of the site. Our intention is that
http://stat.ripe.net/ will replace all functionality currently under
www.ris.ripe.net. If RIPEstat doesn't provide the functionality you are
looking for, please request it by emailing us at s...@ripe.net.
Regards
John
On 1/16/13 8:36 PM, Shrdlu wrote:
On 1/16/2013 9:40 AM, john wrote:
I took a look at this site and unfortunately the use of cookies is very
ingrained into the code. Removing the requirement breaks all
functionality of www.ris.ripe.net and changing the functionality would
require a rewrite
on it again, maybe blocking UDP isn't all that bad. Would force
the vendors to not 'hide' their protocol.
--John
Regards,
CB
On 02/13/2014 06:01 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
On Feb 13, 2014, at 1:47 PM, John jsch...@flowtools.net wrote:
snip
UDP won't be blocked. There are some vendors that have their own hidden
protocol inside UDP packets to control and communicate with their devices.
Thinking on it again, maybe
definitely on the operational security side here.
I do generally prefer X reflection/amplification attack, as Roland
suggested, as it is more specific.
-John
, but he used it in 2002:
http://homes.cs.washington.edu/~arvind/cs425/doc/drdos.pdf. I read that
in 2002, did other research about it in 2002, saw reflected attacks in 2002.
Yes, I used DRDOS, too.
-John
started using it. The best defense against current and
yet-to-be-discovered IPMI vulnerabilities is to make sure that your IPMI
devices are not open to the public internet, as Roland said.
-John
in an earlier rule, to pull out
just the reflection traffic before resorting to the sledge.
-John
On 2016-08-01 13:20, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
> On 2016-07-31 05:46, Randy Bush wrote:
>>> This is silly. Anyone is of course allowed to deny service to parties
>>> involved in obvious criminal activity.
>> so block cloudflare from your network and go back to work already.
>>
>> randy
> I do
to
mitigate or prevent them.
-John
On 11/8/2018 1:12 PM, Zach Puls wrote:
Makes sense, that's understandable. Do you peer with AWS? If not, maybe opening
up a peering agreement will give you a better contact, and a bit more pull when
attacks occur? I know someone with a peering agreement
filtering at any random point in time?
These questions assume that you do not have a single transit provider that
covers both of your locations in the two different regions and can custom
route the packets.
John (ISDN) Lee
From: Net [funky...@gmail.com]
Sent
On Thu, 27 May 2010 21:26:27 +0200
Joe Abley jab...@hopcount.ca wrote:
On 2010-05-27, at 20:47, jacob miller wrote:
Am running an application on Sco Unix but am having the following problem.
Application is hunging sporadically.
That seems consistent with my memory of SCO Unix.
.
Thanks!
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
Begin forwarded message:
From: Mark Kosters ma...@arin.net
Date: June 11, 2010 3:17:49 PM EDT
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Upcoming Improvements to ARIN's Directory Service
Hi
ARIN is making significant improvements to our systems
john,
today, a research batch script running periodic bulk whois work has a
line something like
ncftpget ftp://user:p...@ftp.arin.net/arin_db.txt.gz
well, it can actually be simpler.
for the web 9.3 impaired of us, could you describe the simple batch
script line under the new
!
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
To those of you who may rely upon ATT to deliver your email-to-SMS
messages for monitoring: some of you may be currently out of luck. I
would just send this to the outa...@puck.nether.net list, but it
does seem to be a meta-network failure in that for better or worse
many of us use SMS
bit set. 1024 + 2048 = 3072. Therefore, syn-sport will only
ever equal 1024 or 3072. Or in your case, it shows up as the dport on
the way back.
John
for
something.
John
produced the TNT line of modem/ISDN to Ethernet central site concentrators
(in the early ninties) that drove a large portion of the user traffic to the
Internet at the time, generating the bubble.
John (ISDN) Lee
From: Andrew Odlyzko [odly...@umn.edu]
Sent
Electric.
I can confirm that HE is reachable from the University of Washington.
Thanks,
Ashoat
--
John A. Kilpatrick
j...@hypergeek.netEmail| http://www.hypergeek.net/
john-p...@hypergeek.net Text pages| ICQ: 19147504
Logitech's servers. But since my mail server is
at he.net that was the big thing I noticed. :)
But of course, step one, reboot my modem...*sigh*
--
John A. Kilpatrick
j...@hypergeek.netEmail| http://www.hypergeek.net/
john-p...@hypergeek.net
. ARIN says no, B hasn't shown that they need it
4. A and B say screw it, and B announces the space anyway
5. ???
