Re: China Showdown Huawei vs ZTE

Why not just go the whitebox route and pick your NOS of choice? Far cheaper, and far more flexible. On Fri, Apr 20, 2018, 7:28 AM Colton Conor wrote: > Of the two large Chinese Vendors, which has the better network operating > system? Huawei is much larger that ZTE is

Re: Leasing /22

Not hard to do in the US where most access networks still aren't supporting IPv6. On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 9:54 PM, Ca By wrote: > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 5:48 PM Michael Crapse wrote: > >> Has Hulu, or a thousand other content distributors considered

Re: Spectre/Meltdown impact on network devices

https://www.reddit.com/r/networking/comments/7o4y40/meltdownspectre_vulnerability_tracker/ On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 1:02 PM, Jean | ddostest.me via NANOG wrote: > Hello, > > I'm curious to hear the impact on network devices of this new hardware > flaws that everybody talk about.

Re: Temp at Level 3 data centers

http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2008/10/14/google-raise-your-data-center-temperature On Oct 11, 2017 11:56 AM, "Zachary Winnerman" wrote: > I recall some evidence that 80+F temps can reduce hard drive lifetime, > though it might be outdated as it was from

Re: EdgeRouter Infinity as medium-sized "IXP Peering Router"?

I'm dumb, Brielle is right. 1.9.0, 1.9.5, 1.9.7h1 1.9.8dev and 1.9.8b1 are for two other newer products. On Aug 11, 2017 11:16 PM, "Brielle Bruns" <br...@2mbit.com> wrote: > On 8/11/2017 9:34 AM, Josh Reynolds wrote: > >> As an additional note, sometimes drivers

Re: EdgeRouter Infinity as medium-sized "IXP Peering Router"?

As an additional note, sometimes drivers get backported, this is how 1.9.7hotfix1 works on Infinity. There are multiple trees in various stages of dev at any given time. On Aug 11, 2017 10:29 AM, "Josh Reynolds" <j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote: > Since it's been announced now...

Re: EdgeRouter Infinity as medium-sized "IXP Peering Router"?

06b92) > > > > On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 9:07 PM, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> > wrote: > >> Forgot reply all... >> >> That does not apply to the infinity. Those shipped with 1.9.8dev. >> >> >> On Aug 8, 2017 8:03 PM, "Mike H

Re: EdgeRouter Infinity as medium-sized "IXP Peering Router"?

Forgot reply all... That does not apply to the infinity. Those shipped with 1.9.8dev. On Aug 8, 2017 8:03 PM, "Mike Hammett" wrote: > 1.9.7+hotfix.1 is the currently available stable. 1.9.1.1 was released on > May 1st. > >

Re: XO Provisioning in St. Louis

 On Jul 24, 2017 9:40 AM, "Mike Hammett" wrote: > This e-mail was of a sufficient poke to the original contact I reached out > to and the ball is now rolling. > > You will now be returned to your regularly scheduled programming. > > > > > - > Mike Hammett > Intelligent

Re: EdgeRouter Infinity as medium-sized "IXP Peering Router"?

6.3 ;) - Josh On Jul 5, 2017 2:10 PM, "Paul Gear" wrote: > On 04/07/17 12:28, Hugo Slabbert wrote: > > > > ... > >>> > >>> As far as automation, it's a JunOS-like CLI originally based on vyatta, > >>> which AT now owns - and one of the main reasons is it's >

Re: EdgeRouter Infinity as medium-sized "IXP Peering Router"?

I kinda feel the same way. I wish FRR was a big more mature at this point though. On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 10:21 PM, Baldur Norddahl wrote: > Why not use a Linux or BSD computer for this? It is cheap and you know > exactly what you are getting. It will forward 10 gig at

Re: EdgeRouter Infinity as medium-sized "IXP Peering Router"?

:26:17 -0500, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> > wrote: > >> On Jul 3, 2017 7:23 PM, "Josh Reynolds" <j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote: >> >>> Specs... >>> >>> >>>- MIPS64 16 Core 1.8 GHz >>>- 16 GB DDR4 RA

Re: EdgeRouter Infinity as medium-sized "IXP Peering Router"?

