Hey!
New message, please read <http://iamakeupartistry.com/soul.php?yu>
Cameron Byrne
Hey!
New message, please read <http://in2itshop.com/send.php?jsi>
Cameron Byrne
Hey!
New message, please read <http://actpd.org/spirit.php?p1d6>
Cameron Byrne
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 10:29 PM, Matthew Kaufman matt...@matthew.at wrote:
On 3/5/2013 8:20 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Mar 5, 2013, at 7:55 PM, Matthew Kaufman matt...@matthew.at wrote:
On 3/5/2013 7:15 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Mar 5, 2013, at 6:46 PM, Mukom Akong T. mukom.ta...@gmail.com
Hi,
In-line
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Mukom Akong T. mukom.ta...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear experts,
I've found myself thinking about what ground an engineer needs to cover in
order to convince the executives to approve and commit to an IPv6
Deployment project.
I think such a
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Mukom Akong T. mukom.ta...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 12:34 AM, Mike. the.li...@mgm51.com wrote:
I would lean towards
f) Cost/benefit of deploying IPv6.
I certainly agree, which is why I propose understanding you organisation's
business model
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Warren Bailey wbai...@satelliteintelligencegroup.com
We as Americans have plenty of things we have done halfass.. I hope an
Internet kill switch doesn't end up being one of them. Build
Constantine,
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Constantine A. Murenin
muren...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 January 2013 08:12, fredrik danerklint fredan-na...@fredan.se wrote:
From the article:
Faced with the shortage of IPv4 addresses and the failure of IPv6 to take
off, British ISP PlusNet is
Everything you need to know except for how to actually accomplish this
task in the real world.
In order to accomplish this in the real world using present-day software
development methodologies you would need to do a few more things:
- Generate some user stories that explain why the
Got some bad data here. Let me help.
Sent from ipv6-only Android
On Nov 29, 2012 8:22 AM, Michael Thomas m...@mtcc.com wrote:
Phone apps, by and large, are designed by people in homes or
small companies. They do not have v6 connectivity. Full stop.
They don't care about v6. Full stop. It's
Sent from ipv6-only Android
On Nov 27, 2012 10:57 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.se wrote:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, Cameron Byrne wrote:
Verizon in the USA does have iOS on ipv6. Afaik, the network must ask for
it the same way all Android Samsung devices on t-mobile now have ipv6 as
a
user
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote:
In message alpine.deb.2.00.1211270558340.27...@uplift.swm.pp.se, Mikael
Abrah
amsson writes:
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012, Michael Thomas wrote:
I don't see either Apple or Microsoft as being the hindrance. In fact,
both of them
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:28 AM, mike m...@mtcc.com wrote:
On 11/26/12 8:59 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012, Michael Thomas wrote:
I don't see either Apple or Microsoft as being the hindrance. In fact,
both of them seem pretty ready, fsvo ready. Unlike ISP's by and large.
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Michael Thomas m...@mtcc.com wrote:
On 11/27/2012 11:58 AM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:28 AM, mike m...@mtcc.com wrote:
Is this the app's fault? What are they doing wrong?
Yes, it is the app's fault.
They are either doing IPv4
Sent from ipv6-only Android
On Nov 27, 2012 8:39 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.se wrote:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, mike wrote:
You're saying there are no cellular v6 deployments? I'm about 99%
certain that you're wrong. I see v6 addresses in my apache logs all the
time and they're almost
Sent from ipv6-only Android
On Nov 26, 2012 5:54 AM, Dobbins, Roland rdobb...@arbor.net wrote:
On Nov 26, 2012, at 8:33 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
Why is that a significant question?
It is significant because it provides some rough measure of the relative
*importance* of IPv6
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Dobbins, Roland rdobb...@arbor.net wrote:
On Nov 26, 2012, at 10:36 PM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
Ipv6 is not important for users, it is important for network operators who
want to sustain their business.
