Re: Future of WiMax

they've already claimed they'll probably switch to LTE. They said it was just a software change to do that. Of course the standard for actually placing a phone call on it (LTE) has yet to finalized. On 6/16/2010 3:40 PM, Gregory Hicks wrote: Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 12:35:16 -0700 From:

Re: U.S. Plans Cyber Shield for Utilities, Companies

On 7/8/2010 9:51 AM, Brandon Ross wrote: On Wed, 7 Jul 2010, Michael Painter wrote: Have we all gone mad? I find it hard to understand that a nuclear power plant, air-traffic control network, or electrical grid would be 'linked' to the Internet in the interest of 'efficiency'. Air gap them

Re: Vyatta as a BRAS

On 7/13/2010 2:56 AM, Truman Boyes wrote: On 13/07/2010, at 4:50 PM, Dobbins, Roland wrote: On Jul 13, 2010, at 1:34 PM, Sharef Mustafa wrote: do you recommend it? My comment would be that a software-based BRAS - 7200, Vyatta, et. al. - is no longer viable in today's

Re: Vyatta as a BRAS

On 7/13/2010 4:53 AM, Dobbins, Roland wrote: On Jul 13, 2010, at 3:00 PM,khatfi...@socllc.net wrote: I agree software-based deployments have their flaws but I do not agree that it cannot be managed securely with comparable or exceeding uptime -vs- a drop in appliance. I firmly believe

Re: Vyatta as a BRAS

On 7/13/2010 11:11 AM, Greg Whynott wrote: They are all software based, no matter who builds them. Cisco IOS, Juniper JunOS, etc. controlling hardware asic's and fpga's. In a PIX, its a Pentium 4. I've also been in other routers that use PowerPC. It depends on the

Re: Appliance Vs Software based routers

On 8/4/2010 9:53 AM, Xavier Beaudouin wrote: Le 4 août 2010 à 15:14, Mirko Maffioli a écrit : 2010/7/25 Laurens Vetslaur...@daemon.be: Cisco PIX: no, Cisco ASA: yes. It even runs under VMware... It's however very hackish... :) Cisco ASA under VMware?? :| CiscoASA is

Re: Monitoring Tools

On 8/19/2010 4:23 PM, Phil Regnauld wrote: hat employer=other While developing our own monitoring product, we've had to deal with various constraints from the customer side, for instance pharmaceutical companies where there was no way installing an agent on PLC

Re: DNSSEC and SSL

On 8/22/2010 3:57 PM, Mans Nilsson wrote: a DNSSEC capable stub resolver not in the cards? The best option today is to run a full-service resolver on the host; which is a tad heavy for most desktops, not to speak about the cache misses that would cause root server system load. The latter of

Re: ISP port blocking practice

I use SSL only and even then, it requires authentication. --Curtis On 9/3/2010 1:00 PM, Owen DeLong wrote: I have had it happen in some metro areas on sprint. I have experienced it in at least a dozen hotels over the last 12 months. I have run into it in various airports with free public

Re: Software-based Border Router

Vyatta has support contracts. If you want hardware, they've got that, too. On 9/27/2010 6:48 PM, Heath Jones wrote: Oh, support contract!!? Differences: - Hardware forwarding - Interface options - Port density - Redundancy - Power consumption - Service Provider stuff - MPLS TE? VPLS?

Re: Software-based Border Router

? Real hardware forwarding? Where? Best Regards, Nathan Eisenberg -Original Message- From: Curtis Maurand [mailto:cmaur...@xyonet.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 5:55 AM To: Heath Jones Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Software-based Border Router Vyatta has support contracts

Re: Software-based Border Router

On 9/29/2010 8:59 AM, Heath Jones wrote: What's the real-world power consumption and heat like? 455 days shows some pretty good reliability! Cheers for the info Curtis That's a really good question. This is a small 260 watt supermicro short depth (14) 1u system I purchased from tigerdirect.

Re: ATT Dry Pairs?

