I will just say no on all parts of this current part of the conversation and
leave it at that.
- j
Curtis Maurand wrote:
On 3/14/2012 9:00 PM, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
> Christopher Morrow writes:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
>>> Faisal Imtiaz writes:
>>>
>>
William Herrin wrote:
> I've been an IRTF RRG participant and in my day job I build backend
> systems for mobile messaging devices used in some very challenging and
> very global IP and non-IP environments.
I know non-IP mobile environment is heavily encumbered. So, I
can understand why you insis
Randy Bush wrote:
> none of which seem to move us forward. i guess the lesson is that, as
> long as we are well below moore, we just keep going down the slippery,
> and damned expensive, slope.
As long as we keep using IPv4, we are mostly stopping at /24 and
must stop at /32.
But, see the subje
On 3/14/2012 9:00 PM, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
Christopher Morrow writes:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
Faisal Imtiaz writes:
I am not familiar with VZ's FIOS network...
however I suspect that if they are using a Redback at the Headend, it
would allow you to
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> I fully expect them to develop an HDCP-or-equivalent enabled protocol to run
> over IP Multicast.
>
> Do you have any reason you believe that won't happen?
>
> Owen
I'm pretty sure it's already in place for IPTV solutions.
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
> So it was _one_ of the drivers, but was it a more major driver than
> "for the love of God, not Redback!"? :)
I think there were some significant issues with the redback of the
time, but ... near as I recall a pile-o-cash was put fort
Christopher Morrow writes:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
>>
>> Faisal Imtiaz writes:
>>
>>> I am not familiar with VZ's FIOS network...
>>> however I suspect that if they are using a Redback at the Headend, it
>>> would allow you to have a 'bridge' network with s
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Nate Davis wrote:
> Thanks Chris for the update to the list. One minor clarification for the
> community with regards to:
>
> 4) the proposal passed and the ARIN BoT essentially got a message from
> IANA/IESG saying:
> "Hey, before you leap... lookout, perhaps t
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
>
> Faisal Imtiaz writes:
>
>> I am not familiar with VZ's FIOS network...
>> however I suspect that if they are using a Redback at the Headend, it
>> would allow you to have a 'bridge' network with secure arp
>> settings. (it's a feature
Faisal Imtiaz writes:
> I am not familiar with VZ's FIOS network...
> however I suspect that if they are using a Redback at the Headend, it
> would allow you to have a 'bridge' network with secure arp
> settings. (it's a feature that we have seen on Redback's...)
AFAIK Verizon does not use Redb
While we're talking Looking Glasses, any pointers to best practices or pointers
for securing a public looking glass, besides the obvious such as don't accept
announcements originated from the LG.
In a greenfield environment, is Zebra the choice?
EKG
-Original Message-
From: Jared Geig
Telia - http://looking-glass.telia.net/
Telecom Italia - http://gambadilegno.noc.seabone.net/lg/
The GRX option is at the very bottom of both.
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:50 PM, Gus Crichton <
gus.crich...@digicelgroup.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Any public looking glasses for GRX?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
while this is reasonable, we all have to keep in mind, that you can I can
'toss' in route-reflectors for a few hundred to a few thousand dollars
each... Folks like VZ and AT&T pay top dollars for top capacity equipment to
handle stuff.. so you are talk
- Original Message -
> From: "William Herrin"
> Well... they brand it as a SOHO service and AFAICT they refuse to
> install "business fios" anywhere zoned commercial.
I have Business FiOS in 2 rented commercial properties; business office
space.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth
On 3/14/2012 3:32 PM, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
Most competitive ISP's (such as Sonic and ourselves) a very flexible
to customer's needs and are willing to support custom configurations
but .. it has to make business sense...and the underlying
infras
In defense of the tier 1's it's not as easy as it looks to run BGP with the
lower end business customers. On the technical side the edge boxes and
links to them would be as overloaded with routes and peers and all of the
other PE boxes in an ISP network. Not to mention the changes in routing
poli
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Justin M. Streiner
wrote:
> The point (and this goes back to my original post) was that VZ is missing
> out on revenue (and customer service, but let's not get ahead of
> ourselves...)
> opportunities by not offering such a thing as an add-on for their business-
>
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
Most competitive ISP's (such as Sonic and ourselves) a very flexible to
customer's needs and are willing to support custom configurations but .. it
has to make business sense...and the underlying infrastructure be able to
support that configuration.
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 00:19:16 -0400, William Herrin wrote:
Nope. I have FiOS and the 5 IPs. They are 5 IPs, in sequence, at a
completely arbitrary location in a /24 subnet.
...
Time Warner (TWTC, not TWC) does the same thing... we have 8 addresses
from them... 131 - 138; it's a /24 and we get
Yes, Dane is not only very smart but also a very sharp and savvy
business operator.. But I am also sure they are not doing this as a 'no
charge' offering for a 'resi' circuit.
