-Original Message-
From: Michael Hallgren [mailto:m.hallg...@free.fr]
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 1:11 PM
To: bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com
Cc: Wessels, Duane; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Trouble accessing www.nanog.org
Le mercredi 04 janvier 2012 à 20:18 +,
On Jan 4, 2012, at 7:36 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Michael K. Smith - Adhost
mksm...@adhost.com wrote:
There was a single source IP with 200+ open, active http connections to a
single large media file. The single IP address was blocked. The file
going offlist
Mike
On Jan 4, 2012, at 7:47 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 10:41 PM, Michael K. Smith - Adhost
mksm...@adhost.com wrote:
Err, while we're talking about video files and nanog, why is the video
content still served off (stored content I mean) nanog.org
Hey:
Manually speaking, you can always telnet to route-views.routeviews.org which is
a restricted Cisco interface. Log in with username rviews and don't enable.
From the prompt you can do all the show ip bgp commands you need to see
whether or not your /24 is being announced via your
Hello All:
There will be maintenance performed to the NANOG Website and ARO system on
Saturday, October 22, 2011, starting at 4 PM Pacific (2300 GMT) and lasting
approximately 4 hours. During the window there will be brief periods where the
website and ARO system are unavailable.
Please note
And as always, thank you Matt for taking the time and effort to do all of this
work to provide a great service to the community.
Thanks again,
Mike
On Oct 12, 2011, at 11:46 AM, Matthew Petach wrote:
Wow. As always, Geoff Huston really knows
how to deliver a message in a way that just
Just an FYI - even though you approved the wireless charge, it's actually free.
They pull the per-diem/week charge off your bill. That applies to all NANOG
attendees.
Mike
On Oct 10, 2011, at 11:36 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
I don't think it is. I think that you can negotiate and I will point
-Original Message-
From: Dobbins, Roland [mailto:rdobb...@arbor.net]
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 11:56 AM
To: North American Network Operators' Group
Subject: Re: vyatta for bgp
On Sep 13, 2011, at 1:42 AM, Ben Albee wrote:
Does anybody currently use vyatta as a bgp router
Hello Everyone:
I am recreating the archives for the primary NANOG list, so they will be
unavailable for a little while, probably a couple of hours. The list
will function as expected and all messages to the list will be archived
during this process.
Regards,
Mike
Hello All:
We will be moving the mailing list at 12:00 PDT (GMT -7). The following is the
cutover schedule and expected issues during the cutover.
1) 12:00 - move DNS for mailman.nanog.org (the MX for nanog.org)
2) 12:00 - shut down Mailman on s0.nanog.org (mailman.nanog.org)
3) 12:01 - final
This message is testing the new list server configuration. Please ignore.
Mike
--
Michael K. Smith - CISSP, GSEC, GISP
Chief Technical Officer - Adhost Internet LLC mksm...@adhost.com
w: +1 (206) 404-9500 f: +1 (206) 404-9050
PGP: B49A DDF5 8611 27F3 08B9 84BB E61E 38C0 (Key ID: 0x9A96777D)
(206) 404-9050
PGP: B49A DDF5 8611 27F3 08B9 84BB E61E 38C0 (Key ID: 0x9A96777D)
-Original Message-
From: Michael K. Smith - Adhost [mailto:mksm...@adhost.com]
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 11:44 AM
To: NANOG list (nanog@nanog.org)
Subject: NANOG List Cutover Schedule
Hello All
:4f94
Regards,
Mike
--
Michael K. Smith - CISSP, GSEC, GISP
Chief Technical Officer - Adhost Internet LLC mksm...@adhost.com
w: +1 (206) 404-9500 f: +1 (206) 404-9050
PGP: B49A DDF5 8611 27F3 08B9 84BB E61E 38C0 (Key ID: 0x9A96777D)
-Original Message-
From: Michael K. Smith - Adhost
Hello Everyone:
The correct and updated IPv6 address for the NANOG list is
2001:1838::cc5d:d48a. Forward and reverse records are updated and the
other address will continue to work while the DNS change propagates.
