Nice article relating to the original subject of the post. I didn't see if
it had be previously posted.
http://ccie-in-3-months.blogspot.com/2011/03/trying-to-calculate-ipv6-bgp-table-in.html
-Hammer-
I was a normal American nerd.
-Jack Herer
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Joe Maimon
In this WSJ article
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704893604576199952421569210.html
or
http://on.wsj.com/gaPk8V
This caught my eye :
About half of the existing cables running across the Pacific are damaged ...
It that realistic ? That seems like much more damage than anything
On 2011/03/12 8:51 AM, Deric Kwok wrote:
Hi
ls there any program/way to monitor the switch port/switch status when
it reaches to certain bandwidth?
Cacti with Threshold plugin
--
/Jason
On 3/13/11 9:35 PM, goe...@anime.net wrote:
the real cesspool is POC registries. i wish arin would start revoking
allocations for entities with invalid POCs.
Hear, hear!
Leo's remembering the old days (80s - early '90s), when we checked whois and
called each others' NOCs directly. That
Hi Marshall and all,
About half of the existing cables running across the Pacific
are damaged ...
It that realistic ? That seems like much more damage than
anything I have heard or seen.
Yes, it's definetely true.
Rgs,
Masato
-Original Message-
From: Marshall Eubanks
In a message written on Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 12:11:54PM -0400, William Allen
Simpson wrote:
Leo's remembering the old days (80s - early '90s), when we checked whois and
called each others' NOCs directly. That stopped working, and we started
getting
front line support, who's whole purpose
On 3/14/2011 12:11 PM, William Allen Simpson wrote:
On 3/13/11 9:35 PM, goe...@anime.net wrote:
the real cesspool is POC registries. i wish arin would start revoking
allocations for entities with invalid POCs.
Hear, hear!
Leo's remembering the old days (80s - early '90s), when we checked
On Mar 14, 2011, at 12:15 PM, Masato YAMANISHI wrote:
About half of the existing cables running across the Pacific
are damaged ...
It that realistic ? That seems like much more damage than
anything I have heard or seen.
Yes, it's definetely true.
I'd like to see a list of damaged
In a message written on Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 11:54:15AM -0400, Marshall Eubanks
wrote:
About half of the existing cables running across the Pacific are damaged ...
If you have a broad view of damaged, this may be plausable. Remember
that damaged does not mean traffic impacting in all cases,
On 3/13/2011 7:45 AM, Alexander Maassen wrote:
Why o why are isp's and hosters so ignorant in dealing with such issues
and act like they do not care?
They really do take this serious as it cuts into productivity.
Proof they care:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 12:35:27 EDT, David Miller said:
Define contacts don't work properly.
- Email / phone number does not exist?
- Email / phone was answered by unhelpful person?
Somewhere between these two should be email/phone number exists, but is
completely unable to serve the function
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Jason Bertoch ja...@i6ix.com wrote:
On 2011/03/12 8:51 AM, Deric Kwok wrote:
Hi
ls there any program/way to monitor the switch port/switch status when
it reaches to certain bandwidth?
Cacti with Threshold plugin
--
/Jason
^ This.
--
Brent Jones
-
Alain Hebertaheb...@pubnix.net
PubNIX Inc.
50 boul. St-Charles
P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 6G7
Tel: 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.netFax: 514-990-9443
On 03/14/11 15:17, Brent Jones wrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Jason
On 03/14/11 15:17, Brent Jones wrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Jason Bertochja...@i6ix.com wrote:
On 2011/03/12 8:51 AM, Deric Kwok wrote:
Hi
ls there any program/way to monitor the switch port/switch status when
it reaches to certain bandwidth?
Cacti with Threshold plugin
--
On 3/14/2011 2:13 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 12:35:27 EDT, David Miller said:
Define contacts don't work properly.
- Email / phone number does not exist?
- Email / phone was answered by unhelpful person?
Somewhere between these two should be email/phone number
On Mar 11, 2011, at 11:22, Jeff Wheeler wrote:
I think there are a lot of people who throw around the SLAAC argument
like it's actually good for something. Do these people know what
SLAAC does? For core networks, it doesn't do anything. For
hosting/datacenter networks and cluster/VPS
On 3/14/11 9:11 AM, William Allen Simpson wrote:
On 3/13/11 9:35 PM, goe...@anime.net wrote:
the real cesspool is POC registries. i wish arin would start revoking
allocations for entities with invalid POCs.
Hear, hear!
Leo's remembering the old days (80s - early '90s), when we checked
On 14 Mar 2011, at 23:30, Ask Bjørn Hansen a...@develooper.com wrote:
Doesn't SLAAC give you automatic MAC address to IP mapping? It'll save you
manually doing that (in an otherwise well controlled environment).
No, it doesn't. On some systems, the mac address is used to create the ipv6
On Mar 14, 2011, at 16:38, Nick Hilliard wrote:
Doesn't SLAAC give you automatic MAC address to IP mapping? It'll save
you manually doing that (in an otherwise well controlled environment).
No, it doesn't. On some systems, the mac address is used to create the ipv6
address, but not on
19 matches
Mail list logo