I'd set up something wireless between them. Just my $0.02. --Curtis On 9/30/2010 4:52 PM, Brandon Galbraith wrote: Has anyone had any luck lately getting dry pairs from ATT? I'm in the Chicago area attempting to get a dry pair between two buildings (100ft apart) for some equipment, but when

Re: router lifetime

On 10/2/2010 7:23 PM, Franck Martin wrote: How long do you keep a router in production? What is your cycle for replacement of equipment? For a PC, you usually depreciate it over 3 years, and can make it last 5 years, but then you are stretching the functionality, especially if you upgrade

Re: Only 5x IPv4 /8 remaining at IANA

On 10/18/2010 8:16 AM, ML wrote: And +1 on the pioneers comment too. Paul. IPv6 Hipsters..Doing it before it was cool. IPV4 -easy(); IPV6-really().Really().Difficult();

Re: IPv6 rDNS

I'll note that most of the behavior you describe here is deeply rooted in the RFC's. The concepts of zone transfers for instance are not unique to BIND, but rather in the definition of how interoperable DNS is supposed to work. That said, there is clearly room for improvement, and in fact

Re: Token ring? topic hijack: was Re: Mystery open source switching

Much of Maine is not covered by broadband and companies are still using dialup routers. Much of the US (70%) is not covered by broadband and the only internet connection is dialup. --Curtis On 11/3/2010 11:13 AM, Gary Baribault wrote: And you live in a cabin in the woods, pedal a

Re: Token ring? topic hijack: was Re: Mystery open source switching

On 11/2/2010 3:49 PM, Sven Olaf Kamphuis wrote: Are there still any commercial X.25 nets in operation? I had some peripheral involvement with Tymnet in the MCI/Concert conversion, and hear it shut down sometime in 2003-4.

Re: Blocking International DNS

On 11/22/2010 10:25 AM, Joe Abley wrote: You don't think (i) a service provider, as that term is defined in section 512(k)(1) of title 17, United States Code, or other operator of a domain name system server shall take reasonable steps that will prevent a domain name from resolving to that

Re: wikileaks dns (was Re: Blocking International DNS)

The patriot act did away with due process. On 12/3/2010 3:10 PM, Randy Fischer wrote: On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 12:38 PM, George Bonsergbon...@seven.com wrote: As for a member of Congress pressuring Amazon, what else would one expect? If a site has content that the USG might see as damaging,

Re: Over a decade of DDOS--any progress yet?

On 12/8/2010 3:04 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote: On 12/8/2010 08:06, Jack Bates wrote: I call BS. Windows has it's problems, but it is the most common exploited as it holds the largest market share. Many Windows infections I've seen occur not due to the OS, but due to lack of patching of applications

Re: Windows Encryption Software

On 12/10/2010 8:21 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: I believe EFS is available in Windows XP and Windows 2003 Server, too. Software-based solutions have the advantage that they are somewhat more testable and reviewable. If it's all in the disk, you can't really be sure that the data is encrypted with

Re: Windows Encryption Software

On 12/10/2010 9:33 AM, Michael Holstein wrote: After some research, I find that recovery of EFS (available for Win 2000/2003/XP/Vista/7) encrypted files in the case of disaster can be problematic. It has to do with keys, file ownerships, etc., etc., etc. Plan for disaster and know how to

Re: 5.7/5.8 GHz 802.11n dual polarity MIMO through office building glass, 1.5 km distance

On 12/29/2010 8:19 AM, Robert E. Seastrom wrote: The third consideration is someone notices and cares. The Nanostation Loco (again from Ubiquiti) is easily capable of the distances that you're talking about and is an all-in-out unit (antenna plus radio, fed with POE) about twice the size of a

Re: WebServer and Firewall Help

On 2/8/2011 3:00 PM, Joshua Klubi wrote: I want to know what measure i can do on the server to get it protected which mysql protection I should implement. since i can see that it might be a php or mysql injection that is been used. Currently I run these security measures on it. Ubuntu UFW

Re: Last of ipv4 /8's allocated

Touché! That could theoretically happen. I think Apple should buy HPQDEC just so they can announce 16/7 :-) None of the RIR blocks are going to be routed that way on purpose, though :-) -Randy I agree. Many of those corporations would have a hard time justifying an entire /8, even IBM.