Regards,
Mike
Hello Everyone:
We have tested successfully the Mailman configuration on the new server and are
ready to proceed with moving the various NANOG lists over to that server using
the following schedule. At approximately 12:00 PDT on Monday, July 25th we
will move DNS over for mailman.nanog.org to
Hello All:
Given the issues we had with the mailing list transition, we would like to
solicit volunteers to assist in testing the new configuration. Please note,
we are just moving the existing Mailman configuration to a new server under our
control, but we have to move the list due to
Hello All:
We're back on the old configuration for now. I will send an update later
this afternoon once I speak with AMS about the issues we experienced over
night.
Regards,
Mike
Thank you for your patience as we moved forward with our NANOG transition.
We are excited to announce the opening of NANOG 53 registration. You will
notice a new format and the need to create a user id and password to
complete your registration. We are confident you will find the new system
Hello:
I'll be testing the list cutover again at 10:00 PM PDT (GMT -7). Please
ignore the subsequent NANOG TEST email that comes through to the list.
Regards,
Mike
As per my previous message - please ignore.
Mike
NANOG CC Chair
Hello All:
Thankfully, the current test has been a success. We are going to stay in
the present setup through tomorrow morning at approximately 11:00 AM PDT
(GMT -7). Below is a brief description of the present state and the
changes that will be made tomorrow.
Present State
Hello All:
We are going to cut the mailing list over to the new location at 4:00 PM PDT
(GMT -7). We will be testing the cutover on this list to make sure everything
goes smoothly. Please filter on the subject NANOG TEST.
Regards,
Mike
--
Michael K. Smith - CISSP, GSEC, GISP
Chief
Please ignore
--
Michael K. Smith - CISSP, GSEC, GISP
Chief Technical Officer - Adhost Internet LLC mksm...@adhost.com
w: +1 (206) 404-9500 f: +1 (206) 404-9050
PGP: B49A DDF5 8611 27F3 08B9 84BB E61E 38C0 (Key ID: 0x9A96777D)
Technical Officer - Adhost Internet LLC mksm...@adhost.com
w: +1 (206) 404-9500 f: +1 (206) 404-9050
PGP: B49A DDF5 8611 27F3 08B9 84BB E61E 38C0 (Key ID: 0x9A96777D)
-Original Message-
From: Michael K. Smith - Adhost [mailto:mksm...@adhost.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2011 3:38 PM
Hello Everyone
We are going to be moving the NANOG mailing list over to our new service
provider beginning this week. There are several changes that will occur over
time that will, hopefully, reduce the service impact to users. One key note -
the new system doesn't use Mailman, so your
On 6/22/11 12:48 PM, Jeroen van Aart jer...@mompl.net wrote:
Steven Bellovin wrote:
When I was in grad school, the director of the computer center (remember
those) felt that there was no need for 1200 bps modems -- 300 bps was
fine, since no one could read the scrolling output any faster
Sorry about that - I approved it to the list without looking at it in depth
(hit Approve to quickly).
Mea Culpa
Mike
On behalf of the NANOG CC
--
Michael K. Smith - CISSP, GSEC, GISP
Chief Technical Officer - Adhost Internet LLC mksm...@adhost.com
w: +1 (206) 404-9500 f: +1 (206) 404-9050
PGP:
Hello All:
There is a new Vyatta NSP list, sponsored by Jared on puck.nether.net. If you
are running Vyatta hardware and/or software please join and share your
questions, comments and experiences.
http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/vyatta-nsp
Regards,
Mike
Hello All:
NANOG 52 in Denver is fast approaching. If you're planning on attending and
want to get the benefits of the NANOG room rate, you should consider signing up
as soon as possible. We're at 85% of our room block capacity and the cutoff
date for the NANOG rate is May 29th at 5:00 PM
-Original Message-
From: Seth Mattinen [mailto:se...@rollernet.us]
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 12:52 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: IPv6 Prefix announcing
On 4/26/2011 09:39, Kate Gerry wrote:
Funny enough, some carriers actually require the 'smallest' as being /32...