I agree with the first part; not sure I agree
On Oct 24, 2012 12:40 AM, Daniël W. Crompton daniel.cromp...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 24 October 2012 08:35, Masataka Ohta mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp
wrote:
(2012/10/24 12:29), Rodrick Brown wrote:
With coded TCP, blocks of packets are clumped together and then
transformed into
On Oct 7, 2012 1:48 PM, Tom Limoncelli t...@whatexit.org wrote:
Have there been studies on how much latency CGN adds to a typical
internet user? I'd also be interested in anecdotes.
Anecdote. Sub-millasecond, with full load. (gigs and gigs) . CGN does not
meaningfully add latency. CGN is
:
On Sep 20, 2012, at 8:49 PM, Cameron Byrne cb.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 20, 2012 5:45 PM, Jared Mauch ja...@puck.nether.net wrote:
Oh... It works...
Your IPv4 address on the public Internet appears to be 70.194.10.15
Your IPv6 address on the public Internet appears
On Sep 20, 2012 5:27 PM, Seth Mattinen se...@rollernet.us wrote:
Does Verizon have IPv6 on their LTE network everywhere or is it limited
to specific regions? I ask because I have a Verizon LTE iPad just
upgraded to iOS6 (which supposedly added this capability), but it's not
getting an IPv6
On Sep 20, 2012 5:45 PM, Jared Mauch ja...@puck.nether.net wrote:
Oh... It works...
Your IPv4 address on the public Internet appears to be 70.194.10.15
Your IPv6 address on the public Internet appears to be
2600:1007:b010:a057:d91a:7d40:9871:f1a3
10/11 tests run
Cool!
That is from an
On Sep 17, 2012 5:04 AM, Tom Limoncelli t...@whatexit.org wrote:
My biggest fear is that statements like this will take on a life of their
own:
I can dual stack, then I am not out of IPv4 addresses, and thus I
have no need for IPv6. If I'm out of IPv4 then I need IPv6 and I can't
dual
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
On Sep 5, 2012, at 21:08 , Masataka Ohta mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp
wrote:
Jimmy Hess wrote:
NAT would fall under design flaw, because it breaks end-to-end
connectivity, such that there is no longer an administrative
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Sean Harlow s...@seanharlow.info wrote:
On Aug 22, 2012, at 17:06, Bacon Zombie wrote:
An ISP with a 5GB cap that is charging the end user more then 5$ total
{including line rental} a month should not be allow to operate.
I agree entirely. The US is not
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
And, in the other camp, unlimited offerings from T-Mobile, Sprint, and Metro
Well...sort of. To be fair, the T-Mo version of unlimited is unlimited up to
a certain amount
(that you paid for) and then all-you-can-sip at
On Aug 10, 2012 12:19 PM, shawn wilson ag4ve...@gmail.com wrote:
i'm curious if there is any spec in the voip protocol suite that
allows one to maintain a call while changing networks?
what i want to do is setup a softphone on an android phone. however,
this won't work very well if i can't
If i may summarize this thread as a method to conclude it.
1. Some people like GUA the most.
2. Smart network operators understand the facts and make decisions based on
facts (ULA exist, and it meets a need in some scenarios. NAT and lack of
addresses are not reasons to use ULA).
3. Most FUD
FYI http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r27324698-LTE-access-early-
So much for next generation technology ...
CB
On Jul 15, 2012 9:30 AM, Scott Morris s...@emanon.com wrote:
On 7/15/12 5:38 AM, Grzegorz Janoszka wrote:
On 2012-07-15 00:45, Tony Hain wrote:
There is no difference in the local filtering function, but *IF* all
transit
providers put FC00::/7 in bogon space and filter it at every border,
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 5:43 AM, Brandon Applegate bran...@burn.net wrote:
So I sent an email over a week ago to ipv6...@networksolutions.com - and
since I've only recieved the auto reply.
