Re: Uganda Communications Commission shutdown order

On 1/19/21 16:28, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote: Starlink needs expensive modem, that is not only too expensive for such countries, hard to import, but can be also reason for very long prison sentence. Some nanosatellite with amplified BLE compatible frontend might do miracles. It is

Re: Uganda Communications Commission shutdown order

On 1/19/21 11:49, adamv0...@netconsultings.com wrote: Hopefully starlink and other similar projects will help bring these numbers down a bit. But I think starlink has been already outlawed in some countries? Moonshine satellite links abound in many places they shouldn't be. It's cops &

Re: Uganda Communications Commission shutdown order

On 1/13/21 23:39, Alejandro Acosta wrote: So sad to read this. How is it possible to think this is good to anybody?.., ok, maybe to the very high politicians of the country, but no one else. Not less than 44 million people negative affected. That's it. Just to give you a scale of the

Fwd: [apops] APRICOT 2021 call for presentations reminder

FYI. Mark. Forwarded Message Subject:[apops] APRICOT 2021 call for presentations reminder Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 17:59:19 +1000 From: Philip Smith Organization: Asia Pacific Regional Conference on Operational Technologies To: ap...@apops.net Hi everyone,

Re: Parler

On 1/10/21 16:09, Mike Bolitho wrote: It has nothing to do with networking. Their decision was necessarily political. If you can specifically bring up an issue, beyond speculative, on how their new chosen CDN is somehow now causing congestion or routing issues on the public internet, then

Re: Parler

On 1/10/21 15:43, Mike Bolitho wrote: Can we please not go down this rabbit hole on here? List admins? Why not? Seems terribly relevant to us. Mark.

Re: WhatsApp's New Policy Has...

On 1/8/21 19:26, Drew Weaver wrote: This might be anecdotal but there is a ton of debate about whether or not Telegram is encrypted. This is not anecdotal though, on Wednesday night I saw an interview with a security expert on CNBC and he indicated that they knew that the riots in DC were

Re: WhatsApp's New Policy Has...

On 1/8/21 19:00, Ge DUPIN wrote: There is also Telegram, which is quite good  My rough formula:     Signal > Telegram > iMessage > WhatsApp Mark.

Re: WhatsApp's New Policy Has...

On 1/8/21 18:56, Andy Ringsmuth wrote: Same boat here. I don’t even have a FB account but I am in a handful of WhatsApp groups. Ditched my Facebook account in 2012, after some glitch posted private messages to one's time line. Never looked back. Mark.

WhatsApp's New Policy Has...

... finally been the final push all my friends needed to dump it and move to Signal. Several of the WhatsApp groups I'm on have, as of this morning, been disbanded and re-launched on Signal. Facebook say the new policy applies to business accounts, but heck, the cat's out the bag and gone.

Re: nike.com->nike.com/ca

On 1/6/21 23:41, Kain, Becki (.) wrote: At home, using 8.8.8.8, if I goto www.nike.com , I get rerouted to nike.com/ca. I cleared the dns cache (I’m running Catalina macos) and rebooted just because.  Anyone else seen a weirdism on this?  thanks What happens if you

Re: NDAA passed: Internet and Online Streaming Services Emergency Alert Study

On 1/2/21 22:40, Sabri Berisha wrote: Aliens always invade New York, so I'm safe up here :) I thought that was Roswell :-). Mark.

Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/29/20 21:44, James R Cutler wrote: Supplying any configurable residential CPE would not necessarily be cheaper. The tracking and accounting for the hardware and qualifying said hardware, not to mention truck rolls for hardware updates, could well be more costly than fielding support

Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/29/20 19:00, Mike Hammett wrote: People love throwing their own router behind whatever Internet connection they have. It almost never fails to cause a problem. I'd only do it if I could guarantee the ISP's CPE will run in Bridge mode, or if I can get access to their router to fiddle

Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/29/20 18:50, Aaron Wendel wrote: The majority of our customers are still on Brocade MLXs.  We're in the process of upgrading all our equipment to Arista switches to accommodate the increased demand for 40G and 100G ports as well as implement 400G ports. Unfortunately, switch

Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/29/20 18:42, Aaron Wendel wrote: Oh, we still get calls about speed issues. It's always wonderful when someone puts their own 10 year old Linksys WRT54G and double NATs behind our CPE then sends in a speed test wondering why they're only getting 10Mbits on their Gbit line.  We get

Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/29/20 15:42, Darin Steffl wrote: Oh they'll get plenty of support calls still, almost all about wifi issues. They'll be connected to 2.4ghz on an old device, run a speedtest and only get 30 mbps and complain they're not getting 950 mbps on their free connection. WiFi issues will

Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/29/20 04:41, Keith Medcalf wrote: Are you sure that is not related to "residential services" being of a generally lower quality than business services? It has been my experience that shoddy service generates higher need for "support" than does "non-shoddy" service. In this regard,

Re: [External] Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/29/20 02:06, Matthew Petach wrote: Mark, I think you may have misunderstood Keith's comment about it being "all a matter of time-frame." He's right--when the sun consumes all the hydrogen in the hydrogen-to-helium fusion process and begins to expand into a red dwarf, that's it;

Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/28/20 22:02, Mel Beckman wrote: Darin, Surely you at least give the paying customers priority over the non-paying? It’s one thing to say “I have to write paychecks no matter what”. It’s another to say “I’ll give away my support to free customers AND degrade support for paying

Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/28/20 22:24, Aaron Wendel wrote: We still build when needed. We're in the process of building to 700 new apartments so we can provide them with free service.  We're actually pulling 576 strands into the basement of one building to backhaul each apartment to it's own switch port in

Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/28/20 20:47, Allen McKinley Kitchen (gmail) wrote: A company doing what you describe is one I’d really love to work for. May that philosophy of business be richly blessed. Couldn't have said it better myself! Needless to say, when you work with passion and authenticity, somehow,

Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/28/20 19:48, Darin Steffl wrote: Aaron, The "Free" service doesn't cover your cost of support which is much higher for residential than any business customer. Our residential customers call at least 15x more often compared to business customers compared on a 1:1 ratio. I honestly

Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/28/20 19:15, Aaron Wendel wrote: The $300 covers the equipment and the time to send someone out to a house to install it.  If $300 is too much you can pay in 12 installments of $25. The TIK alone costs us about $250. Still love it :-)! Thanks for sharing. Mark.

Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/28/20 19:11, Aaron Wendel wrote: Actually our free service doesn't have limitations, has an SLA, no time/term restrictions, a CPE, support, etc.  I explained the "why" in a different post so I won't go over it again.  98% of our residential customers are on the free plan. Guess my

Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/28/20 19:01, Aaron Wendel wrote: Darin, We charge a $300 one time install charge to cover our costs on the 1G service (which can be paid out at $25/mo if you can't afford $300 all at once). The area we serve is mainly lower and lower-middle-class income with an 80% transient

Re: [External] Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/28/20 16:57, Mel Beckman wrote: It’s not just the lithium load in the environment that is of concern. As early as 2018 the US EPA had collected data on the incidence of so-called “hot fires” caused by lithium batteries in the waste stream. So far, nobody has been killed. But it’s

Re: [External] Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/28/20 05:29, Brandon Martin wrote: Interestingly, the Lithium content is the, in theory, valuable part of it. There's not actually much Li in a typical Li-Ion rechargeable battery (much less than a Li metal primary cell), but my understanding is that it's enough to have people

Re: [External] Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/27/20 21:56, Keith Medcalf wrote: Me too. On top of that, diesel and gasoline are pretty reliable. Though some people may argue about "renewables" the fact is that it is all a matter of time-frame. Solar power, for example, is not renewable. Once it is all used up, it will not

Re: [External] Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/27/20 21:51, Sabri Berisha wrote: Netflix has a documentary on it, "Fire In Paradise". Gives me the chills every time I watch it. I'll have a sniff. Thanks! Mark.

