From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi@nanog.org Fri Feb 1 16:11:17
2013
Subject: Re: Muni fiber: L1 or L2?
From: Owen DeLong o...@delong.com
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 13:59:54 -0800
To: Jason Baugher ja...@thebaughers.com
Cc: NANOG nanog@nanog.org
On Feb 1, 2013, at 1:43 PM, Jason
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 13:27:05 -0600
From: Michael Vallaly na...@nolatency.com
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Equipment Shuffing Cart Recommendations
Anyone have any good recommendations for an equipment cart to shuffle
IT/Telco equipment around between an office/colo ?
Id like
From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi@nanog.org Wed Jan 16 18:21:21
2013
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 19:16:57 -0500 (EST)
From: Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com
To: NANOG nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Intermittent incorrect DNS resolution?
I'm a touch surprised to find that no one has
Date: 10 Jan 2013 20:57:25 -
From: John Levine jo...@iecc.com
Subject: Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats
*.4.4.3.0.5.a.0.0.8.b.d.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa. PTR a.node.on.vlan344.namn.se.
...will work just fine, for instance.
Since there is no record for a.node.on.vlan344.namn.se., this
won't
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 15:26:57 -0500
From: Tom Beecher tbeec...@localnet.com
Subject: Re: William was raided for running a Tor exit node. Please help if
you can.
Communications Decency Act, 47 U.S.C. 230 is the US law that has been
interpreted to provide immunity to ISP for the actions
From: Blake Dunlap iki...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:20:35 -0600
_
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Mike A mi...@mikea.ath.cx wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:59:18AM -0800, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Does anyone use Eaton 9130 series UPS for anything? I'm curious how
they've
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 07:07:27 -0500
Subject: Re: OT: Hurricane retweet-2-smtp.
From: chris tknch...@gmail.com
It made me lol a bit that their website specifically says this:
*Unlike most mesh implementations, a Byzantium Mesh requires no specialized
equipment that may not be easy to get
Mike Lyon mike.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Seth Mattinen se...@rollernet.us wrote:
On 9/28/12 11:08 AM, Joe Maimon wrote:
Just got told by a Lightpath person that in order to do BGP on a
customer gig circuit to them they would need a visio diagram (of what I
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:46:04 +0200
From: Sebastian Wiesinger na...@ml.karotte.org
To: NANOG nanog@nanog.org
Subject: What are qatesttwai.gov/fttesttwai.gov?
'TWAI' is the U.S. gov't Treasury Web Applications Infrastructre,
run by the Federal Reerve, for a number of secure Treasury-wide
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 17:49:24 +0200
Subject: URGENT - ISP/Telecom
From: Olivier CALVANO o.calv...@gmail.com
To: NANOG list (nanog@nanog.org) nanog@nanog.org
Hi
I am looking for an operator that can build a ADSL or SDSL in record time.
Are you prepared to pay a record amount of money?
Subject: Re: the economies of scale of a Worldcon,
From: Jo Rhett jrh...@netconsonance.com
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:08:22 -0700
On Sep 21, 2012, at 10:00 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
A lot of this, too, depends on what the concom negotiated with the
property about wifi access already.
