My apologies for using gmail. Company policy prohibits the use of
corporate email and identity.
Nobody has heard nothing? Hear no evil… ;)
What we basically have at this point is vendor specifications, sales
talk and rumors that big boys have built large networks using these
boxes (or
Maybe you can try,i am not sure it will work or not, i don't have the lab to
test the script at this moment.
aaa attribute list IPV6
attribute type addrv6 DHCPv6POOL protocol ipv6
!
username ipv6 privilege 0 password ipv6
username ipv6 aaa attribute list IPV6
!
Terry
发件人： Jared Mauch
On 09/16/11 08:35, John Curran wrote:
On Sep 16, 2011, at 10:17 AM, Leigh Porter wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Randy Bush [mailto:ra...@psg.com]
Sent: 16 September 2011 16:05
To: John Curran
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: Disappointing ARIN - A great advertisement for the USA ?
If
On 9/14/11 14:24 , Don Gould wrote:
* Did you know that Cisco has a 100Gb solution?
need more L3 1u TORs with 4 x 40 and 48 x 10...
On 9/16/11 13:50 , Nathan Eisenberg wrote:
As an ISP, ARIN will not give you any space if you are new. You
have to already have an equivalent amount of space from another
provider.
does arin *really* still have that amazing barrier to market
entry?
Yes. If you want PI space, you have to
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 12:06, Joel jaeggli joe...@bogus.com wrote:
.
The ARIN community is easily it's own worst enemy.
Not to mention the difficulty of actually getting a provider to let you
announce their PA IP space to other providers if you already are / want
multihoming.
I just got
As an ISP, ARIN will not give you any space if you are new. You
have to already have an equivalent amount of space from another
provider.
does arin *really* still have that amazing barrier to market
entry?
Yes. If you want PI space, you have to start off with PA space,
utilize it, and then
On Sep 17, 2011, at 12:45 PM, Michael Sinatra wrote:
One approach would be the use of an option flag on the query to obtain
the new hierarchical output No flag = no output change. Would that
suffice?
I think this would be a good way to proceed. John, has this been suggested
as part of
On Sep 17, 2011 10:41 AM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
As an ISP, ARIN will not give you any space if you are new. You
have to already have an equivalent amount of space from another
provider.
does arin *really* still have that amazing barrier to market
entry?
Yes. If you want PI
All of the speculation and comment on this thread has been something
to watch, but, it's not actually all that accurate.
https://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#four2
NRPM 4.2 provides several ways in which an ISP can qualify for space
As has been mentioned in this thread, efficiently using a PA
Or...Go ahead and keep buying 6509 chassis, the 7600 brand is just a marketing
thing
-C
On Sep 14, 2011, at 7:41 AM, Leigh Porter wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Always Learning [mailto:na...@u61.u22.net]
Sent: 14 September 2011 14:39
To: N. Max Pierson
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
- Original Message -
All of the speculation and comment on this thread has been something
to watch, but, it's not actually all that accurate.
https://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#four2
NRPM 4.2 provides several ways in which an ISP can qualify for space
As has been mentioned
On Sep 16, 2011, at 3:45 PM, Charles N Wyble wrote:
2) Obtain ipv6 space from ARIN (inquired about getting space and ran into
some issues. need to speak with my co founder and get details. evidently
getting brand new v6 space for a brand new network is fairly difficult. for
now may just
On Sep 17, 2011, at 2:13 PM, Randy Carpenter wrote:
I have a small ISP customer who is not multi-homed, and is using about a /21
and a half of space, and is expanding. Their upstream is refusing to give
them more space, so they wanted to get their own, and give back the space to
the
On Sep 17, 2011, at 11:19 AM, John Curran wrote:
On Sep 16, 2011, at 3:45 PM, Charles N Wyble wrote:
2) Obtain ipv6 space from ARIN (inquired about getting space and ran into
some issues. need to speak with my co founder and get details. evidently
getting brand new v6 space for a brand
On Sep 17, 2011, at 11:13 AM, Randy Carpenter wrote:
- Original Message -
All of the speculation and comment on this thread has been something
to watch, but, it's not actually all that accurate.
https://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#four2
NRPM 4.2 provides several ways in
On 09/17/2011 01:19 PM, John Curran wrote:
On Sep 16, 2011, at 3:45 PM, Charles N Wyble wrote:
2) Obtain ipv6 space from ARIN (inquired about getting space and ran into some
issues. need to speak with my co founder and get details. evidently getting
brand new v6 space for a brand new network
On 9/16/11 11:42 , Steve Bohrer wrote:
My general question is what meaning do I give to lossy traceroutes,
even when pings show no problem.