A year or so ago I did this and got very quick turnaround, but now just dead
air (sent another email
On the other thread i read that some ISP are running their own proxies
for infected host.
That sounded interesting, so i googled around to find out how to do
that and i could not find a HOWTO, so imagined up a solution myself,
tested it in VirtualBox, and wrote it down in case anyone finds it
So insteading of turning the servers off, would it not have been helpful to
have the servers return a captive portal type of reponse saying hey,
since you use this server, you are broken, go here to get fixed
Seems that would have been a more graceful ramp down.
CB
In Cisco's defense, perhaps the legalese did not fully communicate the
intent of the service.
http://blogs.cisco.com/home/update-answering-our-customers-questions-about-cisco-connect-cloud-2/
CB
On Jul 5, 2012 8:52 AM, Mario Eirea mei...@charterschoolit.com wrote:
Has anyone seen this yet?
On Jul 2, 2012 10:53 AM, Leo Bicknell bickn...@ufp.org wrote:
In a message written on Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 12:23:57PM -0400, david
raistrick wrote:
When the hardware is outsourced how would you propose testing the
non-software components? They do simulate availability zone issues (and
AZ
On Jun 30, 2012 12:25 AM, joel jaeggli joe...@bogus.com wrote:
On 6/30/12 12:11 AM, Tyler Haske wrote:
I am not a computer science guy but been around a long time. Data
centers
and clouds are like software. Once they reach a certain size, its
impossible to keep the bugs out. You can test
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Joel Maslak jmas...@antelope.net wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 1:35 PM, PC paul4...@gmail.com wrote:
While you're at it, I've been also trying to complain about them using
RFC1918 (172.16.) address space for the DNS servers they assign to their
datacard
On Jun 25, 2012 6:38 PM, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 8:03 PM, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote:
Does SCTP operate on a list of IPv4 and IPv6 addresses received from
the application when it asks for a connect, parallelizing its attempt
to reach a live
But whois info is really the linchpin for LEAs trying to find criminals?
I find that very hard to believe.
CB
On Jun 17, 2012 7:46 PM, Vinny Abello vi...@abellohome.net wrote:
On 6/17/2012 10:22 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
On 6/17/12, Joel jaeggli joe...@bogus.com wrote:
[snip]
resources were delegated to them. future prefix assignments will
clearly require that the demonstrate utilization much as
On Jun 13, 2012 8:29 PM, Grant Ridder shortdudey...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a Hurricane Electric v6 tunnel setup on an AWS (amazon web
services)
instance so that i can have ipv6 connectivity. I can ping and traceroute
out of the tunnel fine, but am unable to access the tunnel from
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Jimmy Hess mysi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/3/12, Jeroen Massar jer...@unfix.org wrote:
If one is so stupid to just block ICMP then one should also accept that one
loses functionality.
ICMP tends to get blocked by firewalls by default; There are
legitimate
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Joe Maimon jmai...@ttec.com wrote:
Well, IPv6 day isnt here yet, and my first casualty is the browser on the
wife's machine, firefox now configured to not query .
Now www.facebook.com loads again.
Looks like a tunnel mtu issue. I have not as of yet traced
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
Likely transfers made in this way may not be recordable with the applicable
RIRs and may violate the RIR policies.
If you care about your addresses being properly registered in whois to avoid
unnecessary hassles around
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Randy Carpenter rcar...@network1.net wrote:
Looks like some devices have it enabled, and some do not.
Does anyone have hotspot enabled? I am curious as to if IPv6 is being done
via the hotspot, and how they are handling the prefix delegation.
On T-Mobile,
On May 22, 2012 4:00 PM, Paul Porter paul.por...@gree.co.jp wrote:
Hi NANOG,
I'm looking for some information on the four largest US mobile phone
carriers and the current state of their IPv6 infrastructure. Specifically,
we are trying to figure out:
1. How much of the carrier core and
On May 22, 2012 6:50 PM, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht
wolfgang.ruppre...@gmail.com wrote:
Paul Graydon p...@paulgraydon.co.uk writes:
That's interesting. I have a Galaxy Nexus on T-Mobile USA and it
doesn't get an IPv6 address, only IPv4. Works fine with IPv6 over my
wireless network at home.