Re: Last of ipv4 /8's allocated

On 2/8/2011 7:58 PM, Owen DeLong wrote: It doesn't have to be a public network to need globally unique addresses. There is NO policy requirement to use NAT or RFC-1918 for private networks. Just a suggestion that folks be considerate of the community where they can. I'll bet most of them

Re: two interfaces one subnet

Try this: http://www.linuxfoundation.org/en/Net:Bridge --Curtis Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: On May 11, 2009, at 5:40 PM, Ben Scott wrote: On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Hector Herrera hectorherr...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 2:22 PM, David Devereaux-Weber

Re: ISP best practices

Check out www.powerdns.com as an alternative to bind. Its faster, more secure, does IPV6 and easier to maintain. Curtis Philip Lavine wrote: To all, I am sure this has been asked 10 to the 1 millionth power times, however may be the rules have changed. I am looking to set up a really

Re: ISP best practices

You're correct on the blanket statement. apologies. --C Joe Abley wrote: On 21-May-2009, at 11:06, Curtis Maurand wrote: Check out www.powerdns.com as an alternative to bind. Its faster, more secure, does IPV6 and easier to maintain. I have heard lots of good things about PowerDNS

Re: glue record

Google is your ... well ... anyway. http://www.zytrax.com/books/dns/ch8/ns.html Anton Zimm wrote: On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Scott Howard sc...@doc.net.au wrote: On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 12:09 AM, Anton Zimm anton.z...@gmail.com wrote: Now, from the 'authority section' dig is

Re: Geo Location and DNS

You may have to contact maxmind, the keepers of the geoip database. correct...@maxmind.com Curtis Stefan Molnar wrote: It took us over 3 months with Google to update. They never once said the info was wrong, and it was not even a new ARIN allocation. --Original Message-- From:

Re: In a bit of bind...

I've been using powerdns for quite a while and I've found it to be solid and stable. It'll use quite a few different backends includeing BIND zone files, but its claim to fame is that it uses mysql. a list of different backends can be found at:

Re: Wireless bridge

Cisco Aironet www.cisco.com Alvarion www.alvarion.com Aruba www.arubanetworks.com bluesocket www.bluesocket.com I've used all but bluesocket and they all worked pretty well. bluesocket gets good reviews. These are just a few. There are lots of them. Try to use one as and access point and

Re: Dan Kaminsky

andrew.wallace wrote: On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:48 PM, Dragos Ruiud...@kyx.net wrote: at the risk of adding to the metadiscussion. what does any of this have to do with nanog? (sorry I'm kinda irritable about character slander being spammed out unnecessarily to unrelated public lists lately

Re: ISP customer assignments

Sorry to be a curmudgeon and let me play devil's advocate for a minute. I realize that the address space is enormous; gigantic, even, but if we treat it as cavalierly as you all are proposing, it will get used up. If its treated like an infinite resource that will never, ever be used up

Re: FTTH Active vs Passive

You might look into what's being done in Sweden then, here there are municipality networks who dig up the streets and does fiber to the individual house in suburbia (you have to trench your own land though, 4dm deep, 1-2dm wide, they only dig in the street put down the pipe in your trench).

Re: FTTH Active vs Passive

Mackinnon, Ian wrote: snip In the UK more homes have fixed wire telephony than mains sewers or water. Not sure what that means to this discussion :-) In the US as well, but if you're trying to run a new fiber network and you want it uderground, the sewers in metro areas are a good place to

Re: news from Google

Eduardo A. Suárez wrote: Hi, now Google DNS, anything more? http://googlecode.blogspot.com/2009/12/introducing-google-public-dns-new-dns.html Eduardo.- yawn. So not interested.

Re: Verizon FiOS - is BGP an option?

On 3/14/2012 9:00 PM, Robert E. Seastrom wrote: Christopher Morrowmorrowc.li...@gmail.com writes: On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Robert E. Seastromr...@seastrom.com wrote: Faisal Imtiazfai...@snappydsl.net writes: I am not familiar with VZ's FIOS network... however I suspect that if

Re: Broadband Subscriber Management

I don't understand why DSL providers don't just administratively down the port the customer is hooked to rather than using PPPoE which costs bandwidth and has huge management overhead when you have to disconnect a customer. I made the same recommendation to the St. Maarten (Dutch) phone

