Re: Newbie Question: Is anyone actually using the Null MX (RFC 7505)?

On 2/26/21 2:10 PM, b...@uu3.net wrote: > Hmm right... Somehow I tought that having that special Null MX > will silently discard message... I dont know why... > > So, RFC 7505 is pretty much even pointless in my opinion. > You have to do more.. to pretty much achieve the same.. > Its just easier

Re: Unable to email anyone from my primary domain name; thanks Google Mail and G Suite.

On 10/28/19 1:43 PM, Alain Hebert wrote:     Hi,     This is not an assumption, it is my experience. Mine as well. My mail server's PTR records are identical for IPv4 and IPv6. IPv6 fails and IPv4 is fine. I disabled IPv6 for gmail.com.     Sorry it didn't fit your case. -

Re: Spamming of NANOG list members

On 5/24/19 11:36 AM, Rich Kulawiec wrote: On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 08:17:31AM -0700, Brian Kantor wrote: Anne, the way that such addresses are often harvested is that one of the spammers (or his agent) becomes a member of the list and simply records the addresses of persons posting to the list.

Re: Contacts wanted: OVH, DigitalOcean, and Microsoft (Deutschland)

On 3/19/19 10:49 AM, Rich Kulawiec wrote: On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 09:23:34AM -0400, Jeff McAdams wrote: We would prefer, but don't require, that you use the web form because that is integrated into the workflow of the groups that respond to those reports. Why isn't abuse@ integrated into the

Re: Whats going on at Cogent

On 10/23/2018 08:47 PM, Ross Tajvar wrote: Sorry all. I misread Owen's email. I'm not trying to air his private business to the list. There is no secret - a quick search on the terms HE, Cogent and peering (and possibly cake) will give you the answer. Presumably Owen is not expounding

Re: Comcast

On 06/29/18 13:53, Daniel Corbe wrote: Can someone from Comcast contact me off list? Your customers can’t reach my network right now. They appear to have a nationwide outage: https://twitter.com/search?f=tweets=comcast%20xfinity%20outage=typd -- John PGP Public Key: 412934AC

Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit

On 06/01/2018 08:47 AM, Stephen Satchell wrote: On 06/01/2018 05:24 AM, niels=na...@bakker.net wrote: * h...@efes.iucc.ac.il (Hank Nussbacher) [Fri 01 Jun 2018, 06:56 CEST]: The entire whois debacle will only get resolved when some hackers attack www.eugdpr.org, ec.europa.eu and some other key

Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit

On 05/31/2018 02:37 PM, Dan Hollis wrote: On Thu, 31 May 2018, b...@theworld.com wrote: FWIW a German court has just ruled against ICANN's injunction and in favor of Tucows/EPAG.   https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-4-2018-05-30-en Welcome to contact-free whois? -Dan Already been

Re: Gmail down

https://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/gmail.com On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 10:49:31 -0400 Josh Luthman wrote: > Web interface is broken, downdetector sure sees activity. This > attempt is from mobile. > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100

Re: Netflix banning HE tunnels

Mine, whilst not identifying me personally, has detail down to the correct town and zipcode. On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 10:30:31 -0500 Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Owen DeLong said: > > Contrary to your repeated assertions, HE tunnels are NOT anonymous. >

Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

The whois information on the HE IPv6 address, does give the location. At least, it does on mine. On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 11:03:16 -0400 Spencer Ryan wrote: > As an addendum to this and what someone said earlier about the > tunnels not being anonymous: From Netflix's perspective

Re: AOL emails bouncing back certain domains

I too reported this issue here and an AOL postmaster contacted me offlist and got our servers sorted. On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 15:54:13 -0600 Blake Hudson wrote: > Aaron, I reported an issue here almost a month ago (521 5.2.1 : AOL will > not accept delivery of this message). AOL

Re: AOL postmaster rejections.

On Thu, 19 Nov 2015 13:30:17 -0600 Blake Hudson <bl...@ispn.net> wrote: > > > John Peach wrote on 11/19/2015 8:08 AM: > > Has anyone else with relatively large volumes of email seen a huge > > spike in rejections from AOL recently? > Yes. > > > There

AOL postmaster rejections.

