Xfinity Engineer

My company has many issues with Xfinity users using global protection on the Xfinity network, not Comcast. Does anyone have a contact email list or phone number I can use to reach a real person or engineer who is not in support? Thanks Jason. -- Sincerely, Jason W Kuehl Cell 920-419-8983

Re: Hawaiian ILEC infrastructure and fire

I would be willing to travel down to help restore infra; I did this back around Sandy as well. Is there anyone we can contact? On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 10:51 PM scott via NANOG wrote: > > > On 8/17/23 2:03 AM, John Levine wrote: > > According to Eric Kuhnke : > >> -=-=-=-=-=- > >> > >> It's my

Re: ICANN Response (Re: Ukraine request yikes)

Yep, I completely agree. I also think if they had done anything else, it would have been a reputation-ending. On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 8:19 AM Jorge Amodio wrote: > > I believe it is a proper response, besides that it is not right for ICANN > to get in the middle of this type of conflict, in

Re: massive facebook outage presently

https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1445100931947892736?s=20 On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 3:01 PM Tony Wicks wrote: > Didn't write that part of the automation script and that coder left... > > > I got a mail that Facebook was leaving NLIX. Maybe someone botched the > > script so they took down all

Re: massive facebook outage presently

. The post mortem should be an interesting >>> read. >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 11:46 AM Jason Kuehl >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Looks like they run there own nameservers and I see the soa records are >>>> even missing. >>>

Re: massive facebook outage presently

Yeah it looks like there dns servers are just dead. I can't get an response from them. On Mon, Oct 4, 2021, 12:26 PM Dmitry Sherman wrote: > same problem in Israel > > > > > > *From:* NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces+dmitry=interhost@nanog.org] *On > Behalf Of *Eric Kuhnke > *Sent:* Monday, 4

Re: massive facebook outage presently

Looks like they run there own nameservers and I see the soa records are even missing. On Mon, Oct 4, 2021, 12:23 PM Mel Beckman wrote: > Here’s a screenshot: > > > > -mel beckman > > On Oct 4, 2021, at 9:06 AM, Eric Kuhnke wrote: > >  > https://downdetector.com/status/facebook/ > > Normally

Re: Xfi Advances Security (comcast)

This is an SSL VPN that is being blocked. This is what failure looks like. Curl is the same. Once we disable the Xfi Advanced Security everyone can connect. [image: image.png] On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 11:01 AM Jim Popovitch via NANOG wrote: > On Fri, 2021-09-10 at 10:31 -0400, Jason Ku

Re: Xfi Advances Security (comcast)

. I'm trying to find out why Comcast why they did the block to start with and how to white list. On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 10:57 AM Chris Boyd wrote: > > > > On Sep 10, 2021, at 9:31 AM, Jason Kuehl > wrote: > > > > For whatever reason Comcast Xfinity is blocki

Xfi Advances Security (comcast)

For whatever reason Comcast Xfinity is blocking my VPN URL. I've started the process to unblock, and I'm trying to get a hold of their security team to resolve this. I've been bounced around all morning. Does anyone have a contact at Comcast that can whitelist a URL or get me to a team that can

Re: Google Geo Location Issues

AM Mike Hammett wrote: >> >>> I've discovered that if you *CAN* get a Google ISP account, you can >>> manage it all there. >>> >>> If you can't, well, you're up shit creek without a paddle. >>> >>> >>> >>> - >

Google Geo Location Issues

I'm looking for a contact, email, number, smoke signals for someone at Google I can talk to on geolocation issue. For some reason Google has labeled our IP ranges as Belarus when we're located in the states. If anyone can point me at any contact I would be really happy.. . -- Sincerely, Jason

Re: Comcast Burp in Mass/Boston Area

Comcast's Outage id number OE118864040 On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 11:42 PM Jason Kuehl wrote: > From Comcast's own charts. Looks like something did happen over their > ethernet internet and private ethernet. > > [image: image.png] > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 11:37 PM

Re: Comcast Burp in Mass/Boston Area

>From Comcast's own charts. Looks like something did happen over their ethernet internet and private ethernet. [image: image.png] On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 11:37 PM Neil Hanlon wrote: > Yeah, had several test nodes transiting to me fail via Comcast it seems. > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021,

Comcast Burp in Mass/Boston Area

Anyone else with Comcast have a small outage? About 5-7 minutes? -- Sincerely, Jason W Kuehl Cell 920-419-8983 jason.w.ku...@gmail.com