On 4/16/11 4:24 PM, Michael Painter tvhaw...@shaka.com wrote:
Was trying to determine where this 'honolulu' speedtest was hosted:
Tracing route to honolulu.speedtest.net [74.209.160.12]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
122 ms ** 123.87.93.224
227 ms29 ms25 ms
-Original Message-
From: Eugen Leitl [mailto:eu...@leitl.org]
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 6:11 AM
To: NANOG list
Subject: Syngenta space
Hi,
sorry for the noise, but my contact at Syngenta says
they have 147.0.0.0/8 168.0.0.0/8 and 172.0.0.0/8,
which is obviously bogus.
I thought iced-over fiber was a little bit like muffler-bearings. Great
excuse if they buy it.
Mike
On 4/1/11 6:07 PM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
It's also especially sensitive to icing induced packet loss.
Owen
On Apr 1, 2011, at 7:30 AM, GP Wooden wrote:
I wonder on the carrier
On 3/21/11 5:36 PM, Livio Zanol Puppim livio.zanol.pup...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
I don't know if this is the appropriate list for this kind of subject, so
if
anyone knows another specific list, please tell me...
I'm analysing several DWDM designs to implement at my city, but I'm still
a
bit
Hello:
We had a system issue over the weekend that interrupted delivery of all of the
NANOG mailing lists. We are working presently to clear the queues of the
various applications that service the lists. I anticipate we will have
complete delivery within a few hours. If you find that
Potentially the Cisco 4900M. I can't find specifically about the GRE
support however. My google-fu just finds discussion about v4 to v6
tunnels in software. The chassis has 8 built-in ports and two expansion
modules that can each do another 4 TenG ports in a not-oversubscribed
configuration.
I have both Level3 and NTT v6 connections and there are no additional
charges for the service. I recall NTT had one a few years ago, but I
think that's fallen by the wayside.
Mike
--
Michael K. Smith - CISSP, GSEC, GISP
Chief Technical Officer - Adhost Internet LLC mksm...@adhost.com
w: +1 (206)
From: Yaoqing(Joey) Liu [mailto:joey.li...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 7:04 PM
To: Michael K. Smith - Adhost
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Internet Exchange Point(IXP) questions
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 8:17 PM, Michael K. Smith - Adhost
mksm...@adhost.commailto:mksm
17, 2011 7:04 PM
To: Michael K. Smith - Adhost
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Internet Exchange Point(IXP) questions
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 8:17 PM, Michael K. Smith - Adhost mksm...@adhost.com
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Yaoqing(Joey) Liu [mailto:joey.li...@gmail.com]
Sent
-Original Message-
From: christopher.mor...@gmail.com
[mailto:christopher.mor...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Christopher Morrow
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 11:34 AM
To: Michael K. Smith - Adhost
Cc: Yaoqing(Joey) Liu; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Internet Exchange Point(IXP
-Original Message-
From: Yaoqing(Joey) Liu [mailto:joey.li...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 6:03 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Internet Exchange Point(IXP) questions
I'm doing some research on multiple origin AS problems of IXPs. As I know,
generally there are two
? I'm getting redirect loop:
$ curl -I www.nanog.org
HTTP/1.1 302 Found
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 14:15:04 GMT
Server: Apache/2.2.6 (FreeBSD) mod_ssl/2.2.6 OpenSSL/0.9.8e DAV/2
PHP/5.2.4 with Suhosin-Patch
Location: http://www.nanog.org
Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote:
Hello All
Hello All:
I need to find rack space in data centers in Germany and China, although the
China requirement is more for low(er) latency access into China rather than
needing to be physically in-country. Both data centers have to have the local
equivalent of a SAS 70 Type II validation.
Please
Hello Everyone:
If you receive an auto-responder message to a NANOG posting, please forward a
copy to adm...@nanog.org and we'll set the account to no-mail and contact the
sender. If you don't send us a copy we won't see it necessarily, so feel free
to do so.
Regards,
Mike
NANOG
Hello Adam:
You may want to post this on the ARIN PPML list since the policy folks are all
there. They will be able to point your directly to the portion of the NPRM
that applies. In addition, this would be the appropriate list to submit policy
changes if you don't like the way things are
Hello All:
The NANOG website and NANOG mailing list will be unavailable during the times
listed below. There is an issue with the present location within the
University of Michigan environment that requires a physical move of the NANOG
servers to a discrete location. We apologize for the
-Original Message-
From: Majdi S. Abbas [mailto:m...@latt.net]
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2011 1:29 PM
To: Owen DeLong
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: Membership model
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 12:40:41PM -0800, Owen DeLong wrote:
I'll happily join Newnog/NANOG and pay my dues when I
Also not for the board, but it's also likely to be a DBA because of the 501(c)3
election process, which was initiated under the NewNOG name.