Re: [External] Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/27/20 19:49, Michael Thomas wrote: We can't get enough solar panels on the roof to charge a battery big enough to handle a multi-day outage, and the battery as quoted is only charged from the panels, not from the mains. It's easy enough to get a transfer switch though for the battery

Re: [External] Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/27/20 18:57, Baldur Norddahl wrote: Here in the civilised world we bury the wires ;-) I'm certain every country has a combination of both... one of those more than the other in some places, but a combo nonetheless. Ultimately, it's most unlikely that any utility company is going

Re: [External] Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/27/20 18:14, Michael Thomas wrote: We have both, and are going to get a battery. But the battery would probably only be good for about a day which is not enough, especially with these planned shutoffs because they have to inspect their wire plant in daylight. If you can add some

Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/26/20 20:48, Darin Steffl wrote: Aaron, One simple question. Why on earth would you offer free internet service? How and why? Your site show 1 Gig symmetrical for free when you should be a minimum of $65 per month to be competitive. They also ask for no monthly fee after a single

Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/26/20 20:48, Darin Steffl wrote: Aaron, One simple question. Why on earth would you offer free internet service? How and why? Your site show 1 Gig symmetrical for free when you should be a minimum of $65 per month to be competitive. For me, looks like a loss-leader to reel

Re: [External] Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/26/20 23:57, Michael Thomas wrote: Yeah, it burned somebody's house to a crisp here last year around here. It certainly makes the case why leaving professionals in charge of power issues is the better idea. although with pg it's a tough call, my telco not so much. I considered a

Re: [External] Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/26/20 22:58, Michael Thomas wrote: Here in California the new reality is that multi-day outages are now common. The first few planned outages were 3-4 days, so that would be on the edge, especially if it's for gabby granny on the phone for hours.This all depends on the weather, and

Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/26/20 20:30, Aaron Wendel wrote: https://www.kcfiber.com/residential Curious, any chance you took over Google's fibre project :-)? Mark.

Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/26/20 20:30, Aaron Wendel wrote: We run MikroTik RB4011s for residential speeds between 1G and 10G or just supply a media converter.  For residential 40G and 100G we just drop in Arista or Extreme switches.  SMBs are normally just a media converter or direct fiber handoff.

Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/26/20 20:00, Tony Wicks wrote: Actually the equipment vendor's build in this sort of situation is normally directly related to the availability of affordable chipsets from the likes of Broadcom. For example the chipset in my XGSPON router is a BCM6858. No vendor is going to spend

Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/26/20 19:58, Michael Thomas wrote: The thing is that the pandemic has changed the game on the ground: there is an actual feature differentiator to be had. But having dealt with the Linksys folks in the past I don't put out much hope that they'll take advantage of it. The software

Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/26/20 17:55, Baldur Norddahl wrote: Since a lot of ISP equipment only has tiny buffers you will generally be unable to get great downloads from sources far away. This is true for any application, in general. 500ms vs. 1ms for download efficiency will always show you what they are

Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/26/20 17:35, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: Perhaps there are some issues at other parts of the network that limits their speeds? I'm in Stockholm, Sweden, with plenty of local CDNs located just 1-3ms away from me. The Swedish model (Stokab) is one to envy. If only other gubbermints

Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/26/20 16:38, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: Considering my PC often saturates my 1000/1000 Internet access when downloading, I don't see why the 1GE NIC on PS5 wouldn't be the bottleneck if it's sitting on higher speed Internet access. My experience with customers who've bought 1Gbps

Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/26/20 15:45, Niels Bakker wrote: Why wouldn't it go even faster, assuming it got fitted out with a faster network controller than what they shipped with?  The storage system in the PS5 as sold can transfer at 5 GB/sec and the APUs have the regular set of crypto acceleration

Re: [External] Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/26/20 13:41, Nuno Vieira wrote: Once upon a time a wise main said “Who in their right mind would ever need more than 640k of ram?” While everyone will take a chance at using this line at some point in a computing career, it's somewhat disingenuous to compare (or equate) the 640KB

Re: [External] Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/26/20 13:41, Nuno Vieira wrote: Once upon a time a wise main said “Who in their right mind would ever need more than 640k of ram?” While everyone will take a chance at using this line at some point in a computing career, it's somewhat disingenuous to compare (or equate) the 640KB

Re: [External] Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/26/20 09:44, Jay R. Ashworth wrote: By which you mean that they can safely afford to bandwidth-surf again because the average usage is so much lower than the peak? Unless you are providing some kind of service from your home, yes. Mark.

Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/26/20 07:32, b...@theworld.com wrote: Another way to phrase the question (which was the subject of much dispute 30 years ago) is: Which would you rather have (I'll use modern speeds): 1gb flat rate 10gb metered Where metered 10gb could cost less than 1gb when you don't use it, or

Re: [External] Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/26/20 00:32, John Levine wrote: I agree it is odd to make 100/100 the top speed. The fiber service I have from my local non-Bell telco offers 100/100, 500/500, and 1000/1000. FiOS where you can get it goes to 940/880. The obvious guess is that their upstream bandwidth is

Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/25/20 23:22, Niels Bakker wrote: Download times:- 180GB at 100 Mbps: 4 hours 180GB at 1000 Mbps: 23 minutes For a number of reasons, highly unlikely your console will pull at 1Gbps, but yes, it would certainly pull quicker than 100Mbps :-). I'd just get my 4hrs of sleep, but

Re: [External] Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/25/20 23:04, Michael Thomas wrote: I mean, i understand the arm's race, but now it seems to be an arms race for its own sake. It is, because it is hard to be different when all you know is to sell bandwidth. The next level of differentiation is being a fibre provider, and

Re: [External] Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/25/20 22:49, Michael Thomas wrote: But using the right queuing disciplines it a lot cheaper than the brute force and ignorance of just upping the bandwidth, right? Consumer ISP's have realized that they can make money selling Gigabit services, because the ones who really know how

Re: [External] Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/25/20 22:40, Chris Adams wrote: Bandwidth is like disk space - you think "I'll never use all of this", and then the availability changes behavior. Having ability to do more means your behavior changes to utilize more. We don't NEED high speed Internet to download games - we could

Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/25/20 21:57, Tony Wicks wrote: I Have an RB4011 and while it does work very well for the price it is not really practical for the sort of people who don't reside on this list. Which says what about 10Gbps-in-the-home practicality? Firstly the single 10G port means you have to

Re: [External] Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/25/20 21:45, Michael Thomas wrote: Obviously for downloads it's nice, but how often is that happening? A time or two a month max? It seems sort of strange the providers would build out infrastructure for such a niche activity. Haha, that's the trick; they don't. Because the logic

Re: [External] Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/25/20 21:39, Cory Sell via NANOG wrote: I saturate my 1G connection most during game downloads, file downloads/uploads, full backup uploads, etc. Same here, but how often does this happen? I upload my videos to Youtube once a week, if not less, at the most. The kids, more

Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/25/20 21:34, Niels Bakker wrote: Gigabit speeds are about bursting.  Foreground activities like gaming, making online reservations, streaming won't take more than that, but anything faster is really nice to have when you're waiting for the odd software download to finish. (You may

Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/25/20 20:21, Jared Mauch wrote: Think more using your PON network to also serve commercial customers so you don't need high end CPE to hit 1-5Gbps or WDM setups. . This already happens today, because sales folk want to close deals. Whether PON actually works for an Enterprise

Re: [External] Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/25/20 20:10, Hunter Fuller via NANOG wrote: It would meet some customers’ needs because multiple people could use 1G of service at a time. I think it is interesting to distinguish “>1G CPE” from “true 10G CPE” and I suspect many / most customers are looking for the former. Large

Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/25/20 20:03, Cory Sell via NANOG wrote: Just because nobody is mentioning it - you can always build a pfSense/VyOS/Vyatta box in whatever form factor you’d prefer. Even can run within a VM if you really want to. Not exactly "home" friendly :-). Mark.

Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/25/20 20:18, Bryan Fields wrote: My point was the gear is not there yet for the non-technical people. And that is saying much... Most TV's, the PS4, the Apple TV, e.t.c., still run at 100Mbps max., offering plenty of 4K services. There clearly is no legitimate use-case for Joe

Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/25/20 19:45, Bryan Fields wrote: That has 1 10g port. How can that be a 10g CPE? Realistically, what are you going to be running at 1.01Gbps inside your home at any given point? Yes, this may or may not be a rhetorical question. so, not 10g :) Show me a single

Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/25/20 08:04, Tony Wicks wrote: Stand alone RGW's are hard to find, I'd be interested to hear if people have found anything smaller than the Mikrotik RB4011... Funny, that's the very unit I recommended as well in my previous post to Brandon :-). As reasonably-priced devices that

Re: 10g residential CPE

On 12/25/20 05:53, Brandon Martin wrote: One of my router vendors has been teasing me with a "true 10Gb" router due out 1Q 2021.  I've been told to expect NBASE-T (1G, 2.5G, 5G, 10G) on both WAN and all LAN ports + 802.11ax "Wifi 6" with at least 5Gbps of real-world IPv4 throughput with

Re: Are the days of the showpiece NOC office display gone forever?

On 12/23/20 07:41, Wayne Bouchard wrote: And if the last 15 years has shown us anything, it is that when you can't get past the auto-attendant and talk to a real human, and if that person can't talk to you like a person instead of reading scripts at you, your stress levels go way up as does

Re: Are the days of the showpiece NOC office display gone forever?

On 12/17/20 00:50, Matt Erculiani wrote: But unless you have an entire organization dedicated to automation development or pay an incredibly large sum of money for pre-built packages, the business decision may still be made to actively monitor the network with eyeballs. Solutions do

Re: Are the days of the showpiece NOC office display gone forever?

On 12/16/20 23:48, Max Harmony via NANOG wrote: It seems like the "something impressive looking" might just change. Add a bit of marketing copy about how "our monitoring is distributed, just like our servers" (or some more punchy variant) and show customers what the smaller monitoring

Re: Are the days of the showpiece NOC office display gone forever?

On 12/16/20 22:49, Eric Kuhnke wrote: With the covid19 situation, obviously lots of ISPs have their NOC personnel working from home, with VPN (or remote desktop) access to all the internal tools, VoIP at home, etc. In the traditional sense, by "showpiece NOC" I mean a room designed for

Re: "Hacking" these days - purpose?

On 12/16/20 22:31, b...@theworld.com wrote: I'm not so sure. If someone got the banks, credit card (fintech), big online shopping, etc (tho not a lot of etc needed) on board, the "head count" for that wouldn't be very large, and others would join (particularly retail) just to not be left

Fwd: [apnic-talk] APRICOT 2021 call for presentations

d to the Programme Committee by e-mail at: pc-chairs at apricot.net We look forward to receiving your presentation proposals. Mark Tinka, Marijana Novakovic & Philip Smith Co-Chairs, APRICOT 2021 Programme Committee -- ___ apnic-talk mailing list apni

Re: "Hacking" these days - purpose?

On 12/16/20 02:38, b...@theworld.com wrote: Somedays I wonder if it's some vast, well-funded, Spectre-like organization whose backers just want to see trust in the internet undermined in the public's eyes on behalf of their own non-internet or anti-internet (think: phone companies who'd love

Re: "Hacking" these days - purpose?

On 12/14/20 19:44, Laszlo Hanyecz wrote: This stuff is definitely the most visible type of scamming but this is not any different from swindling people at a flea market. It isn't so much hacking as just using internet to communicate with people and then tricking them.  I think this is a

Re: "Hacking" these days - purpose?

On 12/14/20 19:08, Miles Fidelman wrote: As to chess... I've begun to think that the game to master is now Go... capturing territory, not pieces, and instantaneous global state changes. #TheQueensGambit :-). Mark.

Re: "Hacking" these days - purpose?

On 12/14/20 18:38, David Bass wrote: It becomes more clear when you think about the options out there, and get a little creative.  Now a days it’s definitely chess that’s being played. You're right, it really doesn't take much. Preying on humanity can yield great results. One that has

Re: "Hacking" these days - purpose?

