On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 11:39:32AM -0700, Eric J. Schwertfeger wrote:
Aside from what's in the manual, I have a little to offer. I just
got InnoDB working yesterday, so take what I have to say with a
grain of salt.
And I'll add a bit, too. :-)
Gemini: Currently in Beta testing, with no
I have re-read the appropriate manual sections several times, trying to
decide what is the best option for my database table types. I am using
3.32.37 on
Linux, and am torn between InnoDB, BDB, and Gemini table types. Transaction
handling is very important for my application (commit, rollback
distribution with regard to BDB, Monty sais they are fix in .38
Kevin McBrearty wrote:
I have re-read the appropriate manual sections several times, trying to
decide what is the best option for my database table types. I am using
3.32.37 on
Linux, and am torn between InnoDB, BDB, and Gemini
: 11 May 2001 06:10
To: Kevin McBrearty; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: InnoDB, BDB, and Gemini
InnoDB definately provides more features that BDB, and is probably
going to be faster, Gemini isn't available yet. BDB might be more
complete/stable.
So I'd say Gemini is out of the picture
Have you noticed a significant speed decline using Gemini tables?
RH
-Original Message-
From: Warren van der Merwe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 11:31 AM
To: 'Steve Ruby'; 'Kevin McBrearty'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: InnoDB, BDB, and Gemini
Goodday to you
PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: InnoDB, BDB, and Gemini
Have you noticed a significant speed decline using Gemini tables?
RH
-Original Message-
From: Warren van der Merwe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 11:31 AM
To: 'Steve Ruby'; 'Kevin McBrearty'; [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Fri, 11 May 2001, Kevin McBrearty wrote:
I have re-read the appropriate manual sections several times, trying to
decide what is the best option for my database table types. I am using
3.32.37 on
Linux, and am torn between InnoDB, BDB, and Gemini table types. Transaction
handling is very
