* David J. Weller-Fahy dave-lists-mutt-us...@weller-fahy.com [2013-01-14
21:31:13 -0500]:
* Will Fiveash will.five...@oracle.com [2013-01-14 14:22 -0500]:
Indeed, with hide_top_limited=yes I can limit the display of a
subthread in the desired way. I'm now using this index macro:
macro
:
Hrm... have you tried a combination of 'tag-subthread' and
'limit'?
That is close but not exactly what I'm looking for. The indentation
level of the subtree parent is such with the thread I'm looking at
that the thread display is still beyond the terminal window
* Will Fiveash will.five...@oracle.com [2013-01-14 14:22 -0500]:
Indeed, with hide_top_limited=yes I can limit the display of a
subthread in the desired way. I'm now using this index macro:
macro index _S tag-subthreadlimit~T\ntag-subthread Display only
subthread
with
' and
'limit'?
That is close but not exactly what I'm looking for. The indentation
level of the subtree parent is such with the thread I'm looking at
that the thread display is still beyond the terminal window. It would
be perfect if mutt could also reset the indent level of the subtree
* Will Fiveash will.five...@oracle.com [2013-01-10 18:49 -0500]:
What I'd like is a way to temporarily pull in a subthread so I can
see the threading. To put it another way, make some message that's
the parent of a subthread look like the parent of the entire thread
causing mutt to hide the
for. The indentation
level of the subtree parent is such with the thread I'm looking at that
the thread display is still beyond the terminal window. It would be
perfect if mutt could also reset the indent level of the subtree parent
to 0.
--
Will Fiveash
of the subtree parent is such with the thread I'm looking at
that the thread display is still beyond the terminal window. It would
be perfect if mutt could also reset the indent level of the subtree
parent to 0.
Yep, sorry about the red herring: I just checked on a huge thread in
another list
Occasionally I'm involved in a very long e-mail thread such that the
threading indicators are beyond the width of my terminal window. What
I'd like is a way to temporarily pull in a subthread so I can see the
threading. To put it another way, make some message that's the parent
of a subthread
* Will Fiveash on Thursday, January 10, 2013 at 17:47:21 -0600
Occasionally I'm involved in a very long e-mail thread such that the
threading indicators are beyond the width of my terminal window. What
I'd like is a way to temporarily pull in a subthread so I can see the
threading. To put it
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 12:13:06AM +, Christian Ebert wrote:
set narrow_tree
That is the only option that controls the width of the tree. The
alternative would be some macros that to change $index_format to
make the subject field wider.
On Thursday, 10 January 2013 at 17:47, Will Fiveash wrote:
Occasionally I'm involved in a very long e-mail thread such that the
threading indicators are beyond the width of my terminal window. What
I'd like is a way to temporarily pull in a subthread so I can see the
threading. To put it
to the existing main thread in a
place that still hid the subtree thread display. 8^/
--
Will Fiveash
Oracle Solaris Software Engineer
Austin, TX, USA
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 12:13:06AM +, Christian Ebert wrote:
* Will Fiveash on Thursday, January 10, 2013 at 17:47:21 -0600
Occasionally I'm involved in a very long e-mail thread such that the
threading indicators are beyond the width of my terminal window. What
I'd like is a way to
, but it
might not be too hard to make.
I'd tried breaking the thread but with the threading options I'm using
mutt automatically added the subtree to the existing main thread in a
place that still hid the subtree thread display. 8^/
I guess you mean strict_threads=no. It seems like a bug
the subtree thread display. 8^/
I guess you mean strict_threads=no. It seems like a bug to me that
breaking threads doesn't break them in nonstrict mode too.
Yes, I have strict_threads=no set in my .muttrc. Perhaps I will revisit
that setting which I set years ago and have forgotten
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 08:04:11PM -0400, PeterKorman wrote:
Here are the gory details. Much of my communication is not through
mailing lists. As a rule I don't go to a folder to exchange mail with
a particular person.
that's what I meant ... nearly nobody has one folder per person.
I want
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 01:40:27PM +0200, Christian Ordig wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 08:04:11PM -0400, PeterKorman wrote:
Here are the gory details. Much of my communication is not through
mailing lists. As a rule I don't go to a folder to exchange mail with
a particular person.
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 03:48:39AM +0200, René Clerc wrote:
* PeterKorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [17-09-2002 19:21]:
I think I can correctly interpret what you said in more than 1 way.
So I wont try.
given:
1)message to Sally
2)reply from Sally
3)reply to reply from Sally.
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 12:42:17AM +0200, Christian Ordig wrote:
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 03:48:39AM +0200, René Clerc wrote:
* PeterKorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [17-09-2002 19:21]:
I think I can correctly interpret what you said in more than 1 way.
So I wont try.
given:
On Wed 18-Sep-2002 at 12:45:21AM -0400, PeterKorman wrote:
I guess I need a kind of virtual folder that joins my outgoing
and incoming without duplicating any data.
That isn't possible with mutt
I guess since I'm running on linux, with Maildir, I could brute
force the solution
I'm set up with mutt to bcc all sent data to
a local address that qmail puts in the proper
Maildir subdirectory. Thatz fine for mailing list posts. But
If I want to thread normal conversations, I can't see the whole
converstion without bouncing between my sent directory and
my inbox.
I set this
Peter,
please send your questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED]!
* PeterKorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [17-09-2002 18:21]:
Is there a way to thread full (non news group) conversations
without duplicating and maintaining 2 copies of every message
I send? Thanks.
I use procmail (which puts incoming mails
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 06:43:56PM +0200, René Clerc wrote:
Peter,
please send your questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED]!
Oops!
* PeterKorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [17-09-2002 18:21]:
Is there a way to thread full (non news group) conversations
without duplicating and maintaining 2 copies of
On Tue 17-Sep-2002 at 01:20:09 -0400, PeterKorman wrote:
My current method places messages 1 and 3 in my sent folder.
Message 2 goes into my inbox.
I could automatically put everything I send in both my inbox
and my sent folder.
That would solve the thread problem. But would duplicate
* PeterKorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [17-09-2002 19:21]:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 06:43:56PM +0200, René Clerc wrote:
I use procmail (which puts incoming mails in the correct folder)
in combo with fcc-hooks (which put outgoing mails in the same folder)
Is this what you meant?
I think I
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 06:39:08PM +0100, Bruno Postle wrote:
On Tue 17-Sep-2002 at 01:20:09 -0400, PeterKorman wrote:
My current method places messages 1 and 3 in my sent folder.
Message 2 goes into my inbox.
I could automatically put everything I send in both my inbox
and my sent
26 matches
Mail list logo