Has anyone else with relatively large volumes of email seen a huge spike in rejections from AOL recently? There is no obvious reason why they are being rejected as it is a generic message: Nov 18 12:10:39 pp-serve02 sendmail[1391]: tAIHAcPT001383: mailin-04.mx.aol.com.: SMTP DATA-2 protocol

Re: Uptick in spam

I added this to my postfix header_checks: /^Subject:.*\bFw: new message/ REJECT No more new messages please On Sat, 24 Oct 2015 21:13:58 -0700 anthony kasza wrote: > Has there been a recent uptick in crap sent to the list or is it just > me? Is there anything

Re: another tilt at the Verizon FIOS IPv6 windmill

On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 20:38:13 -0700 Paul B. Henson hen...@acm.org wrote: On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 05:35:35PM -0400, John Peach wrote: and I wouldn't hold my breath over IPv6; I have to run stunnel so I can send email from home because they don't even use TLS. Having Hmm, I just recently

Re: another tilt at the Verizon FIOS IPv6 windmill

On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 12:06:56 -0700 Paul B. Henson hen...@acm.org wrote: From: John Peach Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 5:02 AM smtps was deprecated years ago and is not implemented in postfix, hence the need for stunnel. I should have said they don't implement STARTTLS on either 25

Re: another tilt at the Verizon FIOS IPv6 windmill

The only reason I have FIOS is because they gave me a 2 year deal of 15/15 internet for $30/month. Their advertising is basically just lies and I wouldn't hold my breath over IPv6; I have to run stunnel so I can send email from home because they don't even use TLS. Having said that, I have an

Re: Comcast thinks it ok to install public wifi in your house

/kscotthelms On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:30 AM, John Peach john-na...@peachfamily.net wrote: On Thu, 11 Dec 2014 09:24:10 -0500 valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: On Thu, 11 Dec 2014 00:11:07 -0500, Jay Ashworth said: I will give them their props: I only

Re: NIST NTP Server List

http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/http://tf.nist.gov/tf-cgi/servers.cgi No, it's not On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 10:16:58 -0700 Stuart Sheldon s...@actusa.net wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Yeah, it looks like it's down stu On 10/29/2014 10:14 AM, Brian

Re: crave your indulgence

traceroute to 2001:500:84::b (2001:500:84::b) from 2a04:840:0:2::8baf:41a6, 30 hops max, 24 byte packets 1 2a04:840:0:2::1 (2a04:840:0:2::1) 0.299 ms 0.299 ms 1.03 ms 2 2a00:1c10:3:667::a (2a00:1c10:3:667::a) 1.172 ms 1.42 ms 1.355 ms 3 rtr-23-121-141-2914.thn.v6.custdc.net

Re: ATT / Verizon DNS Flush?

Looks to be godaddy. No surprise then. On Wed, 16 Apr 2014 12:56:59 -0400 valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: On Wed, 16 Apr 2014 10:21:34 -0600, Steven Briggs said: Yeah...I know. Unfortunately, the domain was mishandled by our registrar, who imposed their own TTLs on our zone, THEN turned it

Re: The US government has betrayed the Internet. We need to take it back

On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 07:46:59 -0500 Jorge Amodio jmamo...@gmail.com wrote: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/sep/05/government-betrayed-internet-nsa-spying The US government has betrayed the Internet. We need to take it back Who is we ? If you bothered to read the 1st

Re: Gmail and SSL

On Fri, 14 Dec 2012 09:47:03 -0600 Randy na...@afxr.net wrote: I'm hoping to reach out to google's gmail engineers with this message, Today I noticed that for the past 3 days, email messages from my personal website's pop3 were not being received into my gmail inbox. Naturally, I figured

Re: *spam* Fwd: U.S. spy agencies ... email for cybersecurity

On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:05:36 -0400 shawn wilson ag4ve...@gmail.com wrote: can some op filter this asshole? Please stop forwarding the whole message; I'd already dropped him in my procmail rules. -- john

Re: eircom.net contact

On Thu, 10 May 2012 13:52:23 -0400 Christopher Singhaus csingh...@hopone.net wrote: Not sure if this is the right list to send this out to, but I figured I'd give it a try. I'm looking for anyone with a contact at Eircom.net. Customers on their network are continually trying to brute force

Re: X.509 Certs For Personal Use

On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 14:27:05 +0100 Phil Regnauld regna...@nsrc.org wrote: toor (lists) writes: I use http://www.startssl.com/ for all my personal certifcates. I have not had any issues with the validations (once you have an account you can validate a domain by sending an email to a

