On 1/10/2012 10:58 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
By Knology.
Should I be scared?
My experiences with Knology have been fairly thin, but uniformly negative,
for at least the last 5 years. But I know that the plural of 'anecdote' is
not 'data'. That said, I'm accepting all anecdotes. :-)
On 2/27/2011 12:05 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
With copies out to developers we now have confirmation that Apple
still hasn't included DHCPv6 in the next release of OS X.
what is it about ipv6 which attracts religious nuts?
randy
OSX beta (fanbois + journalists who get paid by word) + IPv6
On 1/17/2011 7:11 PM, Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
William,
You're quite right, we don't. We presume that our customers are
honorable until proven otherwise. We're a legitimate U.S. based
corporation and we make ourselves available to the pertinent RBL's and
authorities as appropriate. We take
On 1/12/2011 3:24 PM, Jeroen van Aart wrote:
What is considered normal with regards to access to your co-located
server(s)? Especially when you're just co-locating one or a few servers.
Depends on how much you are paying really. If you decide to go with
this provider, get dual power
On 12/27/2010 10:10 AM, Mike wrote:
Is there anyone who has a script or process or policy concerning
unreliable customer equipments and how to effectively deal with
unsophisticated home users? I mean, users with business oriented gear
If power glitches are the problem, doing a bulk buy of
On 12/18/2010 12:38 AM, Steve Schultze wrote:
http://blog.comcast.com/2010/12/comcasts-responds-to-level-3s-fcc-filing.html
I very much doubt whether my comment on the blog will survive their
moderation process, so here it is:
===
I am a Comcast residential HSI customer, and have many clients
On 12/16/2010 10:54 AM, Mikel Waxler wrote:
But in that scheme, Comcast looses in the long run, when the FCC gets around
to them, but Netflix looses customers immediately.
I pay Netflix 10$ a month and they wont let me use their service cause I
am on Comcast? I am taking my money to Hulu!
On 12/16/2010 5:57 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
Someone seems to have leaked this out, with the following data within the bgp
update:
Unknown BGP attribute 92 (flags: 234)
Hexdump start---
DD 78 FF 71
Hexdump end
This appeared to bite my Level3-connected bandwidth as well. Time period
On 12/16/2010 10:41 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
Unknown BGP attribute 92 (flags: 234)
Hexdump start---
DD 78 FF 71
Hexdump end
This appeared to bite my Level3-connected bandwidth as well.
sigh. is this an attack by a black hat, or by an rir and researchers
who do not know how to say
Thanks for this, I think, as a residential customer of Comcast, the FCC
and FTC will both be receiving a letter from me. Clearly Comcast is not
making an effort to deliver their advertised service, and instead are
actually degrading my service.
Cordially
Patrick
On 12/13/2010 11:08 AM, Berry Mobley wrote:
Hello...
I'm trying to get a handle on implementation of wake-on-lan in an
enterprise environment. Cisco gear, lots of subnets. I've made it work
with directed broadcasts, but I'd really rather not have 40 or 50 'ip
helper-address
On 10/21/2010 11:08 AM, Jeroen Massar wrote:
On 2010-10-21 16:59, Patrick Giagnocavo wrote:
Are IPv6 connected machines unable to access IPv4 addresses?
Unless you put a application/protocol translation in the middle IPv6
can't talk to IPv4. yahoo(IVI,Ecdysis NAT64) for two possibilities
On 10/18/2010 7:44 AM, Jeroen Massar wrote:
APNIC just got another IPv4 /8 thus only 5 left:
http://www.nro.net/media/remaining-ipv4-address-below-5.html
(And the spammers will take the rest...)
So, if your company is not doing IPv6 yet, you really are really getting
late now.
Actually
.
Cordially
Patrick Giagnocavo
patr...@zill.net
On 9/21/2010 6:04 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
http://www.itnews.com.au/News/232831,us-hunters-shoot-down-google-fibre.aspx
1. Deer tend to hang out in little clearings while eating. Little
clearings like the right of way clearing 25 or 50 feet on each side of
an electricity pylon.
