -0500, John Buttery wrote: Anyway, just out

Re: TDMA (was Re: Spam filtering software)

2002-08-28 Thread Roman Neuhauser
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 11:46:59 +0100 From: Chris Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TDMA (was Re: Spam filtering software) On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 12:34:58PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote: Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 10:15:48 +0100 From: Chris Green [EMAIL

Re: TDMA (was Re: Spam filtering software)

2002-08-28 Thread Chris Green
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 01:58:32PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote: I think you should re-read the tmda docs, especially the client configuration. Yes? This assumes that I own a domain and have an unlimited number of E-Mail addresses available to me, again not the normal

Re: TDMA (was Re: Spam filtering software)

2002-08-28 Thread darren chamberlain
* Chris Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-28 08:38]: On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 01:58:32PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote: 2) the smtp server of your provider accepts addresses with extensions I can't see this bit about accepting addresses with extensions. My adddress here is

Re: Spam filtering software

2002-08-28 Thread Stef Slamon
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 04:05:57AM -0500, John Buttery wrote: OK, this should have been its own thread a long time ago. :) Anyway, just out of curiosity, how come you guys aren't using TMDA? Just haven't found it yet, or...? Because I'm using ASK (www.paganini.net/ask), and it works