Re: Famous operational issues

There are all the hilarious leaks and blocks. Pakistan blocks youtube and the announcement leaks internet-wide. Turk telecom (AS9121 IIRC) leaks a full table out one of their providers. So many routing level incidents they're probably not even interesting any more, I suppose. The huge power

Re: CISA critical infrastructure letters

However, if you are stopped and don't have a letter, you're much more likely to trigger the "bozo making stuff up" detector and get sent home. Virtually no one stops to print out a weird document on their way to buy beer. I'm aware of security guards and telecom techs who have been sent home for

Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT residential

and just to check one thing... On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 2:33 PM Daniel Sterling wrote: > I don't particularly *want* to block or advocate blocking QUIC, but if > I keep hitting the issue and can't help people troubleshoot, what > other sane option have I? > i don't think you've addressed the

Re: ECN

as one of the authors of that talk, it definitely is "a thing", has been for years and years and years, and indeed, mostly works. t On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 12:18 PM Hunter Fuller wrote: > It is certainly odd, but it's definitely a "thing." > >

Re: D'oH III: In 3-D! Plot Twist from Google/Chrome, Vixie approves?

the relevant sentiment is: thanks for whitelisting a fixed number of them so i can block them. t On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 11:42 AM Royce Williams wrote: > The difference is that Chrome won't use resolvers other than the ones > you've configured yourself, and will simply opportunistically

Re: Colombia Network Operators Group

References to all things Colombian being related to drugs and smuggling are racist. Please don't be racist here. Thanks! t On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 4:46 PM Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > In message <6f2876a6abe02547ba85adb58bd21...@mail.dessus.com>, > "Keith Medcalf" wrote: > > >Fascinating.

Re: IPAM recommendations

your software/hardware/datacenter space/networking gear etc. best, t On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 4:42 AM Mehmet Akcin wrote: > Not much beyond this, > https://appuals.com/the-5-best-ip-address-management-ipam-software/ > > On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 5:39 PM Todd Underwood wrote: > &

Re: IPAM recommendations

What have you evaluated so far? Can you share your evaluation grid, how you selected the candidates, how you are weighting criteria and specific interesting findings so far? Thanks! t On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 4:37 AM Mehmet Akcin wrote: > Looking for IPAM recommendations, preferably open

Re: 44/8

silently deleting the thread isn't noise. posting that was, randy. t On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 4:23 PM Randy Bush wrote: > my deep sympathies go out to those folk with real work to do whose mail > user agents do not have a `delete thread` key sequence. >

Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request]

This is truly awful and off topic for network engineering. Please stop and try to listen to the people who are offering you feedback. On other lists. Not here. Thanks! T On Sun, Feb 17, 2019, 21:05 Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan Hello Everyone, > > My name is Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan. I'm the

Re: Amazon now controls 3.0.0.0/8

google used 4.4.4.4 for DNS in the past (2010, IIRC). t On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 8:21 PM Steve Meuse wrote: > > I think it was the dial modem team that beat us to 4.4.4.0/24? > > -Steve > > On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 7:44 PM John Orthoefer wrote: > >> I wish we could have used 4.4.4.4. Although at

Re: CVV (was: Re: bloomberg on supermicro: sky is falling)

This is a confusing and off-topic discussion with respect to network engineering. But for completeness: Payments systems are architected by fraud rates, not by isolated security requirements or engineering mandates, as i think most network engineers can understand. The fraud rates in the US for

Re: courtesy

the "please" distributes to both clauses and the difference is a matter of style rather than substance. job's point is sound and correct. please try to respect his firm suggestion. thanks, t On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 9:03 PM, Scott Weeks wrote: > > > --- j...@instituut.net wrote: > People -

Re: list blockchain

On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 7:05 AM, Tom Hill <t...@ninjabadger.net> wrote: > On 28/01/18 18:38, Todd Underwood wrote: > > Moderators: even when posts are by long term members of the community can > > you remind them of the list purpose when they forget, please? Thanks! > >