From jrh...@netconsonance.com Wed Sep 19 20:47:44 2012
Subject: Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8
nanog@nanog.org
From: Jo Rhett jrh...@netconsonance.com
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 18:46:54 -0700
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
To: Robert Bonomi bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com
From: Jo Rhett jrh...@netconsonance.com
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 10:42:30 -0700
Subject: Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8
[[ sneck ]]
And second, have you ever worked on a private intranet that wasn't
connected to the internet through a firewall? Skipping oob
From: William Herrin b...@herrin.us
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 16:47:34 -0400
Subject: Re: Big Temporary Networks
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Jo Rhett jrh...@netconsonance.com wrote:
On Sep 14, 2012, at 8:53 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
Tech had a person managing the feed to DragonCon from
From: William Herrin b...@herrin.us
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:04:22 -0400
Subject: Re: Big Temporary Networks
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Robert Bonomi bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com
wrote:
'Right to work', as defined by section 14 B of the Taft-Hartley Act,
only prevents a union
From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi@nanog.org Wed Aug 22 10:54:49
2012
From: William Herrin b...@herrin.us
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 11:54:00 -0400
Subject: Re: Copyright infringement notice
To: groupstudytac groupstudytac groupstudy...@gmail.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
On Thu, Aug 16,
From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi@nanog.org Sat Jul 7 23:11:09
2012
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 23:09:54 -0500
Subject: Re: job screening question
From: Jimmy Hess mysi...@gmail.com
To: Keith Medcalf kmedc...@dessus.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org nanog@nanog.org
On 7/7/12, Keith Medcalf
Jared Mauch wrote:
On Jul 6, 2012, at 12:34 PM, Eric J Esslinger wrote:
A) The DNS changer working group site http://www.dns-ok.us seems to be
down for the clean people anyway. (Down for everyone agrees with me).
Works via IPv6. (I suspect all the media attention you referenced may be
From: Paul WALL pauldotw...@gmail.com
Subject: F-ckin Leap Seconds, how do they work?
Comments?
Addressing the Subject question, _as_asked_ -- Very well.
*SNORT*
Mechanically, instead of rolling over from second #59 to second #0 of the
next minute, it goes 59-60-0.
The 'why' is to keep
Rich Kulawiec r...@gsp.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:43:44PM -0700, Leo Bicknell wrote:
(on the use of public/private keys)
The leaks stop immediately. There's almost no value in a database of
public keys, heck if you want one go download a PGP keyring now.
It's a nice
From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi@nanog.org Sun Jun 10 13:18:06
2012
From: Barry Shein b...@world.std.com
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 14:16:10 -0400
To: Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.se
Subject: Re: Dear Linkedin,
Cc: NANOG nanog@nanog.org, Joe Greco jgr...@ns.sol.net
I was
From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi@nanog.org Sun Jun 10 13:26:36
2012
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:25:35 -0700
From: Michael Thomas m...@mtcc.com
To: John T. Yocum john.yo...@fluidhosting.com
Subject: Re: Dear Linkedin,
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
On 06/10/2012 11:22 AM, John T. Yocum
From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi@nanog.org Sun Jun 10 13:34:06
2012
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 14:33:03 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com
To: NANOG nanog@nanog.org
Subject: OT: Credit card policies (was Re: Dear Linkedin,)
- Original Message -
From: Michael
Stephen Sprunk step...@sprunk.org opined:
On 10-Jun-12 14:01, Robert Bonomi wrote:
From: Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com
Even Further Off-Topic, isn't debit supposed to be cash? Why do
I pay the Credit price for it?
It is, and *ISN'T*, 'cash'.
Unlike cash (and like a credit card
From: Oliver Garraux oli...@g.garraux.net
Hey, I'm curious if anyone has heard of a possible timeframe for the
LinkedIn attack?
According to the reports in this group, the attack occured June 4, and
was detected on the 4th or 5th.
Nathan Eisenberg nat...@atlasnetworks.us wrote:
None of these jokes are class-e.
I considered offering 172.24.0.0/14, in an attempt at in-CIDR humor.
Marshall Eubanks marshall.euba...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:46 AM, PC paul4...@gmail.com wrote:
While there may be other grounds for telling them not to call you, the
do not call list is not one of them as it does not apply to business
to business solicitations.
The
Adam Atkinson gh...@mistral.co.uk wrote;
Jay Ashworth wrote:
Now, those codecs *are* specially tuned for spoken word -- if you try
to stuff music down them, it's not gonna work very well at all...
