Re: Open source Netflow analysis for monitoring AS-to-AS traffic

On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 at 20:10, Steven Bakker wrote: > To top it off, both the sFlow and IPFIX specs are sufficiently vague about > the meaning of the "frame size", so vendors can implement whatever they want > (include/exclude padding, include/exclude FCS). This implies that you > shouldn't

Re: N91 Women mixer on Sunday?

> I'm sure that your time was better spent gathering the "credentials" > in your signature, but I checked the last 20 or so NANOG meetings and > didn't see a single registration from you, so perhaps stay out of > things you know literally nothing about. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

Re: N91 Women mixer on Sunday?

Paul, Anne's opinion is just as valid as the others here. I have also browsed through the recent attendee lists and do not see you listed either, pot calling the kettle black. Your comments about her email signature and which voices are valid here, are not productive. We are allowed to back up

Re: N91 Women mixer on Sunday?

Hi, Anne- I'm sure that your time was better spent gathering the "credentials" in your signature, but I checked the last 20 or so NANOG meetings and didn't see a single registration from you, so perhaps stay out of things you know literally nothing about. If it weren't for Ilissa, NANOG would

Re: N91 Women mixer on Sunday?

Matt, For a variety of cultural, religious and philosophical beliefs not everyone can, or wants to enter a bar. So perhaps the experience isn't as universal as you perceive it to be? Eric On 30 March 2024 6:18:30 am ACDT, Matthew Petach wrote: >On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 11:17 PM Eric Parsonage

Re: Open source Netflow analysis for monitoring AS-to-AS traffic

The sFlow frame_length field isn't intended to be vague. If you are seeing non-conforming sFlow implementations, please raise the issue with the vendor so they can fix the issue. Verifying that the frame_length and stripped fields are correctly implemented is one of the tests performed by the

Re: N91 Women mixer on Sunday?

On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 11:17 PM Eric Parsonage wrote: > It's easily fixed by having a mixer at the same time for the other half of > the gathering population thus showing all the population gathering matters > equally. > I believe the mixer for the other half of the gathering population has

Re: N91 Women mixer on Sunday?

we definitely need more men's opinions on what women should want and do randy

Re: Open source Netflow analysis for monitoring AS-to-AS traffic

On Fri, 2024-03-29 at 00:15 +, Nick Hilliard wrote: > Overall, sflow has one major advantage over netflow/ipfix, namely > that > it's a stateless sampling mechanism. Precisely. From my corner of the industry, my use case for flow data is extremely limited: I need (sampled) frame information:

Weekly Global IPv4 Routing Table Report

This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Global IPv4 Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan. The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG UKNOF, TZNOG, MENOG, BJNOG, SDNOG, CMNOG, LACNOG and the RIPE Routing WG. Daily listings are sent to

Re: N91 Women mixer on Sunday?

On 3/29/24 18:31, Tom Beecher wrote: I don't think anything is 'easily fixed' on this topic. I do however hope that everyone accepts at face value that the board, staff, and PC are *trying* to do the right things here. Doesn't mean that it *will* always be the right thing, or even that a

Re: N91 Women mixer on Sunday?

On 3/29/24 18:23, Tom Beecher wrote: My recollection is that every WiT lunch was always open to all. Happy to be corrected if any were that I don't recall. There were definitely a few meetings during my PC years that someone complained that men were not allowed to attend. If my memory

Re: N91 Women mixer on Sunday?

I don't think anything is 'easily fixed' on this topic. I do however hope that everyone accepts at face value that the board, staff, and PC are *trying* to do the right things here. Doesn't mean that it *will* always be the right thing, or even that a majority of people can agree on what the

Re: N91 Women mixer on Sunday?

> > My memory is a little fuzzy, but I think I recall one of the early WiT > lunches hosted at NANOG that was women-only, where some men were upset > for being "left out". Whether that was good or bad is less important > than understanding what the outcome of a women-only activity is for > women,

March is International Women's History Month - Remembering Betty J. Burke!

In honor of Women’s History Month, Ilissa Miller , Founder and CEO of iMiller Public Relations (iMPR) , and Jezzibell Gilmore , would like to recognize Betty Joe Burke, former Executive

Re: N91 Women mixer on Sunday?

We still have a lunch, it is welcome to all as it always has been. It has been widened to talk about many aspects of DEI. The NANOG PC is charged with putting a talk up on the stage just before then we continue the conversation during lunch. The mixer is an additional thing we are doing that

Re: Open source Netflow analysis for monitoring AS-to-AS traffic

On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 at 02:15, Nick Hilliard wrote: > Overall, sflow has one major advantage over netflow/ipfix, namely that > it's a stateless sampling mechanism. Once you have hardware that can > Obviously, not all netflow/ipfix implementations implement flow state, > but most do; some

Re: Open source Netflow analysis for monitoring AS-to-AS traffic

On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 at 20:36, Peter Phaal wrote: > The documentation for IOS-XR suggests that enabling extended-router in the > sFlow configuration should export "Autonomous system path to the > destination", at least on the 8000 series routers: >