On May 22, 2012 7:14 PM, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht
wolfgang.ruppre...@gmail.com wrote:
Cameron Byrne writes:
From what you wrote, guess is you are using a phone that does not
have IPv6 support (only Nexus phones have support today... Other
phones
do not have the correct radio / RIL
On Mar 30, 2012 3:13 PM, Christopher Morrow morrowc.li...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Henry Yen he...@aegisinfosys.com wrote:
uunet/vzb will terminate its United States Newsreader and Newsfeed
services on March 31, 2012, with no plans to offer a replacement, and
any
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 9:21 AM, james jones ja...@freedomnet.co.nz wrote:
Not to sound like I am trolling here, but how hard is it get VPS servers or
some EC2 servers and setup your own DNS servers. Are there use cases where
that is not practical?
If your goal is , i assume you care
On Mar 28, 2012 2:25 PM, Arturo Servin arturo.servinarturo.ser...@gmail.com
@ arturo.ser...@gmail.comgmail.com arturo.ser...@gmail.com wrote:
Another reason to not use them.
Seriusly, if they cannot expend some thousands of dollars (because
it shouldn't be more than that) in
Not sure on the usefulness of these threads, but i have been getting
testy about lightreading.com not working
wget -6 www.lightreading.com
--2012-03-20 04:48:25-- http://www.lightreading.com/
Resolving www.lightreading.com (www.lightreading.com)... 2001:470:1f06:1274::2
Connecting to
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 12:10 PM, -Hammer- bhmc...@gmail.com wrote:
So, we are preparing to add IPv6 to our multi-homed (separate routers and
carriers with IBGP) multi-site business. Starting off with a lab of course.
Circuits and hardware are a few months away. I'm doing the initial designs
On Jan 26, 2012 5:49 AM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
On Jan 26, 2012, at 2:00 AM, George Bonser wrote:
Use different GUA ranges for internal and external. It's easy enough to
get an additional prefix.
As others have mentioned, things like management interfaces on access
On Jan 26, 2012 8:44 AM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
On Jan 26, 2012, at 6:39 AM, Jima wrote:
On 2012-01-26, Owen DeLong wrote:
If you can't point to some specific advantage of ULA over secondary
non-routed GUA prefixes, then, ULA doesn't have a reason to live.
My biggest
On Jan 26, 2012 8:49 AM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
On Jan 26, 2012, at 7:35 AM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
On Jan 26, 2012 5:49 AM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
On Jan 26, 2012, at 2:00 AM, George Bonser wrote:
Use different GUA ranges for internal and external. It's easy
On Jan 25, 2012 7:52 AM, Justin M. Streiner strei...@cluebyfour.org
wrote:
Is anyone using ULA (RFC 4193) address space for v6 infrastructure that
does not need to be exposed to the outside world? I understand the concept
of having fc00::/8 being doled out by the RIRs never went anywhere, and
On Jan 18, 2012 8:43 AM, Christopher Morrow morrowc.li...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Steven Bellovin s...@cs.columbia.edu
wrote:
On Jan 18, 2012, at 10:41 30AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org
wrote:
On
On Jan 15, 2012 1:40 PM, Jared Mauch ja...@puck.nether.net wrote:
On Jan 15, 2012, at 2:56 PM, Saku Ytti wrote:
Unfortunately that does exactly nothing to help with Internet scale.
Now scaling for your local environment embedded RP might be beneficial,
but
actual practical applications
On Jan 10, 2012 5:11 PM, Peter Kristolaitis alte...@alter3d.ca wrote:
Wow! Congrats to the Comcast crew, that's absolutely awesome!