Re: Broadband Subscriber Management

As opposed to SNMP and a script that would shut the port down via SNMP when the customer is disabled? Larry Smith wrote: On Wed April 22 2009 11:01, Curtis Maurand wrote: I don't understand why DSL providers don't just administratively down the port the customer is hooked to rather than

Re: Broadband Subscriber Management

for that if they don't have the reach themselves. From: Larry Smith lesm...@ecsis.net Sent: Thursday, 23 April 2009 2:07:42 AM To: nanog@nanog.org CC: Subject: Re: Broadband Subscriber Management On Wed April 22 2009 11:01, Curtis Maurand wrote: I don't understand why DSL providers don't just administratively

Re: Default route with object tracking

I'd rather send him to something more open like kernel.org; anything but Google's DNS. Google's DNS is a little too nefarious for my taste. On 2/1/2010 10:31 AM, Dan White wrote: On 01/02/10 10:13 -0500, Andrey Gordon wrote: Hi list. I'd like to setup my default routes to the Interwebz

Re: Latest Cisco for small dual homed ASN

On 2/11/2010 1:53 PM, James Smallacombe wrote: I have a customer that is looking at using BGP for their network; one connection over a few bonded T1s, the other over a Comcast Enterprise connection (which supposedly will do BGP now). When I was dual homed a few years ago, a 7204VXR with

Re: DNSSEC Readiness

I haven't run BIND in a number of years. --Curtis On 2/15/2010 2:06 PM, Charles N Wyble wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tony Finch wrote: On Mon, 15 Feb 2010, Charles N Wyble wrote: How are folks verifying DNSSEC readiness of their environments? Any existing

Re: DNS server software

I do hosting rather than network provisioning, but when I was doing network provisioning we used PowerDNS' resolver. Its small, and its very, very fast. Its customizable and can be scripted using LUA. http://www.powerdns.com On 2/22/2010 9:16 AM, Claudio Lapidus wrote: Hello all, We

Re: Email Portability Approved by Knesset Committee

On 2/22/2010 12:02 PM, Joel Esler wrote: I have an idea. Everyone just get a gmail (or otherwise neutral account) like me.com or gmail.com or yahoo.com and be done with it. J Sure and give all that information to data mining companies with no interest in privacy. No thank you. I

Re: DNS server software

DNSSEC with powerdns is under development. Its coming soon to a server near you. --C On 2/22/2010 3:16 PM, Grzegorz Janoszka wrote: On 22-2-2010 15:39, Phil Regnauld wrote: PowerDNS also has an open source solution (www.powerdns.com). PowerDNS is easily modified with custom

Re: Security Guideance

On 2/23/2010 5:38 PM, Nathan Ward wrote: Using lsof, netstat, ls, ps, looking through proc with ls, cat, etc. is likely to not work if there's a rootkit on the box. The whole point of a rootkit is to hide processes and files from these tools. Get some statically linked versions of these bins

Re: lt2p/pptp vpn concentrators

pfsense or Vyatta on Intel dual core hardware with decent network cards will save you a ton of $$$ and run thousands of tunnels. On 3/3/2010 7:01 PM, Paul Wall wrote: On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Leslieles...@craigslist.org wrote: We're currently looking for a small lt2p/pptp

Re: Locations with no good Internet

On 3/6/2010 7:28 AM, Joel Snyder wrote: Patrick Giagnocavo patr...@zill.net wrote: Isn't this really an issue (political) with tariffed T1 prices rather than a technical problem? I was told that most T1s are provisioned over a DSLAM these days anyways, and that the key difference between T1

Re: ARIN IP6 policy for those with legacy IP4 Space

On 4/9/2010 10:10 AM, John Curran wrote: A large *end-user* pays maintenance fees of $100/year. ISPs pay an annual registration services subscription fee each year, proportional to the size of aggregate address space held. I stand corrected. I misunderstood the doc. I could never read.

Re: ARIN IP6 policy for those with legacy IP4 Space

On 4/9/2010 1:43 PM, William Herrin wrote: No, ARIN is not a regulator. Regulators have guns or access to people with guns to enforce the regulations that they enact. ARIN has no such power. The FCC is a regulator. The California PUC is a regulator. ARIN is not a regulator. Last I

Re: Dial Concentrators - TNT / APX8000 R.I.P.