- Josh On Jul 3, 2017 7:23 PM, "Josh Reynolds" <j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote: > Specs... > > >- MIPS64 16 Core 1.8 GHz >- 16 GB DDR4 RAM >- 8 MB NOR Flash 4 GB eMMC NAND Flash >- Data Ports: (1) RJ45 Serial Port, (8) SFP+ Ports (1) RJ45 Gigabi

Re: Internetpulse.net is dead

... it might help explaining what the site did. - Josh On Jun 28, 2017 10:51 AM, "Sean Hunter" wrote: > Anyone know of a site with similar functionality? internetpulse.net > redirects to Dynatrace homepage now. >

Re: Purchased IPv4 Woes

gt; > > - > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > > Midwest Internet Exchange > > The Brothers WISP > > - Original Message - > > From: "Josh Reynolds" <j...@kyneticwifi.com> > To: "Justin Wilson" <li...@mtin.net>

Re: Purchased IPv4 Woes

Would you mind naming the company so that they can be publicly shamed? That is nothing sort of extortion. On Mar 19, 2017 10:36 PM, "Justin Wilson" wrote: > > Then you have the lists which want money to be removed. I have an IP that > was blacklisted by hotmail. Just a single

Re: Passive Optical Network (PON)

That's a genious idead On Jan 23, 2017 11:17 AM, "Leo Bicknell" wrote: > In a message written on Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 03:22:20PM -0600, Stas Bilder > wrote: > > Now, to the projects. > > I have never heard of seen PON on a DC level. > > A friend of mine told me of a

Re: External BGP Controller for L3 Switch BGP routing

I'm going to be keeping a close eye on this: http://blogs.cisco.com/sp/a-bigger-helping-of-internet-please On Jan 16, 2017 1:03 AM, "Yucong Sun" wrote: > In my setup, I use an BIRD instance to combine multiple internet full > tables, i use some filter to generate some

Re: Favorite Speed Test Systems

ew AS > hops away from Netflix. > > > > > - > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > > Midwest Internet Exchange > > The Brothers WISP > > - Original Message - > > From: "Josh Reynolds" <j...@kyneticwifi.com> &

Re: Favorite Speed Test Systems

om my provider in the Tampa Bay area at: > speedtest.bhn.net). > > ~Steven > > On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 10:51 AM, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> > wrote: > >> A lot of people have crappy performance to those. For example, from a 10G >> server to fast.com I

Re: Favorite Speed Test Systems

A lot of people have crappy performance to those. For example, from a 10G server to fast.com I was pulling around 9Mbps up/down. 1 hop away from a Netflix open connect appliance. On Dec 5, 2016 9:49 AM, "Steven Miano" wrote: > fast.com is a dead fast/simple download result

Re: Facebook Geo Routing Issues

Or due to capacity issues. On Nov 16, 2016 7:53 PM, "Mike Hammett" wrote: > I'm in Chicago and I saw mine going to Miami as well (per rDNS). Haven't > looked into it at all. > > I did see a video where they said they occasionally purposely give people > less than ideal

Re: USDA IT Contacts?

11, 2016, at 11:27 , rw...@ropeguru.com wrote: >> >> The very last POC was updated in 2015, but also out of Fort Collins. >> >> On Fri, 11 Nov 2016 12:59:16 -0600 >> Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote: >>> Just looking at that info... ha

Re: USDA IT Contacts?

Just looking at that info... hasn't been updated since 2005 and is listed as being at Ft Collins. So I'll be complaining to some people on Monday :) On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Herriage, James L. wrote: > POCs here: > uda.gov = 162.79.29.12 >

Re: USDA IT Contacts?

Just a head's up, resolution may not happen today - it's veteran's day, which of course is a federal holiday. On Nov 11, 2016 8:17 AM, "Charles Gagnon" wrote: > Would anyone have information about IT contacts within the US Government? > Some of our IP ranges seem to be

Re: USDA IT Contacts?

*Cough* I might know some people. Standby. On Nov 11, 2016 8:17 AM, "Charles Gagnon" wrote: > Would anyone have information about IT contacts within the US Government? > Some of our IP ranges seem to be blocked from access to some government web > servers (discovered on

Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?

he > job" seems very apt, and that you can't just say that only two > protocols are suitable for all jobs. > > /Charles > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> > wrote: > > As cute as your impotent white knighting of one vendor is (I ve

Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?

ial implementations? > > -- > Tim > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> > wrote: > >> Oops, forgot link. Cooking dinner :) >> >> http://www.nongnu.org/quagga/ >> >> On Nov 10, 2016 6:53 PM, "Josh Reynolds&

Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?

