On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 10:49:43 -0600, Andrew Close [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 09:11:32 -0500, Craig Partin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In doing some recent window shopping it seemed to me that you get more
for your money in buying an LCD monitor than a TV. With a myth system
the
As much as I'd love to spend $/£1300 on something like this, I don't
have the spare cash at the moment.
In the interium I am thinking of getting a 19 LCD Monitor for £200 to
replace my 21 TV - I know the formats are not quite the same so the
19 will be smaller, but I need a tv that accepts Svideo
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 13:45:39 +, Greg Cope [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the interium I am thinking of getting a 19 LCD Monitor for £200 to
replace my 21 TV - I know the formats are not quite the same so the
19 will be smaller, but I need a tv that accepts Svideo (mine does
not!).
The 17-19
In doing some recent window shopping it seemed to me that you get more
for your money in buying an LCD monitor than a TV. With a myth system
the need for a tuner in the TV isn't really necessary. You also
wouldn't have any of the HDCP worries like that poor guy with the
Samsung.
The drawbacks
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 09:11:32 -0500, Craig Partin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In doing some recent window shopping it seemed to me that you get more
for your money in buying an LCD monitor than a TV. With a myth system
the need for a tuner in the TV isn't really necessary. You also
wouldn't have
