I think it is going to have to happen. We have several folks on the IX and
various consulting clients who only need 3-6 Ips but have to burn a full /24 to
participate in BGP. I wrote a blog post awhile back on this topic
Hello Nich!
On Oct 3, 2023, at 4:26 PM, Nicholas Warren wrote:
Does anyone know how many people will be elected from each category?
This year’s ARIN election will fill four (4) seats on the ARIN Board of
Trustees and seven (7) seats on the ARIN Advisory Council.
I don’t regularly keep up
Heh. (:
Le 4 octobre 2023 01:23:13 UTC, Owen DeLong via NANOG a écrit
:
>I was one of the main people behind their suspension from ARIN whois for 6
>months.
>
>They have not spammed me since.
>
>They’re probably afraid of another cake.
>
>Owen
>
>
>> On Oct 3, 2023, at 18:18, Mike Lyon wrote:
On Oct 3, 2023, at 11:52 AM, Bryan Fields wrote:
On 10/2/23 11:28 AM, Mel Beckman wrote:
I believe they got the contact information from ARIN
I'd suggest everyone use an alias unique to ARIN for your POC and/or public
email. Makes it super simple to verify where it was sourced from.
(and
> On Oct 3, 2023, at 11:52 AM, Bryan Fields wrote:
>
> On 10/2/23 11:28 AM, Mel Beckman wrote:
>> I believe they got the contact information from ARIN
>
> I'd suggest everyone use an alias unique to ARIN for your POC and/or public
> email. Makes it super simple to verify where it was sourced
I was one of the main people behind their suspension from ARIN whois for 6
months.
They have not spammed me since.
They’re probably afraid of another cake.
Owen
> On Oct 3, 2023, at 18:18, Mike Lyon wrote:
>
> Give it time :)
>
> -Mike
>
>> On Oct 3, 2023, at 18:06, Owen DeLong via NANOG
Give it time :)
-Mike
> On Oct 3, 2023, at 18:06, Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote:
>
> But I seem to have finally gotten Cogent trained not to spam this one, so I
> think I’ll leave it as is.
>
> YMMV
>
> Owen
>
>
>> On Oct 3, 2023, at 08:52, Bryan Fields wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/2/23 11:28 AM,
But I seem to have finally gotten Cogent trained not to spam this one, so I
think I’ll leave it as is.
YMMV
Owen
> On Oct 3, 2023, at 08:52, Bryan Fields wrote:
>
> On 10/2/23 11:28 AM, Mel Beckman wrote:
>> I believe they got the contact information from ARIN
>
> I'd suggest everyone use
* morrowc.li...@gmail.com (Christopher Morrow) [Tue 03 Oct 2023, 21:50 CEST]:
I'm sure telling dave shaeffer: "Hey, your sales droids are being
rude" is going to end as well as sending him ED pill emails.
Such outreach to technical contacts is counterproductive anyway. Which
is more likely,
On 10/3/2023 3:48 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
those are a bit of a false equivalence... but... ok.
I think: "Oh look, more spam, delete"
is basically how this sort of problem (email from randos trying to
sell me ED pills or 10Gs) should be treated.
I don't know that it's helpful to keep
Does anyone know how many people will be elected from each category?
I don't regularly keep up with everyone's business. So, are any of candidates
overachievers or, well, underachievers?
Nich Warren
On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 12:54 PM wrote:
>
> * morrowc.li...@gmail.com (Christopher Morrow) [Tue 03 Oct 2023, 18:29 CEST]:
> >this sort of thing (provider X scrapes Y and mails Z for sales leads)
> >every ~18 months.
> >the same outrage and conversation happens every time.
> >the same protection
* morrowc.li...@gmail.com (Christopher Morrow) [Tue 03 Oct 2023, 18:29 CEST]:
this sort of thing (provider X scrapes Y and mails Z for sales leads)
every ~18 months.
the same outrage and conversation happens every time.
the same protection mechanisms are noted every time.
Is there a reason
this sort of thing (provider X scrapes Y and mails Z for sales leads)
every ~18 months.
the same outrage and conversation happens every time.
the same protection mechanisms are noted every time.
Is there a reason that: "killfileand move on" is not the answer
everytime for this?
(why do we need to
On 10/2/23 11:28 AM, Mel Beckman wrote:
I believe they got the contact information from ARIN
I'd suggest everyone use an alias unique to ARIN for your POC and/or public
email. Makes it super simple to verify where it was sourced from.
(and yes I've got the same spam)
--
Bryan Fields
On 02/10/2023 14:19, t...@pelican.org wrote:
If the FIB is full, can we start making controlled and/or smart decisions about
what to install, rather than either of the simple overflow conditions?
There is a project [1] that make use of sflow to install the top n
prefixes by traffic,
-Original Message-
From: Delong.com
Sent: Monday, October 2, 2023 5:47 PM
To: behrnsj...@yahoo.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: MX204 tunnel services BW
> “Tunnel gets whatever bandwidth is left after physical port packets are
> processed” and likely some additional overhead for
>
> AIUI, with Trio, you don’t have to disable a physical port, but that comes
> at the cost of “Tunnel gets whatever bandwidth is left after physical port
> packets are processed” and likely some additional overhead for managing the
> sharing.
>
This was pretty much my understanding as well,
You can configure tunnel bandwidth everywhere, but you can’t configure
a given tunnel everywhere, you have to assign it to a particular FPC/PIC/0.
For example, with:
set chassis fps 2 pic 3 tunnel-services bandwidth 10g
You need to create gr-2/3/0 interfaces for tunnels to use that PFE.
You can
> On Oct 2, 2023, at 20:18, behrnsj...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Delong.com
> Sent: Monday, October 2, 2023 5:47 PM
> To: behrnsj...@yahoo.com
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: MX204 tunnel services BW
>
>> “Tunnel gets whatever bandwidth is left after
On Sat, 30 Sep 2023, 06:03 Jay R. Ashworth, wrote:
> Layer 8: People
>
> Layer 9: Money
>
> Layer 10: Lawyers.
>
> Cheers,
> -- jra
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "David Conrad"
> > To: nanog@nanog.org
> > Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2023 6:46:31 PM
> > Subject: Legal system
On Mon, 2 Oct 2023 at 20:21, Jeff Behrns via NANOG wrote:
> Encountered an issue with an MX204 using all 4x100G ports and a logical
> tunnel to hairpin a VRF. The tunnel started dropping packets around 8Gbps.
> I bumped up tunnel-services BW from 10G to 100G which made the problem
> worse; the
22 matches
Mail list logo