+1
Between dnssec and ipv6 Comcast has shown true internet evolution
leadership in their *actions*, which really stands out in an industry full
of talk.
Cb
On Jan 4, 2012 4:52 AM, Måns Nilsson mansa...@besserwisser.org wrote:
Subject: anycast load balancing issue Date: Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at
01:02:55PM +0100 Quoting Måns Nilsson (mansa...@besserwisser.org):
Trouble is, we find that (untweaked) cost and metric are such that all
nodes are equal.
On Dec 30, 2011 9:16 AM, Alexander Harrowell a.harrow...@gmail.com
wrote:
In the DHCP v6 thread, there was some discussion of
mobility and its IP layer consequences. As various people
pointed out, cellular networks basically handle this in the
RAN (Radio Access Network) and therefore at layer
On Dec 29, 2011 6:38 AM, Ray Soucy r...@maine.edu wrote:
Sounds like we have one group saying that IPv6 is too complicated and
that all the overhead of IPv6 had resulted in slow adoption.
Meanwhile we have others saying it doesn't have enough functionality,
and should also include IGP.
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 7:28 AM, TJ trej...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/12/28 Masataka Ohta mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp
valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
SNIP
In this case, the following statement in RFC1883:
If the minimum time for rebooting the node is known (often more than
6
On Dec 15, 2011 10:35 PM, Brielle Bruns br...@2mbit.com wrote:
On 12/15/11 3:31 PM, Ricky Beam wrote:
On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 16:36:32 -0500, David Conrad d...@virtualized.org
wrote:
... I had thought new allocations are based on demonstrated need. The
fact that addresses are in use would seem
On Dec 15, 2011 6:43 PM, Stephen Sprunk step...@sprunk.org wrote:
On 15-Dec-11 16:31, Ricky Beam wrote:
On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 16:36:32 -0500, David Conrad d...@virtualized.org
wrote:
... I had thought new allocations are based on demonstrated need. The
fact that addresses are in use would
Fyi, I just was rejected from arin for an ipv4 allocation. I demonstrated I
own ~100k ipv4 addresses today.
My customers use over 10 million bogon / squat space ip addresses today,
and I have good attested data on that.
But all I can qualify for is a /18, and then in 3 months maybe a /17. This
On Dec 7, 2011 7:49 PM, Dobbins, Roland rdobb...@arbor.net wrote:
On Dec 8, 2011, at 1:36 AM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
I don't think you're looking at defense in depth in the right way,
Actually, it sometimes seems as if nobody in the industry understands
what 'defense in depth' really means,
On Nov 15, 2011 7:09 AM, -Hammer- bhmc...@gmail.com wrote:
Guys,
Everyone is complaining about whether a FW serves its purpose or not.
Take a step back. Security is about layers. Router ACLs to filter
whitenoise. FW ACLs to filter more. L7 (application) FWs to inspect HTTP
payload. Patch
On Nov 14, 2011 9:22 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:06:13 EST, William Herrin said:
Using two firewalls in serial from two different vendors doubles the
complexity. Yet it almost always improves security: fat fingers on one
firewall rarely repeat the same way on
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 12:13 PM, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote:
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Robert Bonomi
bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com wrote:
On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 10:36:43 -0500, Jason Lewis jle...@packetnexus.com
wrote;
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 8:40 AM, Jeroen Massar jer...@unfix.org wrote:
On 2011-11-09 17:32 , Brzozowski, John wrote:
Update from http://www.comcast6.net
IPv6 Pilot Market Deployment Begins
Wednesday, November 9, 2011
Comcast has started our first pilot market deployment of IPv6...
Congrats!
On Nov 6, 2011 10:15 PM, David Hubbard dhubb...@dino.hostasaurus.com
wrote:
Hi all, I am looking at cellular-based devices as a higher
speed alternative to dial-up backup access methods for
out of band management during emergencies. I was
wondering if anyone had experiences with such devices
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Tom Hill t...@ninjabadger.net wrote:
On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 15:04 -0700, Cameron Byrne wrote:
FYI.