2. Deer are
Randy Bush wrote:
John - you do not get it...
vadim, i assure you curran gets it. he has been around as long as you
and i. the problem is that he has become a fiduciary of an organization
which sees its survival and growth as its principal goal, free business
class travel for wannabe
andrew.wallace wrote:
Article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704545004575352983850463108.html
Why does it cost $100 million to install and configure OpenBSD on a
bunch of old systems?
--Patrick
one contract resulted in 3 different end of term dates,
months apart, I can't quite figure out.
Can anyone point me to a mailing list or discussion forum containing
advice on dealing with such issues? And the wider issue of negotiating
good rates with telecoms?
Cordially
Patrick Giagnocavo
patr
Srikanth Sundaresan wrote:
I'm trying to model ADSL access link bandwidth shaping. With a link of
18Mbps, I'm using a token bucket filter (tc + netem) to model 10Mbps,
8Mbps and 2Mbps access plans. I have a couple of questions:
- do ISPs typically use token bucket filters with large bursts
Owen DeLong wrote:
I had an interesting discussion with someone from Registration Services at
ARIN today.
The big requests for IP space (the 11 organizations that hold 75% of all ARIN
issued
space) do not come from the server side... They come from the eye-ball ISPs.
The only
/8
Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 19/04/2010 16:14, Patrick Giagnocavo wrote:
The eyeball ISPs will find it trivial to NAT should they ever need to do
so [...]
Patrick,
Having made this bold claim, have you ever actually tried to run a natted
eyeball network? The last two natted eyeball networks
Mark Andrews wrote:
In message 201004200022.o3k0m2ba007...@aurora.sol.net, Joe Greco writes:
That'd be easy if you were just starting up an ISP. What do you do with
your existing customer base? If their current service includes a
dynamic public IPv4 address, you can't gracefully take it away,
Mark Andrews wrote:
In message 4bcd14ef.8090...@zill.net, Patrick Giagnocavo writes:
Mark Andrews wrote:
In message 201004200022.o3k0m2ba007...@aurora.sol.net, Joe Greco writes:
I haven't seen any such documents or regulations.
People purchaced the service on the understanding that they would
joel jaeggli wrote:
On 4/18/2010 6:28 PM, Patrick Giagnocavo wrote:
Reality is that as soon as SSL web servers and SSL-capable web browsers
have support for name-based virtual hosts, the number of IPv4 addresses
required will drop. Right now, you need 1 IP address for 1 SSL site;
SNI spec
Larry Sheldon wrote:
On 4/10/2010 06:36, Roderick Beck wrote:
I would characterize the US as a first rate military and economic
power, but a third rate place to live.
What are the net emigration rates by country?
What are the net medical tourism rates by country?
What are the net
Benjamin Billon wrote:
So basically, the idea is to disconnect China's Internet even more
than what it inflicts to itself?
And that is wrong why exactly? ;-)
Nah, I'm not answering that =D
Nice try, though.
How fun. What was the FCC/Comcast case about again?
It's only port 25, at least
Joe Greco wrote:
It's not the initial assignment fee that's really an impediment, it's
moving from a model where the address space is free (or nearly so) to
a model where you're paying a significant annual fee for the space.
We'd be doing IPv6 here if not for the annual fee. As it
Michael Dillon wrote:
ISPs who don't have IPv6 will soon be unable to provide access to all
Internet sites, as content providers begin to bring IPv6 sites onstream.