Re: list blockchain

This isn't off-topic noise at all. Nope. Nothing to see here. Move along. Moderators: even when posts are by long term members of the community can you remind them of the list purpose when they forget, please? Thanks! T On Jan 28, 2018 13:04, "Andrew Kirch" wrote: > On

Re: media are reporting "major Internet outage"

There's a whole lot of 'Comcast and L3 are having problems' on Reddit. Nothing much beyond that. On Nov 6, 2017 21:47, "Miles Fidelman" wrote: > Folks, > > It seems like various media outlets are reporting a "major Internet > outage" - some going so far as to call it

Re: Puerto Rico: Lack of electricity threatens telephone and internet services

This thread is mostly full of idle speculation, is at the least insensitive and verges on offensive. If you have operational information about Puerto Rico (see Sean Donelan's posts rather than these responses), please go ahead. If you would like to allocate blame, please go somewhere else to do

Re: Puerto Rico just lost internet?

the entire island is now without power: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-41340392 no bueno. t On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Mehmet Akcin

Re: Puerto Rico just lost internet?

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/graphics_at5.shtml?cone#contents it's still south of san juan but maría will move across the island all day today. t On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 7:33 AM, Daniel Brisson wrote: > “Strongest storm of the century” just hit San Juan. > > -dan > > > > — > >

Re: Question to Google

On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Randy Bush wrote: > > it's a whacky world. as geoff said long ago, if there ever is real > money counting on v6 transport, these messes will straighten out. > totally agree. and i'd like someone else to volunteer the "real money" traffic, please.

Re: Question to Google

On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 8:43 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > > There are many zones (including your isc.org) that have several name > servers dual-stacked, and they didn't notice a problem. Furthermore, > since the DNS is a tree, resolution of google.com requires a proper >

Re: dilemmas

randy, On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 11:35 PM, Randy Bush wrote: > > yep. and thanks for the forward, reminding my why i have a long > .procmailrc. > if this is an attempt to simply publicly mock someone on the nanog list i have a polite request: keep your snark to yourself. this

Re: Should abuse mailboxes have quotas?

to answer the actual question: all abuse mailboxes have quotas, either implicitly or explicitly. the amount of storage available to any given mailsystem is finite. technically correct. it's the best kind of correct. :-) t On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Stephen Satchell

Re: Sunday night social?

> > randy, on a phone > >> On Jun 12, 2016, at 15:08, Todd Underwood <toddun...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> surely this is not the same randy bush that loves to point out that >> humans are social animals! >> >> t >> >> On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 2:31

Re: Sunday night social?

surely this is not the same randy bush that loves to point out that humans are social animals! t On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Randy Bush wrote: >>> Is Wednesday night the only social? >> Yes. > > damn! if i had known there was a chance of folk acting more like sober > adults

Re: ATT Mobile Outage San Juan, PR 8+ hours, 1 Million out.

http://www.univision.com/noticias/comunicacion/cerca-de-un-millon-de-abonados-de-at-t-sin-servicio-en-el-pais-debido-a-averia for spanish speakers. they say it's a "hardware" issue that caused the fault. the story has almost no other facts in it about the RFO. there. i just read it for you.

Re: Cogent <=> Google Peering issue

, a date, a path, a fact, a traceroute, a flow, a log entry a clue. cheers, t On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 11:54 AM, jim deleskie <deles...@gmail.com> wrote: > They haven't been since at least the mid 90's :) > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Nick Hilliard <n...@foobar.org> wrote:

Re: Cogent <=> Google Peering issue

Can you scope "issue" with any facts or data? T On Feb 17, 2016 11:16, "Fred Hollis" wrote: > Anyone else aware of it? >

Re: bad announcement taxonomy

Reorigination? Mis-re-origination? On Nov 18, 2015 22:53, "Randy Bush" wrote: > > What about "origin scrubbing". > > so now it has no origin? >

Re: Project Fi and the Great Firewall

Why not both? So sad when you have to choose a single oppressive regime to track your internet use. T On Sun, Nov 15, 2015, 09:04 Brandon Butterworth wrote: > > This is what roaming data means, Your data packet is simply trunked to > > your original operator to process.