Can I expect that backbone routers should never give me timeouts on a
traceroute through them, so, lots of asterisks from these systems
indicate a
One more reason we can all do ourselves a favor by moving to ipv6,
remove the number scarcity issue and associated baggage of begging for
numbers
silly hope. we created monopoly organizations. this kind of thing is
self-perpetuating.
randy
I have absolutely no doubt that there are sufficient folks
participating in NANOG to get nearly any policy desired
through the ARIN policy process. To the extent that folks
don't care to learn the current policies and participate in
the policy development process, they end up
On Sep 17, 2011, at 5:06 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
I have absolutely no doubt that there are sufficient folks
participating in NANOG to get nearly any policy desired
through the ARIN policy process. To the extent that folks
don't care to learn the current policies and participate in
the
I have absolutely no doubt that there are sufficient folks
participating in NANOG to get nearly any policy desired
through the ARIN policy process. To the extent that folks
don't care to learn the current policies and participate in
the policy development process, they end up
On Sep 17, 2011, at 5:05 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
One more reason we can all do ourselves a favor by moving to ipv6,
remove the number scarcity issue and associated baggage of begging for
numbers
silly hope. we created monopoly organizations. this kind of thing is
self-perpetuating.
Randy
Strange... You seem to overcome it well enough to join in the
discussion on PPML, but not to actual propose changes to policy.
i believe you are mistaken. i am not knowingly a subscriber to ppml,
and am not, to the best of my knowledge, participating in any
discussion(s) there.
a search of
One more reason we can all do ourselves a favor by moving to ipv6,
remove the number scarcity issue and associated baggage of begging for
numbers
silly hope. we created monopoly organizations. this kind of thing is
self-perpetuating.
Randy - If you wish to propose an alternative which
On Sep 17, 2011, at 5:23 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
Randy - If you wish to propose an alternative which accomplishes the
mission in a different manner, feel free to do so. The community has
every opportunity and right to accomplish unique Internet number
administration as it sees fit.
rick adams
rick adams was right. this could be done very minimally with some
software and maybe six to ten folk to back it up.
gedanken experiment. instead of frelling up whois, printing comic
books, and playing weenie regulators, design and describe an rir with a
sign on the door which says internet
On Sep 17, 2011, at 5:19 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
Strange... You seem to overcome it well enough to join in the
discussion on PPML, but not to actual propose changes to policy.
i believe you are mistaken. i am not knowingly a subscriber to ppml,
and am not, to the best of my knowledge,
From: Randy Bush ra...@psg.com
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6
naysayer...)
Date: February 21, 2011 9:00:50 PM EST
To: Dan Wing dw...@cisco.com
Cc: 'NANOG list' nanog@nanog.org, 'ARIN-PPML List' arin-p...@arin.net
From: Randy Bush ra...@psg.com
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an IPv6
naysayer...)
Date: February 21, 2011 9:00:50 PM EST
To: Dan Wing dw...@cisco.com
Cc: 'NANOG list' nanog@nanog.org, 'ARIN-PPML List' arin-p...@arin.net
I have a small ISP customer who is not multi-homed, and is using
about a /21 and a half of space, and is expanding. Their upstream
is refusing to give them more space, so they wanted to get their
own, and give back the space to the upstream, with the possible
exception of a small block
- Original Message -
From: Randy Carpenter rcar...@network1.net
I have a small ISP customer who is not multi-homed, and is using about
a /21 and a half of space, and is expanding. Their upstream is
refusing to give them more space, so they wanted to get their own, and
give back the
On Sep 17, 2011, at 3:01 AM, Charles N Wyble wrote:
One aspect of my network, will be operational transparency. So as much as
possible will be viewable in real time. This includes v4/v6 traffic
statistics.
These books are required reading, IMHO:
On 09/17/2011 06:52 PM, Randy Carpenter wrote:
I have a small ISP customer who is not multi-homed, and is using
about a /21 and a half of space, and is expanding. Their upstream
is refusing to give them more space, so they wanted to get their
own, and give back the space to the upstream, with
34 matches
Mail list logo