On 5/10/2010 6:36 PM, Mark Foster wrote: Does this not highlight a wider issue? I realise that dialup is hardly 'cutting edge' but there are providers out there with a significant number of dialup customers still on the books. Surely there's still a market for (what should be by now) a

Re: Rugged wireless bridge

On 5/11/2010 9:36 AM, Andrey Khomyakov wrote: Hi all, I need to provide IP connectivity to an outdoor parking lot for security devices like a camera, and emergency phone and a gate. Does anyone have any suggestions on a wireless bridge and an outdoor rated switch if such exists? How do people

Re: Dial Concentrators - TNT / APX8000 R.I.P.

30% of all people in the US (110 million) have no access to broadband. Large areas of my state have no access to broadband because its rural (Maine). Aastra CVX (it used to be a Nortel product.) --Curtis On 5/11/2010 11:29 AM, Joe Abley wrote: On 2010-05-11, at 11:08, Leo Bicknell wrote:

Re: Barracuda Networks is at it again: Any Suggestions as to an Alternative?

A barracuda appliance uses postfix, amavisd-new, spamassassin with fuzzyOCR and clamav. I've built a couple of these boxes for customers. I use their dnsbl as well as spamhaus. It works pretty well, not much gets through. --Curtis On 4/10/2011 8:24 PM, William Warren wrote: On 4/9/2011

Re: Firewall Appliance Suggestions

On 6/30/2011 12:20 PM, Suresh Rajagopalan wrote: Linux + iptables + fwbuilder On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Blake T. Pfankuchbl...@pfankuch.me wrote: Howdy, I am looking for something a little unique in a bit of a tough situation with some sticky requirements. First

Infected hosts

The number of infected hosts out there is just astounding. I have bots attacking a server from all over the world. Lots of them from a network known as micfo. I could write abuse complaints from here until doomsday and I'd never be done. --Curtis -- Best Regards Curtis Maurand Principal

Re: Windows 10 Release

Microsoft tells me 3.2 GB for win 10 pro 64 bit. On July 28, 2015 6:04:04 PM EDT, Niels Bakker niels=na...@bakker.net wrote: * n...@flhsi.com (Nick Olsen) [Tue 28 Jul 2015, 22:46 CEST]: Being a 3-4GB download. Each device is moving more data than any Apple update ever did. I'm not so sure of

Re: DOCSIS CMTS Systems

is available new for $4500 online. For those of you deploying CMTS systems what do you use and recommend? I am not sure if there is a cable equivalent list to NANOG, but if so please let me know. -- Best Regards Curtis Maurand Principal Xyonet Web Hosting mailto:cmaur...@xyonet.com http

Re: 20-30Gbps UDP 1720 traffic appearing to originate from CN in last 24 hours

On 7/21/2015 8:43 AM, Jared Mauch wrote: On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 08:09:56AM -0400, Curtis Maurand wrote: DNS is still largely UDP. Water is also still wet :) - but you may not be doing 10% of your links as UDP/53. DNS can also use TCP as well, including sending more than one

Re: another tilt at the Verizon FIOS IPv6 windmill

On 7/21/2015 4:05 PM, Ricky Beam wrote: On Tue, 21 Jul 2015 08:13:48 -0400, Curtis Maurand cmaur...@xyonet.com wrote: At least in Maine where I am, TWC does allow you to bring your own modem as long as it's DOCSIS 3 compliant and there's lots of those from motorola, netgear and others

Re: ARIN IPV4 Countdown

On 7/14/2015 7:57 PM, James Downs wrote: On Jul 14, 2015, at 16:09, Curtis Maurand cmaur...@xyonet.com wrote: i think IPV6 adoption is going to be very slow. It's very difficult for the layman to understand and that contributes to the slow rate of uptake. Who is the layman in this story

Re: ARIN IPV4 Countdown

with those still holding out hope. i think that is unfair to the ipv6 fanboys (and girls). ipv6 use is increasing slowly. i bet it hits 10% by the time we retire. randy -- Best Regards Curtis Maurand Principal Xyonet Web Hosting mailto:cmaur...@xyonet.com http://www.xyonet.com

