Samim,
Monday, April 22, 2002, 11:20:48 AM, you wrote:
S> This question is probably repeated each week, but I am an absolute beginner
S> with MySQL. Sorry for that. I've installed the precompiled binaries for Win,
S> and I am very satisfied with MySQL. The only thing I couldn't find is
S> support
Samim,
- Original Message -
From: ""Samim"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: mailing.database.mysql
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 11:31 AM
Subject: InnoDB, BDB
> Hello,
>
> This question is probably repeated each week, but I am an absolute
beginner
Hello,
This question is probably repeated each week, but I am an absolute beginner
with MySQL. Sorry for that. I've installed the precompiled binaries for Win,
and I am very satisfied with MySQL. The only thing I couldn't find is
support for transactions, although it was written in the documentat
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 11:39:32AM -0700, Eric J. Schwertfeger wrote:
>
> Aside from what's in the manual, I have a little to offer. I just
> got InnoDB working yesterday, so take what I have to say with a
> grain of salt.
And I'll add a bit, too. :-)
> Gemini: Currently in Beta testing, with
On Fri, 11 May 2001, Kevin McBrearty wrote:
> I have re-read the appropriate manual sections several times, trying to
> decide what is the best option for my database table types. I am using
> 3.32.37 on
> Linux, and am torn between InnoDB, BDB, and Gemini table types. Transaction
&
eve Ruby'; 'Kevin McBrearty';
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: InnoDB, BDB, and Gemini
>
>
> Have you noticed a significant speed decline using Gemini tables?
> RH
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Warren van der Merwe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
Have you noticed a significant speed decline using Gemini tables?
RH
-Original Message-
From: Warren van der Merwe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 11:31 AM
To: 'Steve Ruby'; 'Kevin McBrearty'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: InnoDB, BDB, and Gem
; Of Steve Ruby
> Sent: 11 May 2001 06:10
> To: Kevin McBrearty; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: InnoDB, BDB, and Gemini
>
>
>
> InnoDB definately provides more features that BDB, and is probably
> going to be faster, Gemini isn't available yet. BDB might be more
> c
in the 3.23.37
distribution with regard to BDB, Monty sais they are fix in .38
Kevin McBrearty wrote:
>
> I have re-read the appropriate manual sections several times, trying to
> decide what is the best option for my database table types. I am using
> 3.32.37 on
> Linux, and am torn b
I have re-read the appropriate manual sections several times, trying to
decide what is the best option for my database table types. I am using
3.32.37 on
Linux, and am torn between InnoDB, BDB, and Gemini table types. Transaction
handling is very important for my application (commit, rollback
I am in the process of building a database/php app that is going to require
transaction support. Which table type should I go with? BerkeleyDB or
Innobase?? It looks like the InnoDB has some neat features like row-level
locking, etc. but is it stable enough for a production system, or should it
be
11 matches
Mail list logo