Oops, forgot link. Cooking dinner :) http://www.nongnu.org/quagga/ On Nov 10, 2016 6:53 PM, "Josh Reynolds" <j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote: > Here's a start! > > "Support for OSPFv3 and IS-IS is various beta states currently; IS-IS for > IPv4 is b

Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?

.. > > Just name 1 feature that was in Cisco and wasn't in other > implementations... Just one.. Something.. Does ISIS on IOS make and > hand out ice cream on Fridays? I want to know if I'm missing out.. > > -- > Tim > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 6:33 PM, Josh Reynold

Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?

en network is > not such a broad landscape, so I think "use the right tool for the > job" seems very apt, and that you can't just say that only two > protocols are suitable for all jobs. > > /Charles > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyne

Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?

in your environment as you can have, you want OSPF or BGP as your IGP. On Nov 10, 2016 5:33 PM, "Nick Hilliard" <n...@foobar.org> wrote: > Josh Reynolds wrote: > > I didn't "trash talk" a vendor. If I did, it would be a multi-thousand > > line hate fueled rant w

Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?

is was my experience at the time, based on my research and discussions with the vendors. On Nov 10, 2016 3:49 PM, "Nick Hilliard" <n...@foobar.org> wrote: > Josh Reynolds wrote: > > I'm sure a lot has changed with Juniper as of 2011 in regard to IS-IS > > support, w

Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?

Hilliard <n...@foobar.org> wrote: > Josh Reynolds wrote: >> I have not kept up with all of the feature differences between Cisco's >> implementation and the other vendors. I can only encourage others >> interested in this to compare the specific feature sets between the

Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?

different from another data center, transport, or transit network provider. If I were a vendor or one of the other I would likely have a list of what I do support, or what my competition does not support. On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Nick Hilliard <n...@foobar.org> wrote: > Josh

Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?

As with anything, it depends on what your needs are. https://pathfinder.juniper.net/feature-explorer/search-features.html Type IS-IS in the box Feature set will vary between JunOS releases. On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Nick Hilliard <n...@foobar.org> wrote: > Josh Reyno

Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?

Juniper of their own merits, but they miss many of the IS-IS features Cisco has (of course). Huawei has very "Cisco-like" code, so there's that... Can't speak for Nokia. On Nov 10, 2016 12:22 PM, wrote: > > Cisco is the only "real" IS-IS vendor. > > > > Juniper, Brocade,

Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?

Cisco is the only "real" IS-IS vendor. Juniper, Brocade, Arista, Avaya, etc you're not getting it. Any of the whitebox hardware or real SDN capable solutions, you're going to be on OSPF. On Nov 10, 2016 12:13 AM, "Mark Tinka" <mark.ti...@seacom.mu> wrote: > > >

Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?

Vendor support for IS-IS is quite limited - many options for OSPF. On Nov 9, 2016 8:47 PM, "RT Parrish" wrote: > I will definitely be looking up the notes from AOL that John referenced. > But working for a vendor and getting insight from multiple ISPs, here are a > few of

Re: Spitballing IoT Security

i think this would be the most effective route proposed so far. May the force be with you :) On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Leo Bicknell wrote: > In a message written on Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 08:06:34AM -0400, Rich Kulawiec > wrote: >> The makers of IoT devices are falling

Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11

You CAN actually block things, within reason. The caveat is you simply have to disclose it. There is a 'reasonable network management' clause. IANAL, please consult your telecommunications legal team. On Oct 24, 2016 1:25 AM, "Richard Holbo" wrote: > I run/manage the networks

RE: Death of the Internet, Film at 11

Modern medicine, sanitation, and sedentary lifestyles for the developed world have effectively culled natural selection for most internet users. On Oct 22, 2016 7:16 PM, "Keith Medcalf" wrote: > > On: Saturday, 22 October, 2016 17:41, Jean-Francois Mezei < >

Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11

One sec, starting a relationship with $CPEvendor... I'll let you know how this goes. "Yes, every customer I went to had malware. That's okay, right?" ;) On Oct 22, 2016 5:56 PM, "Mark Andrews" wrote: > > In message

Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11

game? > > I'm as sympathetic to Aunty Em and Grandma as the next > I-started-on-a-helpdesk guys, but 'you get what you pay for' applies here > as much as it does everywhere else...? > > > On 23/10/2016 11:22 a.m., Josh Reynolds wrote: > >> And then what? The labor to clea

Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11

And then what? The labor to clean up this mess is not free. Who's responsibility is it? The grandma who got a webcam for Christmas to watch the squirrels? The ISP?... No... The vendor? What if the vendor had released a patch to fix the issue months back, and grandma hadn't installed it? Making

Re: Dyn DDoS this AM?

Ah, disregard. I see what you're saying now. Yes, I can see how that would be problematic. On Oct 21, 2016 6:40 PM, "Josh Reynolds" <j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote: > Ansible would be a decent start. > > On Oct 21, 2016 5:26 PM, "David Birdsong" <da...@imgix

Re: Dyn DDoS this AM?

Ansible would be a decent start. On Oct 21, 2016 5:26 PM, "David Birdsong" wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Randy Bush wrote: > > > anyone who relies on a single dns provider is just asking for stuff such > > as this. > > > > randy > > > > I'd love to

Re: Excessive Netflix DNS Traffic?

Same here :) On Oct 13, 2016 1:09 PM, "Ryan, Spencer" wrote: > I was going to point you to the reddit thread about it, but it looks to be > your thread :) > > > Spencer Ryan | Senior Systems Administrator | sr...@arbor.net sr...@arbor.net> > Arbor Networks > +1.734.794.5033 (d)

Re: nexus N3K-C3064PQ vs juniper ex4500 in order to protect against ddos

Again, keep doing that :P Be sure to eBay it for a reasonable price when you are done! On Oct 1, 2016 10:12 AM, "James Jun" wrote: > On Sat, Oct 01, 2016 at 09:22:32AM -0500, Mike Hammett wrote: > > Better power performance, newer features, higher capacities sure are

Re: Looking for recommendations for a dedicated ping responder

Can you elaborate? On Sep 9, 2016 2:54 PM, "Dan White" wrote: > Are there any products you're using which are dedicated to responding to > customer facing pings? > > -- > Dan White > BTC Broadband > Network Admin Lead > Ph 918.366.0248 (direct) main: (918)366-8000 > Fax

Re: Use of unique local IPv6 addressing rfc4193

You can also easily police a subnet. On Sep 8, 2016 6:11 PM, "Pshem Kowalczyk" wrote: > With NAT I have a single entry/exit point to those infrastructure subnets > which can be easily policed. > If I give them public IPs then they're routable and potentially can reach > the

Re: Outdoor ADSL2+/VDSL/G.Fast NIU

Check with Calix or Ciena. On Sep 2, 2016 11:27 AM, "Jeremy Malli" wrote: > I'm hoping somebody on the list has a recommendation for an outdoor > ADSL2+/VDSL/G.Fast NIU. Been doing so some research into this and have > come up empty so far. > > > My thinking is that by housing

Re: Can someone from Amazon please answer.

Excellent info, thank you Mark. On Aug 26, 2016 6:53 PM, "Mark Andrews" wrote: > > In message

Re: Can someone from Amazon please answer.

Just looking at the RFC... - VERSION Indicates the implementation level of the setter. Full conformance with this specification is indicated by version '0'. Requestors are encouraged to set this to the lowest implemented level capable of expressing a transaction, to minimise the responder and

Re: Comparing carrier hotels and colo: How much are you paying per 208V 30A circuit

Assuming a single 208/30 feed, he also asked about redundancy. On Aug 17, 2016 5:23 PM, "Justin Wilson" wrote: > Indiana Data Centers: > $600-900 per lit rack > > > Chicago > $1800 per lit rack > > > Ohio > $700-900 per lit rack > > > Justin Wilson > j...@mtin.net > > --- >

Re: Bitcoin mining reward halved

This is pretty O/T for this list, isn't it? On Jul 9, 2016 12:15 PM, "John Levine" wrote: > At about 16:46 UTC block 420001 showed up on the Bitcoin blockchain, > so the mining reward per block dropped from 25 to 12.5 btc. > > Depending on whom you believe, nothing will change,

