Re: Cogent & FDCServers: Knowingly aiding and abetting fraud and theft?

In message , Mel Beckman wrote: >I’m just saying that I randomly checked one fact and it doesn’t meet >the level of positive certainty that you asserted. It’s thus reasonable >to ask you to double check your research all around. I’m not willing >to be your unpaid copy editor, so let me know

Re: Cogent & FDCServers: Knowingly aiding and abetting fraud and theft?

The fact that the port authority building is also an office building with multiple other tenants? Whois contacts on a defunct domain belonging to an Australian government port authority agency that’s since been renamed don’t appear to support your hypothesis that this is another tenant of a

Re: Cogent & FDCServers: Knowingly aiding and abetting fraud and theft?

Ron, I’m just saying that I randomly checked one fact and it doesn’t meet the level of positive certainty that you asserted. It’s thus reasonable to ask you to double check your research all around. I’m not willing to be your unpaid copy editor, so let me know when you’ve done a double check

Re: Cogent & FDCServers: Knowingly aiding and abetting fraud and theft?

In message <67b3e0d5-7d09-42e2-a753-eb6c93859...@getmailspring.com>, Florian Brandstetter wrote: >if you'd open the traceroute you just sent you'd see that the target >is route looping and not actually used by their alleged customer? Yea. So? How is that relevant to my fundamental narrative?

Re: Google DNS Oddity

Nick Hilliard wrote on 06/09/2019 21:19: Chip Marshall via NANOG wrote on 06/09/2019 20:11: Hello, I'm seeing an oddity when doing DNS lookups for www.google.com from our London datacenter, and I'm curious if other people are seeing the same behavior. I saw a bunch of monitoring systems

Re: rr.level3.net on autopilot?

For following up, their IPadmin team (person) did reach out and resolve this asap for us. Thanks! -- Bryan Fields 727-409-1194 - Voice http://bryanfields.net

Re: Cogent & FDCServers: Knowingly aiding and abetting fraud and theft?

In message <23540.1567802...@segfault.tristatelogic.com>, I wrote: >Is anyone disputing that 168.198.0.0/16 belongs to the Australian >national government, or that AS174, Cogent was, until quite recently, >routing that down to their pals at FDCServers who then were routing >it down to their

Re: Google DNS Oddity

On 2019-09-06, Stephen Stuart sent: > Do you see the same behavior when you execute your dig query without > the trailing dot? Yes. dig adds on the trailing dot to make it an FQDN anyway, so the on-wire qname is the same either way. -- Chip Marshall

Re: Cogent & FDCServers: Knowingly aiding and abetting fraud and theft?

In message <5233b9b9-1bff-425d-bb8f-e3853703b...@beckman.org>, Mel Beckman wrote: >A quick check of one of your facts produces unexpected results, so you might >want to perform more research. According the APNIC, 139.44.0.0/16 does not >“belong unambiguously to the Port Authority of

Re: Google DNS Oddity

On 2019-09-06, Jared Mauch sent: > You may want to post on dns-operations instead. Will do. > Can you do a dig +trace www.google.com instead, that would be more > instructive about what’s happening at each layer of the delegation. # dig +trace www.google.com. ; <<>> DiG 9.10.3-P4-Ubuntu

Re: Google DNS Oddity

Chip Marshall via NANOG wrote on 06/09/2019 20:11: Hello, I'm seeing an oddity when doing DNS lookups for www.google.com from our London datacenter, and I'm curious if other people are seeing the same behavior. I saw a bunch of monitoring systems queries for www.google.com/A return back with

Re: Google DNS Oddity

Do you see the same behavior when you execute your dig query without the trailing dot? Thanks, Stephen > > On Sep 6, 2019, at 3:11 PM, Chip Marshall via NANOG wrote: > > > > Hello, I'm seeing an oddity when doing DNS lookups for www.google.com from > > our > > London datacenter, and I'm

Re: Google DNS Oddity

> On Sep 6, 2019, at 3:11 PM, Chip Marshall via NANOG wrote: > > Hello, I'm seeing an oddity when doing DNS lookups for www.google.com from our > London datacenter, and I'm curious if other people are seeing the same > behavior. > > It appears that when we ask for www.google.com. we

Google DNS Oddity

Hello, I'm seeing an oddity when doing DNS lookups for www.google.com from our London datacenter, and I'm curious if other people are seeing the same behavior. It appears that when we ask for www.google.com. we sometimes get an answer that only contains records for www-anycast.google.com., which