It was claimed to me many years ago that the 4kHz cutoff used in POTS
serves women and
Jimmy Hess wrote:
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 8:48 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
If it was industry-wide standard practice that just notifying a provider
resulted in something being done, we'd not need things like Senderbase,
which is after all basically a list of people who don't take
Keith Medcalf wrote:
{prior attributions lost}
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-17576745
It's sad when you just can't tell with things like this..
I was hoping for something good, like maybe an extension of RFC 1149
implementing ECN (aka SQUAWK) in avian carriers. I'm
From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi@nanog.org Fri Mar 30 13:30:19
2012
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 20:29:03 +0200
From: Stefan Neufeind na...@stefan-neufeind.de
To: 'NANOG list' nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: French Regulator to ask all your information about your Peering
On 03/30/2012
Jeroen van Aart jer...@mompl.net wrote:
valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
The massive drop in latency is expected to supercharge algorithmic stock
market trading, where a difference of a few milliseconds can gain (or lose)
millions of dollars.
But it should be illegal to run a stock
Mike Andrews mi...@mikea.ath.cx wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 04:39:21PM +, Leigh Porter wrote:
From: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu [mailto:valdis.kletni...@vt.edu]
The only reason you got HDMI at all was because the content owners
managed to get HDCP included. You won't get a
Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappydsl.net wrote:
HI Chris,
If you are out of luck in getting DSL or Uverse.
I would suggest that you try your local Cable Service Provider.
If that does not work out either, I would suggest you take a look to see
if you have A WISP (Fixed Wireless Service) service
On Mar 3, 2012 1:34 PM, Guru NANOG nanog.g...@gmail.com wrote:
Common Misconception
With Spread Spectrum IP Addressing the 32-bit Source Address Field is
Shifted LEFT 2-bits by the originator of the packet.
[ [sneck ]]
A unique way to get his two bits in.
I trust he remembers to set the
Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
Richard Barnes richard.bar...@gmail.com wrote:`
123.32.0.0/12 (including 123.45.67.89). Closer to home, you could
also talk to ATT about 12.0.0.0/8 (12.34.56.78).
Somewhat surprisingly, ATT doesn't seem to be *doing* anything special with
12.34.56.78.
From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi@nanog.org Sat Feb 25 16:37:44
2012
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 20:36:44 -0200
Subject: IPv6 net tools
From: Grupo IPv6 grupo.i...@gmail.com
To: nanog@nanog.org
We are a group of students in telecommunications engineering from Uruguay.
We are
Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote:
On Monday, February 20, 2012 09:07:20 PM Jimmy Hess wrote:
RJ45 is really an example of what was originally a misconception
became so widespread, so universal, that reality has actually shifted
so the misconception became reality. When was the last time
From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi@nanog.org Mon Feb 20 09:40:44
2012
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 10:34:58 -0500 (EST)
From: Jon Lewis jle...@lewis.org
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: WW: Colo Vending Machine
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012, John Osmon wrote:
At my $JOB[-1] they laughed at
From ken.gilm...@gmail.com Sun Feb 19 05:04:39 2012
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 11:59:37 +0100
Subject: Re: DNS Attacks
From: Ken Gilmour ken.gilm...@gmail.com
To: Robert Bonomi bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
On Feb 18, 2012 10:24 PM, Robert Bonomi bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com wrote
Joel M Snyder joel.sny...@opus1.com wrote;
http://thehackernews.com/2012/02/fbi-will-shutdown-internet-on-march-8.html
Quoting the FBI:
85.255.112.0 through 85.255.127.255
67.210.0.0 through 67.210.15.255
93.188.160.0 through 93.188.167.255
77.67.83.0 through 77.67.83.255
213.109.64.0
From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi@nanog.org Fri Feb 17 13:11:28
2012
To: Owen DeLong o...@delong.com
Subject: Re: Common operational misconceptions
From: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 14:04:45 -0500
Cc: nanog@nanog.org nanog@nanog.org
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012
Leigh Porter leigh.por...@ukbroadband.com wrote;
On 17 Feb 2012, at 20:10, Peter Kristolaitis alte...@alter3d.ca wrote:
On 12-02-17 03:05 PM, Leigh Porter wrote:
Did anybody say beer yet?