Re: Gmail down

There is an outages list @ puck.nether.net that this might have been better suited for. In the future, please list: Time the issue started (followed by timezone) Nature of the issue Troubleshooting steps you've tried Location Any additional helpful information to replicate the issue Time of

Re: Gmail down

What a terrible report. >From where? What network? Do you see issues through other networks? - Sent from the gmail web interface On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 9:49 AM, Josh Luthman wrote: > Web interface is broken, downdetector sure sees activity. This attempt is > from

Akamai GeoIP

Can somebody from Akamai contact me offlist about a GeoIP location change for a block please? Thank you.

Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

Holy fuck get on your meds. As someone who actually has to deal with 3 different (4 technically) content providers, their distribution agreements and requirements for distribution a the way through the network are absolutely asinine, but required if you want your eyeballs to receive their

Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

I've worked at my fair share of eyeball ISPs, and many of them used HE as one of their connections, On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 12:38 AM, joel jaeggli <joe...@bogus.com> wrote: > On 6/5/16 6:23 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote: >> Uhm, what? Where do you think ISPs get their transit exactly? &g

Re: rfc 1812 third party address on traceroute

I'm assuming you'd like this behavior on EdgeOS changed? I know a guy... On Jun 5, 2016 8:41 PM, "Randy Bush" wrote: > > is anyone seeing the dreaded rfc1812 behavior in a citable fashion? how > > common is it? > > we verified that the juniper and cisco platforms we tested

Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

> pretty small subset. that said they (HE) can be and are a valuable peer > both in v4 and v6. > > Personally I wouldn't single home to anything that looks tier-1ish but > your mileage may vary the residential operators I look at tend to be > fairly diversly connected. > > O

Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

You might be one of a handful. On Jun 3, 2016 7:35 PM, "Gary E. Miller" wrote: > Yo Spencer! > > On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 20:13:03 -0400 > Spencer Ryan wrote: > > > Yes but HE doesn't serve residential users directly. > > Really? I am the only one? Doubtful. > >

Re: FlowSpec Support

There was just a recent discussion about this. None of the big upstreams support it because they are all too busy selling their own DDoS mitigation services :) On May 28, 2016 5:38 PM, "Mike Hammett" wrote: > I know support (from customers) is limited among networks. I know it

Re: SNMP "bridging"/proxy?

+1 On May 23, 2016 4:53 PM, "Eric Kuhnke" wrote: > This doesn't scale on a large cacti installation with hundreds of hosts and > 60-second poller intervals. Cacti data input method scripts spawn a new php > worker for each data acquisition target (they do NOT use the

RE: B5-Lite

AF24HD can do full duplex 1Gbps On May 14, 2016 12:17 PM, "Eric Rogers" wrote: > If it is 3-4KM, I would definitely use the AF24 (24GHz) because it gives > you 750M/750M Full duplex. For longer, or a backup link, I would use the > AF5X (not AF5) instead of the B5.

Re: B5-Lite

WHAT HAVE YOU DONE WITH THE REAL JOSH LUTHMAN?! On May 14, 2016 8:33 AM, "Josh Luthman" wrote: > AF5X is hard to beat and cheaper... > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > On May 14, 2016 9:29

Re: NIST NTP servers

maybe try with an odroid? On May 11, 2016 8:45 PM, "Jon Meek" wrote: > A note on using a Raspberry Pi as a NTP server. In my limited home lab > testing the RPi server had enough instability that Internet time sources > were always preferred by my workstation after ntpd had been

Re: NIST NTP servers

I hope your receivers aren't all from a single source. I was in Iraq when this ( http://dailycaller.com/2010/06/01/glitch-shows-how-much-us-military-relies-on-gps/ ) happened, which meant I had no GPS guided indirect fire assets for 2 weeks. On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Leo Bicknell

Re: CALEA

The first rule of prism is... *silence* :) On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote: >> >> This is a large list that inclu

Re: CALEA

one is doing CALEA or knows > anything about it? > > Personally, I can't say I've heard anything about CALEA, seen people > trying to sell CALEA appliances, or received a CALEA request in maybe 8 > years? > > On 5/10/16 12:34 AM, Josh Reynolds wrote: > >> Hrm?