Re: facebook.com DNS not found 20120218 2125 UTC

On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 13:32:42 -0800 Everett Batey efba...@gmail.com wrote: facebook.com DNS not found 20120218 2125 UTC Is there any outage information for DNS for facebook.com / www.facebook.com ? Oops! Google Chrome could not find www.facebook.com Not here dig +trace www.facebook.com

Re: US DOJ victim letter

On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 16:30:47 + bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote: On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:20:08PM -0500, Martin Hannigan wrote: On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Randy Epstein na...@hostleasing.net wrote: [snip] I missed the part where ARIN turned over its address database

Re: [routing-wg] BGP Update Report

On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 03:50:08 + Skeeve Stevens ske...@eintellego.net wrote: John, Bit hard for Geoff to devnull them, he is the author ;-) not really, given that he is not the sender, the mailing list is [snip] -- John -- John

Re: [routing-wg] BGP Update Report

On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 14:25:56 -0400 valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 09:39:13 EDT, John Peach said: not really, given that he is not the sender, the mailing list is We want to get pedantic, who generated the Message-ID: for the mail in question? ;) I had

Re: [routing-wg] BGP Update Report

On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 22:26:36 +1100 Geoff Huston g...@apnic.net wrote: While I am at it, does anyone read this report, or is this weekly report also just part of the spam load on this list? If you don't want them, filter them to /dev/null. regards, Geoff -- John

Re: Please change Mailman back to NOT force the rewrite for Reply-to

On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 13:51:55 -0700 Lynda shr...@deaddrop.org wrote: I see that someone has instructed Mailman to munge the reply-to. Please don't do that. I was about to make a *private* reply to someone, and realized that the setting had changed, and that I was trapped into replying to

Re: Access and Session Control System?

On Thu, 1 Sep 2011 17:45:55 -0400 Rafael Rodriguez packetjoc...@gmail.com wrote: I recommend you look into the Juniper SSL VPN products (SA Series). Very power boxes, intuitive admin interface (web driven) and are perfect for the Vendor Access type of applications. They work fine (mostly),

Re: Address Assignment Question

On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:26:30 -0400 Steve Richardson steverich.na...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jason, On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Jason Baugher ja...@thebaughers.com wrote: Did everyone miss that the customer didn't request a /24, they requested a /24s worth in even more dis-contiguous

Re: (OT) UN declares Internet access a human right

On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 20:11:21 -0400 Bryan Fields br...@bryanfields.net wrote: On 6/5/2011 19:39, Gadi Evron wrote: The title is misleading, as this is more about denying access. But this is still quite interesting. I don't think this has *any* operational implications, but every operator

Re: SBL99576 195.191.102.0/24 SR04

On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 17:17:30 -0700 (PDT) goe...@anime.net wrote: On Tue, 22 Mar 2011, Sven Olaf Kamphuis wrote: as a european provider, we have no liability whatsoever for what customers do or do not do about the best reason i can think of for listing this block until the heat death of

Re: Contact for msn.com NOC

On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 15:20:30 -0500 cocoloco cocoloco.lo...@gmail.com wrote: Anyone have a working contact for the msn.com NOC? I tried the email listed in Arin - n...@microsoft.com and it bounces back. Thanks Dan whois msn.com Tech Email... msn...@microsoft.com Tech

Re: Working abuse contact for lstn.net / limestonenetworks.com?

Waste of time; I don't accept email from them, it's all spam. On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 13:51:26 -0800 (PST) goe...@anime.net wrote: Anyone have a WORKING abuse contact for lstn.net / limestonenetworks.com? I have tried the usual channels (ab...@limestonenetworks.com, phone calls, live chat)

Re: Mastercard problems

On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 12:14:15 -0500 William Warren hescomins...@emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com wrote: On 12/8/2010 12:00 PM, andrew.wallace wrote: It appears the site is under a sustained attack, CNET reports. http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-20024966-38.html Andrew It's

Re: U.S. officials deny technical takedown of WikiLeaks

On Sat, 4 Dec 2010 20:17:30 -0600 Jorge Amodio jmamo...@gmail.com wrote: However, given the political climate and general network cluelessness in the government sector, it probably wouldn't be a bad idea to spend an hour or so thinking what you'd do if the humorless guys in dark suits and

Re: Randy in Nevis

On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:13:51 +0200 Bjørn Mork bj...@mork.no wrote: John Peach john-na...@johnpeach.com writes: It is on all Linux distros: ssmtp 465/tcp smtps # SMTP over SSL So file bug reports. With IANA? It's common knowledge that 465 is smtps