Re: SIP trunking providers

no place in the contiguous US that isn’t within 100 ms of any other place in the contiguous US these days. Owen -- Best Regards Curtis Maurand Principal Xyonet Web Hosting mailto:cmaur...@xyonet.com http://www.xyonet.com

Re: 20-30Gbps UDP 1720 traffic appearing to originate from CN in last 24 hours

incident was today at 09:00 EST. I'm assuming this is just another DDoS like all others, but I would be interested to hear if I am not the only one seeing this. On list or off-list is fine. Thanks, -Drew -- Best Regards Curtis Maurand Principal Xyonet Web Hosting mailto:cmaur...@xyonet.com http

Re: another tilt at the Verizon FIOS IPv6 windmill

allow you to bring your own modem as long as it's DOCSIS 3 compliant and there's lots of those from motorola, netgear and others. You're not stuck with the Ubee. -- Best Regards Curtis Maurand Principal Xyonet Web Hosting mailto:cmaur...@xyonet.com http://www.xyonet.com

Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption

On 10/1/2015 2:29 PM, Owen DeLong wrote: On Oct 1, 2015, at 00:39 , Baldur Norddahl wrote: On 1 October 2015 at 03:26, Mark Andrews wrote: Windows XP does IPv6 fine so long as there is a IPv4 recursive server available. It's just a simple command

Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption

either. There would be millions of people in the same boat. Cheers, Curtis On October 1, 2015 5:44:46 PM ADT, Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com> wrote: > >> On Oct 1, 2015, at 12:06 , Curtis Maurand <cmaur...@xyonet.com> >wrote: >> >> >> >> On 10/

Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption

-95dd-3f89919a8...@xyonet.com>, Curtis >Maurand wr >ites: >> If Time Warner (my ISP) put up IPv6 tomorrow, my firewall would no >longer wo >> rk. I could put up a pfsnse or vyatta box pretty quickly, but my >off the sh >> elf Cisco/Linksys home router has no ipv6 sup

Re: Thank you, Comcast.

s, why not 53 as well? This is a slippery slope of course, and judgement calls are not easy to make. -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se -- Best Regards Curtis Maurand Principal Xyonet Web Hosting mailto:cmaur...@xyonet.com http://www.xyonet.com

Re: For the Wireless Guys

The higher the frequency, the more it acts like light. at that frequency, it wouldn't take much to block it. even 2.4GHz is stopped by a tree. On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Dan Hollis wrote: > Good for a few meters at best? Terahertz is blocked by air. > > -Dan >

Re: DNS Recursive Operators: Please enable QNAME minimization (RFC7816) for the enhanced privacy of your users

powerdns dnsdist supports dns over https so you don't have to be held hostage by cloudflare or google. On 9/18/19 10:19 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: Why on Earth would anyone want that (Firefox deciding to do it's own DNS) as default behavior? - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing

Re: This DNS over HTTP thing

Power DNS has a ha proxy/load balancer that does dns over https. That way you're not limited to google's and cloudflare's dns servers which exist to drive advertising to you and give a single shource for tracking. dns over https: feh On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 5:28 PM Jay R. Ashworth wrote: >

Re: This DNS over HTTP thing

Might I suggest using PowerDNS's dinsdist. it's an ha proxy that you can put in front of your recursors and It implements dns over https if you want it to. It's open sources and ensures that you're not limited to Google's or Cloudflare's servers which exist to drive advertising at you (I've seen

Re: Google peering in LAX

pointing to 8.8.8.8.  Google's DNS servers are slow and extra latency makes it worse. -- Best Regards Curtis Maurand mailto:cmaur...@xyonet.com

Re: Integrated WIFI router and phone adapter

don't forget to disable SIP-ALG on the units.  That will be a huge improvement. On 5/18/20 12:34 PM, Mark Tinka wrote: On 18/May/20 16:45, Kevin Burke wrote: They have an Ethernet version and GPON version. The GPON version is the same price their Ethernet version + low end GPON ONT. We

Re: Better description of what happened

On 10/5/21 5:51 AM, scott wrote: On 10/5/21 8:39 PM, Michael Thomas wrote: This bit posted by Randy might get lost in the other thread, but it appears that their DNS withdraws BGP routes for prefixes that they can't reach or are flaky it seems. Apparently that goes for the prefixes that