Re: Art and Tech is madness

--- cb...@gizmopartners.com wrote: From: Chris Boyd There’s also this gem from 2005 or 2007 days. I’ve heard Cisco staff was involved in its creation. http://www.mattzrelak.com/mp3/t1down.htm -- At work... == This site is

Weekly Routing Table Report

This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan. The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG TZNOG, MENOG, BJNOG, SDNOG, CMNOG, LACNOG and the RIPE Routing WG. Daily listings are sent to

Re: IPAM recommendations

You might also want to look at 6connect. Owen > On Sep 6, 2019, at 02:05 , > wrote: > > I tried all 3 netbox, nipap and phpipam as a gui user and I like the phpipam > the best as it has most knobs and features and is very intuitive, (can't > comment on the api richness, yet) > But what is

Re: Cogent & FDCServers: Knowingly aiding and abetting fraud and theft?

On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 8:13 AM Neo Soon Keat wrote: > Sorry, re-sending to include the list. > > Looking at the history of the prefix, it does look like it did belong to > the now-defunct Port of Melbourne Authority, with the matching e-mail > address. That particular organization, however, no

RE: gtt bgp fu?

+ @Adam Davenport Rob Wcislo VP, Sales office: +1(908)516-4211 www.gtt.net [GTT_Logo_RGB_Blue] -Original Message- From: NANOG On Behalf Of Randy Bush Sent: Friday, September 6, 2019 8:56 AM To: North American Network Operators'

Re: Cogent & FDCServers: Knowingly aiding and abetting fraud and theft?

Sorry, re-sending to include the list. Looking at the history of the prefix, it does look like it did belong to the now-defunct Port of Melbourne Authority, with the matching e-mail address. That particular organization, however, no longer exists, having been absorbed into the Port of

Re: Cogent & FDCServers: Knowingly aiding and abetting fraud and theft?

Important realization: Things don’t always work there like they work here (wherever “here” is for you). -Ben > On Sep 6, 2019, at 6:57 AM, Carlos Friaças via NANOG wrote: > > > Hi, > > (Also never been in Australia, unfortunately...) > > Netname is "PMANET": > ...isn't it OK to assume it

Re: Cogent & FDCServers: Knowingly aiding and abetting fraud and theft?

Hi, (Also never been in Australia, unfortunately...) Netname is "PMANET": ...isn't it OK to assume it could stand for "Port of Melbourne Authority Network"? * pma.vic.gov.au is not operational (i wonder what can be found with passive dns) * vic.gov.au is still operational. Quick

Re: Cogent & FDCServers: Knowingly aiding and abetting fraud and theft?

A quick check of one of your facts produces unexpected results, so you might want to perform more research. According the APNIC, 139.44.0.0/16 does not “belong unambiguously to the Port Authority of Melbourne”. It belongs to an individual, with an office address at a building called “Port

gtt bgp fu?

hi. i would love to chat (email) with someone in gtt (AS3257) who has bgp fu. doing some bgp measurements, we see something we do not understand and would love a clue. thanks. randy

Re: Art and Tech is madness

On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 11:04:30PM -0500, Chris Boyd wrote: > There???s also this gem from 2005 or 2007 days. I???ve heard Cisco staff was > involved in its creation. > > http://www.mattzrelak.com/mp3/t1down.htm If this is keeping on topic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CyvQ5Pu_k1o > >

RE: IPAM recommendations

I tried all 3 netbox, nipap and phpipam as a gui user and I like the phpipam the best as it has most knobs and features and is very intuitive, (can't comment on the api richness, yet) But what is strange is that none of these tools provides RT (or extended/standard communities or even vlan for

Re: rr.level3.net on autopilot?

AS1, baby!! On 9/6/19 1:45 AM, Bryan Fields wrote: On 9/5/19 2:05 PM, Jon Lewis wrote: I was doing some IRR clean-up and after a few successful updates, I'm no longer able to alter or delete our objects in rr.level3.com. Emails to r...@level3.com result in no action and no response. I've

Cogent & FDCServers: Knowingly aiding and abetting fraud and theft?

Few of you here probably know about this, but nearly a week ago now an article appeared in South Africa's largest and most popular online tech publication, MyBroadband.co.za. It detailed many, but certainly not all of the results of my multi-month investigation of a massive and ongoing fraud

Re: Cat 5 hurricane -- How are the Bahamas doing?

Any further details? On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 4:10 PM J. Hellenthal via NANOG wrote: > > Bahamas are essentially flattened as per recent reports. Or in other words > BAAD > > -- > J. Hellenthal > > The fact that there's a highway to Hell but only a stairway to Heaven says a > lot about