Regards,
Mike
--
Michael K. Smith - CISSP, GSEC, GISP
Chief Technical Officer - Adhost Internet LLC mksm...@adhost.com
w: +1 (206) 404-9500 f: +1 (206)
Hello Brian:
If you go to the Donors page (http://www.newnog.org/donors.php) there is a
PayPal link there.
Regards,
Mike
--
Michael K. Smith - CISSP, GSEC, GISP
Chief Technical Officer - Adhost Internet LLC mksm...@adhost.com
w: +1 (206) 404-9500 f: +1 (206) 404-9050
PGP: B49A DDF5 8611 27F3
Hello Everyone:
Merit will be performing maintenance on the server providing for the NANOG
mailing list at 5:00 PM EST today. The anticipated downtime is less than 5
minutes. If you have any questions please send let us know at adm...@nanog.org.
Regards,
Mike
On behalf of the NANOG
Here's what I see:
Level 3: 2949
HE: 3775
NTT: 3867
Init7: 3665
Mike
--
Michael K. Smith - CISSP, GSEC, GISP
Chief Technical Officer - Adhost Internet LLC mksm...@adhost.com
w: +1 (206) 404-9500 f: +1 (206) 404-9050
PGP: B49A DDF5 8611 27F3 08B9 84BB E61E 38C0 (Key ID: 0x9A96777D)
On Dec 21, 2010, at 4:20 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
On 12/21/2010 14:18, Frank Bulk wrote:
There are 4,035 routes in the global IPv6 routing table. This is what one
provider passed on to me for routes (/48 or larger prefixes), extracted from
public route-view servers.
ATT AS7018: 2,851
Hello All:
This Friday morning, December 17, at 5:00 a.m. EST, Merit staff will relocate
the server that operates the NANOG mailing lists and website. This will result
in a list outage that should last not more than two hours. If you have any
questions, please send them to adm...@nanog.org.
-Original Message-
From: Joe Abley [mailto:jab...@hopcount.ca]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2010 1:15 PM
To: Sean Figgins
Cc: nanog-futures@nanog.org
Subject: Re: [Nanog-futures] New Membership-WG Draft
On 2010-10-27, at 15:43, Sean Figgins wrote:
If someone leaves the
-Original Message-
From: Peter Rudasingwa [mailto:peter.rudasin...@altechstream.rw]
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 1:24 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: P2P link over STM-1
I have clients who want a P2P link over STM-1.
How can I achieve this? What kind of equipment do I need.
On Oct 4, 2010, at 6:45 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
and what about lifers, the other long-term unwindable commitment?
Specifically what is your objection to offering life membership?
i thought i was pretty clear, if terse.
we do not have consensus over membership categories.
Hello All:
If you are attending NANOG 50 in Atlanta and have free time there is an exhibit
of Salvador Dali's late period works at the High Museum that is incredible. And
if you are here now there will be a discussion with his former students and
models as well as the exhibit curator at 2 EDT.
-Original Message-
From: Lyndon Nerenberg [mailto:lyn...@orthanc.ca]
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 9:30 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Randy in Nevis
On 10-09-27 7:20 AM, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
Cannot establish SSL with SMTP server 67.202.37.63:465 does not
sound
-Original Message-
From: Reese [mailto:re...@inkworkswell.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 12:36 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: US hunters shoot down Google fibre
At 11:39 21 09 10, Leslie wrote:
I don't think anyone is claiming all hunters/gun owners are
Hello:
Nominations for the NANOG Communications Committee are now open. This
is a great way to become involved and serve the NANOG community. From
the website:
The Communications Committee is a group of five individuals from the
NANOG community who together are responsible for the
--
Michael K. Smith - CISSP, GSEC, GISP
Chief Technical Officer - Adhost Internet LLC mksm...@adhost.com
w: +1 (206) 404-9500 f: +1 (206) 404-9050
PGP: B49A DDF5 8611 27F3 08B9 84BB E61E 38C0 (Key ID: 0x9A96777D)
-Original Message-
From: Alan Bryant
Hello All:
This Wednesday morning at 7:00 a.m. EDT, Merit staff will replace the
power supply on the NANOG server that operates the mailing lists. (The
original power supply failed some time ago and was swapped for a part
owned by a different project. In the operation on Wednesday, a new power
snip
In any case, instead, both sides have left the community with a
transition where
1) the broader community was not brought along for the ride with
identified problems and proposed solutions, it was a 'done deal'
(this would have taken time)
2) the plan for this new NANOG
snip
aol
but where the heck are pro forma financial projections for the new
nanog? we were to get them with lead time to actualy study and ask
questions before now.
