On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 01:16:24PM +0300, Alexander Gattin wrote:
I tried my best to not give a clueless advice this
time, so before suggesting to omit the user@ part
from smtp_url I studied the mutt-1.5.20/smtp.c
source:
if (conn-account.flags M_ACCT_USER)
{
if (!mutt_bit_isset
Hello,
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 06:08:10PM -0700, jeremy
bentham wrote:
I'm sure I tried that--I didn't record
everything I did, but that is something I
_would_ try.
I tried my best to not give a clueless advice this
time, so before suggesting to omit the user@ part
from smtp_url I studied the
Hello,
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 05:23:36PM -0700, jeremy
bentham wrote:
3.263. smtp_authenticators
Type: string
[...]
Yes. I found this. I tried various values,
including the empty string, and nothing changed.
probably, mutt uses default authenticators list
when
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:13:15AM +0300, Alexander Gattin wrote:
[...]
msmtp does SMTP well, and I use msmtp instead of
smtp_url -- that's why my advices earlier in the
thread missed the target. I have the last
suggestion though: try to omit user@ part from
smtp_url.
I'm sure I tried
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 07:45:32PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* jeremy bentham d...@eskimo.com [06-23-12 19:36]:
...
Ok, I installed msmtp and after a bit of flailing about got it
working.
Part of the flailing included an error message from
mail.eskimo.com that it didn't support
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 06:37:54PM -0700, jeremy bentham wrote:
On Jun 22 you wrote:
Hello,
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 05:06:40PM -0700, jeremy
bentham wrote:
[stuff about inability to send mail from my own machine's mutt]
instant connection refused, with either smtp
or smtps,
* jeremy bentham d...@eskimo.com [06-23-12 19:36]:
...
Ok, I installed msmtp and after a bit of flailing about got it
working.
Part of the flailing included an error message from
mail.eskimo.com that it didn't support authentication.
So I suppose it's puking when mutt insists.
msmtp