Re: Unimus Network Automation https://unimus.net/

Sorry, RANCID is open source. rConfig is not. On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 8:46 AM Jason Kuehl wrote: > unimus is great I've used it for simple sites. rConfig is better as there > is no licensing and open source. It's more involved at setting up but worth > it. > > On Wed, Jan 13,

Re: Unimus Network Automation https://unimus.net/

unimus is great I've used it for simple sites. rConfig is better as there is no licensing and open source. It's more involved at setting up but worth it. On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 8:20 AM Mike Hammett wrote: > I've been using Unimus since before 0.3.0 (as I see it contains a number > of additions

Re: Parler

S3 objects in Parler are now showing " All access to this object has been disabled" This error means you are trying to access a bucket that has been locked down by AWS so that nobody can access it, regardless of permissions -- all access has been disabled. On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 9:06 AM

Re: Wildfires: Reminder smart devices don't include emergency warnings while streaming

Amazon Fire TV, Apple TV and Alphabet Android TV executives don't see a need to support emergency alerts on their products. You can enable severe weather alerts on both google home and Alexia. But I get the point. On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 2:58 PM Sean Donelan wrote: > > As some of the largest

Re: Centurylink having a bad morning?

If the client pays me a shit ton of money to make sure the server won't turn off, and they pay for the hardware to make it happen. I;d think about it. It's a like a colo move on hardmode. Its extremely stupid, and I would advise not doing it. Hell even when I migrated e911 server, we had a 20

Re: Centurylink having a bad morning?

At the end of the day, the business needs to besides to take that cost. All you can do is document, and talk about the risks. Save that email for that "I told you so moment" On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 10:50 AM Mike Bolitho wrote: > That's all we can do. Thankfully I work for an org that

Re: Centurylink having a bad morning?

I've been burning before. I'll wait at least an hour before turning my links back on. On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 11:31 AM Job Snijders wrote: > I believe from this moment forward things are converging back to normal. > > Kind regards, > > Job > -- Sincerely, Jason W Kuehl Cell 920-419-8983

Re: Centurylink having a bad morning?

How is that acceptable behavior? It's not, the best part. There RCA will be terrible. "Bad Regex" or the best I ever got was "Bad cable" just two words... My contact is ending soon... On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 10:29 AM Antonios Chariton wrote: > Reporting from Europe, any IP with them in the

Re: Centurylink having a bad morning?

People are rebooting ghosting now. [image: image.png] https://twitter.com/ir_kujoe/status/1300066569645707265 Seeing other reports of this too. On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 9:45 AM Drew Weaver wrote: > That site seems to be just for their cloud products, is there one of these > for their actual

Re: Centurylink having a bad morning?

I'm over in MA in a CL building, it's very much still broken. I shut down the interfaces to CL and now just using Comcast. On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 9:20 AM Andy Brezinsky wrote: > Started about 5:05am central, started clearing up for me about 7:15am. > My route from ATT in Chicago is still going

Re: Centurylink having a bad morning?

Well, When I tried calling I got a fast busy, so that's nice. On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 8:33 AM David Hubbard wrote: > Same. Also, as reported on outages list, what’s even worse is that they > appear to be continuing to propagate advertisements from circuits whose > sessions have been turned

Re: Centurylink having a bad morning?

Its dead JIM. I also can't get in starting around 7 est On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 8:19 AM Drew Weaver via NANOG wrote: > Hello, > > > > Woke up this morning to a bunch of reports of issues with connectivity had > to shut down some Level3/CTL connections to get it to return to normal. > > > > As

Re: Boston Telecom Hotels

One Summer is overdue for its annual fire. On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 4:14 PM Rod Beck wrote: > Does everyone agree that the 4 most important data centers are 1 Summer, > Coresite, INAP, and 300 Bent Street. Both 1 Summer and Coresite clearly > below in that group. Not sure about INAP and 300 Bent

Looking for a Secuirty Contact at Vmware.

If you have a contact at VMware in their security department please contact me off-list. Or if you know of the good email to send security-related issues to send that over as well. -- Sincerely, Jason W Kuehl Cell 920-419-8983 jason.w.ku...@gmail.com

Re: Measuring packet loss and Latency Between eastern Europe and north america

Smokeping On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 4:19 PM Matt Erculiani wrote: > Don’t forget you can use any port/protocol for MTR and traceroute, which > is basically all the fancy apps will do, just automatically. > > $ mtr -T -P 443 den01.example.com > > This will send 443 tcp syn packets that should

Re: Work from Home and other dynamics

The one thing we did since we run full tunnel was moving our conference solution off the full tunnel requirements. We did this for a few other heavy hitters as well. (Youtube, Spotify.) On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 9:35 AM Jared Mauch wrote: > I’m wondering what general trends people have seen with

Re: AWS Network Engineering contact?