Re: NIST NTP servers

That would be a very poor idea, since a lot of the circuits the DoD still uses to communicate with are ATM lines :) On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 10:52:28AM -0400, > valdis.kletni...@vt.edu

Re: CALEA

Hrm? On May 9, 2016 11:04 PM, "shawn wilson" wrote: > The OP is also asking someone to register a throwaway email, subscribe, and > respond "yes" so that the owner can't be tracked to their employer. That's > kind of a steep ask for something that's almost moot. > On May 9,

Re: sub $500-750 CPE firewall for voip-centric application

I've been very happy with the 2.3 release. Modularizing everything and the new bootstrap GUI is very nice. Updated BSD code base is a godsend. On May 6, 2016 2:36 PM, "Aris Lambrianidis" wrote: > Mel Beckman wrote: > >> But bug reports and response can be measured, at least

Re: Frontier Internet Outage

Something else you may want to look for in the future is an email report from the puck.nether.net outages list. On May 2, 2016 8:54 AM, "Matt Hoppes" <mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote: > Yes yes yes, Josh :) Jeff got me the info I was looking for. > > On 5/2/

Re: Standards for last mile performance

Disagreeing is okay. It wouldn't make you any less wrong though :P On May 1, 2016 3:58 AM, "Mark Tinka" <mark.ti...@seacom.mu> wrote: > > > On 1/May/16 10:55, Josh Reynolds wrote: > > > No. Active has higher initial and ongoing plant costs (cabinet power, >

Re: Standards for last mile performance

In addition, the upgrade path uses the same strands simultaneously. On May 1, 2016 3:46 AM, "Mark Tinka" <mark.ti...@seacom.mu> wrote: > > > On 30/Apr/16 20:36, Josh Reynolds wrote: > > > For us (FTTH) we had/have enough aggressive foresight to do smaller >

Re: Standards for last mile performance

No. Active has higher initial and ongoing plant costs (cabinet power, cabinet wear and tear, more battery banks, chargers, etc). You also end up using far, far less fiber strands. On May 1, 2016 3:46 AM, "Mark Tinka" <mark.ti...@seacom.mu> wrote: > > > On 30/Apr/16 2

Re: Standards for last mile performance

For us (FTTH) we had/have enough aggressive foresight to do smaller splits.. 1x16. Some are doing 1x2's or 1x4's at the corner somewhere into 1x16's or 1x8's, so at the point where you start to hit decent saturation you can just shrink the upstream split and fuse onto a new upstream strand /

Re: Mobile providers in the US for backup access

Ting's support is the BEST support I've ever had in the IT industry. I event ended up in a long discussion with one of the reps about custom roms :P On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 3:59 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: > *shrugs* Seems to work here, though if Ting uses T-Mo and Sprint, I

Re: 10G-capable customer router recommendations?

With a Chelsio T5 you might get some decent pure routing / NAT performance with the right card mod, but as soon as it goes into firewall/ACL/QoS etc, performance will tank drastically. On Apr 18, 2016 7:49 AM, "Micah Croff" wrote: > I haven't tried to do 10Gb with it but

Re: 10G-capable customer router recommendations?

It does have limited static routing capability built in to the hardware though, but no NAT. On Apr 18, 2016 8:25 AM, "Faisal Imtiaz" wrote: > double check the spec sheets, EP-s16 is a switch not a router.. > the smaller units are switch + routers. > > Regards > > Faisal

Re: 10G-capable customer router recommendations?

> > http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Wiki/Fasttrack > On 16/04/2016 10:07 am, "Josh Reynolds" <j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote: > >> Can't do more than 1Gbps per flow. Not suitable for this application. >> On Apr 15, 2016 5:03 PM, <mike.l...@gmail.com> w

Re: 10G-capable customer router recommendations?

p://www.ics-il.com > > > > Midwest Internet Exchange > http://www.midwest-ix.com > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Josh Reynolds" <j...@kyneticwifi.com> > To: "Andrew Thrift" <and...@networklabs.co.nz> > Cc: &

Re: 10G-capable customer router recommendations?

year now. > > Most Mikrotik routers now support FastPath/FastTrack. This is kind of > like CEF in Cisco land. > > http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Fast_Path > > http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Wiki/Fasttrack > On 16/04/2016 10:07 am, "Josh Reynolds" <j.

Re: 10G-capable customer router recommendations?

change > http://www.midwest-ix.com > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Josh Reynolds" <j...@kyneticwifi.com> > To: "Mike Hammett" <na...@ics-il.net> > Cc: "NANOG" <nanog@nanog.org> > Sent: Friday, April 15, 2016 8:

Re: 10G-capable customer router recommendations?

likely to be an issue for this residential use case. > > > > > - > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > > > Midwest Internet Exchange > http://www.midwest-ix.com > > > - Original Message - > > From: "

Re: 10G-capable customer router recommendations?

Would still need a Chelsio / Mellanox etc card, and even then you're not going to hit line rate if you have NAT or any traffic shaping enabled at all. Maybe with DPDK/netmap/pf_ring, but that would be some pretty custom work. On Apr 15, 2016 6:47 PM, "Michael Brown"

RE: 10G-capable customer router recommendations?

Different philosophy - strings attached. When I sell a service, either residential or business or DIA, the terms are clearly stated. If I were selling a multi-hundred dollar a month service, the CPE cost is minimal. If I don't offer a service that is at least *capable* of providing what I'm

Re: 10G-capable customer router recommendations?

As much as I enjoy Mikrotik products and respect my friends and peers who use them, until ROS 7.x the CCR is a "gimped" product. On Apr 15, 2016 5:10 PM, "Filip Hruska" wrote: > Hi, > > I would also vote for Mikrotik products; IMHO this looks perfect for this > situation. > >

Re: 10G-capable customer router recommendations?

Can't do more than 1Gbps per flow. Not suitable for this application. On Apr 15, 2016 5:03 PM, wrote: > Check out the Mikrotik Cloud Core routers, they make them with SFP+ > support now. I have one of them with 10g deployed right now. > > -Mike > > > On Apr 15, 2016, at

Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences

All, Is NANOG really the best place for this discussion? On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Leo Bicknell wrote: > . >> So maybe 10% of all cell phones are primarly used in the "wrong"

Re: mpls switches

I know the 4500/4550 does but it requires a license. On Apr 12, 2016 8:07 AM, "Colton Conor" wrote: > Do the Juniper EX switches support MPLS? I know they have models with > multiple 10G ports on them. There is also the QFX series. > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 7:02 PM, Mike

Re: Colocation Server Lifts

They are much more likely to be used for things like Juniper MX960's (and larger), Brocade MLXe-32's (and larger), etc. Routers and switches that weigh hundreds or thousands of pounds ;) On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Wayne Bouchard wrote: > In all my time dealing with various

Re: SFP Cost Variation

http://packetpushers.net/overpriced-optics-by-oems/ On Mar 12, 2016 1:16 PM, "Nicholas Warren" wrote: > Quick question for the experts. > > Why when looking at SFPs, some sites list them as $800 when the same part > number can be found on places like amazon for

anyone from google email / net ops here?

It seems like one of your email servers is on SORBS which is causing any email outbound from said server to be blocked by those using SORBS. IP in question is 209.85.214.170 Offlist responses are fine, thanks

Re: sFlow vs netFlow/IPFIX

Brocade as well. On Mar 1, 2016 8:39 AM, "David Bass" wrote: > I don't agree with that statement (about rare to find big companies using > Nexus). If you want 10 gig/40 gig (or 100 gig soon) your options are Cisco > Nexus/Arista/Juniper QFX...some periphery devices as

Re: Cisco ASR9010 vs Juniper MX960

m +1 713 703 3552 > ja...@rice.edu <a...@rice.edu> > > On 18, Feb 2016, at 7:59 AM, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote: > > With GRES, can't you simply set the master RE as backup, apply firmware, > then switch back to master and upgrade the backup

Re: Cisco ASR9010 vs Juniper MX960

With GRES, can't you simply set the master RE as backup, apply firmware, then switch back to master and upgrade the backup RE? On Feb 18, 2016 7:57 AM, "Jason Bothe" wrote: > We have both and they’re both great boxes, however it’s sort of > embarrassing that the ASR9k still can’t

  1   2   >