On 12/14/20 18:23, Ryland Kremeier wrote: I would have to disagree. Considering the amount of people who have bitcoin, and even less the amount of people who farm it, or have farmed it before it became so difficult. It seems much more likely that the wide-spread infiltrations of every-day

Re: Weather Service faces Internet bandwidth shortage, proposes limiting key data

I've got plenty of spare capacity in Kenya - I can give them a couple of Gbps for just US$1,000/month :-). _classic_ Mark. On 12/10/20 15:27, Mel Beckman wrote: Something is stupidly wrong here. From a non-paywallled article (WaPo blocks me from reading its content):

Re: A letter from the CEO

On 11/23/20 18:14, Thomas Scott wrote: "Terrorbits" sounds like a 3 year old unplugging a router - over and over Because of dead wi-fi, or just for giggles :-)? Mark.

Re: A letter from the CEO

On 11/23/20 15:50, Mike Hammett wrote: I eagerly await a more substantive response. This is from a position of inquiry, not a position of combat. I'm new to the world of hardware that has those capabilities, so if there's something better, I'm all for hearing about it. What I meant was

Re: A letter from the CEO

On 11/23/20 14:40, Mike Hammett wrote: I've been looking at some deployments in areas with sketchy political forces and I was looking to use MACsec. How underwhelming :-)... Mark.

Re: A letter from the CEO

On 11/23/20 09:52, Carsten Bormann wrote: I know most people here don’t care (because they don’t have to(*), literally), but there are standards for these things, and there are reasons for the way that they have turned out to be. If you want to taste a little treatise from engineers who

Re: Apple Catalina Appears to Introduce Massive Jitter - SOLVED! - Update!

On 11/22/20 12:25, d...@darwincosta.com wrote: “Saw the same” after installing yesterday Big Sur and suddenly received a notification “this version of little snitch is no longer supported by macOS. It’s looks like I have to pay 25€ for a new compatible version. My advice would be to keep

Re: Apple Catalina Appears to Introduce Massive Jitter - SOLVED! - Update!

So after installing Little Snitch and basically denying "trustd" any kind of Internet access, I have been seeing reasonably normal jitter with Bluetooth enabled. It's not that Bluetooth stops scanning, but it's not scanning as aggressively. So after a few minutes, there will be very high

Re: A letter from the CEO

On 11/21/20 01:20, Mel Beckman wrote: I’m sure the implication that “safe, secure” refers to less susceptibility to eavesdropping. But of course fiber can still be tapped trivially with angle-of-incidence intercept taps. I think the implication was some measure of superiority compared to

Re: A letter from the CEO

On 11/21/20 01:06, Aaron C. de Bruyn via NANOG wrote: > high speed, safe, secure global fiber connectivity More importantly, can someone tell me what 'safe global fiber connectivity' is?  As opposed to 'unsafe global fiber connectivity'? Do these guys have the market cornered on not

Re: A letter from the CEO

Oh dear, what will poor Kenya ever do :-)... Mark. On 11/21/20 00:22, Josh Luthman wrote: Got this message to me directly as well as through the list. @6x7 this list is *NOT* to be scrapped for email addresses for your marketing purposes.  This is complete garbage.  I'll be sending a

Re: Telia Not Withdrawing v6 Routes

On 11/18/20 14:58, adamv0...@netconsultings.com wrote: From my experience, most of the SPs spend a considerable time testing for SW defects on features (and combinations of features) that will be used and at scale intended, I'm not so sure about that, actually. I'd say there are some

Re: Telia Not Withdrawing v6 Routes

On 11/17/20 08:54, Saku Ytti wrote: I put most of the blame on the market, we've modelled commercial router market so that poor quality NOS is good for business and good quality NOS is bad for business, I don't think this is in anyone's formal business plan or that companies even realise

Re: Apple Catalina Appears to Introduce Massive Jitter - SOLVED!