And ISPs without IPv6 will not be able to continue growing their networks,
even for something as trivial as an existing
Dan White wrote:
On 31/03/10 22:14 -0300, jim deleskie wrote:
I'm a real life user, I know the difference and I could careless about
v6. most anything I want I is on v4 and will still be there long
after ( when ever it is) we run out of v4 addresses. If I'm on a
From a content
Dan White wrote:
Are you willing to gamble your business on your expectations? Business
models will develop that will take advantage of global addressing to end
devices. The Next Big (Nth) Thing will. Do you feel that you have a
perfect
Crystal Ball, or do you want to start hedging your bets
Michael Sokolov wrote:
Another possible way to solve the middle mile issue would again be to
use the copper plant that's already in the ground. Unlike fiber, the
copper plant is *ubiquitous*: I don't know of any place in the 1st or
2nd worlds that doesn't have copper pairs going to it. Also
Gadi Evron wrote:
The email portability bill has just been approved by the Knesset's
committee for legislation, sending it on its way for the full
legislation process of the Israeli parliament.
While many users own a free email account, many in Israel still make use
of their ISP's email
Craig Holland wrote:
Just me, or is showing the floorplan not the typical behavior of a
super-secure anything?
You mean, security through obscurity?
--Patrick
Marc Farnum Rendino wrote:
Folks -
At some point, a society decides that X is important enough to the
society as a whole, that something official is in the overall
interest. Roads, immigration, whatever. That it's necessary to require
that some things be done (or not be done).
Peering
solely focused
on operational issues that might affect e.g. connectivity.
Cordially
Patrick Giagnocavo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Henry Linneweh wrote:
If a consensus can be reached here, we have seen a rise in this, that does
raise concerns
of a RIAA/MPAA type of mindset, which is detrimental
vigilante Definition vigi·lante (vij′ə lan′tē, -län′-)
It is not vigilantism, it is the common law, rooted in ancient
Does anyone have more info as to what Level3 changed last night during
their maintenace window?
Also I am going through either WashDC or Atlanta it seems, on most
traceroutes.
Here is a weird traceroute from this morning (note the first 4 traces):
traceroute cwlabs.com (used as an example)
John Lee wrote:
Adrian,
The traceroute utility that I used gave me a list of hops that the
packet I was interested in transited and a time when it transited the
hop. When the TTL was reached it would terminate the listing.
But if I can control your traffic I could change everything,
Today I looked at my most recent bill from Level3.
They are now assessing a 2.5% surcharge, which is listed as Taxes on
the bandwidth bill I have. In the state of PA, telecoms services are
explicitly not taxable.
When you call Level3 billing, they admit in their recorded message it is
not
Matthew Petach wrote:
I'm sure when Gmail gets close to the same number of users
as Yahoo, they will discover how challenging and painful it is
to support that many simultaneous short-lived SSL connections.
It's much easier to support CPU intensive tasks like full-time
SSL when you have a small
their crap.
Patrick Giagnocavo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
NANOG mailing list
NANOG@nanog.org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
for in even a 35-person, simple
LAN setup (the smallest and simplest config anyone on this list could
possibly have), has had to have me lay hands on it at odd, unplanned
times to keep working.
Cordially
Patrick Giagnocavo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
?
Cordially
Patrick Giagnocavo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
from their servers, and there would be no FOS issue.
Cordially
Patrick Giagnocavo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Oct 19, 2007, at 7:16 PM, Sean Figgins wrote:
You ever wonder why some places have cable modem but not DSL?
That's usually because the telcos can't get the bandwidth there.
That is a laughable statement.
In many places there is no real ability to tag the voice traffic
with a higher
On Oct 19, 2007, at 3:42 PM, John C. A. Bambenek wrote:
Since when did private companies no longer have the right to regulate
their own property?
I must have missed the Amendment...
If you want to make a property argument, how do you explain them
denying me my right to enjoy my rental
I am a smug Telcove weenie (customer) who has been watching the
integration of Telcove into the L3 Borg with satisfaction, as network
connectivity has gotten better and even their billing system seems to
be slowly improving over time.
Meanwhile have come to expect that almost any Level3
barriers).
Cordially
Patrick Giagnocavo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
threads.
Cordially
Patrick Giagnocavo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
49 matches
Mail list logo