I think it's safe to say that the Datacenter operators generally want customer
visits to be as
From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi@nanog.org Tue Jan 31 19:57:51
2012
To: David Conrad d...@virtualized.org
From: Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org
Subject: Re: [#135346] Unauthorized BGP Announcements (follow up to Hijacked
Networks)
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 12:52:57 +1100
Cc:
Nick B n...@pelagiris.org wrote:
I'm about 90% sure that in a fair court, it would be concluded that
disabling the reported URL qualifies as disabling access to the material.
The court might then issue an injunction to, in the future, disable *all*
*possible* access to the material, but
Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote:
I suspect most file sharing site don't have illegal content. Most
would have some content that is there without the permission of the
copyright holder. These are different things.
nitpick
Without the permission of the copyright holder _is_ contrary to
Carsten Bormann c...@tzi.org wrote:
On Jan 20, 2012, at 11:25, Robert Bonomi wrote:
Public distribution without the permission of the copyright owner is
illegal.
This is veering off the purpose of this list, but maybe it is operationally s
This is veering off the purpose of this list
From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi@nanog.org Fri Jan 20 08:11:24
2012
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 08:07:10 -0600
From: -Hammer- bhmc...@gmail.com
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: US DOJ victim letter
On a less serious note, did anyone notice the numbers on the fbi.gov
link? I'm
From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi@nanog.org Thu Jan 19 10:06:17
2012
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 11:01:13 -0500
From: Peter Kristolaitis alte...@alter3d.ca
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: RIS raw data
On 12-01-19 10:46 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012
Paul Graydon p...@paulgraydon.co.uk wrote
http://arstechnica.com/business/news/2012/01/before-shutdown-megaupload-ate-up-more-corporate-bandwidth-than-dropbox.ars
Ars Technica are implying it was quite a source of bandwidth usage
within companies. I'm curious, are any interesting charts
From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi@nanog.org Sun Jan 15 02:02:00
2012
Subject: Re: Whois 172/12
From: Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 02:58:11 -0500
To: NANOG list nanog@nanog.org
Read RFC1918.
Likely a machine on his local network (i.e. behind the
From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi@nanog.org Wed Jan 11 00:02:13
2012
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 00:58:31 -0500
From: Scott Schmit i.g...@comcast.net
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Comcast DNSSEC
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 05:24:47PM -0600, Jeremy Bresley wrote:
Hadn't seen this
Nathan Eisenberg wrote:
To: Jeroen van Aart jer...@mompl.net, NANOG list nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: Looking for a Tier 1 ISP Mentor for career advice.
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 22:25:40 +
Say a
coder gets confused when /tmp fills up and being unaware of this thing
called a search
From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi@nanog.org Fri Dec 30 07:03:54
2011
From: Vitkovsky, Adam avitkov...@emea.att.com
To: Ray Soucy r...@maine.edu, Tei oscar.vi...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 14:00:16 +0100
Subject: RE: next-best-transport! down with ethernet!
Cc:
valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
OK, I'll name names. If you have end users still running WinXP, getting
them at least somewhat working under SLAAC/DHCPv4 is a lot less headache
than trying to DHCPv6 them.
Anybody managed to stamp out WinXP in their end user population yet?
Heh. I
From: David Barak thegame...@yahoo.com
Should the HAC be expected to manage the transition to HumorV6?