On 11/17/20 09:26, Saku Ytti wrote: https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT202491 I am not trying to make any argument, just wanted to add context. Yes, saw that too, and that post by Apple is also highlighted (and explained) in the same report. The Gatekeeper OCSP checks remain unencrypted.

Re: Apple Catalina Appears to Introduce Massive Jitter - SOLVED!

I'm not generally into conspiracy, but as I keep trying to work out the issue I described in this thread, I came across this:     https://sneak.berlin/20201112/your-computer-isnt-yours/ Might explain quite a lot, actually, (particularly at the FAQ section under "When did this start?") and why

Re: Apple Catalina Appears to Introduce Massive Jitter - SOLVED!

nd I prefer to be connected to 5Ghz before 2.4Ghz. 1. Darwin Kernel Version 20.1.0: Thu Oct 29 05:35:40 PDT 2020; root:xnu-7195.50.5~4/RELEASE_X86_64 2. https://www.dropbox.com/s/m3xm3fpoziwe01d/Screen%20Shot%202020-11-10%20at%2008.20.08.png?dl=0 3. https://apps.apple.com/us/app/wifi-explorer/i

Fwd: [apnic-talk] APRICOT 2021 PC call for volunteers

ng e-mail address), and a brief description of why you would make a good addition to the PC. The PC Chairs will accept nominations received by 17:00 UTC+8 on Monday 23rd November 2020, and will announce the new PC shortly thereafter. Many thanks! Mark Tinka, Marijana Novakovic & Philip Smit

Re: Apple Catalina Appears to Introduce Massive Jitter - SOLVED!

Just an update on this re: the Bluetooth. I had my AirPods paired previously for single use. I don't use them on the laptop (there is some latency), so I prefer the wired earphones. But it seems like Bluetooth was aggressively scanning for them. After removing them from the system, the

Re: Apple Catalina Appears to Introduce Massive Jitter - SOLVED!

plications.         --karl-- On 10/30/20 12:08 PM, Mark Tinka wrote: Hi all. So I may have fixed this for my end, and hopefully others may be able to use the same fix. After a tip from Karl Auerbach and this link: https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/97805 ... I was able to fix t

Re: Apple Catalina Appears to Introduce Massive Jitter - SOLVED!

On 10/30/20 23:57, Doug Barton wrote: I would hesitate to blame BT. I have a macbook pro from ~1 year ago, on Catalina, and I use BT extensively ... mouse, keyboard, and headset. I do have location services trimmed down to just find my mac. I ran: ping -c 1000 -i 0.1 1000 packets

Re: Apple Catalina Appears to Introduce Massive Jitter - SOLVED!

Hi all. So I may have fixed this for my end, and hopefully others may be able to use the same fix. After a tip from Karl Auerbach and this link:     https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/97805 ... I was able to fix the problem by disabling Bluetooth. However, disabling Bluetooth was

Re: Apple Catalina Appears to Introduce Massive Jitter

On 10/29/20 20:14, David Curado wrote: I was curious, so poked at this... my results from a macbook pro 2019 running Catalina 10.15.3 sudo /usr/local/sbin/mtr -r 10.200.200.200 Start: 2020-10-29T14:09:08-0400 HOST: bos-mp36c                   Loss%   Snt Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev  

Re: Apple Catalina Appears to Introduce Massive Jitter

On 10/29/20 19:38, colin johnston wrote: Be careful using Apple wireless diagnostic package, uses a lot of /var/tmp space on a small Macbook air 128ssd Mine cost me 300MB. Mark.

Re: Apple Catalina Appears to Introduce Massive Jitter

On 10/29/20 19:24, colin johnston wrote: This does seem to be solved with the checksum disable below, or at least pings down to sub 10ms on Mac book air with Catalina beta 10.15.6, why aim performs far better I don’t know. I tried to introduce load after cksum disable and it did not see

Re: Apple Catalina Appears to Introduce Massive Jitter

On 10/29/20 19:27, Randy Bush wrote: you only *think* you turned off location services. as they are a vital component of providing a good user experience ... :( That was an honest, lingering thought. Mark.

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >