Re: Named pipe vs TCP/IP speed

2003-08-23 Thread Matt W
- Original Message - From: "Jakob Dölling" > Hi: > > > This surprised me! I have been connecting with named pipes (and telling > > others to do the same) on Win2k since I discovered them, because my queries > > (and time to connect) are most definitely *faster*. The client/server > > commu

Re: Named pipe vs TCP/IP speed

2003-08-23 Thread Jakob Dölling
Hi: > This surprised me! I have been connecting with named pipes (and telling > others to do the same) on Win2k since I discovered them, because my queries > (and time to connect) are most definitely *faster*. The client/server > communication is about 25-30% slower using TCP/IP. Example: a simpl

Named pipe vs TCP/IP speed

2003-08-22 Thread Matt W
Hi all, I just noticed this in the manual yesterday: http://www.mysql.com/doc/en/Windows_running.html "MySQL supports TCP/IP on all Windows platforms. The mysqld-nt and mysql-max-nt servers support named pipes on NT, 2000, and XP. The default is to use TCP/IP regardless of the platform, because n