BEFORE that is introduced, one needs a mailing-list designated for discussion
of the potential problems an dangers associated therewith, similar to the
ACM's discussion list on computer
From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi@nanog.org Fri Dec 2 13:29:31
2011
From: Leigh Porter leigh.por...@ukbroadband.com
To: Justin M. Streiner strei...@cluebyfour.org,
Leo Bicknell
bickn...@ufp.org
Subject: RE: IP addresses are now assets
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 19:29:43
John Lightfoot jlightf...@gmail.com wrote;
I have a boatload of IPv6 addresses I'm willing to sell at the low, low price
of $.01 each.
Good for you. _I_ have somewhat over 17.8 million IPv4 addresses, in 3 large
blocks, for which I will sell my 'right to use', at half your offering price.
Scott Weeks sur...@mauigateway.com wrote:
Apologies for the rapid-shot email. It's Friday... :-)
bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 04:35:27PM -0500, David Radcliffe wrote:
The reason it is not more accepted is too many people still think If I
cannot see
Jonathon Exley jonathon.ex...@kordia.co.nz wrote;
That's the problem - as a propellorhead I don't make the purchasing decisi
ons. I can recommend products but low cost speaks more loudly than this g
ear is a dog to work with.
I don't really believe that manufacturers make crippleware user
Owen DeLong o...@delong.com naively wrote:
On Nov 22, 2011, at 7:38 AM, Joel Maslak wrote:
On Nov 22, 2011, at 8:05 AM, Ray Soucy r...@maine.edu wrote:
As long as a static allocation can be billed as a premium service,
most providers will unfortunately do it.
Exactly. ISPs are
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 02:26:34PM -0500, Jay Ashworth wrote:
Some other things to consider.
Relays are more likely to fail. Yes, the relay architecture was
carefully designed such that the most failures would not result in
conflicting greens,
My understanding was that it was
From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi@nanog.org Thu Nov 17 14:53:57
2011
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 15:52:33 -0500 (EST)
From: Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com
To: NANOG nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: economic value of low AS numbers
- Original Message -
From: Dave Hart
Apologies for the noise, but I have been absolutely unable -- despite
literally *hours* of trying --to contact anyone at _any_ of the published
Verizon Business phone numbers who has any comprehension of what I am
talking about -- to wit:
I am looking for someone with _any_
On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 10:36:43 -0500, Jason Lewis jle...@packetnexus.com wrote;
I don't want to start a flame war, but this article seems flawed to
me.
Any article that claims a /12 is a 'class B', and a /16 is a 'Class C', is
DEFINITELY 'flawed'.
It seems an IP is an IP.
True.
From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi@nanog.org Sun Nov 13 14:15:38
2011
From: William Herrin b...@herrin.us
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 15:13:37 -0500
Subject: Re: Arguing against using public IP space
To: nanog@nanog.org
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Robert Bonomi
bon...@mail.r
From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi@nanog.org Sun Nov 6 19:58:58
2011
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2011 19:57:51 -0600
Subject: Re: Performance Issues - PTR Records
From: Jimmy Hess mysi...@gmail.com
To: Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Mark
Tom Lanyon tom+na...@oneshoeco.com opined:
OK.. let's say you're a DSL provider. Are you going to have your
DHCP server populating the forward and reverse DNS? With what, the
account holder's name?somename.example.com ?
I'll suggest that (a) IF the addresses do migrate among
On: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 09:48:21 -0700, Michael Thomas m...@mtcc.com opined:
Dave CROCKER wrote:
On 10/30/2011 8:36 PM, Brian Johnson wrote:
So you support filtering end-user outbound SMTP sessions as this is a
means to prevent misuse of the Commons*. Correct?
If it is
On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 13:53:34 -, Brian Johnson said:
It is interesting that some people who fully understand that the Internet is
composed of many networks run by people with different interests can say what
is best for the Internet as a whole. How my organization (or yours or anybody
From: steve pirk [egrep] st...@pirk.com
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 09:24:04 -0700
Subject: Re: Facebook insecure by design
On Oct 24, 2011 7:55 AM, Robert Bonomi bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com wrote:
You can even download it all and erase yourself if
you want out.