Log a ticket in the console. No one will help you until the ticket is in. Contact your TAM if you have one and give them the ticket number. On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 2:36 PM Hugo Slabbert wrote: > If you have Direct Connects you should be able to log a ticket in the AWS > console, no? And/or the

Re: AWS/Route53 Issues?

Contact your TAM with your AWS ticket number and let them know about your issue. I haven't seen anything as of yet but I'm still on my way into the office. (No Friday alerts yet) On Fri, Nov 22, 2019, 8:02 AM John Von Essen wrote: > Anyone else seeing major issues in Europe? Starting midnight,

Re: Viability of GNS3 network simulation for testing features/configurations.

I use the server version of GNS and I love it. I just need to VPN into my DC and use my client to connect to GNS. On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 2:22 PM Mike Bolitho wrote: > EVE-NG is also really good. Just an FYI, GNS3 went through a major refresh > about 18 months ago or so and it's so much better

Re: Viability of GNS3 network simulation for testing features/configurations.

I did this at my current company with also using VM Palo Alto. Greeting of testing out a plan to make sure its insane. The key it keeping its all up todate down to the firmware version (I know its not possible for some because virtual) The things this wont find are hardware related faults or

Re: Must have ISP Open Source & tools

We use https://cbackup.me/en/ over Rancid On Sun, Jul 7, 2019 at 11:38 PM Mehmet Akcin wrote: > Awesome list > > On Sun, Jul 7, 2019 at 19:42 Ryan Hamel wrote: > >> My List: >> >> Oxidized as a replacement for RANCID >> Telegraf + InfluxDB = Tons of Grafana Dashboards >> (Open Source Slack

Re: Intermittent "bad gateway"

Unknown but this looks very different from before. https://www.cloudflarestatus.com/ On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 10:18 AM Stephen Satchell wrote: > Are we having another BGP problem this morning? > -- Sincerely, Jason W Kuehl Cell 920-419-8983 jason.w.ku...@gmail.com

Re: PSA: change your fedex.com account logins

Is it possible, yes. I've seen it several times now at my place of work. Targeted attacks are a thing. On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 2:53 AM Mike Hale wrote: > Oh for fucks sake. > > Really? > > You two are questioning someone who subscribes to Nanog over Fedex? > You really think it's more likely

Re: Youtube Outage

Nothing on the homepage but search is working. (boston) On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 10:17 PM Charles Mills wrote: > The reports I've seen showing it as a worldwide outage. > > On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 10:14 PM Nathan Brookfield < > nathan.brookfi...@simtronic.com.au> wrote: > >> Australia too…. >>

Re: Rising sea levels are going to mess with the internet

Science https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/sea-level/ Give the data yourself. On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 12:50 PM Rod Beck wrote: > Unfortunately, the science community disagrees with Rob and you. > > > Have a great day, big guy. > > > Regards, > > > Roderick. > > >

Re: Cloudflare 1.1.1.1 public DNS broken w/ AT CPE

Not saying you're wrong. But people did it for whatever reason. On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 11:12 AM, Justin Wilson wrote: > 1.0.0.0/8 was assigned to APNIC in 2010. Those who used it as a > placeholder were doing it wrong. It is valid IP space. It just was not > assigned until

Re: Cloudflare 1.1.1.1 public DNS broken w/ AT CPE

Just like "S3 dependency check day" Thus begins "National 1.1.1.1 change week" I've already around a few peaces of equipment sets with 1.1.1.1 On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 11:05 AM, Matt Hoppes < mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote: > Seeing as how 1.1.1.1 isn’t suppose to be routed I’m not

Re: How does ER Infinity Hold up?

UBNT’s recent hostility to the open source community What do you mean by that? On Tue, Mar 27, 2018, 12:02 PM Owen DeLong wrote: > I don’t know about the device itself, but given UBNT’s recent hostility to > the > open source community, I won’t be buying their products anyway.

Re: Amazon peering peeps on the list?

The better way to go ahead and get a hold of Amazon for peering issues is to open a ticket with them via AWS account with business support. This is how I resolved issues with peering in the past. On Mar 9, 2018 8:27 AM, "Joe Nelson" wrote: > I've all but given up on

Re: Static Routing 172.16.0.0/32

+1 for gross comment. On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Hunter Fuller wrote: > I think I'd rate this one as "gross but technically not breaking any rules > I suppose." (I couldn't find any at first glance, anyway.) > > On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 1:55 PM Ryan Hamel