Pascal
Could you elaborate a bit more? Maybe some desired features or industry.
On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 3:04 AM Pascal Masha wrote:
> Hello Folks,
>
> Any good alternatives to Ciena Blue Planet out there?
>
> Regards,
> Paschal Masha
>
--
- Andrew "lathama" Latham -
On 8/23/23 18:29, t...@pelican.org wrote:
Not Trio, and different PLM :)
Yes, aware... I was just speaking in general for what is likely to be a
very popular platform :-).
MX304 (well, strictly LMIC16) has the same restriction, and a need for another entry in the
magic port checker
some of these port capabilities are weird to me. like on the
ACX7100-48L you can do 4x100 or 8x50, but ONLY one 40g ?!
me@7100> show chassis pic pic-slot 0 fpc-slot 0 | find 400
48 0 1x400G 1x100G 1x40G 4x100G 2x100G 8x50G 2x50G 4x25G
4x10G 3x100G
49 0 1x400G 1x100G
On Wednesday, 23 August, 2023 16:33, "Mark Tinka" said:
[faceplate oversubscription]
> On the new ACX line, yes.
Not Trio, and different PLM :)
> We don't mess around with any other MX products, so not sure (although
> we are still yet to deploy the MPC10E's and the MX304).
MX304 (well,
On 8/23/23 17:01, Tom Beecher wrote:
I'm not sure they allow oversubscription on anything in the MX line
anymore honestly. I could be wrong, I've been face down in a specific
subset of equipment for a while, someone please correct me if I am.
On the new ACX line, yes.
If I look at the
Does Fusion not make sense in this case? I've not had a ton of experience
with it, but it does well to add a crazy port count to an otherwise very
port limited device.
-Matt
On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 9:01 AM Tom Beecher wrote:
> What would have been nice is if Juniper oversubscribed the face
>
> What would have been nice is if Juniper oversubscribed the face plate of
> this platform, as most people are more likely to run out of ports than
> they would the 400Gbps forwarding capacity of Trio.
>
You're restricted to 400G because they did fixed lane allocations to the EA
chip on the PFE
I don't think any of us really understand what you're hoping to find. I
sure don't.I think that this might be a result of a disconnect between
your understanding of how these should be monitored and how they are
monitored.
Specifically, of your two statements below, one is true and one is
We can help you. I will contact offlist
On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 09:42 Eric C. Miller wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> We have a circuit in MI1 that we are trying to relocate, but there’s a
> crazy delay. Does anyone have the ability and desire to coordinate a
> Equinix cross connect and sell us DIA for
Hello,
We have a circuit in MI1 that we are trying to relocate, but there's a crazy
delay. Does anyone have the ability and desire to coordinate a Equinix cross
connect and sell us DIA for 3-4months? Usage is 2-3Gbps Residential, we can use
our own IPs/ASN if necessary.
Eric
Hello folks,
Based on data I've gathered through quantitative and qualitative surveying,
I can detect no application of Provider Backbone Bridging (MAC-in-MAC).
Please bear with me while I clarify that I am not enquiring about Provider
Bridging (QinQ).
I would like to ask specifically about
On 8/23/23 08:00, Pascal Masha wrote:
Thanks just wanted to know whether it was a supported feature.
What would have been nice is if Juniper oversubscribed the face plate of
this platform, as most people are more likely to run out of ports than
they would the 400Gbps forwarding capacity
Thanks just wanted to know whether it was a supported feature.
On Tue, 22 Aug 2023, 21:00 Chris, wrote:
> No, but they do however work just great as an active-active pair of
> routers when cross linked and iBGP peered to each other and everything
> downstream connected to each one.
>
> Chris
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