Most competitive ISP's (such as Sonic and ourselves) a very flexible to
customer's needs and are willing to support cu
On Mar 14, 2012, at 7:41 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 7:54 AM, ML wrote:
>> On 3/14/2012 2:22 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
>>>
>>> NetRange: 100.64.0.0 - 100.127.255.255
>>> CIDR: 100.64.0.0/10
>>> OriginAS:
>>> NetName:SHARED-ADDRESS-SPACE-RF
On Mar 14, 2012, at 9:18 AM,
wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 20:13:41 PDT, Owen DeLong said:
>> I expect within my lifetime that multi-gigabit ethernet will become
>> commonplace in the household LAN environment and that when that
>> becomes reality, localized IP Multicast over multi-gigabit ethe
As far as I know only ISP that will let you do BGP with them on DSL is Sonic
and their Fusion service is awesome but very limited to bay area.
they rock though.
mehmet
On Mar 14, 2012, at 6:36 AM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
> I am not familiar with VZ's FIOS network...
> however I suspect that if t
Thanks Chris for the update to the list. One minor clarification for the
community with regards to:
4) the proposal passed and the ARIN BoT essentially got a message from
IANA/IESG saying:
"Hey, before you leap... lookout, perhaps the IETF should weigh in?"
After the ARIN Advisory Council fo
Mike Andrews wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 04:39:21PM +, Leigh Porter wrote:
> > > From: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu [mailto:valdis.kletni...@vt.edu]
> > >
> > > The only reason you got HDMI at all was because the content owners
> > > managed to get HDCP included. You won't get a replacement
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 04:39:21PM +, Leigh Porter wrote:
> > From: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu [mailto:valdis.kletni...@vt.edu]
> >
> > The only reason you got HDMI at all was because the content owners
> > managed to get HDCP included. You won't get a replacement that doesn't
> > do HDCP until
Hi all,
I suggest to check out www.audriga.com which runs www.email-umzug.de
and www.groupware-migration.com. They are from Germany and adhere the
EU data privacy regulations.
I have to disclose that I am one of the founders of www.audriga.com.
:-) So, if you have any questions about www.audriga.
> -Original Message-
> From: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu [mailto:valdis.kletni...@vt.edu]
>
> The only reason you got HDMI at all was because the content owners
> managed to get HDCP included. You won't get a replacement that doesn't
> do HDCP until we fix the sorry state of copyright in th
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 20:13:41 PDT, Owen DeLong said:
> I expect within my lifetime that multi-gigabit ethernet will become
> commonplace in the household LAN environment and that when that
> becomes reality, localized IP Multicast over multi-gigabit ethernet
> will eventually supplant HDMI as the pr
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 7:54 AM, ML wrote:
> On 3/14/2012 2:22 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
>>
>> NetRange: 100.64.0.0 - 100.127.255.255
>> CIDR: 100.64.0.0/10
>> OriginAS:
>> NetName: SHARED-ADDRESS-SPACE-RFCTBD-IANA-RESERVED
>>
>
>
> Did IANA have to justify this space to
I am not familiar with VZ's FIOS network...
however I suspect that if they are using a Redback at the Headend, it
would allow you to have a 'bridge' network with secure arp settings.
(it's a feature that we have seen on Redback's...)
Allows you to have a 'flat network' for all your subs, and t
- Original Message -
> From: "Faisal Imtiaz"
> Is that is needed, what is wrong with that ?
Well, we just had FiOS Business 150/65 dropped this week, and my /27 isn't
even a /27; we're sharing a /24 with, presumably, a bunch of other customers.
Not sure how BGP would handle that...
Che
in the DSL world, when we were providing service using Bridge PVC's, it
was easier to allocate (as many needed) /32 to a customer CPE, than to
route a subnet.
This changed when the AT&T/BellSouth infrastructure changed from being
able to get ATM PVC's to PPPoE only network.
Faisal Imtiaz
Snapp
Is that is needed, what is wrong with that ?
Isn't MPLS a form of encapsulation ? Don't the enterprise folks run routing
protocols on it ?
With carriers today it is very common to deliver L2 connectivity over L3
networks.
One does not have to like it...and just because someone else (upstream)
On 3/14/2012 2:22 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
NetRange: 100.64.0.0 - 100.127.255.255
CIDR: 100.64.0.0/10
OriginAS:
NetName:SHARED-ADDRESS-SPACE-RFCTBD-IANA-RESERVED
Did IANA have to justify this space to ARIN or was it just given to them
no questions asked because a
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 02:22:04AM -0400, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> NetRange: 100.64.0.0 - 100.127.255.255
> CIDR: 100.64.0.0/10
> OriginAS:
> NetName:SHARED-ADDRESS-SPACE-RFCTBD-IANA-RESERVED
GOOD.
Now I can BOTH keep sticking my head in the sand AND get NEW RFC 1918
s
On 3/14/12 00:06 , Frank Habicht wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 3/14/2012 9:42 AM, Joel jaeggli wrote:
>> On 3/13/12 23:29 , Joel jaeggli wrote:
>>> On 3/13/12 23:22 , Christopher Morrow wrote:
NetRange: 100.64.0.0 - 100.127.255.255
CIDR: 100.64.0.0/10
OriginAS:
NetName:
37 matches
Mail list logo