T-Mobile USA now has opt-in beta support for an Android phone on IPv6,
more info here https://sites.google.com/site/tmoipv6/lg-mytouch
Very, very good. I hope T
FYI.
T-Mobile USA now has opt-in beta support for an Android phone on IPv6,
more info here https://sites.google.com/site/tmoipv6/lg-mytouch
As far as i know, this is the first Android phone that support IPv6 on
the GSM/UMTS mobile interface. Previous version of Android phones
supported IPv6 on
On Oct 31, 2011 9:13 PM, Jack Bates jba...@brightok.net wrote:
On 10/31/2011 11:00 PM, Scott Whyte wrote:
But seriously, if you can help her ascertain real middlebox use cases
she wants to help improve that segment of networking via useful research,
nothing more or less.
Would love to see
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net wrote:
On Oct 13, 2011, at 7:26 PM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
On 10/13/11 3:30 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
In fact, Skype, just as a for instance, is worse on hotel wifi as launching
the app on a laptop makes you a middle
On Sep 26, 2011 1:29 AM, Florian Weimer fwei...@bfk.de wrote:
* Cameron Byrne:
It is very important to ask the redirect partners about yields...
meaning,
you may find that less than 5% of nxdomain redirects can be actually
served
an ad page because 95%+ of nxd are printer lookups
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Seth Mattinen se...@rollernet.us wrote:
On 9/26/11 8:36 AM, Drew Weaver wrote:
Has anyone been able to pull any magic off that allows PPTP connectivity
over sprint's 3G/4G wireless network?
I assume they're just filtering it flat out, but before I contact
Just an fyi for anyone who has a marketing person dreaming up a big nxdomain
redirect business cases, the stats are actually very very poor... it does
not make much money at all.
It is very important to ask the redirect partners about yields... meaning,
you may find that less than 5% of nxdomain
On Sep 21, 2011 4:43 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net wrote:
On Sep 20, 2011, at 11:17 PM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
On Sep 20, 2011 7:54 PM, Joseph Gersch joe.ger...@secure64.com
wrote:
Does anyone know if Akamai edgesuite servers rate limits or blacklists
caching servers that query
On Sep 20, 2011 7:54 PM, Joseph Gersch joe.ger...@secure64.com wrote:
Does anyone know if Akamai edgesuite servers rate limits or blacklists
caching servers that query it too often? It appears that queries are timing
out if we exceed a query load to edgesuite.
Does anyone at Akamai know if
On Sep 18, 2011 1:08 PM, Benson Schliesser bens...@queuefull.net wrote:
On Sep 18, 2011, at 15:51, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
I'm told of others that have bought legacy IPv4 prefixes with no
intention of updating whois at this time - no desire to enter into a
relationship with ARIN
On Sep 17, 2011 10:41 AM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
As an ISP, ARIN will not give you any space if you are new. You
have to already have an equivalent amount of space from another
provider.
does arin *really* still have that amazing barrier to market
entry?
Yes. If you want PI
On Sep 11, 2011 4:33 AM, Dobbins, Roland rdobb...@arbor.net wrote:
On Sep 11, 2011, at 4:02 PM, Leigh Porter wrote:
I'd agree that, usually, distributed is better but these are not
distributed networks, there is a single point (or a few large single points)
of contact.
The point is that
On Sep 9, 2011 10:54 PM, Dobbins, Roland rdobb...@arbor.net wrote:
On Sep 10, 2011, at 12:46 PM, Mark Tinka wrote:
GPRS/3G/EDGE has made many a mobile provider especially notorious.