Re: Randy in Nevis

On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:06:02 +0200 Bjørn Mork bj...@mork.no wrote: John Peach john-na...@johnpeach.com writes: It's common knowledge that 465 is smtps, whatever else IANA might say. It's common knowledge that 465 *was* smtps. A decade ago. But it has never gone anywhere

Re: Randy in Nevis

On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 06:16:04 -0700 Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote: On Sep 29, 2010, at 6:10 AM, John Peach wrote: On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:06:02 +0200 Bjørn Mork bj...@mork.no wrote: John Peach john-na...@johnpeach.com writes: It's common knowledge that 465 is smtps, whatever

Re: Randy in Nevis

On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 17:39:33 + Nathan Eisenberg nat...@atlasnetworks.us wrote: 465 is not an odd-ball port, it's the standard well-known port for STMPS. It is? That's not what's recorded at: http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers urd 465/tcpURL

Re: Active Directory requires Microsoft DNS?

It does not need MS DNS. $dayjob uses Infoblox appliances (BIND under the hood) for DNS and it works fine with AD. You just need to make sure you allow the Domain Controllers to do dynamic updates (AD uses SRV records). On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 08:04:49 -0600 Tom Mikelson tmikel...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: Hung Telnet Sessions on Sco Unix

On Thu, 27 May 2010 21:26:27 +0200 Joe Abley jab...@hopcount.ca wrote: On 2010-05-27, at 20:47, jacob miller wrote: Am running an application on Sco Unix but am having the following problem. Application is hunging sporadically. That seems consistent with my memory of SCO Unix.

Re: Anyone from UUNET.CA around.

On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:56:03 +1000 Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote: --- Forwarded Message [snip] n...@uunet.ca: host firewall.verizonbusiness.com[199.249.25.205] said: 530 5.7.1 This system is not an open relay.: n...@uunet.ca (in reply to RCPT TO command) I sent

Re: what about 48 bits?

On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 11:10:56 -0400 David Andersen d...@cs.cmu.edu wrote: There are some classical cases of assigning the same MAC address to every machine in a batch, resetting the counter used to number them, etc.; unless shown otherwise, these are likely to be errors, not accidental

Re: what about 48 bits?

On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 14:48:38 -0700 Jim Burwell j...@jsbc.cc wrote: On 4/4/2010 08:46, Jonathan Lassoff wrote: Excerpts from John Peach's message of Sun Apr 04 08:17:28 -0700 2010: On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 11:10:56 -0400 David Andersen d...@cs.cmu.edu wrote: There are some

Re: T1 aggregation and data center gateways

On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 20:00:45 -0500 Tim Sanderson t...@donet.com wrote: [snip] THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY TO WHOM IT IS ADDRESSED AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL,

Re: Spamhaus...

On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 21:28:41 -0800 Scott Howard sc...@doc.net.au wrote: On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 5:20 PM, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote: On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Rich Kulawiec r...@gsp.org wrote: Barracuda's engineers apparently think that using SPF stops backscatter -- and it

Re: Cyber Shockwave on CNN

On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 19:49:25 -0800 Tomas L. Byrnes t...@byrneit.net wrote: Right, because GCHQ doesn't/hasn't/never would do such a thing... plonk - moron -- John

Yahoo abuse

Does anyone know how to get Yahoo abuse to recognize that they're hosting a phishing site? All I can ever get back from them is boilerplate telling me they know how frustrating it is to get spam, that it did not originate from them and how to read the headers. Not half as frustrating as their

Re: Yahoo abuse

Damn forms; whatever happened to abuse@ addresses? On Tue, 9 Feb 2010 07:39:20 -0700 Jaren Angerbauer jarenangerba...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 5:54 AM, John Peach john-na...@johnpeach.com wrote: Does anyone know how to get Yahoo abuse to recognize that they're hosting

Re: Idiotic Newstar Networking Equipment Sales Droid

On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 09:10:22 -0800 Scott Weeks sur...@mauigateway.com wrote: Did anyone here get spam from this idiot? It appears someone is harvesting email addresses from nanog. If you do get any contact from this company PLEASE do not do business with them and tell them you don't

Re: New SPAM DOS

It's a phishing scam: http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=7918rss On Fri, 8 Jan 2010 12:41:07 -0700 Blake Pfankuch bpfank...@cpgreeley.com wrote: I too have been receiving these to my spamtrap domain... again any ideas to combat this would be helpful. -Original Message-

Re: Are the Servers of Spamhaus.rg and blackholes.us down?