R's,
John
On Aug 13, 2010, at 2:15 PM, John R. Levine wrote:
...
10. ARIN attempts to allocate the /20 to someone else, who is not amused.
Note that at this point ARIN presumably has no more v4 space left, so a
threat never to allocate more space to A or B isn't very scary. Given its
limited
but does another when
it comes to routing.
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
very difficult to obtain;
how do you see it impacting the overall outcome?
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
order estimate for your second and third
questions.
% of space and % of holders, please
I gave % of space in the April numbers above (the number of
holders at that time was approximately 700 of estimated 18000)
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
On Aug 13, 2010, at 4:37 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
thanks. but i meant when you report at meeting, on web site, whatever.
please report both, not just the one with the larger number.
Yes, will do.
/John
it as a proposal?
(and to answer Randy - the only control over the administration is based
on the policies adopted. Reduce the corpus of applicable policy if that
is your desire.)
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
allocated it and doesn't want to give it
back? My impression is that stolen space is all swamp or legacy or
abandoned, but I really don't know.
In case it's not obvious, I'm not advocating that people thumb their
noses at ARIN, but I don't see any obvious way to avoid my scenario.
R's,
John
is per-RSA,
and ARIN's action with this space is clearly governed by the
policies adopted by the community.
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
On Aug 13, 2010, at 6:33 PM, Vadim Antonov wrote:
John - you do not get it...
First of all, I don't want your organization to have ANY policy at all.
Unfortunately, Vadim, even No Policy *is* a policy.
Being just a title company for IP blocks is well and good - and can be
easily done
On Aug 13, 2010, at 5:46 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
to make it easiest to understand, i might grind it up into /24
equivalents and present as percentages
Acknowledged,
/John
exchange,
but you might want to seek counsel before trying such on a collective basis...
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
for the associated policy development process,
public policy meetings, travel, conference calls. Quite a bit of savings
available there, but the community first has to decide on permanent policy
(or lack thereof :-) for that automated world before we can reap the savings.
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
/index.html
If you submit it, I will bring it to the Board for consideration. In fairness,
I will tell you that I'll also recommend to the that we continue to pay for the
travel for the Advisory Council, unless and until there is no need for a policy
development process.
/John
, and that's often in
person and at the joint ARIN/NANOG meetings, etc. I can't speak
to the strength of your arguments for eliminating travel, but I
will carry them to the Board as well, if you use the suggestion
process.
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
. where the ISP turns
out to be simply a purveyor of IP addresses to online marketing
firms), and circumstances such as those are where reclamation is
used.
Does that clarify things?
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
On Aug 14, 2010, at 1:00 AM, Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
John,
I have privately e-mailed you 5 x /18 and 3 x /19 that are being
abused. If ARIN takes action against even one of these allocations I
will commend you publicly. I'll go do the investigation for you if you
need evidence.
I'm
On Aug 14, 2010, at 12:32 AM, Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
John,
I will concur with Randy that much of the travel that ARIN funds is
excessive. ARIN has a booth at trade shows so i'm going to guess that
entire setup with travel costs about $20,000 - 50,000 per show. Why?
To convince me to use ARIN
as opposed to the nanog list.
FYI,
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
the historical scrub will nearly guarantee instability.
(Followups for this really should be to PPML.)
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
section nine
Seeking contractual rights contrary to IETF RFCs 2008 and 2150?
as we say in our family, i smell cows.
No comment.
/John
. Or you can enjoy the status quo.
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
p.s. If you want to continue to discuss, can we shortly move this to PPML
or ARIN-Discuss for the sake of those not interested in these matters
who have different expectations from their NANOG list
or the IETF as a way of bringing about the change you want based on
community consensus (this is the Internet style of addressing it); feel
free to add your choice of multinational organizations or governments if
you want to more choices with different decision processes.
/John
John Curran
President
that it should include all resources,
including those not currently being utilized, i.e. the phrase wasn't
intended to exclude *utilized* resources from ARIN will take no action
clause. I will have that fixed on the next version of the LRSA.
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
* resources from ARIN will take no action
clause. I will have that fixed on the next version of the LRSA.
but john, should you not run the change through the policy process?
Randy - The language ARIN will take no action to reduce the services
provided for Included Number Resources
of improvements to the LRSA (version 2.0) added several
circumstances that result in pre-contract status quo, and additional
ones could be added if the community wants such and the Board concurs.