All this problematic state should be broken up into smaller instantiations
and distributed as close to the
On Sep 8, 2011 1:47 AM, Leigh Porter leigh.por...@ukbroadband.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Owen DeLong [mailto:o...@delong.com]
Sent: 08 September 2011 01:22
To: Leigh Porter
Cc: Seth Mos; NANOG
Subject: Re: NAT444 or ?
Considering that offices, schools etc
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Joel jaeggli joe...@bogus.com wrote:
On 9/7/11 09:02 , Michael Holstein wrote:
I would love a world where engineering was consulted by marketing :(
Wouldn't be a problem is management invested based on engineering's
recommendations.
There are few problems
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Serge Vautour sergevaut...@yahoo.ca wrote:
Hello,
Things I understand: IPv6 is the long term solution to IPv4 exhaustion. For
IPv6 to work correctly, most of the IPv4 content has to be on IPv6. That's
not there yet. IPv6 deployment to end users is not
On Aug 17, 2011 6:58 AM, Justin M. Streiner strei...@cluebyfour.org
wrote:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011, Randy Bush wrote:
What would you rather rely on at 3am in the morning when things are
breaking? Someone who has just learned IS-IS or someone who already
has good experience with OSPF?
what
On Aug 16, 2011 9:41 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 10:53:24 EDT, Christopher Morrow said:
anyway, they do these donkey things because they can :( people have no
real option (except not to play the game, ala war games).
My brother recently tried to get a smartphone
On Aug 15, 2011 2:15 PM, Tim Wilde twi...@cymru.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/15/2011 2:24 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
What does it say that the same thing happens in IPv4?
I really don't see a significant difference in that regard.
I will admit to not
On Aug 12, 2011 8:40 PM, Ryan Finnesey rfinne...@gmail.com wrote:
Well they are two completely separate companies . I would think that the
LTE network would be a good replacement for DS1 type services.
My guess is no.
Yes, I bet vzw buys from vzb, but not the other way round. Whatever you
On Aug 11, 2011 5:25 PM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
On Aug 11, 2011, at 5:08 PM, Matthew Moyle-Croft wrote:
On 11/08/2011, at 1:33 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Aug 10, 2011, at 7:45 PM, Mark Newton wrote:
On 11/08/2011, at 8:42 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
I suppose that
On Aug 10, 2011 7:45 PM, Mark Newton new...@internode.com.au wrote:
On 11/08/2011, at 8:42 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
I suppose that limiting enough households to too small an allocation
will have that effect. I would rather we steer the internet deployment
towards liberal enough
On Aug 8, 2011 4:24 PM, Christopher Morrow morrowc.li...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 10:03 PM, Scott Helms khe...@ispalliance.net
wrote:
Not trying to be obtuse, but none of the technical docs you cite appear
to
talk about HTTP proxies nor does the newswire report have any
On Aug 6, 2011 2:11 AM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
I'm not the only person who prefers /48 and hopefully most ISPs will
eventually
come around and realize that /56s don't really benefit anyone vs. /48s.
Hurricane Electric has been handing out /48s upon request to our customers
and
On Jul 26, 2011 6:57 AM, harbor235 harbor...@gmail.com wrote:
I am curious what is the best practice for OOB for a core
infrastructure environment. Obviously, there is
an OOB kit for customer managed devices via POTS, Ethernet, etc ... And
there is OOB for core infrastructure
typically a
On Jul 26, 2011 7:58 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ jordi.pa...@consulintel.es
wrote:
Hi all,
I will like to know, from those deploying IPv6 services to residential
customers, if you are planning to provide static or dynamic IPv6 prefixes.
Just to be clear, I'm for static prefix delegation to
,
Jordi
-Mensaje original-
De: Cameron Byrne cb.li...@gmail.com
Responder a: cb.li...@gmail.com
Fecha: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:34:36 -0700
Para: Jordi Palet Martinez jordi.pa...@consulintel.es
CC: NANOG list nanog@nanog.org
Asunto: Re: dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential
1 - 100 of 206 matches
Mail list logo