Don't
From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi@nanog.org Tue Oct 25 14:53:32
2011
Subject: Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers
From: Alex Harrowell a.harrow...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 20:52:46 +0100
To: Ricky Beam jfb...@gmail.com, Jeroen Massar jer...@unfix.org
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Ricky
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 21:45:33 -0700
Subject: Re: Facebook insecure by design
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
The way I look at it, unless you want to host everything yourself, you have
to choose someone to be your Unix like home directory in the cloud.
Correct. Either it's 'local', or it's
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:53:46 +
From: bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: FCC - with Klezmer backup
http://gcn.com/articles/2011/09/26/fcc-net-neutrality-rules-nov-20.aspx
wondering who is going to publically announce any changes prior to the
20nov date.
From: Nathan Eisenberg nat...@atlasnetworks.us
Subject: RE: Synology Disk DS211J
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 21:58:23 +
And this is why the prudent home admin runs a firewall device he or she
can trust, and has a default deny rule in place even for outgoing
connections.
- Matt
From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi@nanog.org Tue Sep 27 15:54:37
2011
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 13:54:26 -0700
From: JC Dill jcdill.li...@gmail.com
To: NANOG list nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Nxdomain redirect revenue
On 27/09/11 7:20 AM, William Allen Simpson wrote:
Most
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 00:07:06 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com
Subject: Re: wet-behind-the-ears whippersnapper seeking advice on building a
nationwide network
From: Randy Bush ra...@psg.com
you left out one connection via a chevy full of hollerith cards and the
From: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu
Subject: Re: wet-behind-the-ears whippersnapper seeking advice on building a
nationwide network
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 00:14:59 -0400
Does anybody actually *have* a functional 7 track drive?
I _think_ there's a guy in OZ that still has one or more.
Haven't
From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi@nanog.org Fri Aug 26 21:58:30
2011
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 21:56:48 -0500
From: Charles N Wyble char...@knownelement.com
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: New Natural Disaster! 8/27/2011 Hurricane Irene
On 08/26/2011 09:51 PM, Scott Morris wrote:
Cc: na...@nanog.org.r-bonomi.com
In-Reply-To: 1be304a1-0da0-4558-83ad-0e4f08f81...@twincreeks.net
Subject: Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward
From: Steve Feldman feld...@twincreeks.net
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 07:00:51 -0700
We're aware of the spam problem and have our top people working
From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi@nanog.org Tue Jul 12 11:29:29
2011
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 12:22:09 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com
To: NANOG nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Spam?
- Original Message -
From: Randy Bush ra...@psg.com
Also, where is the
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:03:00 -0700
To: NANOG list nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Yup; the Internet is screwed up.
[[ attibutions lost ]]
toddlers around and drive to and from work. An SUV in almost all cases
is added luxury.
My SUV carries seven passengers and allows me to haul
From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi@nanog.org Mon Jun 20 00:15:32
2011
To: David Conrad d...@virtualized.org
From: Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org
Subject: Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:14:49 +1000
Cc: NANOG list nanog@nanog.org
From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi@nanog.org Sun Jun 19 01:46:06
2011
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 23:44:28 -0700
Subject: Re: Cogent depeers ESnet
From: George B. geor...@gmail.com
To: Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org
Cc: nanog@nanog.org nanog@nanog.org
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 5:26
From geor...@gmail.com Sun Jun 19 17:48:31 2011
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 15:48:32 -0700
Subject: Re: Cogent depeers ESnet
From: George B. geor...@gmail.com
To: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu
Cc: Robert Bonomi bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com, nanog@nanog.org
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 2:47 PM, valdis.kletni
Subject: Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
From: Owen DeLong o...@delong.com
MacDonald's would likely get title to .macdonalds under the new rules,
right?
Well... Which MacDonald's?