Re: spam smackdown?

luckily, many of us saw almost none of this spam due to effective inbound spam filtering on our accounts. which is awesome. i did, however, manage to see lots of messages from people complaining about the spam that they did receive. :-) t On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Jim Popovitch

Re: /27 the new /24

it's also not entirely obvious what the point of having local IXes that serve these kinds of collections of people. how much inter-ASN traffic is there generally for a city of 100k people, even if they all have 1Gb/s connections? are they all torrenting, accessing local business web pages that

Re: /27 the new /24

all, On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Todd Underwood <toddun...@gmail.com> wrote: >> it's also not entirely obvious what the point of having local IXes >> that serve these kin

Re: /27 the new /24

In general, most of NANOG recipients live in the populated metros and know very little about what it's like to try to provide internet access in the hinterlands. do not pay attention to there magical claims of 'just connect to some IX and everything will be fine'. you already know that that's

Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption

On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Owen DeLong wrote: > > None of them does what you propose — Smooth seamless communication between > an IPv4-only host and an IPv6-only host. i view this point/question as an assertion by owen as follows: "it was never possible to design a smooth

Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption

that's crazy. why would you want a simple way to boostrap more addresses from what we have now? you'll never make yourself into an internationally known ipvNEXT advocate with engineering like that. more advocacy. less engineering! t On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 5:18 PM, William Herrin

Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption

i'm still confused, to be honest. why are we 'encouraging' 'evangelizing' or 'forcing' ipv6 adoption. it's just a new addressing protocol that happens to not work with the rest of the internet. it's unfortunate that we made that mistake, but i guess we're stuck with that now (i wish i could say

Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption

is an ugly hack and should die already. It will take a few years for > router manufactures to get it right but them they do it will be better for > all. > > Regards, > > Dovid > > -Original Message- > From: Todd Underwood <toddun...@gmail.com> > Sender:

Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption

one interesting thing to note... On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 8:01 PM Mark Andrews wrote: > > Some of us have been running IPv6 in production for over a decade > now and developing products that support IPv6 even longer. > > We have had 17 years to build up a universal IPv6 network.

Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption

ess, let’s see if you have a genuine solution to > offer or if this > is just bluster. > > Owen > > > On Oct 1, 2015, at 16:52 , Todd Underwood <toddun...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I can't tell if this question is serious. It's either making fun of the >

Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption

here. > Handwaving about ASN32 doesn’t cut it. > > > If you can’t answer that, there’s really nothing to your argument. > > Owen > > On Oct 1, 2015, at 17:56 , Todd Underwood <toddun...@gmail.com> wrote: > > this is an interesting example of someone who has ill advisedly tied

Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption

another good idea is to design a migration path to ipv6 so that people using hte internet can also use the ipv6-internet. that would be cool. we should probably think about some migration path other than the pretty obviously implausible "dual stack" silliness before this stuff actually becomes a

Re: Recent trouble with QUIC?

This has now been resolved. See recent post by ian swett in a separate thread about quic. T On Sep 24, 2015 1:12 AM, "Mike Meredith" wrote: > On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 19:01:19 -0500, Sean Hunter > may have written: > > a) Has anyone here had a similar

Re: Android (lack of) support for DHCPv6

lorenzo already stated that the cost was in user satisfaction related to tethering and the business reason was the desire to not implement NAT in v6 on android. many people didn't like those reasons or think that they are less important than their own reasons. shockingly, everyone believes that

Re: Android (lack of) support for DHCPv6

On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:43 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: On Fri, 12 Jun 2015 10:33:55 -0700, Dave Taht said: The core bits of what I don't understand about the flamage is how hard would it be for an end-user - or corporate client - to just add any of these functionalities to this,

