This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG
TZNOG, MENOG, BJNOG, SDNOG, CMNOG, LACNOG, IRNOG and the RIPE Routing WG.
Daily listings are sent to
On 22/Jun/18 15:05, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG wrote:
> I’m not really sure “you get what you pay for” … compare with OpenWRT … you
> have frequent updates, even in days when some important security flaw is
> discovered, as it happened a few months ago with WiFi. You can even develop
>
I’m not really sure “you get what you pay for” … compare with OpenWRT … you
have frequent updates, even in days when some important security flaw is
discovered, as it happened a few months ago with WiFi. You can even develop
yourself what you want or pay folks to do it for you.
And of
On 22/Jun/18 12:47, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
>
> Yeah I can confirm, as I tested it several times, 6to4 for them is
> proto41, but it is very confusing and against standards nomenclature …
> This don’t say anything good from a vendor, in my opinion!
>
Even those networks I know running
The problem with its IPv6 support is that is only supporting 6in4, which by the
way, they call it 6to4, so it is very weird and confusing customers ...
That "6-to-4 actually means 6-in-4" was quite confusing to me as well. I just
enabled it to prove that they had a language moment there. Good
On 22/Jun/18 10:00, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG wrote:
>
> The problem with its IPv6 support is that is only supporting 6in4, which by
> the way, they call it 6to4, so it is very weird and confusing customers ...
That "6-to-4 actually means 6-in-4" was quite confusing to me as well. I
I've many customers using MikroTik.
The problem with its IPv6 support is that is only supporting 6in4, which by the
way, they call it 6to4, so it is very weird and confusing customers ...
So for native IPv6 or a 6in4 tunnel, is fine, but any other transition
mechanism is NOT supported, so
On 20/Jun/18 06:06, Jared Mauch wrote:
> I know. They’re very popular in the WISP and FTTH communities that are doing
> sub-10G as their aggregate bits. I understand the price appeal but not a fan
> personally.
Not a fan either for the backbone, even though a lot of ISP's in South
Africa
On 20/Jun/18 05:48, Jared Mauch wrote:
> MikroTik is getting there but most people are just not enabling it either.
I have a MikroTik hAP Lite router for my FTTH service at my house.
It has excellent support for IPv6, including a ton of translation
mechanisms.
My problem is my home provider
9 matches
Mail list logo
