Re: Changes to ARIN Online - Routing Security Dashboard - RPKI & IRR integration (was: Fwd: [arin-announce] New Features Added to ARIN Online)

that additional time for community consultation on this integration functionality is warranted. Regards, Mark From: NANOG on behalf of John Curran Date: Wednesday, August 9, 2023 at 6:20 PM To: NANOG Subject: Re: Changes to ARIN Online - Routing Security Dashboard - RPKI & IRR integration (was:

Re: Changes to ARIN Online - Routing Security Dashboard - RPKI & IRR integration (was: Fwd: [arin-announce] New Features Added to ARIN Online)

NANOGers - As alluded to by Mark Kosters in his message below, we are placing on hold the functionality for the automatic creation of corresponding new route objects for RPKI validated ROAs that lack such. This is being done out of an abundance of caution in order to allow us to conduct a

Re: Changes to ARIN Online - Routing Security Dashboard - RPKI & IRR integration (was: Fwd: [arin-announce] New Features Added to ARIN Online)

Responses inline starting with "MK:" On 8/9/23, 10:21 AM, "NANOG on behalf of Jay Borkenhagen" mailto:arin@nanog.org> on behalf of j...@braeburn.org > wrote: I agree that in ARIN's RPKI-->IRR synthesis, the set of route[6] objects created should not depend on the

Re: Changes to ARIN Online - Routing Security Dashboard - RPKI & IRR integration (was: Fwd: [arin-announce] New Features Added to ARIN Online)

Job Snijders via NANOG writes: > > > > > Would it not be advantageous to create at a minimum the 256 of the > > > 'least-specific' objects? > > > > MK: That may be a reasonable approach. Do you see any adverse effects > > in simplifying the IRR Route creation logic to just have > >

Re: Changes to ARIN Online - Routing Security Dashboard - RPKI & IRR integration (was: Fwd: [arin-announce] New Features Added to ARIN Online)

Dear Mark, Thank you for sharing all the details in your previous email. For brevity I'm snipping most of your reply. On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 03:59:19PM +, Mark Kosters wrote: > Job Snijders wrote: > > > Would it not be advantageous to create at a minimum the 256 of the > > 'least-specific'

Re: Changes to ARIN Online - Routing Security Dashboard - RPKI & IRR integration (was: Fwd: [arin-announce] New Features Added to ARIN Online)

Hi Job Answers below starting with MK: On 8/7/23, 7:31 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Job Snijders via NANOG" mailto:arin@nanog.org> on behalf of nanog@nanog.org > wrote: - is the IRR state directly derived from the RPKI state? MK: No. This is all done in software.

Re: Changes to ARIN Online - Routing Security Dashboard - RPKI & IRR integration (was: Fwd: [arin-announce] New Features Added to ARIN Online)

Dear John, ARIN, NANOG, On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 06:24:09PM +, John Curran wrote: > We have made some fairly significant changes for those customers using > ARIN Online for routing security administration – see attached message > for specifics. Yes, significant changes! I very much appreciate

Changes to ARIN Online - Routing Security Dashboard - RPKI & IRR integration (was: Fwd: [arin-announce] New Features Added to ARIN Online)

NANOGers - We have made some fairly significant changes for those customers using ARIN Online for routing security administration – see attached message for specifics. FYI, /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers Begin forwarded message: From: ARIN