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
Policy Development Process.
My apologies if this was somehow unclear,
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
process to remove the reference.
Thanks,
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
Begin forwarded message:
From: John Curran jcur...@arin.net
Date: August 15, 2010 6:49:12 AM EDT
To: Randy Bush ra...@psg.com
Cc: North American Network Operators Group nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Lightly
and conquer... I will confirm with the Board that that is the
intent of the LRSA (which would then allow us to initiate the task of
changing the language accordingly); can you submit this as a suggestion
so that this request is not accidentally lost or overlooked?
Thanks!
/John
John Curran
)
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
On Aug 16, 2010, at 8:04 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
John/Steve,
Just me (we don't pay Steve to read Nanog, although I do
forward him legalistic emails depending on content :-)
Bill makes a reasonable point here. Is there a way to, in the next round of
LRSA mods, include something to the effect
ISPs to have, even if never needed.
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
On Aug 16, 2010, at 9:57 AM, Joe Maimon jmai...@ttec.com wrote:
...
Kind of interesting to consider how a successful implementation of RPKI
might change the rules of this game we all play in. I tried talking
.
FWIW, I asked the same question. My guy was polite, but w/o info.
John Springer
, which is
unlikely, one can properly instrument diversity using a single origin
ASN with multiple prefixes. Its the path and the prefix that matters,
much less the ASN.
John
not the only
one saying to them before they interview circuit.
Here's what things looked like last quarter to give you an idea of the
general topics covered:
http://condor.depaul.edu/~jkristof/tdc375/
Thanks,
John
sad about all the token ring
experience I have that is slowly rotting to history with no one to pass
it on to, but was a wow for me at the time.
John
.
John
for other people.
R's,
John
solutions to *all* the ways spam
is injected, and then there will be no more spam.
Interesting guesses, but wrong.
R's,
John
deployment has it's own
requirements and challenges to be considered.
John
On Saturday, September 18, 2010, Georges-Keny PAUL paulgk...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
My team is working on technical and technological specifications of a
document for the deployment of Internet service on public
that is already
working.
--
John
.
It is on all Linux distros:
ssmtp 465/tcp smtps # SMTP over SSL
--
John
On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:13:51 +0200
Bjørn Mork bj...@mork.no wrote:
John Peach john-na...@johnpeach.com writes:
It is on all Linux distros:
ssmtp 465/tcp smtps # SMTP over SSL
So file bug reports.
With IANA?
It's common knowledge that 465 is smtps
On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:06:02 +0200
Bjørn Mork bj...@mork.no wrote:
John Peach john-na...@johnpeach.com writes:
It's common knowledge that 465 is smtps, whatever else IANA might
say.
It's common knowledge that 465 *was* smtps. A decade ago. But it has
never gone anywhere
On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 06:16:04 -0700
Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
On Sep 29, 2010, at 6:10 AM, John Peach wrote:
On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:06:02 +0200
Bjørn Mork bj...@mork.no wrote:
John Peach john-na...@johnpeach.com writes:
It's common knowledge that 465 is smtps, whatever
different DKIM signatures will do the trick.
R's,
John
theory, history and implementations.
John
that it was an artifact of the
IOS code being run, which was an old 11.x train and the only one in the
net at the time.
John
what else
you suggest we do... could you elaborate here?
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
with this problem? If you can suggest
a straightforward way of vetting a new organization which the community
will support, I'll happily have it implemented asap.
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
policy.
/John
On Oct 1, 2010, at 5:12 PM, George Bonser gbon...@seven.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Morrow
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 7:46 AM
To: Rich Kulawiec
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: AS11296 -- Hijacked?
this is still less than a /8, which
is issued to an entity and that entity no longer
exists, those resources should be reclaimed by the community within some
reasonable amount of time
Agreed,
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
On Oct 1, 2010, at 5:43 PM, John Curran wrote:
Resources being used by actual defunct organizations we will reclaim if
reported.
Folks -
It occurred to me that I could have been clearer, so here I am replying
to myself...
When we at ARIN can readily determine that an organization
Thanks John,
On Fri, 1 Oct 2010, John Curran wrote:
On Oct 1, 2010, at 5:43 PM, John Curran wrote:
Resources being used by actual defunct organizations we will reclaim if
reported.
Folks -
It occurred to me that I could have been clearer, so here I am replying
to myself...
