Re: Netflix banning HE tunnels

(alternate solution: rename IPv6 to something media-friendlyish and request ISPs to enable support for it, advertising that most of their hardware "*already supports it*") On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 2:58 PM Cryptographrix <cryptograph...@gmail.com> wrote: > Just to clarify - th

Re: Netflix banning HE tunnels

Just to clarify - there's no transition involved - IPv4 to IPv6 is like going from the VINES protocol to IPv6: IPv6 may as well have been called "PROTOCOL 493" - it bares very little relation to the original protocol that brought us the internet as-it-is-today. The deployment of IPv4 had nothing

Re: Netflix banning HE tunnels

I suspect we should just accept that IPv6 is never actually happening with all this infighting of its own very vocal proponents. On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 2:49 PM Steve Mikulasik wrote: > https://i.imgur.com/LvVHJZf.png > > I had to make this, talking about IPv6 or

Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

By <cb.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tuesday, June 7, 2016, Cryptographrix <cryptograph...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> As I said to Netflix's tech support - if they advocate for people to turn >> off IPv6 on their end, maybe Netflix should stop supporting it on

Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

As I said to Netflix's tech support - if they advocate for people to turn off IPv6 on their end, maybe Netflix should stop supporting it on their end. It's in the air whether it's just an HE tunnel issue or an IPv6 issue at the moment, and if their tech support is telling people to turn off IPv6,

Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

And yeah, most every US ISP *can* route IPv6, but they just haven't for absolutely no reason. On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 11:11 PM Cryptographrix <cryptograph...@gmail.com> wrote: > Surely they could - for some reason they haven't. > > It's not better - it's desperate. > > But i

Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > How is this better than getting native IPv6 from a provider? If they are > willing to run a BGP session with you (that too with a private ASN), surely > they can offer native IPv6 as well. > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 10:19 PM, Cryptographrix <cryptogra

Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

"Yeah, I'm actually only going to use 6 of them, between all of my phones, my Roku, and my laptop, but I'll advertise for all 1.2Septillion" On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 10:21 PM Cryptographrix <cryptograph...@gmail.com> wrote: > "Hello Time Warner?I happen to have 1.2Se

Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

"Hello Time Warner?I happen to have 1.2Septillion IPv6 IPs I need to advertise" On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 10:19 PM Cryptographrix <cryptograph...@gmail.com> wrote: > "A /48 is officially the smallest"...but apparently smaller gets > advertised all over, an

Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

un 3, 2016 at 10:11 PM Cryptographrix <cryptograph...@gmail.com> wrote: > Nope - You'd have the /56 and only people within your /56 (or /64 if you > sliced it up nicely) would be able to do things with it routed by your ISP. > > Of course this means we'll have to get ou

Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

<mnathani.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > Wouldn't the /56 get blocked as soon as Netflix detects multiple accounts > logging in from the same IPv6 range? > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 9:49 PM, Cryptographrix <cryptograph...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> This is a good idea. We shoul

Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

This is a good idea. We should do this. On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 9:48 PM Raymond Beaudoin < raymond.beaud...@icarustech.com> wrote: > Make it a /56 each and you've got a deal. Hell, I'll throw in a round of > drinks. > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Cryptographrix <cry

Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

e, there are multiple cloud service offerings that will > >> advertise your IPv6 allocations on your behalf direct to a server in > their > >> data centers. It seems pretty tongue-in-cheek, and satisfying, to turn > >> up a * >> favorite virtual router instanc

Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

er instance> *and then route through it. The > Internet is such an amazing place. > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 8:15 PM, Cryptographrix <cryptograph...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Yeah I RAWRed to them pretty hard whilst being as understanding to the CS >> rep that i

Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

Time > > Warner, but they decided to in their wisdom to disable IPv6 service for > > anyone that has an Arris SB6183 due to an Arris firmware bug. And they > are > > taking their sweet time pushing out the fixed firmware update that > Comcast > > and Cox seemed to be able

Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

d of us start walking off and it starts to look like a trend, > it can > change things. > > Owen > > > On Jun 3, 2016, at 17:17 , Cryptographrix <cryptograph...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Very true. Telling people to turn off IPv6 support through their custo

Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

arbor.net > *Arbor Networks* > +1.734.794.5033 (d) | +1.734.846.2053 (m) > www.arbornetworks.com > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Cryptographrix <cryptograph...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I don't remember the source, but I do remember that even with Comcast's >> deplo

Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

w.arbornetworks.com > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 7:49 PM, Cryptographrix <cryptograph...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Depends - how many US users have native IPv6 through their ISPs? >> >> If I remember correctly (I can't find the source at the moment), HE.net >>

Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

(and this is coming from someone that has serious issues with IPv6 but understands that we need to move forward) On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 7:49 PM Cryptographrix <cryptograph...@gmail.com> wrote: > Depends - how many US users have native IPv6 through their ISPs? > > If I rememb

Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

a bit important to me. On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 7:45 PM Baldur Norddahl <baldur.nordd...@gmail.com> wrote: > Den 4. jun. 2016 01.26 skrev "Cryptographrix" <cryptograph...@gmail.com>: > > > > The information I'm getting from Netflix support now is explicitly > t

Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

The information I'm getting from Netflix support now is explicitly telling me to turn off IPv6 - someone might want to stop them before they completely kill US IPv6 adoption. On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 7:15 PM Cryptographrix <cryptograph...@gmail.com> wrote: > > "What you are

Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

> "What you are NOT allowed to do is impose new requirements on our Internet to support your business licensing models and make it our problem" They're not imposing new regulation on your internet to support their business licensing models - they're imposing existing (and international)

Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

> explaining how badly Netflix VPN detection works and why it is so hard for > us to help with it and why they should be complaining to Netflix. > > Steven Naslund > > From: Cryptographrix [mailto:cryptograph...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, June 03, 2016 5:06 PM > To: Naslund,

Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

to determine your location much more precisely than IP geolocation. Period. On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 6:35 PM Cryptographrix <cryptograph...@gmail.com> wrote: > But wait, content providers *do that.* > > *Microsoft too...for illegal copies of Outlook, even...* > > How do we kn

Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

packet - and of course all of them can be hacked - but those same content providers have established in their audit requirements that they're perfectly willing to accept the risks involved. On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 6:18 PM Cryptographrix <cryptograph...@gmail.com> wrote: > " > the

Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

re never has been yet. Good luck ever getting that to > work behind the great firewall of China. > > Steven Naslund > Chicago IL > > From: Cryptographrix [mailto:cryptograph...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, June 03, 2016 4:56 PM > To: Naslund, Steve; nanog@nanog

Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

There's really no point in whining about content providers and regionalization as long as TV channels are still a thing. I get that the internet totally annihilated borders of all kind (including the book store), but some businesses change slower than others, and content production is still back

Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

+1 to this idea. On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 5:29 PM Mark Andrews wrote: > > It's time for Netflix to offer IPv6 tunnels. That way they can > correlate IPv4 and IPv6 addresses. Longest match will result is > the correct source address being selected if they do the job > correctly. >

Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

. Ever hear of Slingbox? > > Steven Naslund > Chicago IL > > From: Cryptographrix [mailto:cryptograph...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, June 03, 2016 3:42 PM > To: Naslund, Steve; nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed > > Apple TV

Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

; -Original Message- > From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Cryptographrix > Sent: Friday, June 03, 2016 3:21 PM > To: Spencer Ryan > Cc: North American Network Operators' Group > Subject: Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed > > Com

Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

ilto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Cryptographrix > Sent: Friday, June 03, 2016 3:18 PM > To: Robert Jacobs; Spencer Ryan > Cc: North American Network Operators' Group > Subject: Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed > > To be honest, I don't care about content provid

Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

Networks* > +1.734.794.5033 (d) | +1.734.846.2053 (m) > www.arbornetworks.com > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Cryptographrix <cryptograph...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I have a VPN connection at my house. There's no way for them to know the >> difference between me using

Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

y telephone or e-mail > immediately. > > > > -Original Message- > From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Spencer Ryan > Sent: Friday, June 3, 2016 2:49 PM > To: Cryptographrix <cryptograph...@gmail.com> > Cc: North American Network Operator

Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

(since we must dual-stack still here in the US) On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 4:09 PM Cryptographrix <cryptograph...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have a VPN connection at my house. There's no way for them to know the > difference between me using my home network connection from Hong Kong or my &g

Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

ing in NY > and using the tunnel, and you living in Hong Kong and using the tunnel. > > > *Spencer Ryan* | Senior Systems Administrator | sr...@arbor.net > *Arbor Networks* > +1.734.794.5033 (d) | +1.734.846.2053 (m) > www.arbornetworks.com > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at

Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

3, 2016 3:46 PM, "Cryptographrix" <cryptograph...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Netflix needs to figure out a fix for this until ISPs actually provide >> IPv6 >> natively. >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 3:13 PM Blair Trosper <blair.tros..

Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

Netflix needs to figure out a fix for this until ISPs actually provide IPv6 natively. On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 3:13 PM Blair Trosper wrote: > Confirmed that Hurricane Electric's TunnelBroker is now blocked by > Netflix. Anyone nice people from Netflix perhaps want to

Re: Microwave link capacity

I do not have direct experience with this, but Ubiquiti's AirFiber 5 seems like an applicable solution: https://www.ubnt.com/airfiber/airfiber5/ It runs around $1.000USD each On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 1:30 PM Jean-Francois Mezei < jfmezei_na...@vaxination.ca> wrote: > > In a context of providing

Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption

t;l...@satchell.net> wrote: > On 10/02/2015 07:48 AM, Cryptographrix wrote: > > For ISPs that already exist, what benefit do they get from > > providing/allowing IPv6 transit to their customers? > > > > Keep in mind that the net is now basically another broadcast mediu

Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption

For ISPs that already exist, what benefit do they get from providing/allowing IPv6 transit to their customers? Keep in mind that the net is now basically another broadcast medium. On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 10:33 AM Steve Mikulasik wrote: > I think more focus needs to

Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption

n from the get-go as an incentive? On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 12:02 PM George, Wes <wesley.geo...@twcable.com> wrote: > > On 10/2/15, 10:48 AM, "NANOG on behalf of Cryptographrix" > <nanog-boun...@nanog.org on behalf of cryptograph...@gmail.com> wrote:

How to build an IPv6-only internal network?

Hypothetically, I want to build an internal network that runs just IPv6 and apply stateless ACLs at redundant external connections. How do users access the current v4 address space?

Re: OPM Data Breach - Whitehouse Petition - Help Wanted

Have to agree with Shawn on this. If you watch her testimony in front of Congress, it is clear that she was completely flustered at the inability to hire competent people, and the lack of her superiors to prioritize the modernization project she had so passionately advocated for. When I've worked

Re: All of .mil tld is down

Well that's the most ludicrous thing I've heard all month. *grabs popcorn* On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:40 PM, jamie rishaw j...@arpa.com wrote: At time of post.. .mil. is down. Apparently an Anonymous Operation Payback. .mil nameservers are unresponsive.

Re: Residential CPE suggestions

It also has support for some type of ipv4 and ipv6 offload. On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 3:01 AM, Joe Greco jgr...@ns.sol.net wrote: I was also going to recommend the EdgeRouter Pro as it has dual SFP = ports and the Vyatta/Linux stuff works quite well. I suspect you will be very surprised

Re: Residential CPE suggestions

I've used both the Ubiquiti EdgeRouter and Cisco RV042G. The EdgeRouter runs a modified version of Vyatta that's incredibly versatile. The RV042G is your standard Cisco SOHO Dual-WAN router - it has telnet, but is limited, and otherwise is solid. On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Deepak Jain