On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 12:28:41 +0100 (CET) Raymond Dijkxhoorn raym...@prolocation.net wrote: Hi! Are this Blacklistservers since x-mas down. We receive in the last days many errors from this servers... Exemple enclosed Anonymsed. Greeting Xaver Dec 31 10:12:37 linux-1ij2

Re: Is there anyone from ASPEWS on this list?

On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:48:35 -0800 Seth Mattinen se...@rollernet.us wrote: William Pitcock wrote: On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 23:39 +, John Levine wrote: ASPEWS is listing 216.83.32.0/20 as being associated with the whole Atrivo incident of 2008. My memory does not recall 216.83.32.0/20

Re: I got a live one! - Spam source

On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:25:27 -0800 Michael Peddemors mich...@linuxmagic.com wrote: Could you elaborate on what constitutes correct swip information? Sure, you just opened the door to my opinions on this :) hmmm - odd that the 2 you chose to show as wrong, both feature highly in my

Re: What DNS Is Not

On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:15:09 -0500 David Ulevitch dav...@everydns.net wrote: On 11/9/09 6:06 PM, Alex Balashov wrote: Anything else is COMPLETELY UNACCEPTABLE. I don't understand how or why this could possibly be controversial. Because some people want the ability and choice to block

Re: New Class C's just lit on on ATT, Email Marketing

On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 12:10:43 -0800 Aaron L. Meehan aa...@coinet.com wrote: I don't think ATT cares, since I complained about a massive snowshoe spamming campaign a couple of months ago--no action taken it seems--and they have netblocks all over the place there. A bunch of customers were

Re: DreamHost admin contacts

On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:24:35 -0700 Charles Wyble char...@thewybles.com wrote: On 10/13/09 2:19 PM, Justin Shore wrote: Andy Ringsmuth wrote: Barring that, what recommendations might the NANOG community have for an extremely rock-solid e-mail hosting company? I realize that may mean

Re: subnet aggregation script

netmask: netmask 192.168.0.0/30 192.168.0.4/30 10.0.0.16/29 10.0.0.16/29 192.168.0.0/29 Certainly available in the ubuntu repositories. On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:00:16 -0500 Ric Moseley rmose...@softlayer.com wrote: Does anyone know of a tool/script that can aggregate subnets feed

Re: Beware: a very bad precedent set

On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 08:12:33 +1000 Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote: In message 4a9c45d2.1000...@brightok.net, Jack Bates writes: na...@wbsconnect.com wrote: Any and all nefarious activity alleged in this lawsuit was conducted by a c ustomer, of a customer, of a customer yet the

Re: Can someone from SORBS contact me offlist?

On Sat, 11 Jul 2009 11:34:58 -0500 James Hess mysi...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Christopher Morrowmorrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote: From www.sorbs.net: It comes with great sadness that I have to announce the imminent [snip] You might want to read the June 25th

Re: Request for contact and procedure information

Turn off whatever you have listening on port 80. On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 21:25:48 -0400 Mark Price mpr...@tqhosting.com wrote: Turn off your DSL modem for awhile, and hope for a new dynamic IP? Mark On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Charles Wyblechar...@thewybles.com wrote: All, I'm

Re: Yahoo and their mail filters..

On 25 Mar 2009 11:52:20 - John Levine jo...@iecc.com wrote: And yes indeed, its a way for us to automate termination of spammers, and to discover other patterns (in signup methods / spam content etc) that we can use to update our filters. That's a great theory. Would you be

Re: v6 DSL / Cable modems [was: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space

On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 21:16:49 -0500 TJ trej...@gmail.com wrote: The SOX auditor ought to know better. Any auditor that requires NAT is incompenent. Sadly, there are many audit REQUIREMENTS explicitly naming NAT and RFC1918 addressing ... SOX auditors are incompetent. I've been

Re: Mail Server best practices - was: Pandora's Box of new TLDs

On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 17:25:16 -0500 Chris Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] So should I have bounced all 4,602? Since ninety some percent of them came from forged addresses that would not only be pointless but would be contributing to the problem (and get us into bl.spamcop.com). Of