When we
suggest such a policy if you feel strongly about this; the process to
to so is shown here: https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp_appendix_b.html
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
the business name. ARIN's much
more rigid about that sort of thing than any other supplier you'll
ever deal with.
The compliment is received and appreciated. :-)
/John
surviving entity to
contact. Many parties abandon these transfers mid-process, leaving us to
wonder whether they were exactly as claimed but simply lacking needed
documentation, or whether they were optimistic attempts to hijack.
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
any policy which adopted by the community.
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
P.S. I will note that we fully have the potential to recreate this problem
in IPv6 if we're not careful, and establishing some very clear record
keeping requirements for IPv6 with both RIRs and ISPs
hostmas...@arin.net.
YESSS! This is exactly the kind of thing I have been asking for!
But more to the point, this is the exact kind of thing that (very bizzarely)
John Curran just told me that he would accept as, in effect, and enhancement
request... AS IF IT DIDN'T ALREADY EXIST
.
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
) at automating
this process of marking resource blocks with no valid contacts as an
inherent part of the new automated POC verification process.
/John
John Curran
President CEO
ARIN
Without proper SPF records your mail stands little chance of making it
through some of the larger providers, like gmail, if you are sending
in any high volume. You should be using SPF, DK, and DKIM signing.
I don't really understand how your security company related SPF to DoS
though. They're
AM, John Adams wrote:
Without proper SPF records your mail stands little chance of making it
through some of the larger providers, like gmail, if you are sending
in any high volume. You should be using SPF, DK, and DKIM signing.
There should really be no reason to sign with DK too. It's
presentation slide
for the exact query rate graph, but we're handling orders of
magnitude more queries at present.
/John
://www.arin.net/participate/acsp/index.html
FYI,
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
Perm connection from China Netcom? Does anybody have any more info about
this?
http://175.45.179.68/
R's,
John
Really the best thing to do is to just leave SORBS alone.
The more idiotic bans they put into place with demands for $50 per IP
per incident, the less trustworthy of an RBL they become.
Most large network operations will end up ignoring them, or if they do
use the data from their RBL, they will
for reference.
Thanks!
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
---
Begin forwarded message:
From: ARIN i...@arin.netmailto:i...@arin.net
Date: October 13, 2010 11:17:36 AM EDT
To: arin-annou...@arin.netmailto:arin-annou...@arin.net
Subject: [arin-announce] Vote Now for the 2010 Board and AC Elections
approach and it
was requested by the community during the ARIN/NANOG Dearborn meeting.
FYI,
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
a /29, can request a new
block.
Obviously, this can be changed if the community wishes it so. Bring
any obvious suggestions to the ARIN suggestion process, and anything
which might be contentious or affect allocations to the policy process.
Thanks!
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
FYI,
/John
https://www.arin.net/announcements/2010/20101020.html
Posted: Wednesday, 20 October 2010
ARIN today recognizes Interop, an organization with a long-standing presence in
the Internet industry, for returning its unneeded Internet Protocol version 4
(IPv4) address space
is still under discussion.
So, there's no way to know if there's a global policy which would
allow the space to be returned to the IANA, but I'm optimistic...
/John
On Oct 20, 2010, at 10:43 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
Thank you Interop - for performing an outstanding act of altruism.
John, could you provide more details at this stage on how much address space
was returned to ARIN?
INTEROP is retaining 2 /16 blocks for existing usage;
i.e. more than 99
On Oct 20, 2010, at 11:26 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org wrote:
Thank you Interop - for performing an outstanding act of altruism.
John, could you provide more details at this stage on how much address space
was returned to ARIN
) won't change the IPv4
depletion/IPv6 deployment timeline substantially, but it's also true
we have folks who are just now realizing IPv4 depletion is happening
and returned address space may make the difference for those who need
just a bit more time...
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
of improved utilization for returned space
is less space which is sitting idle and available to be hijacked.
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
On Oct 20, 2010, at 11:35 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
yes, sorry.. since this was returned to ARIN, I assumed the ARIN
region drain rate.
Ah, good point. It may end up in the global pool, so comparison to
either drain rate is quite reasonable.
/John
are followed.
STLS to me is kind of double speak, ARIN says: this isn't a capital
resource, but yet if you go through us and list your 'unused' blocks in this
space, we don't care what financial transaction happens behind the scenes.
Maybe John can shed more light on this.
Specified Transfer Listing
being able
to return the space, but overall the community recommended
proceeding because the benefit to overall utilization was
deemed worthwhile.
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
1 - 100 of 2731 matches
Mail list logo