Re: Open letter to Level3 concerning the global routing issues on June 12th

i remember that presentation! https://www.nanog.org/meetings/abstract?id=459 :-) On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:53 AM, jim deleskie deles...@gmail.com wrote: People from Big telcom should never reply to mailing lists from work addresses unless specifically allowed, which I suspect TATA doesn't

Re: Android (lack of) support for DHCPv6

Anyone who thinks Lorenzo hasn't been on the front lines of pushing for IPv6 adoption is pretty late to the party or confused about the state of affairs. T On Wed, Jun 10, 2015, 21:30 Ray Soucy r...@maine.edu wrote: I agree that some of the rhetoric should be toned down (go out for a beer or

Re: AWS Elastic IP architecture

fb is not a 'cloud provider'. it's orthogonal to the question. t On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Ca By cb.li...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Matthew Kaufman matt...@matthew.at wrote: On 6/1/2015 12:06 AM, Owen DeLong wrote: ... Here’s the thing… In order to land

Re: AWS EC2 us-west-2 reboot

read: http://www.xenproject.org/security-policy.html they have a sensible, commonly used security policy that involves private notification to large customers in advance where it is practical and there is not evidence of ongoing exploits in the wild. this is kind of incident handling 101 and

Re: [Paper] B4: Experience with a Globally-Deployed Software Defined WAN

Unpossible. I heard that no one really uses sdn for anything. :) T On Aug 17, 2013 2:43 PM, staticsafe m...@staticsafe.ca wrote: We present the design, implementation, and evaluation of B4, a pri- vate WAN connecting Google’s data centers across the planet. -

Re: It's the end of the world as we know it -- REM

this is still my favorite post on this subject: http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2011-February/031737.html t On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 3:36 PM, staticsafe m...@staticsafe.ca wrote: On 4/23/2013 18:04, Leo Bicknell wrote: In a message written on Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 05:41:40PM -0400,

Re: Notice: Fradulent RIPE ASNs

I do not understand why you're so adamant about sending this information to an organization primarily distinguished by its incompetence and negligence. If they were actually DOING THEIR JOBS in even minimally diligent fashion, then Ron wouldn't needed to write that note or do the research

Re: Notice: Fradulent RIPE ASNs

it's nice that we've proceded to insult our colleagues. many thanks to mr. petach for achieving the end of this thread. thank you all for participating. On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Rich Kulawiec r...@gsp.org wrote: On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:07:40AM -0500, Todd Underwood wrote: no one

Re: FYI Netflix is down

Actually, it was a very complex power outage. I'm going to assume that what happened this weekend was similar to the event that happened at the same facility approximately two weeks ago (its immaterial - the details are probably different, but it illustrates the complexity of a data center

Re: FYI Netflix is down

On Jun 30, 2012 11:23 AM, Seth Mattinen se...@rollernet.us wrote: But haven't they all been cascading failures? No. They have not. That's not what that term means. 'Cascading failure' has a fairly specific meaning that doesn't imply resilience in the face of decomposition into smaller

Re: FYI Netflix is down

This was not a cascading failure. It was a simple power outage Cascading failures involve interdependencies among components. T On Jun 30, 2012 2:21 PM, Seth Mattinen se...@rollernet.us wrote: On 6/30/12 9:25 AM, Todd Underwood wrote: On Jun 30, 2012 11:23 AM, Seth Mattinen se

Re: FYI Netflix is down

scott, This was not a cascading failure.  It was a simple power outage Cascading failures involve interdependencies among components. Not always.  Cascading failures can also occur when there is zero dependency between components.  The simplest form of this is where one environment fails

RIPE 65 Call for Presentations/Papers

. -- Todd Underwood for the RIPE Program(me) Committee toddun...@gmail.com

Re: AD and enforced password policies

http://www.diceware.com/ works well. has plausible analysis of the entropy of the passphrases created. it's 100% prescriptive and deterministic so can be used for large, unevenly skilled userbases. the passphrases are easy to remember and type for english speakers (and there are alternative

