aside from the official pablum that was released about an “incorrect process
used”
(which says exactly nothing) does anyone actually know anything accurate and
more specific about the root cause?
(and why it took 11 hours to recover?)
> On Feb 22, 2024, at 11:15 AM, John Councilman wrote:
>
well, that isn’t exactly true.
ALL of the fraudsters, business email compromisers, spoofing accounts are now
from gmail and as far as i can tell,
there is no evidence that they do ANYTHING about them.i recently gave a
talk on fraudulent restaurant reviews
in google maps. easy for humans
talk at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=beuy9QbQ5lg
(higher quality) slides at
https://archive.nanog.org/meetings/nanog49/presentations/Monday/gill-keynote.pdf
> On Aug 3, 2022, at 12:45 PM, Mel Beckman wrote:
>
> Besides his many contributions to Nanog, I knew Vij from Twilio. He was very
btw, if you want to do this yourself, you might consider using something like
https://github.com/opsdisk/scantron
> On Jun 19, 2022, at 11:17 AM, Mark Seiden wrote:
>
> greetings.
>
> it should be mentioned that shadowserver also notifies those who register as
> the owne
greetings.
it should be mentioned that shadowserver also notifies those who register as
the owners of that address space.
it’s very useful. (it would be more useful if they calculated diffs and
notified about changes/additions.)
my thinking about this sort of thing, in general, is:
- it
of course, jay is right (in the US, anyway).
vpn providers often keep the (verified) email address and ip addresses used for
service establishment.
expressVPN takes bitcoin and what look to me like several other anonymous
payment schemes, and there
are always prepaid debit cards.
following the
i’ll save you some time.
larus Foundation seems to be a shell in Hong Kong. with one employee named as
the “Chair” since 1/2019. (She was previously
executive assistant to the CEO of Larus Cloud Service Limited, and before that
at University.). There is an org chart but nobody
on Linkedin has
i forwarded this to a colleague who has just taken a job that looks like he’s
running abuse and security at g fiber.
(not sure that he’s started work yet, it’s that new.)
> On Feb 18, 2021, at 2:24 PM, TJ Trout wrote:
>
> Did you try opening a ticket with arin?
>
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at
at the risk of providing more heat than light, trump violated the
Presidential Records Act repeatedly by later taking down (aka destroying)
his own unwise tweets. this repeated violation of law using twitter itself
would have been enough for twitter to either restrict his using any
mechanism for
> On Nov 1, 2020, at 5:32 PM, Fletcher Kittredge wrote:
>
>
> Sonic builds their own fiber; they are insurgents. This is a good thing and
> society would be better off with more competition among infrastructure
> providers. It needs to be funded somehow.
>
> You can cheat, but if you are a
s hackers.
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 1, 2020 at 8:23 PM Mark Seiden <mailto:m...@seiden.com>> wrote:
> att 1Gb/sec symmetric fiber is about $70/month.
>
> their “business class” service costs >10x that price.
>
> if i don’t want an SLA, does anything keep a non-profi
att 1Gb/sec symmetric fiber is about $70/month.
their “business class” service costs >10x that price.
if i don’t want an SLA, does anything keep a non-profit organization from
ordering (from att or sonic) residential service at what normally would be
considered a business location?
sonic seems
> On Sep 14, 2020, at 5:04 PM, John Levine wrote:
>
> In article
> you
> write:
>> I moved to Seattle. Today I found my grmail box subscribed to a
>> congressman's list from a nearby Washington jurisdiction. Not some
>> random congressman. And not any of the addresses I give out; my gmail
Wasn’t Hadron a Roman emperor who can somehow be blamed for the killing of
Jesus?
(or was that Jebus?)
or was that Hadrian? I forget…)
(jest sayin’…)
On Jan 27, 2020, 9:41 AM -0800, Valdis Klētnieks ,
wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 07:10:02 +, Large Hadron Collider said:
> > As much as
manifestly untrue
https://movie-tourist.blogspot.com/2012/08/the-day-earth-stood-still-1951.html
On May 7, 2019, 1:33 PM -0700, Nick Hilliard , wrote:
> Marshall Eubanks wrote on 07/05/2019 21:16:
> > Yes, they kept moving the impact site around all week (both Denver and
> > West Africa were
excellent! (but i was hoping this would be a swamp-draining-by-vaporization
exercise.)
i particularly liked this animation.
https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/pd/cs/pdc19/Day5-MegaFire.mov
On May 7, 2019, 11:21 AM -0700, Sean Donelan , wrote:
>
> EXERCISE Only
>
> The scenario was chosen to stress the
particularly "interesting" when someone downloads CP (or, as it now seems to be
called, CSAM) using their ipaddr and causes them to become a Person of Interest.
On Apr 25, 2019, 12:43 PM -0700, Tom Beecher , wrote:
> It seems like just another example of liability shifting/shielding. I'll
>
feeling cranky, are we, job? (accusing an antispam expert of spamming on a
mailing list by having too long a .sig?)
but it’s true! anne runs the internet, and the rest of us (except for ICANN
GAC representatives) all accept that.
to actually try to make a more substantial point, i am quite
of course p2p is the way to distribute this but i doubt the justice department
can admit there is any positive legitimate use for p2p.
(i’ve been surprised that it hasn’t made it to wikileaks or bittorrent yet.
“russiar, are you listening?”)
(i sure hope there’s a signed version or at least a
On 12/11/18 1:53 PM, Mark Foster wrote:
Amazingly I had a sales-type engage with me via InMail just recently,
defending his cold sales approach (spam, basically) when I tried to do the
polite thing and explain why what he was doing was 'bad'.