randy
The hope is to get the pro forma out before the end of the week. We
just received additional data from Merit that
-Original Message-
From: Joe Abley [mailto:jab...@hopcount.ca]
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 4:57 AM
To: Sean Figgins
Cc: Nanog Futures
Subject: Re: [Nanog-futures] Transition update
On 2010-06-09, at 07:08, Sean Figgins wrote:
I would think that there may also me less
Hello Everyone:
The NewNOG website is up at http://www.newnog.org. It is definitely in
its nascent stage but more data is being added every day. Please take a
look at the site and look at the documentation that has been posted
already. This includes the Board of Directors information, the
-Original Message-
From: Pete Templin [mailto:peteli...@templin.org]
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 4:31 PM
To: joel jaeggli
Cc: nanog-futures@nanog.org
Subject: Re: [Nanog-futures] Transition update
joel jaeggli wrote:
Um insofar as I'm aware Andy Rosenzweig is still the Marit
-Original Message-
From: Joe Abley [mailto:jab...@hopcount.ca]
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 10:41 AM
To: Michael K. Smith - Adhost
Cc: Pete Templin; joel jaeggli; nanog-futures@nanog.org
Subject: Re: [Nanog-futures] Transition update
On 2010-06-03, at 13:00, Michael K. Smith
-Original Message-
From: Rafael Ganascim [mailto:rganas...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 11:25 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: BGP Transit AS
Hi all,
I have a doubt about the bellow scenario, where the ISP1 use eBGP
sessions to its peers and is a BGP Transit AS.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dillon [mailto:wavetos...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 3:40 PM
To: NANOG list
Subject: Re: Cheers to the Communication Committee [was: Likely /8
Scenario - Carriers will TAKE what they want ?]
I guarantee you the Communications
-Original Message-
From: Blomberg, Orin P (DOH) [mailto:orin.blomb...@doh.wa.gov]
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 11:37 AM
To: sfou...@shortestpathfirst.net; Voll, Toivo; Chris Campbell; Dawood
Iqbal
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: Best VPN Appliance
There is also the fact to
Hello Everyone:
The thread Sorbs on autopilot? has been moderated.
Kind Regards,
Mike (on behalf of the NANOG CC)
--
Michael K. Smith - CISSP, GSEC, GISP
Chief Technical Officer - Adhost Internet LLC mksm...@adhost.com
w: +1 (206) 404-9500 f: +1 (206) 404-9050
PGP: B49A DDF5 8611 27F3 08B9
Hello Everyone:
I am requesting the assistance of operators who are receiving full IPv6
routing tables from upstream, transit providers. If you could send me a
copy of your full IPv6 table, as plain text or whatever format best
suits, I would be sincerely grateful.
I am doing some preliminary
-Original Message-
From: Joel Jaeggli [mailto:joe...@bogus.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 8:14 AM
To: Michael K. Smith - Adhost
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Request for Information - IPv6 Routing Table Snapshots
you might take a look at route-views6.routeviews.org
Hello Michael:
-Original Message-
From: Michael Ruiz [mailto:mr...@telwestservices.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 8:02 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Help -- Having trouble trying to activate a GigE
connection
Group,
I am having an issue with
As an aside, the 6-port GigE card is not oversubscribed.