Re: AD and enforced password policies

additionally, etrade in the states has had 2-factor authentication (RSA token) for over 8 or 9 years now. it's one reasonable reason to stay with them. t On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote: fwiw, citibank in the states uses normal passwording for personal

RIPE 64 Call for Presentations

speaker. If you have any questions or requests concerning content submissions, please email p...@ripe.net. For more information about RIPE 64, including how to register, visit: http://ripe64.ripe.net/ Kind regards, todd underwood, for the RIPE Programme Committee toddun...@gmail.com p

Re: Y'all know Google is offering public DNS services now?

not bad for CDNs anymore: http://arstechnica.com/telecom/news/2011/08/opendns-and-google-working-with-cdns-on-dns-speedup.ars t On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Scott Howard sc...@doc.net.au wrote: This service has been discussed several times in the ~2 years since it was first released

Re: F.ROOT-SERVERS.NET moved to Beijing?

User Exercise:  What happens when you enable integrity checking in an application (e.g., 'dnssec-validation auto') and datapath manipulation persists?  Bonus points for analysis of implementation and deployment behaviors and resulting systemic effects. i agree with danny here. ignoring

Re: F.ROOT-SERVERS.NET moved to Beijing?

leo, all, in the past, name servers that operated inside of china were subject to arbitrary rewriting or blocking of their results by the Great Firewall. this is obviously bad for Chinese citizens but it's *dramatically* worse for people outside of china who end up reaching a root server in

Re: F.ROOT-SERVERS.NET moved to Beijing?

valdis, all, On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 6:02 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: On Sun, 02 Oct 2011 17:30:37 EDT, Todd Underwood said: 2) can any root server operator who serves data inside of china verify that the data that they serve have not been rewritten by the great firewall? DNSSEC

Re: [Nanog-futures] Moving Forward - What kind of NANOG do we want?

On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Jay Hennigan j...@west.net wrote: On 7/2/10 8:29 PM, Simon Lyall wrote: Unless people serious intended for the organisation to have regular [1] meetings outside of North America (which I doubt) then it should retain the current general name and focus.

Re: Todd Underwood was a little late

this idea. cheers, todd underwood toddun...@gmail.com

Re: Todd Underwood was a little late

christopher, all, ...nothing to see here, this is CGN's... oh, i think this has several important advantages aver carrier-grade nat (which i believe to be mostly dead, anyway, no? someone who knows more can chime in with references to the contrary should this not be the case). firstly:

[NANOG-announce] change in roles on the program committee

information. again, congratulations to dave and tom. cheers, todd underwood, outgoing chair for the program committee spots opening up in october ___ NANOG-announce mailing list nanog-annou...@nanog.org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-announce

[NANOG-announce] lightning talks open and hotel rate expiring

submitted so if you've got a good idea, now is the time to write it up and get it in. i'm very much looking forward to seeing all of you in philadelphia. todd underwood, chair nanog program committee ___ NANOG-announce mailing list nanog-annou...@nanog.org

[NANOG-announce] NANOG 46 agenda announced; reduced rate registration expiring soon

or still-gestating idea. The first round of Lightning talks will be selected on June 9 and will be announced immediately prior to the start of the conference. Additional lightning talks will be selected during the conference. Looking forward to seeing all of you in Philadelphia, Todd Underwood

[NANOG-announce] NANOG 46 Call for Presentations

submission. Todd Underwood, Chair NANOG Program Committee ___ NANOG-announce mailing list nanog-annou...@nanog.org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-announce

NANOG 45 Lightning Talks Open

lightnings talk proposals (and voting on them) through the conference, as timeliness is part of what makes lightning talks so great. The sooner you submit, though, the better your chance to present. See all of you in Santo Domingo. Todd Underwood Chair, Program Committee, NANOG