Mark.
when on the third un-replied to email
wrote:
>
> https://www.interpol.int/Crime-areas/Crimes-against-children/Access-blocking
>
>
>
> *From: *NANOG on behalf of Mark Seiden <
> m...@seiden.com>
> *Date: *Friday, 7 December 2018 at 11:54 AM
> *To: *"Lotia, Pratik M"
> *Cc: *"nanog@
where is this list of dirty domains?
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018, 10:08 PM Lotia, Pratik M
wrote:
> Hello all, was curious to know the community’s opinion on whether an ISP
> should block domains hosting CPE (child pornography exploitation) content?
> Interpol has a ‘worst-of’ list which contains such
my entire bus in san francisco got it. the expressions were priceless.
t-mobile sent it earlier than other carriers -- i got it at x:18
On 10/3/18 11:52 AM, Andy Ringsmuth wrote:
> Did anyone on AT or an iPhone receive the test today? I believe it was
> supposed to happen at 2:18 EDT,
You've probably used the Wayback Machine, but have you ever wondered how
it works?
We think of Nanog folks as part of our natural community.
So Nanog attendees who will be in the Bay Area before or after the
upcoming San Jose Nanog meeting are particularly welcome to be our
guests at community
at the internet archive we have a strange problem at the moment.
a slightly upstream device looks like it's returning icmp
administratively unreachable for our main load balancer's ip address
(which serves archive.org).
comcast has interpreted this to remove or (maybe blackhole) connections
to
looking for a helper in London: a US-based client of mine is turning off a
small London data center presence ASAP.
they want to hire someone trustworthy to unrack, properly pack up and ship to
the US a small number of 1u and 2u sized devices and hard drives.
the person has to be capable of
On Apr 13, 2014, at 7:52 AM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
the point of open source is that the community is supposed to be doing
this. we failed.
Versus all of the closed source bugs that nobody can know of or do
anything about?
for those you can blame the vendor. this one is owned
i am aware of
http://www.stanford.edu/group/networking/netdb
which is used widely at stanford and few other places. it’s going through some
improvements, according to
my reading of the list. tilburg university appears to be adopting it. not
sure if it’s suitable mostly
for an ISP. it
On Sep 3, 2013, at 9:12 PM, ML m...@kenweb.org wrote:
On 9/3/2013 11:57 PM, Scott Howard wrote:
Overall this is nothing new - Hotmail has been doing the same thing for
years.
Scott
When I used to use Hotmail - Your account was dropped after 30-60 days
of non-use.
Whereas Yahoo
and here i am in the icann-selected hotel for the icann conference, and they
gave us a total of 500MB of metered usage. for our entire stay, not per day.
(should be better on the conference net).
maybe i should just check out and check in every day.
On Jul 14, 2013, at 6:44 AM, Alex
there are lots of other attack scenarios besides the simple one you suggest,
as people who try to analyze malware payloads by their outbound network activity
have figured out.
an attack could be time-driven, or driven by some very hard to interpret
network
signalling (such as a response to
paper is downloadable from
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~sps32/Silicon_scan_draft.pdf
On Jun 13, 2013, at 3:52 PM, Scott Weeks sur...@mauigateway.com wrote:
--- r...@gsp.org wrote:
From: Rich Kulawiec r...@gsp.org
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 06:10:39PM +0200, Randy Bush wrote:
we really should
On Jun 13, 2013, at 5:39 PM, Michael Thomas m...@mtcc.com wrote:
On 06/13/2013 05:28 PM, Scott Helms wrote:
Bill,
Certainly everything you said is correct and at the same time is not useful
for the kinds traffic interception that's been implied. 20 packets of
random traffic capture is
On Jun 6, 2013, at 10:25 PM, jamie rishaw j...@arpa.com wrote:
tinfoilhat
Just wait until we find out dark and lit private fiber is getting vampired.
/tinfoilhat
well, that's exactly and the only thing what would not surprise me, given the
eff suit
and mark klein's testimony about room
, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 22:57:07 -0700, Mark Seiden said:
and also, only $20m/year? in my experience, the govt cannot do anything
like this
addressing even a single provider for that little money.
Convince me the *real* number doesn't have another zero.
Remember
...@vt.edumailto:valdis.kletni...@vt.edu
On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 22:57:07 -0700, Mark Seiden said:
and also, only $20m/year? in my experience, the govt cannot do
anything like this addressing even a single provider for that little money.
Convince me the *real* number doesn't have another zero
what a piece of crap this article is.
the guy doesn't understand what sniffing can and can't do. obviously he
doesn't understand peering or routing, and he doesn't understand what cdns are
for.
he doesn't understand the EU safe harbor, saying it applies to govt entitites,
when it's purely
On Jun 6, 2013, at 6:28 PM, Leo Bicknell bickn...@ufp.org wrote:
On Jun 6, 2013, at 8:06 PM, jim deleskie deles...@gmail.com wrote:
Knowing its going on, knowing nothing online is secret != OK with it, it
mealy understand the way things are.
While there's a whole political aspect of
that could occur when
a. student machines are botted (for institutions not blocking outbound
port 25)
b. student and alumni accounts are compromised by phishers
(both of these just for the purposes of sending spam from well
connected, reputable institutions.)
and then consumers really do
it probably has something to do with the large proportion of fraudsters
using linked in and every personals site in the world for 419 and
other confidence schemes, don't you think?
of course, this only forces the fraudsters to use proxies, aol and
satellite
providers which are more difficult
40 matches
Mail list logo