Mike
--
Michael K. Smith - CISSP, GISP
Chief Technical Officer - Adhost Internet LLC mksm...@adhost.com
w: +1 (206) 404-9500 f: +1 (206) 404-9050
PGP: B49A DDF5 8611 27F3 08B9 84BB E61E 38C0 (Key ID: 0x9A96777D)
-Original
-Original Message-
From: Seth Mattinen [mailto:se...@rollernet.us]
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 8:28 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: IPv6 in the ARIN region
New thread: who will route the full IPv6 table? So far I'm seeing PI
/48's out of 2620:0:/23 from:
NTT, 2914
ATT,
Hello Michael:
-Original Message-
From: Michael J McCafferty [mailto:m...@m5computersecurity.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 2:46 PM
To: nanog
Subject: cross connect reliability
All,
Today I had yet another cross-connect fail at our colo provider.
From
memory,
08B9 84BB E61E 38C0 (Key ID: 0x9A96777D)
-Original Message-
From: Michael K. Smith - Adhost [mailto:mksm...@adhost.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 8:41 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Datacenter recommendations - China and Latin America
Hello Everyone:
Does anyone have
Hello Everyone:
Does anyone have any recommendations for data centers in China (PRC) and
Latin America? The Latin America site doesn't have to be in any
particular country within the region, although facilities with good
network connectivity are obviously preferred.
Regards,
Mike
--
Michael
Hello:
Thank you to everyone that provided off-list recommendations. I've
compiled the list of providers in no particular order.
Regards,
Mike
Latin America
- Securehost - http://www.securehost.com
- Triara (Telmex) - http://www.triara.com/Datacenter.htm
- KIO Networks
- Xertix
- Hortolandia
-Original Message-
From: Tomas L. Byrnes [mailto:t...@byrneit.net]
Sent: Fri 7/3/2009 10:20 AM
To: David Hubbard; NANOG list
Subject: RE: Fire, Power loss at Fisher Plaza in Seattle
This begs the question of what basic parameters should be for a carrier
hotel or co-lo.
Given that
That was my assumption when I checked the UCLA is wrong button on the
form. We only have one downstream, but it's a distinct ASN so that says
not stub to me.
Mike
Randy top posting - will wonders never cease.
-Original Message-
From: Randy Bush [mailto:ra...@psg.com]
Sent:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Joe Provo nanog-...@rsuc.gweep.net
wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 11:51:45AM -0700, Steve Feldman wrote:
[snip]
aol
Is this really enough of a problem to devote the MLC and Merit's
energy toward solving it?
I do agree that if this really is worth the effort,
.
Since the primary justification for a shared fabric is cost savings
What if everyone who participated at an IXP brought their own switch.
For argument's sake, a Nexus 5xxx. It has 20+ ports of L2, wire speed
10G.
[Michael K. Smith - Adhost]
This sounds like fertile ground for unintended
IPv4-style utilization ratios do make some sense under IPv6, but not
at the
address level - only at the network level.
First, it was (mostly) a joke.
Second, where did you get 4 users per /64? Are you planning to hand
each cable modem a /64?
At the least. Some would say a /56 is
Hi all,
A quick question, what is the common bandwidth for out-of-band access?
Thanks.
In the optical world it's often 192 Kb/sec.
Mike
PGP.sig
Description: PGP signature
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Black [mailto:bl...@csulb.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2008 10:32 AM
To: Etaoin Shrdlu; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: What to do when your ISP off-shores tech support
On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 10:10:33 -0800
Etaoin Shrdlu shr...@deaddrop.org
Hello Alex:
Depending how cheap and ghetto you want to get, there's also possibility
of doing WDM on 1310/1300. I have custom-manufactured splitters filtering
1307nm +-2nm - and any given LR XFP [*1] will be either within that band
or outside [*2]. Test a bunch of them, split them into two
-Original Message-
From: Martin Hannigan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 11:36 AM
To: Joel Jaeggli
Cc: nanog-futures
Subject: Re: [Nanog-futures] The Peering BOF and the Fallout?
It's distracting when the speaker
gets verbal time warnings(not
-Original Message-
From: Martin Hannigan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 10:51 AM
To: Alex Pilosov
Cc: nanog-futures@nanog.org
Subject: Re: [Nanog-futures] Cisco outage
On Nov 28, 2007 1:33 PM, Alex Pilosov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 28 Nov
91 matches
Mail list logo