[NANOG-announce] NANOG 45 Agenda Posted

. Todd Underwood Chair, NANOG Program Committee toddun...@gmail.com ___ NANOG-announce mailing list nanog-annou...@nanog.org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-announce

NANOG 45 Preliminary Agenda and Conference Registration

, t. -- -- Todd Underwood, Chair, NANOG Program Committee [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Prefix Hijack Tool Comaprision

. -- _ todd underwood +1 603 643 9300 x101 renesys corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.renesys.com/blog

Re: Prefix Hijack Tool Comaprision

. -- _ todd underwood +1 603 643 9300 x101 renesys corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.renesys.com/blog

Re: Peering - Benefits?

was not an individual addressed but the attached mail was sent to a mailing list of 10k people. HRH Sven Olaf is in violation of his own policy about dissemination, distribution or copying. t. -- _ todd underwood

vote now, please

:-) t. -- _ todd underwood +1 603 643 9300 x101 renesys corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.renesys.com/blog

lighting talks and the program committee

://www.nanog.org/governance/elections/2008elections/ you can nominate yourself or someone else by sending mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] looking forward to seeing many of you in LA tomorrow. t. -- _ todd underwood

NANOG 45 Jan 25-28 in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic

work directly with you or find someone else on the program committee to help you put together a presentation. We have already received a number of early submissions for NANOG45 so for the best chance to be accepted, please begin working on your presentations now. Thanks, Todd Underwood NANOG

Re: 198.32.64.12 -- Harmless mis-route or potential exploit?

. -- _ todd underwood +1 603 643 9300 x101 renesys corporationgeneral manager babbledog [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.renesys.com/blog

[NANOG-announce] NANOG44 updated agenda, so register already

. t. /hat -- _ todd underwood +1 603 643 9300 x101 renesys corporationgeneral manager babbledog [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.renesys.com/blog

[NANOG-announce] NANOG 44 Call For Presentations Posted

submit by the deadline above. Thanks, todd underwood NANOG Program Committee Chair -- _ todd underwood +1 603 643 9300 x101 renesys corporationgeneral manager babbledog

[NANOG-announce] NANOG43 survey for on-site and remote attendees

in the planning for future NANOGs. so whether you are attending on-site or via the webcast, please take a couple of minutes to fill out the survey. thanks! todd NANOG PC chair -- _ todd underwood +1 603 643

[NANOG-announce] Program Committee Nominations

it and we'll get it added). thanks, todd underwood chair, nanog program committee Nominated by David Conrad - Nominee's name (if not you) - Nominee's email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Reason why: I was the co-founder and original program chair committee for APRICOT for 3 years, been loosely

[NANOG-announce] Lightning Talk submissions open for NANOG42

-- _ todd underwood +1 603 643 9300 x101 renesys corporationgeneral manager babbledog [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.renesys.com/blog ___ NANOG-announce

[NANOG-announce] New socials for NANOG 42 Brooklyn -- Register

/registration/ thanks, todd /hat -- _ todd underwood +1 603 643 9300 x101 renesys corporationgeneral manager babbledog [EMAIL PROTECTED

[NANOG-announce] Program Committee Vacancy Call for Volunteers Extension

in this seat to offer their name. so if you're interested, review the call for volunteers and submit your name promptly, please. thanks, todd -- _ todd underwood +1 603 643 9300 x101 renesys

[NANOG] [NANOG-announce] NANOG43 in Brooklyn Registration Hotel -- Cheap rates going going ...

committee will be accepting lightning talks for late-breaking or shorter presentations, but those will be accepted closer to the event (or at the event itself). see you in brooklyn. t. (chair of the program committee) -- _ todd

Re: 40Gbit private peer

on other gear inside of your network. t. -- _ todd underwood +1 603 643 9300 x101 renesys corporationvp operations and professional svcs [EMAIL PROTECTED