Hi,
It depends on the configuration of the bandwidth how dedicated it is, leaving
the shared PON architecture aside.
There are three different types of bandwidth on a PON
Committed: always reserved, can't be used by other customers, like fixed TDM
bandwidth
Assured: your bandwidth is still
On 10/25/23 01:56, Neader, Brent wrote:
Hello!
Interested in getting the larger community’s thought on this.
The primary question being does XGS-PON have a place in providing a
dedicated enterprise level service (at least sold as one) in the
marketplace? Delivered via a residential (per
Check your blocks on the various databases here and see which ones are reporting as out of the country:IP Geolocation and VPN Resourcesthebrotherswisp.comThen follow-up with those individual DBs to get the locations corrected.You should be all set.-MikeOn Oct 24, 2023, at 20:32, Brad Bendy
> Believe it or not, Job, there are parts of the internet that exchange
> traffic and move packets that are not IXPs.
in fact, measurements had shown that the majority of inter-domain
traffic is over pnis
randy
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 05:28:31PM -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
> Yes, but we weren’t talking about an IXP here.
> We’re talking about an ISP.
Sure, perhaps you were
I intended to submit an example where a resource holder constructively
uses a ROA designating AS 0 as purported originator, actually
>
> He’s announcing all 4 /24s
>
That's not what was described as the original situation.
Operator has prefix 1.2.4/22, but announce only 1.2.5/24 and 1.2.6/24,
> with appropriate ROAs. To avoid abuse of 1.2.4/24 and 1.2.7/24, they also
> make a ROA for 1.2.4/22 with AS 0. Attacker now
Yes, but we weren’t talking about an IXP here.
We’re talking about an ISP.
Believe it or not, Job, there are parts of the internet that exchange traffic
and move packets that are not IXPs.
Owen
> On Oct 22, 2023, at 11:48, Job Snijders via NANOG wrote:
>
> On Sun, 22 Oct 2023 at 20:33, Tom
The covering /20 isn’t his to announce… He has a /22. He’s announcing all 4
/24s, and may not have a legitimate place to announce the covering /22, which
wouldn’t help in this case anyway.
So I’m not sure why you think that’s a solution.
Owen
> On Oct 22, 2023, at 10:45, Tom Beecher wrote:
Cogent doesn’t have any peer specific action communities.
Brendan
On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 9:01 am, Eric C. Miller wrote:
> It’s definitely been an annoying day. Cogent’s “don’t advertise to telia”
> BGP community doesn’t work, so we can’t route around this either. Then
> again, my bad for using
Hello!
Interested in getting the larger community's thought on this.
The primary question being does XGS-PON have a place in providing a dedicated
enterprise level service (at least sold as one) in the marketplace? Delivered
via a residential (per the data sheet description) CPE, Nokia
It’s definitely been an annoying day. Cogent’s “don’t advertise to telia” BGP
community doesn’t work, so we can’t route around this either. Then again, my
bad for using the “Wal-mart” of the internet.
Eric
Anyone have a contact for ESPN or can someone contact me off list?
Have a good amount of IP space that just started reporting the IP is
out of the country.
Thanks
Anyone with abilities to view traffic for the STUN servers able to message
me off list?
I have been going back and forth a couple of weeks now doing PCAPs with not
only RingCentral but with Palo Alto on the phone as well showing there is
no return traffic coming from the RC side on call
About as ugly as a graph as ive seen! Reverse path for this site is cogent,
mtr and forward ISP failing me a bit not returning the transition hop IP I need
to verify, but im assuming its Arelion. This site is in the southeast also.
[cid:image001.png@01DA0667.5563C150]
From: NANOG On Behalf
I've got a small single-homed site in Central Europe with an Arelion
transit circuit and it had some brief connectivity issues around 0830-0900
Central US time. Cleared up relatively quickly.
Also have connectivity with Arelion in NYC at 60 Hudson, but have not
experienced any issues related to
$dayjob has transit from 1299 in Miami. We’ve been seeing packet loss nearby
in their network since around 06:00 UTC, still ongoing.
Steve
> On Oct 24, 2023, at 8:20 AM, Elmar K. Bins wrote:
>
> We also observed this today, UTC morning, esp. across the pond, and our
> alternative paths
I'm experiencing this in the southeast US region.
Unfortunately, return traffic from a data center that we have a VPN
connection to. Is routed first over Level 3 who is then handing it off to
Arelion in Miami where we then see the 200 to 300 millisecond latency and
50% plus packet loss.
On Tue,
We also observed this today, UTC morning, esp. across the pond, and our
alternative paths from Europe to the US were suffering from the still unfixed
fibre cut, so I was a bit unhappy with 200 extra ms, and 60% loss.
1299 seems to've found an alternative path in the meantime, looks good to us.
We had the same issue with Arelion this morning, a huge increase in the
latency and jitter was happening across the US and of course for any
traffic sourced from the EU flowing to the US.
Within the US we noticed a latency spike from 20-50ms to ~200ms. From the
EU to our US facilities, we noticed
Hey all, anyone aware of issues with Arelion this morning? We have a bunch of
end users on at least Cox and Cogeco who are having serious issues with service
access, and the problem appears to be on the return path where it traverses
Arelion. Source net is Lumen/L3 3356 but loss/latency
Sorry for the late response, but I can speak about the FS M6200 product. We
have been using the 10GOEO card for 10G DWDM/WDM on a span. The hardware works
reasonably well though we had to reseat a card once in the last 18 months or so
of operation. It also seems to be a bit finicky when you
21 matches
Mail list logo
