software platform : Broadband Network Platform Software
software version: GPON CASSETTE OLT V100R001B01D001P008SP6
copyright : Copyright (C) 2001-2017
compiled time : Apr 10 2018 09:00:00
processor : CORTEX-A9 MP, 1GHz
SDRAM(bytes): 1G
flash memory(bytes) :
Hi Simon,
This looks like an interesting project. What are you ultimately trying to
achieve?
Stretching an Ethernet segment between sites shouldn't be the first choice,
but I imagine you're having to deal with some legacy use case and your
hands are tied. I'm a little curious on what that might
The solution we've deployed is to use a VXLAN termination device at each
location requiring multi-path redundancy.
Run VXLAN over isolated L3 domains, let IS-IS or OSPF handle path selection,
including ECMP if desired.
If multi-chassis redundancy is required, pick a platform that can do MLAG or
*Monday's Keynote will ft. Elad Nafshi from Comcast*
*Presenting "The Future is Now: Delivering the Next Generation Brilliant
Network"*
Elad Nafshi will share how 10G network technologies are evolving connected
experiences in real-time, even as they continue to get smarter, faster,
more reliable,
*Monday's Keynote will ft. Elad Nafshi from Comcast*
*Presenting "The Future is Now: Delivering the Next Generation Brilliant
Network"*
Elad Nafshi will share how 10G network technologies are evolving connected
experiences in real-time, even as they continue to get smarter, faster,
more reliable,
Looking for contacts at Hot-Net AS12849 to fix a routing issue. Contacts
listed on RIPE are unresponsive.
> On Feb 6, 2023, at 18:43, Fernando Gont wrote:
>
> Hi, Owen,
>
> On 6/2/23 20:39, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> As long as they have a reasonable expiry process, it could work.
>
> What, specifically? Banning /128s?
Yes.
>
>
>> After all, they’re only collecting addresses to ban at the rate
VPLS doesn't handle loop avoidance. At least, not apart from split horizon
rules.
I assume that them properly connecting routers only and doing dynamic routing
over your service is out of the question? (Even _just_ doing this doesn't
completely solve the challenge though.)
It sounds to me
On Thu Feb 09, 2023 at 11:54:28AM -0500, Shawn L wrote:
> You should be able to setup a VPLS between 3 (or more) devices. Something
> like this --
[snip]
Thanks - I'm not committed to EVPN, so VPLS could work too. Would VPLS
handle loop avoidance for me? (i.e. if I have two VPLS PE connections
You should be able to setup a VPLS between 3 (or more) devices. Something like
this --
Example: VFI on a PE Device
The following example shows a virtual forwarding instance (VFI) configuration:
Device(config)# l2 vfi vfi110 manual
Device(config-vfi)# vpn id 110
Device(config-vfi)# neighbor
I am also a big fan of installing cake (sqm-scripts) in front cable devices.
On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 5:59 AM Todd Stiers wrote:
>
> [OP here]
>
> Just some minor follow up:
>
> - The tech was able to swap out their RG with the modem-only one that I had
> sent (after making a couple phone
[OP here]
Just some minor follow up:
- The tech was able to swap out their RG with the modem-only one that I
had sent (after making a couple phone calls). It didn't seem like they
could provision a user-supplied modem remotely for some reason, but it also
sounded like maybe this wasn't
Apparently iCloud’s hide my email implementation can only be used with one
recipient, so here was my reply to Josh (apologies to him for the spam), for
posterity:
Hi,
Thanks for your reply.
Double NAT tends to break things like ZeroTier.
But even if that wasn’t a problem for us, I think the
For the past two weeks we have seen increased latency coming from Asia. On my
side this is from multiple providers/AS's below is just one example. I have
tried to reach out to them directly but no response as of yet. Anyone with a
contact or seeing the same high latency?
14 matches
Mail list logo