1. The fast food chain
2. O.C. MacDonald's Plumbing Supply
3. MacDonald and Sons Paving
Subject: Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
From: Owen DeLong o...@delong.com
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 01:24:37 -0700
[[.. sneck ..]]
While that is true, there are several McDonalds registered in various
spaces that actually predate even the existance of Mr. Crok's famous
burger
From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi@nanog.org Fri Jun 3 17:25:39
2011
To: sur...@mauigateway.com
Subject: Re: Microsoft's participation in World IPv6 day
From: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 18:24:42 -0400
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1307139882_2680P
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 02:08:04 +0100 (BST)
From: Brandon Butterworth bran...@rd.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: Re Netflix Is Eating Up More Of North America's Bandwidth Than
Any
Other Company
You demonstrate you have no understanding of what the word 'feasable'
means.
OK, but we
From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi@nanog.org Tue May 24 22:12:57
2011
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 23:12:41 -0400
Subject: Re: Netflix Is Eating Up More Of North America's Bandwidth Than Any
Other Company
From: Christopher Morrow morrowc.li...@gmail.com
To: nanog@nanog.org
On
From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi@nanog.org Tue May 24 22:19:18
2011
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 23:14:56 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com
To: NANOG nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Netflix Is Eating Up More Of North America's Bandwidth Than Any
Other Company
-
From bran...@rd.bbc.co.uk Wed May 25 04:21:13 2011
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 10:19:09 +0100 (BST)
From: Brandon Butterworth bran...@rd.bbc.co.uk
To: morrowc.li...@gmail.com, nanog@nanog.org, bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com
Subject: Re: Netflix Is Eating Up More Of North America's Bandwidth Than Any
From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi@nanog.org Wed May 25 13:44:21
2011
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 14:43:24 -0400
Subject: Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space
From: Christopher Pilkington c...@0x1.net
To: Michael Dillon wavetos...@googlemail.com
Cc: NANOG
Wildly off-topic for the NANOG mailing-list, as it has -zero- relevance to
'network operations'
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 13:07:32 -0700
Subject: Had an idea - looking for a math buff to tell me if it's possible
with today's technology.
From: Landon Stewart lstew...@superb.net
To: nanog
From: Paul Vixie vi...@isc.org
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Yahoo and IPv6
Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 17:06:45 +
From: Marshall Eubanks t...@americafree.tv
Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 13:02:16 -0400
I think that the real question is, when will people who are running
IPv4 only not
From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi@nanog.org Thu May 12 11:04:15
2011
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 19:33:21 -0500
Subject: Re: 23,000 IP addresses
From: Jimmy Hess mysi...@gmail.com
To: Michael Holstein michael.holst...@csuohio.edu
Cc: NANOG list nanog@nanog.org
On Wed, May 11, 2011
From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi@nanog.org Wed May 11 13:22:18
2011
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 14:21:30 -0400
Subject: Re: Japan electrical power?
From: Jay Nakamura zeusda...@gmail.com
To: Robert Boyle rob...@tellurian.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
On May 11, 2011 10:09 AM, Robert
Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 09:43:53 +0100
Subject: OT: Server Cabinet
From: Robert Lusby nano...@gmail.com
Sorry to start the day OT, but I'm sure you lovely lot will have some
tips/experience! ;)
We have a HP Server Cabinet (42U 10842 G2), that we've stripped down to the
bare-bones chassis.
Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 10:11:34 -0400
From: David Sparro dspa...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: How do you put a TV station on the Mbone?
On 4/29/2011 8:57 PM, Robert Bonomi wrote:
Those royalties are based on the_actual_number_ of persons
tuning in to each such work. No 'averaging
Date: Sun, 01 May 2011 11:07:56 -0700
From: Mike mike-na...@tiedyenetworks.com
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Amazon diagnosis
On 04/29/2011 12:35 PM, Joly MacFie wrote:
http://aws.amazon.com/message/65648/
___
So, in a nut shell, Amazon had a single point of failure which
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
